FTC Delays Implementation of HISA’s Drug and Doping Program

In an order Monday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act's (HISA) anti-doping and medication control (ADMC) program would not go into effect as scheduled Jan. 1 due to swirling legal uncertainty.

“The bedrock principle of the Act is the need for uniformity,” wrote the FTC in the order, adding that “the Commission's approval of the Anti-Doping and Medication Control proposed rule would not result in uniformity because the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act has been held unconstitutional by a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.”

Oral arguments similarly surrounding HISA's facial constitutionality were held last week in a separate case before the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.

“The Commission therefore disapproves the proposed rule without prejudice. If the legal uncertainty regarding the Act's constitutionality comes to be resolved, the Authority may resubmit the proposed rule or a similar rule, and the Commission will consider all comments filed in this proceeding as well as any updated or new comments and filings.

“In the meanwhile, and until any future proposed rule on the subject is approved by the Commission, State law will continue to regulate the matters that the proposed rule would have covered,” the order states.

According to HISA's CEO Lisa Lazarus, who held an impromptu press conference Monday afternoon, this means that the current regulatory “status quo” will remain in place at the start of 2023.

“They made reference to the fact that, since the FTC has not approved any ADMC rules under HISA's authority, that means all the state rules remain in full force and effect,” said Lazarus, stressing that this was her “interpretation” of the FTC order.

“If there wasn't a clear statement on this issue quickly, then we might get to Jan. 1, and there might be some uncertainty around who actually has the authority. It's important for the states to know now that they're going to continue to be the ones in charge of testing on Jan. 1,” Lazarus added.

When it comes to the financial implications from Monday's announcement, HISA will refrain from collecting any of the 2023 fee assessments, designated for the individual states or, alternately, the racetracks, said Lazarus.

“The vast majority of those fees relate to the anti-doping program,” said Lazarus, explaining that the 2023 fees will be collected once the legal uncertainty has been resolved.

“There are still assessments being paid for 2022 that obviously are still required for the state racing associations who opted in, and the racetracks to cover, because those costs have already been incurred, or are in the process of being incurred,” she added.

Ben Mosier, executive director of the Horseracing Integrity & Welfare Unit (HIWU), the enforcement arm of HISA's ADMC program, released a statement explaining that HIWU will continue its education and outreach efforts “to all stakeholders in the Thoroughbred industry,” despite the delay in implementation.

“As HISA re-submits the draft ADMC rules for the FTC's approval, HIWU will use any additional time before implementation as an opportunity to ensure the industry is even more prepared for an efficient rollout of this Program, which will promote fair competition in the sport of Thoroughbred racing and the safety and welfare of our human and equine athletes,” wrote Mosier.

According to Lazarus, “So long as that preparatory work doesn't extend beyond two to three months, [HIWU's work] would still be covered by the 2022 budget.” However, “if it extends longer, we would have to revisit that issue.”

As for potential timelines moving forward, Lazarus explained that once the ADMC rules have been resubmitted with the FTC, it would take approximately 60 days for them to then go into effect, “assuming that the FTC was going to approve them substantively.”

Lazarus also broached a number of different scenarios in what appears to many in the industry a swirling morass of unpredictability and confusion.

Last month, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals found the law facially unconstitutional due to the lack of rule-making authority ceded to the FTC. That mandate is set to go into effect Jan. 10.

But if HISA is able to secure a stay on the Fifth Circuit's ruling in the interim, “we would then go back to the FTC [with the ADMC rules] and seek approval on that basis,” said Lazarus.

A similar case questioning HISA's constitutionality is also before the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. According to Lazarus, a ruling in the Sixth Circuit is expected “in the next month or two.”

If the Sixth Circuit issues a ruling favourable to HISA, “it would potentially give us the ability to continue with our program in those jurisdictions the Sixth Circuit covers,” said Lazarus.

“And it would also potentially lead to the [U.S.] Supreme Court hearing the case,” said added.

Nevertheless, even if the Sixth Circuit issues a friendly ruling on HISA, the FTC still might prove reluctant to allow HISA's ADMC to go into effect in those jurisdictions as the new law wouldn't be implemented uniformly, said Lazarus.

“For that reason, it's very possible the FTC would maintain the position that we shouldn't resubmit our rules until we have clear ability to move forward and launch across the whole country,” said Lazarus.

Another potential fix to the current knot of legal problems is a congressional re-write of the rules to cede more rule-making power to the FTC. Lazarus declined to speculate on the likelihood and possibility of that option.

A number of experts have questioned whether the legal uncertainty surrounding HISA's constitutionality puts into jeopardy the law's racetrack safety rules, already in effect. Lazarus said that Monday's order has no effect on the racetrack safety prong of the program.

“This related solely to the ADMC rules, and also, it was not a substantive review,” said Lazarus. “It was a statement on their perspective with regards to the legal uncertainties and ensuring there's clarity before we launch the new program.”

Ed Martin, the Association of Racing Commissioners International's (ARCI) president and CEO, referenced a letter the organization sent last week to the FTC highlighting “a real Catch-22” come Jan.1 concerning the legality of HISA's ADMC program.

“We are appreciative that the FTC listened and considered the request of the Association of Racing Commissioners International not to create regulatory uncertainty on Jan. 1 by approving the proposed HISA rules,” Martin told the TDN.

“Whoever got brought up on a charge could potentially have appealed it ad nauseam, and maybe win, which means there might be no rules in effect. That was the danger here,” Martin speculated. “They might be mad at me for bringing it up, but it needed to be brought up.”

The following is HISA's full statement in response to the FTC order:

“HISA appreciates the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) decision to deny HISA's draft Anti-Doping and Medication Control (ADMC) rules without prejudice as we actively seek to resolve current legal uncertainties. HISA is eager to launch Thoroughbred racing's first and long-awaited national, uniform ADMC program and stands ready to do so. We will re-submit the draft ADMC rules to the FTC for their review as soon as these legal uncertainties are resolved, and once approved, we will implement the program through the Horseracing Integrity and Welfare Unit (HIWU). In the meantime, HIWU will continue to work toward the implementation of a uniform, independent anti-doping and medication control program that is administered consistently and fairly across the United States.”

In a statement, National HBPA CEO Eric Hamelback wrote, “The recent FTC decision is another positive step forward for horsemen in our battle against the unconstitutional takeover of our industry. The strength of our legal arguments led to a unanimous decision in the Fifth Circuit, and now the FTC has done the right thing in declining to defy a federal court that has found HISA unconstitutional. The FTC order is clear: state law continues to govern medication issues until our final victory in this case.”

 

The post FTC Delays Implementation of HISA’s Drug and Doping Program appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

ARCI’S Ed Martins Joins The TDN Writers’ Room

Confusion has reigned ever since an appellate court ruled last week that the Horse Racing and Integrity Act (HISA) is unconstitutional. So what does that mean for the state racing commissions and what should they do going forward? The TDN Writers' Room presented by Keeneland called upon Ed Martin, the chairman and CEO of the Association of Racing Commissioners International to help clear up the situation. Martin was this week's Green Group Guest of the Week.

Martin believes that considering the situation HISA should drop the Jan. 1 date and put off taking over drug testing until after the situation has been fully resolved in the courts.

“HISA could fix this themselves by going back to the FTC and saying we're going to put off enforcement of our drug rules,” Martin said. “And they could put it off six months and hopefully we'll get a final court answer by then. But it doesn't look like we're going to get a final determination of their constitutionality any time soon. So this is going to go into a great gray area.”

Martin said he feared that if HISA were to sanction someone after taking over drug testing and enforcement from the state racing commissions that the ruling could be thrown out because the court has said that HISA is unconstitutional.

“We're in a situation where we have a sport where the HISA rules will apply on January 1st and people will get sanctioned for a drug violation or a doping violation under the HISA Rule,” Martin said. “Then if HISA is ultimately declared unconstitutional and invalid, then that violation goes away. It doesn't exist. The penalty goes away. And you've redistributed purses. So this has the potential to be an enormous, chaotic situation.

“There's also been a number of jockeys across the country who have been sanctioned for HISA crap rule violations. Well, if there aren't constitutional, those violations really don't exist. So expect litigation.”

Martin said he is hearing that should HISA go through some tracks will elect not to take part. That would mean they cannot send out their simulcast signal, a price some may be willing to pay.

“There are tracks that, and I'm not at liberty to say who they are, that are considering not simulcasting their signal to come out from under HISA,” Martin said. “And there are states where the tracks in that state, some of them will simulcast and some of them won't. It depends on their economic viability. This was supposed to bring uniformity to the sport. Right now, it's kind of going in the other way. It's off the rails right now. ”

Elsewhere on the podcast, which is also sponsored by Coolmore, Lane's End, the Kentucky Thoroughbred Association, XBTV and https://www.threechimneys.com/ West Point Thoroughbreds, Bill Finley, Zoe Cadman and Randy Moss gave their own take on the HISA mess. They also looked at Frankie Dettori's decision to join the Santa Anita riding colony starting on Dec. 26 and hue and cry over overly aggressive riding in New York and the feeling that the NYRA stewards are not doing enough to discipline jockeys who go over the line.

To listen to the audio version only, click here. To watch the entire video, click here.

The post ARCI’S Ed Martins Joins The TDN Writers’ Room appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Letters to the Editor: Ed Martin, President, Association of Racing Commissioners International

For well over a year, we have been told that the HISA Act was legally bulletproof and within the parameters of the US Constitution. According to a unanimous decision of a three judge panel from both political parties issued last week, such assertions may not be so.

The ARCI has not taken sides in this legal dispute, although some of our member agencies have as there are serious issues involving States rights, taxation without representation and commandeering that are at stake. The final outcome of the legal process may not be known for quite some time, creating an uncertainty for everyone involved with thoroughbred horseracing.

Conflicting legal opinions will determine what happens next in the individual States.

Some States, like California, will honor a written agreement they have executed with HISA to enforce their racetrack safety rules. Other States, upon the advice of counsel or Attorney General, will revert to state rules that remain on the books, not wanting to jeopardize the outcome of a court challenge to any enforcement action.

Not all states have written agreements. Many have sent letters informing HISA as to what they will or will not do. Those can be withdrawn or modified at any point if a State believes it's a roll of the dice as to whether enforcement actions will hold should the current ruling stand.

Last Friday, most US racing commissions participated in an emergency meeting convened by the ARCI. The commissions have and continue to work with HISA and HIWU representatives in a cooperative effort. While that will not change it should not be assumed that there are no concerns or limitations as to what an individual commission may or may not do.

What happens next is unknown and there currently is a storm cloud hanging over regulatory actions taken by HISA. It is not unreasonable to expect that those sanctioned for HISA crop rule violations will go to court as there now is reason to question the legality of the HISA Act itself.

We are but a few weeks away from when HISA plans to take over the anti-doping and medication control enforcement.  That's huge and state regulators are concerned about whether a HISA drug violation levied after January 1, 2023 is valid if HISA itself is not legal.

Most State Racing Commissions believe the HISA Act is in need of modification to restore the financial, operational and rulemaking transparency and accountability this industry has now lost with the private entity. In addressing this Congress can eliminate the legal problems as well as mitigate the enormous cost about to be levied on the thoroughbred racetracks, owners, and horsemen. I was on a panel in August with Lisa Lazarus and proposed that HISA and its proponents get “everyone” in a room and reach an agreement in order to make this work to avoid the mess we are now in.

We should all be working together to salvage the many good things that can come out of this. But that might require an amendment to the HISA Act or short-term delay. Some people refuse to even consider that.

There are many who believe the current animosity of the US political divide is killing the country. We should not let that happen to this great sport.

The post Letters to the Editor: Ed Martin, President, Association of Racing Commissioners International appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Racing and Gaming Conference Focus Shifts to Horse Racing’s Future

By Scott Finley

After an opening day of casino and conventional gaming panels, the focus of Wednesday sessions was on developments in racing, including a review of the newly launched Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act and a thoughtful panel on how fixed-odds betting can positively impact the American horseracing industry.

Lisa Lazarus, newly appointed CEO of the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority (HISA) spoke of the challenges her organization has faced in launching the initial phase of the Federal Statute that created HISA.

Of the 21 states that host live racing, 17 state racing commissions have signed on and voluntarily registered with HISA, with over 34,000 horses and 28,000 owners on board. Yet there have been federal court cases filed in Texas and Kentucky challenging the constitutionality of the federal statute, and a more recent case in Louisiana seeking a temporary restraining order on the implementation of HISA regulations in that jurisdiction.

All three cases lost in the first round but are being appealed. To date, HISA has incurred over $1.8 million in legal fees fighting these legal challenges, making a considerable dent in the organizations initial $14 million annual budget.

The HISA Board anticipates further legal challenges, but has committed to implementing corrections to many of the issues that have generated complaints from various sectors of the racing industry.

“We still have several transparency issues that need to be addressed, said Lazarus, ” and we will.”

“We are a very young organization created by federal statute,” Lazarus continued, “but we are learning as we go and it will get better.”

Fellow panelist Ed Martin, President and CEO of the Association of Racing Commissioners International (ARCI) commented, “It's been a little messy [with the start-up], but it's gotten much better since Lisa showed up.”

At the heart of the disagreements over HISA, across all facets of the industry, is the process of turning over what has aways been a state regulated industry to a federal agency. However, owners, trainers, racing commissioners and multiple industry bodies are all in agreement that uniformity of regulations is essential for racing to thrive, grow, attract new fans and shed some of the negative images that have arisen over the past decade.

Speaker John Kimmel, a leading trainer and licensed veterinarian commented, “On the surface, two barometers here at Saratoga look good: NYRA stands to handle over $850 million for the meet and the average price of yearlings at the recent sales was over $400,000. But, there are looming problems out there.

“Lack of uniformity in state regulations creates havoc for horsemen that race in multiple jurisdictions. We need uniform medication withdrawal times. We also need to overcome differences in managing enforcement for on-track versus off-track stabled [race] entrants.”

HISA can resolve these multitude of different regulatory matters, but all states must come on board for the process to be effective.

Kimmel also suggested the HISA must do a better job of communicating with industry stakeholders and perhaps could create a marketing and public relations department.

“There are lots of rumors out these and complexly inaccurate statements,” Lazarus agreed. “We want to make racing better through uniformity and stability.”

New York is one of the four state racing commissions yet to come to an agreement to fully embrace HISA. Speaker Rob Williams, Executive Director of the New York State Gaming Commission (NYSGC), explained, “NYSGC has not accepted two of the tasks requested by HISA [registering participants by NY State employees and fully staffing drug testing collection].”

Overall, though, NYSGC has been supportive, providing staff and professional expertise to assist HISA in developing rules and regulations. Williams and Lazarus both anticipate that the differences can be worked out and that NYSGC and HISA will resolve the issues over funding and that New York State will eventually join the fold.

Panel moderator Alan Foremen, Chairman and CEO of Thoroughbred Horsemen's Association, “The road to uniformity is so difficult.”

“We are making even more effort to listen to the industry on the pending anti-doping programs,” Lazarus stated. “We are a young organization created by Federal Statute; learning as we go. It will get better.”

Perhaps most encouraging was the level of respect that all panelists and their respective organizations had for Lazarus' efforts to date. All seemed to reflect that all will improve once the growing pains of HISA are worked out.

Ed Martin concluded, “Once the industry begins to trust HISA, that's the key to getting there.”

“Fixed Odds and the Future of Horseracing” the concluding panel on Wednesday, brought together racing executives, service providers and fixed-odds operators to offer their opinions on the current state of fixed-odds horse betting, but more importantly where and how the racing industry can capitalize on the stratospheric growth of legal sports betting by coupling both pari-mutuel and fixed odds betting to the current sports betting content menus.

Dallas Baker, Head of Business Development for BetMakers US, the operator first to market with fixed-odds betting at Monmouth Park, was adamant. “This is THE MOMENT for racing in the USA. We are at a critical point moment.”

“Just think how Illinois Horsemen felt watching the Arlington Million at Churchill Downs this past weekend!” Baker exclaimed.    Baker contended that like in his native Australia, fixed odds betting – primarily on win and place markets only–can revitalize a declining USA racing industry, capture younger bettors and fairly remunerate horsemen for purses, so long as the commercial and tax structures are on a level playing field for all operators and content providers.

Colorado is the only state besides New Jersey to have approved and regulated fixed odds on horse racing. Moderator Dan Hartman, Director of the Colorado Division of Gaming, explained how his agency consulted all segments of the racing industry, especially horsemen, and established a tax and regulatory scheme that returns a fair share to purses at Colorado's racetrack. The fixed-odds law sunsets in 18 months unless renewed by the Colorado Legislature. All stakeholders will be asked to weigh in on the future of fixed odds in Colorado at that point.

David O'Rourke, President and CEO of the New York Racing Association, believes that sports betting is a massive distribution channel for racing. NYRA plans to work with all current sports betting operators on ways in with NYRA pari-mutuel content may be added to current platforms and then see where fixed odds fits in.

NYRA recently concluded partnership deals with Caesars Entertainment and BetMGM to add NYRA horse racing content to those sports betting platforms. Regulatory and banking/funding roadblocks have so far limited the launch to only two states.

Paul Hannon, Senior Vice President Corporate development for PointsBet USA, is also bullish on fixed odds attracting a new audience to racing and building on the growth of online and retail sports betting in 30 states just four years after The Supreme Court overturned the Federal Law {PASPA] prohibiting sports betting in all States except Nevada.

“Racing must reap the benefits of Sports betting's growth,” Hannon said. “I believe that within two years of launch, fixed odds sports betting on racing will become the fifth-most wagered on sport, after NFL, NCAAB football, NBA and NCAA basketball.

“Racing fills a content void, especially this time of year between the end of NBA and the start of NFL when sports betting revenue and interest typically decline.”

Michelle Fischer, Vice President for SiS Content Services, also agrees that fixed odds on horse racing will be a successful product and generate new interest in racing from a younger audience.

“Adding fixed odds racing to existing sports betting platforms will only increase the pie,” Fischer stated.

She agreed with Hannon about the massive potential for racing, essentially a 24-hour per day global sports, nicely filling in the down time between more conventional sports. It has done so in the United Kingdom, Australia and much of Europe. It should be successful in America as well.

“Americans want to bet of American sports and American racing,” Fischer said. “We as an industry must give them the opportunity to do so.

“But we need an open market for content and a fair pricing model [as compared to conventional sports betting] to make this successful.”

O'Rourke summed up NYRA's position on the opportunity for racing to offering fixed odds to reach a newer and younger demographic.

“Racing is essentially an entertainment product, but you cannot lose control of your content.”

Tuesday sessions focused on downstate casino development in New York, with most speakers concluding that two of the three licenses are heavily favored to be warded to Genting Resorts World at Aqueduct and MGM Empire City Casino at Yonkers, both of which are well-established VLT “racino” facilities.

The third, and final downstate license is up for grabs, but unlikely to be situated in Manhattan due to community and business opposition.

At a Tuesday panel on “Sports Betting: What's Next?” speakers reflected on the excessive 51% tax rate in New York on mobile sports betting operators and how that may eventually lead to market decline and further competition. Panelists also echoed many of the same sentiments as expressed at the Wednesday Fixed Odds and the Future of Horse Betting session, as the conclusion of most regulators, including in New Jersey, is that “racing is a sport.”

The post Racing and Gaming Conference Focus Shifts to Horse Racing’s Future appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights