Barry Spears Joins Bettor Things with Joe Bianca

Barry “The Sniper” Spears, a successful handicapping tournament player, public handicapper, podcast host and influential voice in the world of horse racing Twitter, joined the latest episode of Bettor Things with Joe Bianca this week for a wide-ranging conversation on topics inside the sport and out. Spears has been an outspoken advocate for better minority representation in racing, and talked to Bianca about the importance of pointing out the subtle racism that the industry has been slow to address over the years. Spears and Bianca also discussed the good, bad and ugly of racing Twitter, strategies for conquering the Saratoga meet, differences in contest and daily wagering and much more.

Later in the show, following up a profitable first week of his handicapping segment sponsored by the Breeders' Cup in which he gave out $17.60 Haskell winner Cyberknife (Gun Runner), Bianca lays out his plays for Saturday's GI Whitney S. at Saratoga, a star-studded Win and You're In qualifier for the GI Breeders' Cup Classic. Click here to watch the show; click here for the audio-only version or find it on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

The post Barry Spears Joins Bettor Things with Joe Bianca appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

‘Toxic Words And Divisive Behavior’: Guillot Banned Over Horse Name, Social Media Posts

Respect for All.

That's the new name given to an Uncle Mo gelding owner Lawrence Roman claimed for $25,000 out of Friday's first race at Aqueduct racetrack in Ozone Park, N.Y.

Bred by Southern Equine Stables LLC, the 3-year-old won the race, his debut, under the name Grape Soda, for owner Cypress Creek Equine and trainer Eric Guillot.

Following the race, an outcry ensued on social media that referenced an earlier Tweet from Guillot showing he gave the horse its original name – which can be interpreted as an offensive racial stereotype – in “honor” of a TVG analyst he has since admitted to be Ken Rudulph, who is Black. The Tweet included a emoji of a Black fist.

Guillot falsely claimed on Twitter after the race he named the horse “after my favorite drink when I was a little boy.”

By then, Rudulph had already called Guillot out on Twitter, saying: “The winner in race #1 from Aqueduct is the perfect example of my issue with horse racing. The winning trainer is a disgusting and racist man. But, if you want to make money in this game you have to be able to ignore that stuff. I can't do it. But y'all carry on with your $11.”

Guillot has posted bigoted or racially tinged comments in the past, including a Tweet in August 2020 saying he had given another horse the name “Uncle Ken's Cabin,” an obvious reference to the Harriet Beecher Stowe novel about slavery. When asked, Guillot said he didn't recall the Tweet.

On Saturday morning, The Jockey Club issued the following statement: “The Jockey Club was notified yesterday that the name Grape Soda, which was approved for a 2018 gelding, was potentially offensive. Upon review we have confirmed that the name is ineligible under Rule 6.F.11. of the Principal Rules and Requirements of The American Stud Book, and we have begun the name change process in consultation with the current owner, which must be completed as soon as possible.”

By early afternoon, the horse's new owner, Roman, told Daily Racing Form's David Grening that the name Respect for All had been approved by The Jockey Club and that he will donate 10% of the gelding's future earnings to the Backstretch Employee Service Team at New York Racing Association tracks. Within hours, the name change was reflected at Equibase, the industry's official database.

But the ripple effects had just begun.

David O'Rourke, president and CEO of the New York Racing Association, issued the following statement: “Racism is completely unacceptable in all forms. NYRA rejects Eric Guillot's toxic words and divisive behavior in the strongest terms. At this time, he will no longer be permitted to enter horses at any NYRA track nor will he be allocated stalls on NYRA grounds. In addition, we will review what further steps may be available to us. Our racing community is diverse, and we stand for inclusion.”

Rudulph's employer, TVG, took its Guillot ban one step further, saying it would not televise any races in which Guillot is participating.

“TVG commends NYRA for taking swift action on the matter involving Eric Guillot,” a company statement said. “There is simply no place in society for racism and we condemn his behavior, a deliberate attempt to slur one of our employees, in the strongest terms. Our network will no longer air races in which he has an entry. We also commend the action by new owner Larry Roman to change the horse's name. We will continue to work toward making racing more inclusive and to attracting a new generation of fans to the sport.”

The Stronach Group and 1/ST Racing chief operating officer Aidan Butler also said Guillot would not be welcome at the company's tracks in California, Maryland or Florida.

“1/ST Racing stands firmly against the inexcusable actions of trainer Eric Guillot,” Butler said. “There is no place in the sport of Thoroughbred racing for racism in any form. Our company will not tolerate the use of hateful and divisive language or behavior.

“1/ST Racing agrees fully with the New York Racing Association's move to ban Mr. Guillot from racing and will take the same action,” added Butler. “Mr. Guillot is no longer welcomed at any 1/ST RACING track.”

Guillot, who only started nine runners in 2020 and 19 the year before that, posted a video on Twitter on Saturday saying that he has now retired from training. Licensed since, 1991, Guillot has won 259 races from 2,348 starts. He's won 19 graded stakes, the most recent coming in 2016 with Laoban in the G2 Jim Dandy Stakes at Saratoga.

When reached by the Paulick Report, Guillot said the entire matter has been overblown, stating nothing would have happened if the horse had finished second in Friday's race.

“I didn't do anything wrong,” said Guillot, who insisted that he is not racist.

When asked why he gave the horse that specific name and said it was “in honor” of TVG's Rudulph, Guillot said, “I was just teasing him. It wasn't meant in a harmful way.

“I did nothing wrong but be a common comedian, and my skin's a little too light to be joking about grape sodas, that's all,” Guillot said. “If Chris Rock or David Chappelle had said it, it would be OK.”

Guillot went on to blame Rudulph for starting a feud with him, calling him “pompous” and the “most privileged Black person I know. … He plays the 180-degree Black Lives Matter racist card and is as condescending as you get. It has nothing to do with me being racist. This is what he wanted; I just fueled the fire is what I did.”

Rudulph declined to comment.

The post ‘Toxic Words And Divisive Behavior’: Guillot Banned Over Horse Name, Social Media Posts appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

‘Human Error’ Behind Filly Named With Racial Slur; BHA To Review Naming Process

A filly racing at Wolverhampton this Saturday ignited social media when fans recognized her name as a racial slur, reports The Guardian. The offensive name was apparently an innocent mistake made by her owner, Emma Evans: the filly is sired by Bungle Inthejungle and was named “Jungle Bunny” in reference to a child's computer game called Jungle Bunny Run.

The filly has since been renamed Jungle Bells.

Two hours after the filly's race, the BHA wrote on Twitter acknowledging that the name was “deeply offensive and should not have been permitted. It was not picked up by the team responsible for filtering names. This is a human process and this was a human error.”

The British Horseracing Authority plans to review the process by which it approves racehorse names after the racial slur slipped by the naming committee.

In addition, a BHA spokesperson said: “We reiterate the apology that was issued after the horse ran. Racist language is not tolerated in our sport, whether intentional or accidental. We are opposed to racism and prejudice in all its forms and are committed to making British racing an open, diverse and inclusive industry that is welcoming to all.”

Read more at The Guardian.

The post ‘Human Error’ Behind Filly Named With Racial Slur; BHA To Review Naming Process appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Racing Diversity: Why We Must Do Better, And Why Horses Are Counting On Us

I spend a lot of time these days thinking about Gene Carter. I was fortunate enough to meet the 'last man to ride Man o' War,' as he was billed by myself and others, before his death last fall. Carter had an undeniable magic with horses, which was still evident when I spoke to him just after his 93rd birthday. He was working his retirement gig, showing the likes of Funny Cide, Point Given, Go For Gin, and others at the Kentucky Horse Park's Hall of Champions.

I had the impression that Carter's only real regret about his long career as an exercise rider and groom in Central Kentucky was that he was never able to get a jockey's license. He won his lone start, an amateur race on a farm. The margin wasn't close. From what he told me, it was helped that he knew his horse like the back of his hand because they'd spent many mornings together.

I knew that horse racing's early history had included many black jockeys (though I didn't realize just how many until I researched Edward Brown, who eventually became one of several successful black trainers also). I also knew that I didn't see so many in the saddle these days and couldn't remember reading about many after about the 1920s. I had never been too sure why that was, so I timidly asked Gene about it.

Carter told me that in the days he was longing to enter the starting gates in a race, Jim Crow was alive and well. Black riders could not get licenses in the 1950s and 1960s in some places. Successful jockeys could make real money, and he suspected that wasn't something the sport's white gatekeepers were comfortable with, especially in the South. He did have a trainer who, impressed with his work in the mornings, pledged to take him to New York and vouch for him to be licensed there. Unfortunately, the trainer died of a heart attack the week before they were scheduled to make the trip, and there went his opportunity.

So many of us want to believe we are horse whisperers, but too often we're not as good as we wish at either speaking or listening to them. The best most of us can hope for is to sharpen our skills with practice, but we can never quite match someone with the natural gift. I've only ever seen a handful of horsemen who possess an innate aura of calm authority that instantly softens a horse's eye and relaxes them. Those are the people who can, seemingly without trying, soothe the nervous horse and coax out the cautious. I didn't see Carter ride, but he did tell me about how he figured out the key to difficult horses very early – by speaking to them, and assuming they could understand him. Not a popular concept at the time, and one that enabled him to get on the barn's tougher horses with success. If his ground work is anything to go by, he would have been one of those riders I envy and one horses love.

That Carter wasn't allowed to get his jockey's license for something as arbitrary as the color of his skin was and is outrageously wrong and unfair to him. It was also a great loss for the sport, and more importantly, a great loss for the horses who could have benefitted from having a partner like him in a race. Horses, after all, care about what's in your heart and what's in your brain, and not your race or ethnicity.

Since the time when Carter was refused a license, most people say there are fewer and fewer black jockeys and trainers (though they are by no means absent). Through the years, newspaper and magazine writers have questioned why that may be, and whether black horsemen have felt excluded by the sport.

As with any complex question, there is no single answer. Some interview subjects told stories of their experiences with overt racism in the Thoroughbred industry, while others said they never felt singled out or treated differently.

The children of Will Harbut (who would become Gene Carter's father-in-law) remember how famous Harbut's connection with Man o' War was. But, in a Lexington Herald-Leader feature from 2001, one of them also remembered that Harbut was asked not to attend Man o' War's 21st birthday party.

“They said, 'Will, you eat first,' [separately from others attending the dinner]” Tom Harbut told writer Maryjean Wall. “Well, it's embarrassing. That shows, 'I can tell hello to you but I don't want to sit down with you. My mother wouldn't go. In those days, the only time they wanted to see you was when you were working. Otherwise you hide yourself.”

Tom followed his father into the horse business, working as a groom and exercise rider and eventually serving as stallion manager at Spendthrift Farm.

Wall also interviewed Dick Spiller, who worked as a groom and got his trainer's license in California while working for Cy White. Although Spiller remembered how harrowing it was to ship horses around the country in a time of segregation, he felt respected by the horsemen he worked with.

“To tell you the truth about it, I wasn't bothered about segregation too much because the people I came under, like Cy White, I never did feel like a segregated person,” Spiller told Wall. “And he didn't consider me segregated. He was a wonderful man to be around.”

A report from the Louisville Courier-Journal in 2000 highlighted the career of William Skiles Sr just before his retirement from Churchill Downs, where he started as a waiter in 1946. Kentucky tracks didn't hire black mutuel tellers for another two decades, and according to the article, Skiles was the first. Still, he didn't consider himself a pioneer.

“I was treated no differently than any other clerks,” he told writer Mark Coomes. “If [white co-workers] felt different about me, they didn't show it.”

According to a report in the Daily Racing Form, the first black head starter wasn't hired in America until Rick Walker was named to the position at Thistledown in 2004. The track also saw the country's first black racing official in 1982, and its first black steward in 1986.

That wasn't so long ago.

Recent comments from well-known bloodstock agent Tom VanMeter have sparked a new discussion about race in horse racing. They're proof that racist sentiments are still present in our sport, as they are in the greater world. Jim Crow may be gone, black riders can be licensed as jockeys, but that doesn't mean our sport has resolved its issues with race. I can't pretend to understand all the reasons why there are fewer black horsemen in our sport than there once were, but I would venture to guess racing may not feel like a comfortable environment for some. There were likely children who grew up hearing about their parents' experiences as trainers, grooms, exercise riders and justifiably thought, 'That doesn't seem like a space where I'd be valued.'

First and foremost, those in power in horse racing (who are almost uniformly white men) should care about this because they should want people to be treated with respect and kindness in our little corner of the world. They should recognize that diverse viewpoints and experiences at all levels can only make our sport better. Besides basic human decency, we should also want to do the best we can for the horse, who is supposed to be at the center of everything. It does the horse no good for generational knowledge to be lost or for good horsemen not to be given opportunities to rise through the ranks to become trainers, owners, board members, track management.

Everyone can play a part in making our sport a more welcoming place for all. For us at the Paulick Report, that means continuing to tell the stories of BIPOC (black/indigenous/people of color) in our industry, bringing their forgotten history to light, and seeking to amplify BIPOC voices when we look for contributors to our publication. We have done some good work on these points, but we can and should do more. I challenge others to think about what they can do to increase diversity in their segment of the sport. Do it for your fellow human, and do it for the horse.

The post Racing Diversity: Why We Must Do Better, And Why Horses Are Counting On Us appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights