November Sale Catalogue Unveiled By Tattersalls Ascot

The Tattersalls Ascot November Sale catalogue, featuring 104 lots on the Flat and over jumps, is now online. Slated for Nov. 3, the sale comprises 35 fillies and mares in/out of training, 52 colts and geldings in/out of training, 11 stores, five yearlings and one point-to-pointer. Trainers under both codes have supported the sale, including Cullentra House Stables, Clarehaven Stables, East Everleigh Stables, Godolphin, Jane Chapple-Hyam, Lodge Hill Stables, Middleham Park Racing, Park House Stables, Urloxhey Farm, and WH Bloodstock. Supplementary lots will be accepted until Friday, Oct. 28.

The post November Sale Catalogue Unveiled By Tattersalls Ascot appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Missing July 1 HISA Deadline Could Result in Scratches

Facing a July 1 federal mandate to get all licensed personnel and actively racing Thoroughbreds registered in accordance with the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act (HISA), representatives from that organization's Authority team fielded questions from industry participants Friday in an online “town hall” forum, where the most pertinent query had to do with whether horses will get scratched if their online HISA registrations are incomplete by that deadline.

The short answer, according to the HISA Authority's chief executive officer, Lisa Lazarus, is yes.

But her slightly longer explanation tells us the Authority is trying to give trainers–who are additionally tasked with registering all horses under their care and maintaining daily records of their conditioning–a grace period during which they will be prodded to comply so scratches won't have to happen.

“A horse will only be scratched if it or the trainer is not registered,” Lazarus said. “What we tried to build in was kind of a safety mechanism for you in these early months, which is you can enter a horse, but when you enter a horse [without HISA registration], the racing office will get a flag that says, 'can't race.' They will then reach out to you and say, 'You're in the race, but you've got to get this done by start time, or race time, or else you're scratched. Based on most racing calendars, that will give you a couple days, at least, to do it. And that will essentially be the warning.”

But horses and trainers aren't the only ones required by federal law to be registered under HISA. Everyone who holds a state racing commission license–including owners, jockeys, jockey agents, exercise riders, stable employees, pony personnel, outriders, racing office staff, veterinarians, farriers and backstretch vendors–have to sign up too.

And although it won't result in a scratch, Ann McGovern, representing HISA's Racetrack Safety Committee, added that, “if your jockey isn't registered by scratch time, you'll have to have a rider change.”

The Authority's reps underscored that the newly operational HISA registration portal is a work-in-progress endeavor, and it's scheduled to be updated with a slate of changes by Monday based on feedback from users who've already registered themselves and their horses. Additional tweaks will be rolled out as the process evolves.

The HISA speakers acknowledged the daunting nature of the work that looms in the weeks ahead, and made it known that the Authority will be depending upon the input of horsemen and women to help make the process less time consuming.

“We know we're going to make mistakes. We just do. We're dealing with a really tough timeline,” said John Roach, HISA's general counsel. But, he added, “We'll talk to you. We'll figure it out. We'll work collaboratively with you. And I hope that even when we disagree about things, you know that we will listen and we'll try and do the right thing.”

Roach continued: “You should go ahead and get all your registration done. It's important to get it done before July 1. But we understand that this is a new system; this is new technology. So we are not going to stop anybody from entering.”

Other complexities within the HISA framework still seem a little shy on details–at least based on the way they were discussed during the June 3 webcast.

Take a trainer's maintenance of records, for example. Here's how Roach put it:

“Trainers are not responsible for [providing] any kind of information or data to HISA. You are required under the rules to maintain certain records. They have to be available for inspection. The vets will have to do the inputting. But as it relates to your records, you just need to maintain them. The safety rules set forth what you are to maintain.”

But then McGovern interjected to say that when a horse gets claimed and goes to a new owner, additional trainer responsibilities will come into play.

“If a horse is claimed, you are responsible for making a copy of those [training] records and giving that, along with the veterinary records, to the new trainer of the claimed horse,” McGovern said.

One audience member wanted to know how far back the training records have to go. McGovern answered 30 days. Then someone else asked for a clarification of what “training records” actually mean.

“Whatever records you think would be necessary,” McGovern answered. “But in our minds, you know the big board on the end of everyone's shedrow that has the horse's name, [and notations of] 'jogged, worked,' all that good stuff? [Whether the horse] had a supplement in his feed. Did he hand-walk that day? What did you do with the horse on a daily basis? You could take a picture of that board and put it in a file every day…. If that's what you want to do, that would be fine too.”

If it struck anyone on the webcast as unusual that a digital image of a magic-markered white board hung in someone's barn would suffice as a precise “training record” under the federal HISA guidelines, no one said so.

Nor did any of the Authority reps go into detail about exactly how or when trainers would be required to transfer those records to the people who claimed the horse.

Other questions from industry participants focused on the registration process itself. Each horse for example, must have not only a HISA registration, but also a “designated owner” and a “responsible person” associated with it.

But what if five people own a horse in partnership? Do all five have to be registered? And who among them gets listed as the designated owner?

“There only needs to be one designated owner to take responsibility for the horse,” Lazarus said. “[Partners] can decide amongst [themselves] who that's going to be. We do want all owners to register. But with regards to the initial enforcement piece, et cetera, really we're going to be focusing on the designated owner.

Added Roach, “If [an] owner is not licensed because they own such a small percentage that they're not required to be licensed [at the state level], they do not have to register.”

Lazarus also attempted to smooth over confusion related to the differences between being licensed at the state level while also needing to meet the federal requirement to be registered under HISA.

“This is a one-time registration. It's not an annual registration. And it has no actual connection to your state license,” Lazarus said.

Then why is a state racing license identification number listed as one of the HISA registration requirements?

“The only reason that we ask for a state license number is to make the whole process easier for you,” Lazarus said. “If you give us a state license number, we can go into the ARCI system and help pre-populate your information [so it gets auto-filled on the online form]. It's a one-time registration, a one-time number [provided by HISA]. Once you do it, unless something dramatically changes, you never have to do it again. And that [HISA] number stays with you forever.”

What if you are licensed in multiple states? Which license number do you provide to HISA?

“You can enter any license number,” from any state, Lazarus replied. “That is just to help [the system] figure out who you are, to make your input time shorter and to make it a less onerous process for you. Later though, there's a separate box that asks you to check all the states that you're licensed in. When you get to that screen, you should check all the states that you're licensed in. You don't need to provide the numbers.”

There were also concerns about whether it's a trainer's responsibility to register their licensed employees. The trainer is not required to do that, but the Authority is asking trainers to encourage their staff to sign up themselves.

“There's no legal consequence for a trainer if an employee doesn't register,” Roach said. “There may be a consequence for the employee depending on what activity they want to engage in and where they want to be and go.”

There was also uncertainty among trainers about what happens when a horse leaves the track to go to a lay-up facility or offsite training center. Who becomes the responsible party?

“If the farm manager is a registered person, and the [horse's] owner is comfortable with making that the responsible person, that can happen if the horse is going to be there for some time,” McGovern said. “If not, the trainer would remain the responsible person and would be responsible for getting the [training] records from the farm manager.

Roach clarified whether or not caretakers at a farm would also have to register under the HISA system.

“If the farm employees are licensed by [a] racing commission, and they have contact [with] Thoroughbred horses, they need to be registered,” Roach said. “If they are not licensed, they do not have to register with [HISA]. No one that is not licensed [by a commission] has to register with us.”

The post Missing July 1 HISA Deadline Could Result in Scratches appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Freddie, Martyn Meade Unite Under Manton Banner

Freddie Meade will join his father, Martyn, on the trainer's license under the umbrella of Manton Park Racing. Technique (GB) (Mastercraftsman {Ire}), entered to run in the G3 Cazoo Princess Elizabeth S. Derby Day, will be the first runner for the new training partnership. Freddie has served as an assistant to his father since 2014.

“I have grown up around horses and ridden from an early age. Training has always been the ultimate goal.” said Freddie. “I look forward to us being able to use traditional methods of training at Manton but appealing to a wider audience through utilizing modern techniques.”

The operation has undergone extensive renovations to both the yard and the gallops, which have been restored and fully irrigated. The father and son operation, which is aiming double the number of horses they have in training to fill the yard with a capacity for 100 horses, plan to be active at the yearling sales.

The post Freddie, Martyn Meade Unite Under Manton Banner appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Should the Triple Crown Be Changed? We Ask Trainers to Weigh In

After the connections of GI Kentucky Derby winner Rich Strike (Keen Ice) opted to skip the GI Preakness S. and instead prepare for the GI Belmont S., the structure of the Triple Crown races has been a subject of debate leading up to the second leg of the historic series. Should the timing between the races be adjusted? We asked a few veteran trainers here.

 

 

Mark Casse:

I think it has to stay the same. I think it's nonsense to talk any different. This is history, this is what our game has been about for over a hundred years. The Triple Crown is not supposed to be easy. A horse can handle the racing, especially now where we aren't doing as much prior to the Kentucky Derby.

In the Kentucky Derby, we run at a neutral surface. There has been no racing there all spring. Some horses may have ran there in the fall, but the Churchill Downs racetrack is very different in the fall compared to the spring so I don't feel like there's any home field advantage there. Then we go to Pimlico, where it is definitely a neutral playing field. We see a lot of horses run well in the Kentucky Derby and the Preakness. War of Will (War Front) is a perfect example of that. He was very much hindered in the Derby and he came back and won the Preakness, but he didn't show up in the Belmont. A lot of people would say he was tired, but I would say it had more to do with the fact that they call it Big Sandy for a reason. The surface is very loose and a lot of horses won't handle it.

It's my feeling that anyone stabled at Belmont has a big advantage. The Kentucky Derby and Preakness are run on a neutral battlefield, but the Belmont is not. I think if you look over the last 20 years, a lot of it has to do with there being a home field advantage rather than horses being tired.

That was my reasoning in doing what I did with [2019 Belmont S. winner] Sir Winston (Awesome Again). I ran him in the GIII Peter Pan S., where he ran second, and I thought going into the Belmont that he had a big chance because he was running over a racetrack he had already ran on. There's no question that Belmont is entirely a different world. A lot of times these horses are doing well in the Derby and the Preakness and then are getting beat in the Belmont. They'll say it's because the horse is tired, but I don't think it's that.

I'm always looking for new ideas and new reasons to make things better, but I don't think the Triple Crown should be changed.

 

Doug O'Neill:

I think it is time for a change. Everything evolves. We have made a lot of other positive changes in the best interests of the horse. I like the concept of putting four weeks between each of the races and having it be the first Saturday in May, the first Saturday in June and the first Saturday in July. It would work well, too, from a marketing standpoint. My gut says that's the way to go.

I completely disagree with the idea that it would diminish the accomplishment. Sometimes, coming out of the Derby and going into the Preakness, you really don't have to do a lot.  As long as there are no injuries, you can kind of coast in between. If you put a month in between, that would require some good horsemanship. Man and horse will have to work together to maintain that level of brilliance in between the races. It could even make it a tad more challenging. I hate being a contrarian, but I think changing it would be a good thing.

 

Shug McGaughey:

I don't think it should be changed. It's very traditional and one of the reasons why it is so difficult to win is the way the races are spaced.

If they went to three weeks, I wouldn't complain about that. But I think the way it is structured right now adds to the mystique of the Triple Crown. You have to run and you have to have the horse and the knowledge to be able to get the horse from the Derby to the Preakness and then from the Preakness to the Belmont. If I had a horse that ran second or third in the Derby, would I come back in the two weeks? I would think about it.

The Preakness is a race that stands on its own and I would love to win it. If I had a horse that was capable of coming back in two weeks, I would run. If I didn't think the horse was capable of coming back in two weeks, I wouldn't run.

Check in tomorrow for more responses from industry participants.

The post Should the Triple Crown Be Changed? We Ask Trainers to Weigh In appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights