‘Maryland, My Maryland” Won’t Be Played at Preakness

The Stronach Group, which operates Pimlico, has confirmed that the song “Maryland, My Maryland” will no longer be played before the running of the GI Preakness S. The story was first reported by the racingbiz.com.

The song, which has been played at Pimlico since 1909, has stirred up controversy because its lyrics are meant to encourage Maryland to join the Confederacy. The sixth verse includes the following lines; “Dear Mother! burst the tyrant’s chain, Maryland! Virginia should not call in vain, Maryland! She meets her sisters on the plain-‘Sic semper!’ ’tis the proud refrain.”

The song was adapted from a poem by James Ryder Randal, which called the Union “Northern scum.”

At the Preakness, only the third verse, one that is not particularly controversial, is usually played.

In the aftermath of the George Floyd death, Maryland House Speaker Adrienne Jones (D-Baltimore County) announced she would lead an effort to remove Maryland, My Maryland as the state’s official song.

“The Maryland Jockey Club is respectful and supportive of Speaker Jones’ move to remove ‘Maryland My Maryland’ as the state song, and we look forward to starting a new tradition for Preakness 145,” the Stronach Group said in a statement.

In another sign of the times, Pimlico has changed the name of the GII Dixie S. It will now be known by its original name, the Dinner Party S. The race has been run since 1870.

The post ‘Maryland, My Maryland” Won’t Be Played at Preakness appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Free Data Friday: Tracks Running Races at the Wrong Distances

From the Thoroughbred Idea Foundation

Saratoga, Gulfstream and Kentucky Downs have all run races over wrong distances within the last six weeks – at least one half-furlong longer than the races were scheduled.

This 50th volume of #FreeDataFriday is not an explanation of some obscure method of timing races, it offers merely a sobering fact, easily exposed BECAUSE of the way in which America times horse races.

First, understand that nearly every distance of a race run in North America is not the actual distance traveled, but the distance which is timed. Horses run-up to the starting point and reach the spot which is the published race distance away from the finish, and then the clock starts. It might be 30 feet, 50 feet, 70 feet or more. It depends on many factors.

Yes, we think this is the wrong way to time races, but at least we know that run-up exists.

But when the un-timed portion of a race is a half-furlong (1/16th of a mile) or more, and those wagering on that, riding in those races or preparing horses for such events are either unaware or not properly informed of this? Well, that’s a problem – for the integrity of the sport and for the confidence of stakeholders.

Saratoga ran the Grade II Bowling Green on August 1, 2020 at a reported 1 3/8 miles on turf-the race was likely at least 1 7/16th miles, more than a half-furlong farther than reported to anyone, including owners of horses in the race, jockeys who rode it and the bettors who staked more than $1.7 million on this race.

Last Saturday, September 5, Gulfstream Park ran two listed, black-type awarding stakes (the Bear’s Den and Miss Gracie) at a reported “about” 7.5 furlongs on the turf. The races were very likely about 540 feet, or roughly four-fifths of a furlong longer than that, much closer to 8.5 furlongs.

On Monday, September 7, Kentucky Downs ran four races at 6 ½ furlongs. The reported “run-up” for the race, acquired via the new Equibase-serviced Gmax timing and tracking system, was 330 feet, a distance that equates to a half-furlong. In other words, horses actually ran seven furlongs. The charts for these races (R2, R6, R7) are HERE–but a replay can be found via ADW replay providers.

The circumstances of all of these races, and the impact of the extra ground covered, and the degree of harm done by presenting customers with these errors, assuredly, varies.

Click here to read this entire report from the Thoroughbred Idea Foundation.

The post Free Data Friday: Tracks Running Races at the Wrong Distances appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Betfair to Pull Plug on NJ Betting Exchange

Beginning Oct. 1, Betfair will no longer accept exchange wagers from its New Jersey customers, ending a brief and unsuccessful experiment in the U.S. for a form of wagering that couldn’t overcome a number of obstacles that stood in its way of success.

Founded in 2000, Betfair introduced exchange wagering in the U.K., where it proved to be wildly popular. A betting exchange is a marketplace where customers set their own odds on a horse. If someone accepts those odds, the bets are matched. This also allows customers to act as bookmakers and wager that a horse will lose. Customers could also bet on the outcome of races while they were being run.

Twenty years later, Betfair has over one million customers worldwide.

Sensing that the U.S. could become a large and important market, Betfair worked with Darby Development, the operator of Monmouth Park, to change existing laws. The exchange, the first of its kind in the U.S., debuted May of 2016. In addition to Monmouth, a handful of other tracks were soon made available to Betfair customers in New Jersey.

But U.S. horseplayers never embraced the concept like their peers in the U.K. and other countries did. According to the New Jersey Racing Commission’s annual report, the exchange handled $12,371,257 in 2018. More up-to-date handle numbers were not available.

“When we launched in 2016, we felt like exchange wagering, popular elsewhere, was worth trying in New Jersey to see if it could increase new fan interest in racing,” said Kip Levin, the COO of FanDuel Group, now the parent company of Betfair. “For a variety of reasons, including a customer base used to exotic wagers and a reluctance by major US racing associations to embrace the different business model, it never hit the critical mass needed for it to be viable.”

Had Betfair been able to secure rights to accept bets on more U.S. tracks, perhaps the story would have ended differently. While able to line up several second-tier tracks, Betfair was unable to broker agreements to take bets from U.S. customers from NYRA, The Stronach Group, Churchill Downs, Del Mar and Keeneland.

“I still think the exchange is a good product that could have been successful if we were able to get signals from the major jurisdictions,” said Darby Development Chairman and CEO Dennis Drazin. “We had all the ‘B’ tracks but we didn’t have New York, California, Kentucky, Florida. I think the exchange would have been very successful if we could have gotten those tracks. Betfair tried very hard to make progress to get those signals but were just unable to do so.”

But even higher quality signals like Monmouth and Woodbine failed to attract a sizeable amount of wagers. That could have been the result of the takeout structure. One of the reasons behind Betfair’s success in the U.K. was that it charged commissions far lower than the traditional takeout. For most U.K. bettors, the commission was just 5%.

Betfair was able to charge that little because it was not required to turn over any of its profits to purses. Had it tried to do the same in the U.S. it would have had a difficult time getting tracks and horsemen’s groups to sign off on the product. Agreeing to pay U.S. tracks, Betfair charged its New Jersey customers a 12% commission.

Another factor was Betfair’s inability to expand outside New Jersey. Exchange wagering was also legalized in California, but was never made available in that state or any other state outside of New Jersey, seriously limiting Betfair’s ability to expand its customer base in the U.S.

The post Betfair to Pull Plug on NJ Betting Exchange appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

An Authentic Milestone in the Hughes Adventure

Revolutions start in the street. But it’s only once they have taken over the citadels, and adapt to the trappings and opportunities of power, that you can judge their ultimate success.

In transforming the stallion business from the bottom up, B. Wayne Hughes was aptly faithful to his own origins. The son of an Oklahoma sharecropper, he remembers a Grapes Of Wrath migration from the Dust Bowl to California with a mattress strapped to the family jalopy. He also remembers local hostility to the incomers: not least because the “Okies,” being there to work, would give full value for a day’s wage. And it was pretty much the same when he shook up the Kentucky breeding industry with radical incentive schemes for Spendthrift clients. Rival farms complained that matching his concessions would be unsustainable; would take them beyond the brink.

But Hughes felt he only needed to strike gold once, on a proliferating roster of blue-collar sires, to redeem the cost of giving them all a chance. And he promptly hit a truly historic seam. Last week, Into Mischief answered the last remaining question about his prowess: would better mares stretch his trademark speed sufficiently for him to become a bona fide Classic influence?

The signs had been promising. His cheaper books had produced Owendale and Audible (out of a Gilded Time mare) to finish strongly for Classic podiums. And remember that even Authentic, who has now set a spectacular seal on his rise, graduates from one conceived at $45,000. In the meantime, of course, Into Mischief has received giddy annual hikes to $75,000, $100,000, $150,000 and $175,000, in step with his elevation through ranks 35, 13, four and one in the general sires’ championship.

But if Authentic’s Derby is another momentous chapter in the epic Hughes tale, not least in his evangelical embrace of a mass ownership syndicate, then the course of the narrative was already clear. Before last year’s Derby, remember, Hughes had done much the same as he did this time round, with Authentic: he had booked a place at Spendthrift for the fastest colt on the Classic trail. In the event, Omaha Beach (War Front) was a late scratch as Derby favorite and instead won two Grade I sprints. But he was able to start at $45,000, the highest for any new stallion since Hughes bought the farm in 2004.

Spendthrift’s other recruits for 2020 included Breeders’ Cup winners Vino Rosso (Curlin) and Mitole (Eskendereya), at $30,000 and $25,000 respectively. Only two other farms managed to launch a stallion at Mitole’s fee (Audible at WinStar; Catholic Boy (More Than Ready) at Claiborne). In other words, you could have paid the three highest fees in the intake without leaving Spendthrift.

We’ll see what their remaining track endeavors can do to protect Authentic and also Vekoma (Candy Ride {Arg}), from the icy economic winds that must surely curl up stallion fees in 2021. But Vekoma is the third winner of the stallion-making GI Met Mile to arrive at the farm in four years. The next phase of the Hughes revolution, then, seems plain for all to see: he appears convinced that a model developed with cheaper stallions is going to prove no less effective at the top of the market.

Back in 2010, nine lucky breeders signed a Share The Upside contract for Into Mischief when–needing traction in his second season, just as the last recession was biting–an investment of $13,000 across two seasons secured a lifetime breeding right. Two years later, when Spendthrift started seven new stallions on a roster of 15, Malibu Moon still stood apart at $70,000; the average fee for the rest worked out at $9,250. By 2016, Malibu Moon was up to $95,000 and Into Mischief to $45,000; and the 23 other sires now on the roster averaged $6,900.

Young stallions were being launched with discounts and incentives on such a scale that by 2018 one prominent farm owner confided that he felt it no longer viable to stand a stallion for $10,000 or less in Kentucky. How, then, will this gentleman feel about Spendthrift rounding up so many top-class prospects?

Doubtless he has hitherto been among those who had pictured Nashua and Raise A Native turning in their graves as their “pile-’em-high” successors went to market. In the meantime, however, other commercial farms in Kentucky have meanwhile been eager to imitate the iconoclast, in the process creating precisely the kind of trading environment Hughes sought for people he views as the backbone of the industry; people he felt were previously being taken for a ride. Now he is extending opportunity–the key concept for his stallions and clients alike-right across the market.

Hughes loves to plow his own furrow; and certainly doesn’t mind ruffling Establishment feathers. His original appeal was to the kind of small-time player he had once been himself: both in his business life, where he and a partner put up $25,000 apiece to found a storage firm eventually valued at $40 billion; and in his initial explorations of the Turf. Hughes cheerfully declares that he knows nothing about breeding. He can leave that to the estimable Ned Toffey and his team. But he does know business; and he also understands human nature, by no means an unrelated attribute. In the long term, settling for a smaller profit made business sense: give his clients a piece of the action, and they would keep coming back.

Hughes challenged the sport whether it was really going to persist in trying to resuscitate some Golden Age, when the top horses were shared by a handful of plutocrats. Hence his engagement, now, with MyRacehorse. And hence, also, the upgrading of his breeding shed.

In the end, he vows, even those farms defending the very pinnacle of the traditional market will be forced to emulate his example. “You pay a bunch of money for a stallion, it’s got the best chance,” he told me once. “But his chances aren’t 100 percent. And another guy’s chance isn’t zero… Some of the horses we put in are going to end up there. It’s happening.”

That was two or three years ago, and now perhaps we can say that “it” has happened. Last year, nine other farms tried for Omaha Beach. And now, at last, a tenth Kentucky Derby winner will soon be standing at Spendthrift.

Omaha Beach will certainly have covered over 200 mares in his first season. A soaring fee, after all, did not prevent Into Mischief covering 486 mares through 2018 and 2019. Obviously that landscape is beginning to shift, with the impending 140-mare limit. From Spendthrift’s point of view, it doubtless feels as though the old guard is circling its wagons. Personally, I’d be as concerned as The Jockey Club by the potential legacy, for the breed, of so many unproven, ostensibly “commercial” stallions commanding such huge books. For every Into Mischief, clearly, there will duds by the dozen.

Whatever your views, however, we could all tip our hats to Mr. Hughes last Saturday. He is an authentic pioneer. With a nod to the source of his fortune, you might well say that he thinks “outside the box.” And now, having changed our whole industry, he is changing the complexion of his own business. He is cornering stallions that would be a perfectly good fit for a venerable rival such as Claiborne. At the same time, he is parlaying those trademark principles of accessibility and inclusion to racehorse ownership.

Can we ever have too much of a good thing? Even if you’re as smart as Hughes, it’s in the nature of the Thoroughbred that we are unlikely ever to find out. But it’s interesting, and on many levels admirable, to see someone trying to find out.

The post An Authentic Milestone in the Hughes Adventure appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights