Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Finds HISA Unconstitutional

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on Friday ruled that the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act (HISA) is unconstitutional because it “delegates unsupervised government power to a private entity,” and thus “violates the private non-delegation doctrine.”

The Appeals Court order by a panel of three judges reverses a lower court's decision earlier this year that dismissed a constitutionality lawsuit initiated in 2021 by the National Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association (NHBPA).

The Nov. 18 order also remands the case back to U.S. District Court (Northern District of Texas) for “further proceedings consistent with” the Appeals Court's reversal.

The immediate ramifications of how this order will affect the day-to-day operations of HISA and its Authority are still unclear. TDN is in the process of obtaining further comment from stakeholders on both side of the issue, and this story will be updated.

On Mar. 15, 2021, the NHBPA and 12 of its affiliates (later joined by the state of Texas and its racing commission) sued the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), its commissioners, the HISA Authority, and its nominating committee members, bringing claims under the private-nondelegation doctrine, public nondelegation doctrine, Appointments Clause, and the Due Process Clause, seeking to permanently enjoin the defendants from implementing HISA and to enjoin the Nominating Committee members from appointing the Authority's board of directors.

“The plaintiffs argued HISA is facially unconstitutional because it delegates government power to a private entity without sufficient agency supervision,” the Appeals Court order stated. “The district court acknowledged that the plaintiffs' 'concerns are legitimate,' that HISA has 'unique features,' and that its structure 'pushes the boundaries of public-private collaboration. Nonetheless, the court rejected the private non-delegation challenge, concluding HISA stays within current constitutional limitations as defined by the Supreme Court and the Fifth Circuit.'

“We cannot agree,” the Appeals Court order stated. “While we admire the district court's meticulous opinion, we conclude that HISA is facially unconstitutional. A cardinal constitutional principle is that federal power can be wielded only by the federal government. Private entities may do so only if they are subordinate to an agency. But the Authority is not subordinate to the FTC. The reverse is true. The Authority, rather than the FTC, has been given final say over HISA's programs.”

The order continued: “While acknowledging the Authority's 'sweeping' power, the district court thought it was balanced by the FTC's 'equally' sweeping oversight. Not so. HISA restricts FTC review of the Authority's proposed rules. If those rules are 'consistent' with HISA's broad principles, the FTC must approve them. And even if it finds inconsistency, the FTC can only suggest changes.

“What's more, the FTC concedes it cannot review the Authority's policy choices. When the public has disagreed with those policies, the FTC has disclaimed any review and instead told the public to 'engag[e] with the Authority.' An agency does not have meaningful oversight if it does not write the rules, cannot change them, and cannot second-guess their substance. As the district court correctly put it: 'Only an Act of Congress could permanently amend any Authority rule or divest it of its powers. The FTC may never command the Authority to change its rules or divest it of its powers.'”

“The end result is that Congress has given a private entity the last word over what rules govern our nation's thoroughbred horseracing industry. The Constitution forbids that. For good reason, the Constitution vests federal power only in the three branches of the federal government. Congress defies this basic safeguard by vesting government power in a private entity not accountable to the people. That is what it has done in HISA,” the order stated.

“It is the duty of the National Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association to protect horsemen across the country and that is not a responsibility I take lightly,” said Eric Hamelback, CEO of the NHBPA. “From HISA's onset, we have thoroughly and fairly examined the HISA corporation's impact on our industry and its constitutionality. We operated in good faith and did our due diligence to appropriately weigh the pros and cons. We have been saying for years this law and the defined Authority itself are unconstitutional and we are pleased the court has unanimously sided with our position, an outcome many in our industry thought was impossible. Today's unanimous ruling clearly states the entity constructed under HISA is an unconstitutional body and should not hold governing power over our industry, a position we have long supported. On behalf of the NHBPA, I can assure you that we will be following this development closely and support the power reverting back into the hands of the State Racing Commissions. I will keep our members updated as more details come to the surface. We are very appreciative of the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals for the thorough analysis and opinion. We also thank the many industry stakeholders who supported us in our effort to ensure that horsemen are not subject to an unconstitutional law.”

“While HISA is disappointed by the Fifth Circuit's decision, we remain confident in HISA's constitutionality and will be seeking further review of this case,” said Charles Scheeler, Chair HISA Board of Director. “If today's ruling were to stand, it would not go into effect until January 10, 2023 at the earliest. We are focused on continuing our critical work to protect the safety and integrity of Thoroughbred racing, including the launch of HISA's Anti-Doping and Medication Control Program on January 1, 2023.”

At a different point in the order, the Appeals Court delved deeper into the issue of rulemaking.

“For instance, HISA broadly instructs the Authority to create a program that includes '[a] uniform set of training and safety standards and protocols consistent with the humane treatment of covered horses,' while leaving the policy details up to the Authority…. Keep in mind, moreover, that we are not considering here whether the 'considerations' provide a sufficiently intelligible principle to satisfy the public non-delegation doctrine. Instead, we are deciding whether the Authority is subordinate to the agency. And, on its face, HISA's generous grant of authority to the Authority to craft entire industry 'programs' strongly suggests it is the Authority, not the FTC, that is in the saddle…”

The order continued: “If the FTC cannot review the policy choices behind the rules, then logically the FTC cannot make the Authority modify those policies. That is again confirmed by HISA's plain terms. The modification power the Act gives the FTC is limited in two ways. It pertains only to whether a rule is 'consistent' with the Act and does not include review of the policies informing the rule…”

“The Authority's power outstrips any private delegation the Supreme Court or our court has allowed. We must therefore declare HISA facially unconstitutional. In doing so, we do not question Congress's judgment about problems in the horseracing industry. That political call falls outside our lane. Nor do we forget that '[t]he judicial power to declare a law unconstitutional should never be lightly invoked.' We only apply, as our duty demands, the settled constitutional principle that forbids private entities from exercising unchecked government power.”

The NHBPA lawsuit is separate from a similar HISA complaint over alleged constitutional issues brought by racing commissions and attorneys general in a number of opposing states. That case, too, was dismissed earlier this year but has a motion to dismiss pending.

The post Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Finds HISA Unconstitutional appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Industry Will Pay Twice For HISA Litigation

Barely six weeks into its existence as the sport's national rule enforcer, the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority (HISA) has spent $1.8 million defending itself in four separate lawsuits currently pending or under appeal in federal court.

But the true irony behind the spiraling costs of the anti-HISA litigation is that almost all entities–owners, trainers, jockeys, tracks, racing commissions and states–are going to have to pay twice, regardless of the final outcomes of those complex lawsuits.

That's because plaintiffs like the Jockeys' Guild and various horsemen's associations will spend their organizations' money trying to halt HISA on constitutional grounds and federal rulemaking procedures, while at the same time HISA will be using money it collects from federally sanctioned assessments paid by those same industry participants to fight the lawsuits.

Lisa Lazarus, HISA's chief executive officer, disclosed the to-date litigation costs Sunday as the keynote speaker at the 70th annual Round Table Conference on Matters Pertaining to Racing hosted by The Jockey Club in Saratoga Springs, New York.

“As you all know, HISA is industry-funded,” Lazarus said. “So these lawsuits are ultimately being paid for by the industry, and ironically in part by the entities suing us. It is really a shame to see industry dollars that could [otherwise] be spent on positive reforms to make racing safer. It's deeply disappointing because there is so much we could do as an industry for unity.”

Stuart Janney III, The Jockey Club's chairman, didn't try to hide his disdain for the groups trying to derail HISA, terming the plaintiffs in the lawsuits as “certain politically charged states, rogue horsemen's groups, and–'Surprise, surprise!'–the Jockeys' Guild.”

And while the annual Round Table has largely devolved over the years into a two-hour echo chamber of platitudes, preaching-to-the-choir presentations, and a pep rally for pet Jockey Club projects, Janney did give a succinct analysis of where those lawsuits stand from a pro-HISA perspective during his closing remarks.

Janney focused on one of the lawsuits in particular, in which HISA and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) are alleged to have violated the Fourth and Seventh Amendments to the United States Constitution, plus the Administrative Procedure Act, which governs the process by which federal agencies develop and issue regulations.

The states of Louisiana and West Virginia, plus the Guild, are the lead plaintiffs in that case, and just this past Friday, Aug. 12, 14 affiliates of the Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association petitioned a federal judge to be allowed to join the lawsuit.

“Significantly, the Louisiana federal district court found zero constitutional violations,” Janney said. “But it did initially agree with plaintiffs that the Authority's definition of 'covered horse' and its search-and-seizure rules expand beyond the scope of the statute ever so slightly.

“Practically speaking, this portion of the ruling has no impact, because the Authority voluntarily revised both rules to comply with the statute,” Janney said.

“The district court also questioned the Authority's rule on funding, which was actually favorable to the plaintiffs, Louisiana and West Virginia. And amazingly, if the plaintiffs prevail, it will have those two states paying hundreds of thousands more for HISA.

“And finally, [the court] queried the length of the notice and comment period, though it recognized that any of the claimed deficiencies can easily be remedied by the Authority, even if the Authority is ultimately unsuccessful on the merits,” Janney said.

“In other words, in ruling in favor of the Authority's opponents, the Louisiana federal district court nevertheless acknowledged that the implementation of the Authority's rules cannot be stopped,” Janney said.

“So to be clear, none of these issues threaten HISA's long-term viability. But they certainly waste time and money,” Janney said.

“Another federal lawsuit challenging the Authority and HISA was filed in Texas last week,” Janney said. “It recycles many of the failed claims. Like the cases that came before it, and those that will come after it, the new lawsuit merely serves as a distraction and a waste of industry resources,” Janney said.

“Ironically, under HISA, horsemen will be the ones who bear the brunt of these additional legal costs,” Janney said.

Lazarus gave an update on HISA's next steps, acknowledging that she understands HISA needs to build trust within the industry, even among those who already support it.

“We at HISA are accountable to you. We have to listen to everyone and adapt as appropriate,” Lazarus said.

“HISA wants open and collaborative dialogue with everyone in the industry who comes to us in good faith,” Lazarus said.

“Specifically, I will soon be creating several advisory groups, including a horsemen's group, to enhance engaging with stakeholders to ensure we are delivering the best programs to the industry,” Lazarus said.

“We will continue to refine the racetrack safety rules,” Lazarus said. “Future rules will fill in gaps, clarify ambiguities.”

A transition to a new and permanent website will hopefully ease some of the concerns from industry participants who have complained about the user interface when registering with HISA.

The rollout of the Anti-Doping and Medication Control Program (ADMC) is HISA's next high-profile endeavor.

“We've made significant progress on the ADMC program,” Lazarus said. “In recent weeks we have developed and refined, with input from hundreds of racing stakeholders, a comprehensive set of rules. These will be submitted to the FTC this coming week for implementation in January 2023.”

Lazarus continued: “We are building a seasoned, world-class team that will implement the first national anti-doping program in horse racing, with uniform testing and uniform sanctions. It will be tough, but it will be fair. And in time, horses will be able to complete with the comfort of knowing they will not be beaten by someone who is cheating.”

Beyond that, Lazarus explained, “We also see a future where we can marry anti-doping investigations and intelligence with a robust capability that will be deployed nationally in both in- and out-of-competition testing.”

Lazarus also gave an update on HISA's participation levels.

“We are now six weeks into the implementation of the racetrack safety rules. To date we have registered 34,000 horses and 28,000 people. And more importantly, in my view, 90% of horses, jockeys, and trainers that are competing are registered. And if you take the state of Louisiana out of the picture, we're at 95%, because the majority of our non-registered participants are located in Louisiana.

“We've reached voluntary agreements to implement HISA rules in 17 state racing commissions out of a total of 21 that HISA currently governs,” Lazarus added.

HISA is in the process of hiring a national medical director to support tracks nationwide with jockey safety and health protocols, and has already facilitated and paid for concussion testing for riders at 10 tracks, Lazarus said.

“Jockey welfare alongside equine welfare is a major priority for HISA,” Lazarus said.

But the topic of jockey welfare brought up another ironic twist, at least from Janney's perspective.

“If I were a jockey, I'd be very excited about [HISA's safeguards for riders],” Janney said. “But apparently, they're not. Upping the ante, [the Guild] joined with [other plaintiffs in the Louisiana lawsuit] in adding a charge of contempt. It's outrageous. The jockeys are wasting their time and are hurting our sport. I hope they will come to realize that.”

Janney continued: “HISA is a once-in-a-lifetime chance to grow the sport through increased integrity and enhanced safety of horse and rider. This business isn't the same as it was 10, 20, 30 years ago. We all know it. And we now understand the economics… Folks, it's time to get together on HISA. It's good for the sport. HISA is legal. HISA is here to stay.”

Lazarus also concluded her presentation with a plea for unity.

“I don't mean that we are going to agree on every single rule. But I mean that we unify around the governing principle, the core principle, that we need to speak with one voice,” Lazarus said.

“HISA, as I sit here today and address you, is not perfect. And as you know, it is still a work in progress. But I'm incredibly proud of the work done by our small team under the very tight time frame set by Congress and the legislation.

“We have one industry and one chance. Let's have vigorous debate about what the rules should be. Let's never forget that our real adversaries are the bad actors who tarnish our sport, anyone who is cavalier about horse welfare, and those who want to shut down horse racing for good.”

“It's been only six weeks since we have launched HISA. Give us some time. Give us some grace. This effort to enhance the safety and integrity of racing is so important. And if it fails, we all fail. And if it succeeds, we all succeed. It's really that simple,” Lazarus said.

The post Industry Will Pay Twice For HISA Litigation appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

14 HBPA Affiliates, 4 Tracks Want in on HISA Lawsuit

Led by 14 affiliates of the Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association (HBPA) and four racetracks, an alliance of entities seeking protection from the alleged harms of the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act Authority (HISA) have asked a federal judge to allow them to participate in an existing lawsuit that claims HISA and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) violated the Fourth and Seventh Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, plus the process by which federal agencies develop and issue regulations.

On Friday, the anti-HISA parties filed what is known as a “motion to intervene” in United States District Court (Western District of Louisiana). If accepted by the judge, it would grant the petitioners status in the case alongside the lead plaintiffs from the states of Louisiana and West Virginia.

An “intervenor” designation allows outside parties who have a personal stake in the outcome of a civil suit to participate in a case, even if their interests don't align exactly with those of the original plaintiffs.

“[Our] interests will be seriously impaired if Defendants prevail in their effort to enforce the enjoined HISA Rules beyond Louisiana and West Virginia,” the movants wrote in their Aug. 12 court filing. “Intervenors are not adequately represented by the parties to this action. Intervenors therefore respectfully request that this Court grant their motion to intervene as plaintiffs to protect their and their members' interests.

“Specifically, Intervenors seek to ensure that HISA does not kneecap the horseracing industry as a whole or themselves with the implementation and enforcement of defective HISA Rules,” the filing continued.

HISA and the FTC have consistently denied the allegations listed in the underlying June 29 lawsuit, which was filed two days before the federally mandated July 1 start date for HISA's first set of rules.

“Plaintiffs' eleventh-hour challenge to those rules on the eve of the statutory deadline [is an] emergency of their own making,” the defendants wrote in court documents just after the complaint was filed, noting that the plaintiffs waited a full three months after the approval of the rules to challenge them in court as being immediately harmful.

The HBPA affiliates wanting in on the suit are Arizona, Arkansas, Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, Kentucky, Minnesota, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Washington, Charles Town and Tampa Bay Downs. The Colorado Horse Racing Association, which is that state's statutorily recognized horsemen's group for all racing breeds, also wants to be an intervenor.

Three of the four opting-in racetracks are in Nebraska: Fonner Park, Horsemen's Park, and the recently approved racino that will go by the name Legacy Downs. The fourth is Arizona's Turf Paradise.

The North American Association of Racetrack Veterinarians, plus the state of Oklahoma and its racing commission, round out the list of potential intervenors.

“Intervenors seek to join this action to protect their interests and those of their members or citizens in avoiding severe economic harms to the horseracing industry generally and to Intervenors specifically through the enforcement of HISA Rules that suffer from fatal procedural and substantive defects,” the Aug. 12 filing stated.

“Intervenors further seek intervention to address HISA's exercise of regulatory power against Intervenors and the threat of severe sanctions that HISA is currently imposing on Intervenors,” the filing continued.

“Intervenors interests may not–indeed, will not–be adequately represented by the existing parties because they have a different ultimate objective from the [existing plaintiffs] by covering a different portion of the United States and of the horseracing industry,” the filing stated.

Beyond the states of Louisiana and West Virginia, the Jockeys' Guild and various Louisiana-based “covered persons” under HISA rule are the existing plaintiffs.

Friday's motion to intervene asked for “expedited” consideration. But that might not be possible because aspects of the underlying lawsuit have been appealed to a higher court.

When cases go under appeal, the lower-court judge has limited power to change anything in the underlying case until the appeals process has been completed. The movants in Friday's filing wrote that they recognized that fact.

“Of course, Intervenors understand that though this Court's preliminary injunction order is on appeal to the Fifth Circuit, which partially stayed the injunction pending the outcome of an expedited appeal,” the filing stated. “At a minimum, the Court could hold the motion to intervene in abeyance, pending the resolution of the appeal.”

The post 14 HBPA Affiliates, 4 Tracks Want in on HISA Lawsuit appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Senators Send Letter to HISA, FTC About ‘Chaotic’ Implementation Process

Four U.S. senators, Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Joe Manchin (D-WV), Joni Ernst (R-IA) and John Kennedy (R-LA), sent a letter to the Federal Trade Commission and Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority Monday asking for clarification and explanation about HISA's ability to meet its upcoming July 1 implementation deadlines for the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act (HISA).

“The Authority publicly stated in a December 2021 press release that it will not implement the Anti-Doping and Medication Control program by the statutory deadline of July 1, 2022,” the letter said. “This deadline is statutorily required and neither the FTC nor the Authority have the authority to extend this deadline. The Authority's release also makes clear that the Authority has not submitted proposed Anti-Doping and Medication Control program regulations to the FTC in compliance with the statute. HISA required the Authority to issue the rule for Anti-Doping and Medication Control not later than 120 days before the program effective date of July 1, 2022. This deadline has passed, and it appears the Authority failed to meet the statutory requirements.”

The letter also raised questions about reports of the Authority delaying rules regarding riding crops and horseshoes, calling the implementation process 'chaotic' and as a result difficult to comply with for horsemen.

“Recent news reports also highlight that the Authority will postpone enforcement of newly approved rules regarding horseshoes and riding crop specifications, initially set to take effect on July 1, 2022 under the Racetrack Safety Program. This is also concerning because we understand the initial rules were functionally impossible for industry participants to implement due to limited supply chain availability of horseshoes and riding crops. This raises questions about what industry representatives were consulted in the drafting of the rule. And now, only one week before the rule was set to take effect, the Authority published a notice announcing a one month delay in enforcement of these rules. This chaotic implementation process and poor communication by the Authority makes it difficult for industry participants to comply with the new rules and regulations. Additionally, continuously changing implementation dates for new rules and regulations, and last-minute delays, cause more confusion and difficulty with implementation.”

The National HBPA applauded the letter Tuesday, saying in a statement, “Hardworking, day-to-day horsemen and horsewomen want safe and clean horse racing, and the Authority is failing in its duty to realize this goal. The Authority and HISA staff are populated with members who do not offer a true inclusive representation for the entire industry, and because of that we are seeing what lack of proper input from all participants causes. They are brazenly violating federal law by missing deadlines and staff are admitting in public forums that the FTC gave them permission to do so. We fully support Senator Grassley's efforts to find out why this is happening.”

TDN has reached out to both the FTC and HISA for comment.

The post Senators Send Letter to HISA, FTC About ‘Chaotic’ Implementation Process appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights