Al Aasy Primed For July Test

One of the season's elite older horses is in action at Newmarket on Thursday as Al Aasy (Ire) (Sea the Stars {Ire}) headlines the opening card of the three-day July Festival. Runner-up in the June 4 G1 Coronation Cup at Epsom last time, Shadwell's progressive 4-year-old stays in his home town for the 12-furlong G2 Princess of Wales's Tattersalls S. at the meeting at which he first served notice of his talent when taking last year's G3 Bahrain Trophy. Successful in the G3 John Porter S. and G3 Aston Park S. over this trip at Newbury Apr. 18 and May 15, the apple of William Haggas's eye lost nothing in defeat when a neck second to Pyledriver (GB) (Harbour Watch {Ire}) in the Coronation Cup and bids to stay in the picture for the July 24 G1 King George and Queen Elizabeth Qipco S. “I was thinking of waiting for Ascot, but I've changed my mind,” his trainer said. “He's in good form and I think ground should be fine. We've had some decent showers and everybody has been saying we need the rain, so I should think it will be lovely ground.”

Up against Al Aasy is The Niarchos Family's 'TDN Rising Star' Highest Ground (Ire) (Frankel {GB}), who has yet to deliver on early promise and who after finishing runner-up in the G2 Dante S. at York last July has been unplaced in three of his four starts. “Al Aasy is clearly the one we all have to fear and he is likely to take a lot of beating too, but hopefully Highest Ground can return to form after a below-par run in the Hardwicke,” jockey Ryan Moore said. “He obviously had a tough task there though and the soft ground was not ideal for him by any means. His earlier defeat of a good subsequent winner in Outbox at Leicester was a fair effort, however he has to raise his game if the form horses run their races, that much is obvious.”

In the six-furlong G2 Tattersalls July S. for 2-year-olds, some of the prominent Royal Ascot runners go head-to-head with the June 15 G2 Coventry S. second and fifth Eldrickjones (Ire) (Cotai Glory {GB}) and Ebro River (Ire) (Galileo Gold {GB}) joined by the June 17 G2 Norfolk S. third Project Dante (GB) (Showcasing {GB}) and the June 16 Listed Windsor Castle S. runner-up Dig Two (Ire) (Cotai Glory {GB}). Nick Bradley said of Eldrickjones, “It looks no stronger than the Coventry and some might say it's a little bit weaker. He goes there with a massive chance, I think.”

Trainer Bryan Smart said of Project Dante, “The horse proved his worth and we like him a lot. He did a nice piece of work on Friday and had a nice little blow on Tuesday morning–Graham Lee rode him and was thrilled with him. He said he feels as good as if not better than he did before Royal Ascot. I think he'll get the trip, because he settles and you can put him in most places.”

Hugo Palmer saddles both Dig Two and Ebro River, with the latter already successful in black-type company having won Sandown's Listed National S. May 27, and he said, “They both ran very well at Ascot. It's always tricky having two colts in the same race, but I feel they both deserve to take their chance. They've both really thrived since Ascot–I've been delighted with them. Ebro River is a winner of a listed race on soft ground, so any significant rain wouldn't hinder his chances, but I think he proved at Ascot he's also fine on top-of-the-ground. Dig Two definitely wants quick ground, so if the word soft started to appear in the going description we would probably take him out.”

In the G3 Bahrain Trophy, Nat Rothschild's June 16 G2 Queen's Vase third Stowell (GB) (Zoffany {Ire}) encounters Godolphin's Apr. 23 G3 Sandown Classic Trial third and May 21 Listed Cocked Hat S. runner-up Yibir (GB) (Dubawi {Ire}), while the Listed Sir Henry Cecil S. looks a fascinating race with some smart colts from the major stables. Among them is Juddmonte's 'TDN Rising Star' Derab (GB) (Sea the Stars {Ire}), who was not disgraced when eighth in the G1 Prix du Jockey Club over 10 1/2 furlongs at Chantilly June 6, and the same owner-breeders' Maximal (GB) (Galileo {Ire}) who was fourth in the G1 St James's Palace S. at Royal Ascot June 15. Juddmonte's Barry Mahon commented, “We're keeping an eye on the weather with Maximal, because he wants fast ground so with the risk of thunderstorms, we'll be monitoring it with him. Both horses are in good form. It's not ideal to have the two of them running, but there's no alternative. Maximal ran a great race at Ascot and the other horse, to be fair, had a rough trip over to France. He had rough trip in the race and we threw him in at the deep end a little bit. It will be nice to give him a confidence-booster close to home and get him back on an upward curve.”

Godolphin's G3 Autumn S. winner One Ruler (Ire) (Dubawi {Ire}) is tried in cheekpieces following his disappointing seventh in the G3 Hampton Court S. at Royal Ascot June 17 and Charlie Appleby is hoping for a return to his former glories. “One Ruler has been slightly frustrating so far this year, but dropping back to a mile should suit,” he said. “He will be a major player if he can rediscover his two-year-old form.” Shadwell's well-regarded and unbeaten Baaeed (GB) (Sea the Stars {Ire}) is another fascinating contender, having won by 7 1/2 lengths over this course and distance June 19.

Friday's G1 Tattersalls Falmouth S. has attracted a field of 13, with the June 18 G1 Coronation S. one-two-three Alcohol Free (Ire) (No Nay Never), Snow Lantern (GB) (Frankel {GB}) and Mother Earth (Ire) (Zoffany {Ire}) tackling their elders including the May 2 G2 Dahlia S. one-two Lady Bowthorpe (GB) (Nathaniel {Ire}) and Queen Power (Ire) (Shamardal) and the June 16 G2 Duke of Cambridge S. winner Indie Angel (Ire) (Dark Angel {Ire}). Also in the mix is David Ward's Primo Bacio (Ire) (Awtaad {Ire}), who was forced to miss the Coronation due to the testing ground but who had previously been the impressive winner of York's Listed Michael Seely Memorial S. May 14.

Click here for the group fields.

 

The post Al Aasy Primed For July Test appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Max Shows Honor Still Cracking the Code

When a horse carries a name like this, there can be no evasion or equivocation. With due honesty, then, let us admit that Honor Code is not yet converting his transparent eligibility as a stallion–apparently so watertight in pedigree, physique and performance–in quite the fashion that seemed likely when he produced the luminous Honor A.P. from his very first crop.

Not yet. Small, agonizingly flexible words, in the context of a suffocatingly impatient marketplace. By any rational measure, it should still feel like early days in Honor Code's stud career. After all, his forte was always going to be two-turn horses that progress with maturity. And it was only this time last year that one such, Honor A.P., was basking in a decisive defeat of Authentic (Into Mischief) in the GI Santa Anita Derby. Luck would subsequently turn against this vital flagship, thereafter confined to two starts that did inadequate justice to his ability before being forced into retirement–and, indeed, into competition with his sire at Lane's End. But let's not forget that Honor A.P. was the only colt ever to beat the eventual Horse of the Year and, moreover, appeared to do so entirely on merit.

Even so, with only his second crop of sophomores barely halfway through their campaign, Honor Code somehow finds himself at something of a crossroads. For the success of Max Player in the GII Suburban S. last Saturday shone a fairly unsparing light on the fact that for now he remains Honor Code's only other graded stakes winner, besides Honor A.P., with just two other black-type scorers to back them up.

As another graduate of his first crop, of course, the fresh impetus of Max Player may yet be emulated by others responsible for this fitful record to date, which has seen Honor Code's fee halved to $20,000 from an opening $40,000. (A pretty standard slide, of course, as the freshman luster fades.) True, we all need to see Max Player do it again: the track was sloppy, and the runner-up perhaps a little rusty. But he certainly looked like a horse who, having meanwhile joined one of the powerful barns in the land, is belatedly renewing the promise of his GIII Withers S. emergence last year.

Regardless, long experience permits the people behind Honor Code to place in heartening context the teething problems of so many sires who then regrouped to become important contributors to the breed.

“You know, people rush to judgement so early,” says Bill Farish of Lane's End. “And we've seen it over and over again with our stallions: sometimes they just take a little while to get going. Kingmambo's first 2-year-olds just didn't light it up for people, and then he came on like crazy. We had quite a lot of interest in him [at that time] from abroad, but luckily Dad was pretty firm in his belief. And thank goodness. I remember breeding to him I think at $18,000, after he had started at $45,000. And there was a shareholder market significantly below that. What an opportunity that was!”

Before long, in fact, Kingmambo was standing at $300,000.

“We went through a similar experience with Smart Strike,” Farish continues. “And Curlin was another, just the same. It's amazing how everyone forgets now that Curlin went through a tough stretch before he came flying out. In the meantime, unfortunately, he had found a new home. But yes, he went through that same kind of patch. So we're still very optimistic that Honor Code can still go on the same kind of course.”

Having launched a series of new stallions over recent seasons, the farm routinely faces challenging decisions on the distribution of support among the broodmare band. But knowing that Honor Code was hardly likely to produce a bunch of Keeneland sprint maiden winners, he was maintained at full subscription (at least by the wisely temperate standards of this farm) through his first four years at stud. This third group of juveniles, then, represents a book of 154. And, in scanning the horizon for reinforcements, the Lane's End team can already make out the silhouettes of the cavalry.

The retention of several Honor Code yearlings for their racing division reflected a concern that they might be undervalued in a market so shaken by the pandemic. And Shug McGaughey, whose Hall of Fame career includes supervision of Honor Code's own track career, has encouraged them that this strategy will pay off.

“We've got an exciting group of 2-year-olds,” Farish says with enthusiasm. “There's a colt named Informal who's out of the Epsom Oaks winner Casual Look (Red Ransom). He should run in the first grass race up at Saratoga: obviously that makes sense with that female family. Another one who's quite close is Irish Sea, who's out of [multiple graded stakes winner] Irish Jasper (First Defence). I only mention those because they're just a couple of weeks off running, but we have three others that we're very high on. So we'll see.”

Farish acknowledges that some stallions won't make the grade even when, by all the consensus that governs breeding selection, it seems like they just can't miss. But the immediate advent of Honor A.P. really did appear to corroborate the sense of destiny vested in Honor Code, one of 36 named foals in the final crop of A.P. Indy–the breed-shaping farm icon, who finally passed on last year at the venerable age of 31.

Honor Code's maternal family, moreover, complements the aristocratic genes of A.P. Indy: his dam Serena's Cat (Storm Cat) made $1.4 million as a weanling grand-daughter of elite runner and producer Serena's Song (Rahy). And besides extending the Bold Ruler sire-line, Honor Code combines two mares that helped to make Bold Ruler's greatest son Secretariat such an important broodmare sire: A.P. Indy's dam Weekend Surprise, and damsire Storm Cat's mother Terlingua.

A Saratoga debut winner who missed a Grade I by a neck on his second juvenile start, Honor Code was sidelined from the Triple Crown trail by injury but matured into a tremendously charismatic dasher, pouncing from way off the pace in races like the GI Met Mile and, most memorably, the GI Whitney S.

That epic race, where Honor Code nailed Liam's Map on the line, had an intriguing sequel when the first three (Tonalist having also finished well for third) all ended up at Lane's End. And, since renewing their rivalry, they have been somewhat reprising their Whitney performances.

Liam's Map made a similarly explosive start to his stud career, with two Grade I winners among his opening salvo of juveniles immediately elevating his fee from $20,000 to $35,000. Tonalist, in contrast, was away relatively slowly and duly absorbed a series of fee cuts, standing this year at just $12,500. But he has been quietly working his way forwards through this competitive intake (headed by American Pharoah and Constitution): his black-type winners and performers now tally seven and 17, against nine and 16 for Liam's Map, and he recently registered a breakout Grade I success through Country Grammer. Indeed, Tonalist's diligent progress (currently fifth in the third-crop table) makes him look exceptional value–and he could yet become another slow-burning success along the lines of those cited by Farish.

That must also be the hope for Honor Code. This is a notoriously ruthless business and every farm, at some point, must decide when to yield to the prejudices even of a market as foolishly capricious as this one. But Farish is keeping the faith, albeit he acknowledges both that Honor Code needs to retrieve commercial attention and also that he faces an additional challenge in the rivalry of his own son Honor A.P.–introduced as a freshman this spring at a bargain $15,000.

It's a situation that presents difficulties to father and son alike, but they also share a glossy physical allure, showcased in their racing days by the earnest head carriage and raking stride trademarked by A.P. Indy himself.

“People are always a little hesitant to breed to a stallion whose own sire is still young, and hasn't proven himself as a sire of sires,” Farish accepts. “But people that come out and look at them generally end up breeding to them, because they're both very flashy, eye-catching types.”

So while Honor Code's book this time round was evidently down somewhat, from 138 mares in his fourth book and 85 mares in his fifth, he remains absolutely entitled to consideration–not least, in view of that seamless pedigree, by breeders disposed to retain a filly. Perhaps there isn't sufficient commercial oxygen in the modern market for all three of those Whitney protagonists to find a sustainable niche in the Bluegrass. But it's far from clear that the current balance of power, between them, will prove a lasting one. Remember that even their oldest stock has not yet arrived at the point in their careers that they themselves reached that day.

“Tonalist had a decent sort of book this year,” Farish reflects. “I think he's really in the fight, too, along with Honor Code. His race record was phenomenal. People forget that he won the [GIII] Westchester and the [GI] Cigar, and was really a good miler as much as anything. They're not all going to make the grade but they each have the chance to ride it out and come out the other side.

“But yes, while things like Max Player's win are great, you need more than that; you've got to have some new horses, some 2-year-olds coming along. And we're more than hopeful that we do. Sometimes you just need quite a bit of patience. It's interesting how we seem to have more stallions that need a bit of time, where other farms tend to have a bunch of hot 2-year-olds and then it all goes quiet. Ours seem to go a different route. But so long as they show up at some point, I guess it doesn't matter. And there are so many things to like about Honor Code that it's hard to imagine he's not going to come on through.”

The post Max Shows Honor Still Cracking the Code appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

How to Read an Online Poker Review: Part 2 of 2

In part 1 of this 2 part series, we began to lay out for you exactly what online poker reviewers look for when evaluating an online poker room, using the poker review template from our own poker portal at Poker-Ranking.com.

In part 1, we explained in depth the following sections: Software and Graphics, Game Variation and Limits, and Traffic. In this concluding article, we will delve into what information is contained in the rest of the sections of a typical online poker review.

Competition
Here in an online poker review, you’ll find a gauge of the level of skill predominant at the various games (Texas Hold’em, etc.), types (Ring Games, etc.), betting structures (Limit, etc.), and stakes ($100/$200, etc.).

The term fish refers to players that aren’t very good. The call a lot of bad bets and can be intimidated easily. A good player can beat fish consistently with little difficulty.

The term shark refers to expert players that devour the fish. (For another appropriate animal reference, consider a fox in the henhouse.)

Bonuses
This part of an online poker review will tell you the signup bonus you’ll get (usually a percentage match against your first deposit), as well as any other bonuses available at the online poker room.

Some common bonuses are as follows:

Bad Beat Bonus: If you lose a hand holding higher than a certain amount (usually 4 Queens), you win the largest portion of a bonus that is shared amongst all the players that posted blinds in that round

Magic Hand Bonus: Every round (or hand) in an online poker room is given a number (which is how you can later refer back to earlier games); in a Magic Hand Bonus, the online poker room chooses a number (say, every one millionth hand) and gives every player who posted blinds in that hand a share of the bonus, the largest portion going to the winner of the hand

High Hand Bonus: Given to any player that gets the highest hand (above a minimum high hand, eg. 4 Kings) in a set period of time, without folding

Progressive bonuses (or Progressive Jackpots): These start at a certain amount (eg. $500) and each day that goes by without a winner claiming the bonus, a certain amount (eg. $50) is added, until someone wins the accumulated amount and the jackpot is then reset to its starting level.

Rake
Here is where the online poker review will tell you what the commission is that the online poker room takes for each hand. The average rake is 5% of the pot, up to but not exceeding $3. Many online poker rooms take smaller cuts from smaller pots or lower stakes games.

Some have a wonderful No Flop/No Drop policy, stating that if nobody stays in to see the flop, no rake is taken.

Customer Service
This section of the online poker review tells you the ways to reach customer support (toll-free phone, email, live chat), the hours (preferably 24/7), and most importantly, the quality, courteousness, and responsiveness.

Promotions
Similar to bonuses, but meriting their own section of the online poker review, promotions are special, time-sensitive events, generally with extraordinary prizes that include hefty jackpots, vacations, automobiles, and free seats in World Poker Tour and World Series of Poker events.

Deposits and Cashouts
You’ll find two things in this section of an online poker review: first, the payment methods accepted for deposits (purchases) and cashouts (withdrawals), such as PayPal, credit cards, NETeller, etc., and second, the promptness, reliability, and security with which they process these transactions.

Ease of Use
This section of an online poker review usually discusses the usability and intuitiveness (or lack thereof) of the interface. In addition, you’ll learn here about the layout of the lobby and the information given, including lobby stats like the following:

Hands per hour: Tells you how quickly the game moves and could be a gauge of the experience level of the players;

Average pot: Tells you how aggressive the players are and how much you can expect to win or lose each hand; and

Flop percentages: How many players at the table on average are staying in to see the flop; tells you how loose they’re playing.

With this handy, two-part guide to online poker reviews at your side, you should be sitting in at the perfect online poker table for you, any moment now!

Verified by MonsterInsights