NYRA Tells Judge Its Motion to Dismiss Baffert Suit is Imminent

The New York Racing Association (NYRA) on Tuesday gave notice to a federal judge that it intends to file a formal motion to dismiss trainer Bob Baffert's civil complaint, which seeks to overturn NYRA's ban against him.

On May 17, NYRA informed the Hall of Fame trainer with the highly-publicized string of recent equine drug positives that he was temporarily not welcome to stable or race at the association's three tracks, Saratoga Race Course, Belmont Park and Aqueduct Racetrack.

That ban, NYRA said at the time, would be re-evaluated once the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission adjudicates Medina Spirit (Protonico)'s positive betamethasone tests that came back after the colt won the GI Kentucky Derby. In the 12 months prior to Medina Spirit's positive, four other Baffert trainees also tested positive for banned substances, two of them in Grade I stakes.

On June 14, Baffert filed a civil complaint against NYRA, alleging that the association's ban violates his Fourteenth Amendment constitutional right to due process.

On June 30, NYRA filed a 236-page memorandum in opposition to granting Baffert an injunction (read those legal arguments in detail here).

A new twist in the July 6 letter is that lawyers for NYRA wrote that they first want to have a conference among parties prior to filing the motion to dismiss.

The timing will be tight, as the judge had already set a July 12 court date for Baffert's motion to be heard.

“Plaintiff's Complaint asserts five causes of action: (1) preliminary and permanent injunction; (2) an alleged violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983; (3) declaratory judgment; (4) tortious interference with business relations; and (5) an alleged violation of certain New York State laws,” NYRA's Tuesday letter to the judge stated. “Each of these claims are deficient as a matter of law and should be dismissed.”

The post NYRA Tells Judge Its Motion to Dismiss Baffert Suit is Imminent appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

‘Enough’: New Mexico Horsemen File Federal Lawsuit Against Commission

The New Mexico Horsemen's Association filed suit against the New Mexico Racing Commission in federal court late Monday, charging the regulatory body with depriving racehorse owners and trainers of their civil rights and other violations.

“The horsemen finally said, 'Hold it. How many constitutional laws can you continue to violate? How many statutes can you continue to ignore?'” said Gary Mitchell, attorney for the New Mexico Horsemen's Association (NMHA). “The horsemen said, 'Enough. We don't have any other place to go but federal court. We need this to stop.'”

The NMHA, which represents about 4,000 Thoroughbred and Quarter Horse horsemen in New Mexico, already has two lawsuits pending in state court against the New Mexico Racing Commission (NMRC).

Instead of working with horsemen to settle the dispute, the NMRC subsequently barred the NMHA from communicating with the commission, contacting any commissioners or attending the regulatory agency's public meetings. With no alternative after being deprived of any forum before the commission, the NMHA sought relief in federal court against the NMRC, as well as the individual commissioners, under Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act and the New Mexico Tort Claims Act. A highly unusual step for a state horsemen's association, the action creates the potential for individual members of the commission to be held personally liable.

Mitchell said the commission is trying to silence the largest advocacy group under its jurisdiction.

“The commissioners are deliberately attempting to do away with the horsemen's association,” Mitchell said. “We're prepared to prove, in court, that this is being done intentionally. They haven't hesitated to do everything in their power to shut out New Mexico's horsemen, and ultimately shut down the NMHA.”

The NMHA filed suit in the Second Judicial District Court in Bernalillo County in December to stop the commission's years-long practice of taking horsemen's purse money to pay the racetracks' liability insurance on jockeys and exercise riders, in clear violation of state law. The transfer of purse money to pay track operating expenses has cost horsemen to date more than $8 million.

The horsemen were back in court in May after the commissioners ordered tracks to immediately shut off the NMHA's revenue stream, derived from access to funds horsemen have earned from purses.

The funds in question are used by the NMHA to pay medical fees for its members, the NMHA's Political Action Committee and administrative costs associated with a proper accounting for all expenditures. That includes the critical role of overseeing the purse account for the horsemen and the state's five racetracks.

“We have never taken money from the purse funds to benefit our organization,” Mitchell said. “In fact, we took our own money to pay for the accounting, collection, management, dispersal and annual audits of how this money is handled. The taxpayer was not paying for us to do all of this. We were doing it for free, paying for it through contributions from our members, and the commissioners now say 'stop.'”

Mitchell also questioned the commission's motivation.

“They wish to get their hands on this money and use it how they see fit – which is basically to pay the costs of running the racetrack, thereby allowing more money to go into the casinos' pockets,” he said. “Sadly, the commission, which is supposed to be fair and equal to everybody, sees no obligation to be fair to the horsemen.

“Allowing gaming at racetracks in New Mexico was done to save racing,” Mitchell said. “The racetracks cannot have gaming unless they have racing. The law is very clear about it. The gaming compact is clear about it. The Gaming Control Act is clear about it. The Horse Racing Act is clear about it.”

The NMHA challenges the commission's contention that the horsemen's organization is taking money designated for purses, pointing out that the money in question has transitioned into owners' earnings based on race results.

“When the race is run, the purse is paid and that now becomes the winning horseman's money,” said long-time racehorse owner and NMHA President Roy Manfredi. “By their actions, the racing commission has taken away the NMHA's ability to provide financial assistance to horsemen in need. That's the same as saying you cannot donate to the March of Dimes, the NRA or any other organization, simply because your employer doesn't like the March of Dimes or the other organization. Once the money is paid to an individual who owns a horse, that money is theirs and they can do whatever they want with it. During the pandemic, the NMHA provided $100,000 in alfalfa and grain to the horsemen when we weren't able to run.”

“All we've ever asked them to do is just follow New Mexico state statute, which are laws. This commission considers them suggestions.”

The horsemen seek compensatory damages, legal fees and other relief the Court may deem appropriate.

The post ‘Enough’: New Mexico Horsemen File Federal Lawsuit Against Commission appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Jockey Club Wants to Give ‘Unique Perspective’ in Baffert vs. NYRA Suit

The Jockey Club (TJC) now wants to get involved in trainer Bob Baffert's federal lawsuit against the New York Racing Association (NYRA), which seeks to overturn his banishment from stabling and racing horses at Belmont Park, Saratoga Race Course, and Aqueduct Racetrack.

In a June 22 letter to United States District Court (Eastern District of New York), Susan Phillips Read, an attorney for TJC, asked permission to file an “amicus” brief that she believes will “provide the Court with a unique perspective and information to assist in deciding the pending motion for preliminary injunction.”

Baffert was told by NYRA that he was not welcome to stable or race at the association's three tracks on May 17 in the wake of his disclosure that Medina Spirit (Protonico) had tested positive for betamethasone after winning the GI Kentucky Derby. That revelation by Baffert was later confirmed by split-sample testing at two different labs approved by the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission, but no ruling has yet been issued over those findings.

On June 14, Baffert filed a civil complaint against NYRA, alleging that the association-level ban violates his Fourteenth Amendment constitutional right to due process. He wants a preliminary and permanent injunction ordered against NYRA to prevent his further banishment from those tracks, claiming that if that does not happen, he will suffer immediate and irreparable harm.

The betamethasone finding in the Derby was the fifth positive test in a Baffert trainee for a regulated but prohibited-on-race-day drug within the past year (two others were for lidocaine, one was for dextrorphan, and another also for betamethasone). It was the third during that time frame to occur in a Grade I stakes.

While all of this has been going on, Baffert has also been embroiled in a long and complicated court and racing commission battle in California over whether to disqualify 2018 Triple Crown winner Justify from that year's GI Santa Anita Derby because of a scopolamine finding.

“TJC has long believed that horses must only race when they are free from the effects of medication, and vociferously advocated for the passage of The Horseracing Safety and Integrity Act,” Read wrote. “TJC thus has a special interest in sharing with the Court its perspective regarding the deleterious effects of improper drug use on the health of horses, the Thoroughbred racing industry, and public trust in the honesty of competition.

“Further, TJC, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries and Thoroughbred Safety Committee, has access to information not necessarily available to the parties,” Read wrote.

Read wrote that she has asked the attorneys for both parties for consent to file TJC's amicus brief. NYRA's counsel has given permission; Baffert's has not.

The post Jockey Club Wants to Give ‘Unique Perspective’ in Baffert vs. NYRA Suit appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Gamblers Will Be Allowed To Sue Over Money Lost On Historical Horse Racing

Fayette Circuit Court Judge Thomas Travis ruled Tuesday that gamblers will be allowed to sue Keeneland and the Red Mile over financial losses sustained via historical horse racing terminals, reports the Lexington Herald-Leader.

Since a Kentucky Supreme Court ruled in September of 2020 that HHR machines were illegal under existing state statutes (since remedied with new legislation in February of 2021), the lawsuit will be seeking to recover gamblers' losses within the past five years.

Keeneland and Red Mile had filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, but Judge Travis overruled that on Tuesday and ordered the parties to prepare for trial. A pretrial conference is scheduled for July 7.

The lawsuit will also be seeking punitive damages under the Kentucky Consumer Protection Act.

Similar lawsuits have been filed in other counties, according to the report, but this is the first to have been ruled on.

Read more at the Lexington Herald-Leader.

The post Gamblers Will Be Allowed To Sue Over Money Lost On Historical Horse Racing appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights