Vaccarezzas Win $1M Veterinary Negligence Jury Verdict

Carlo and Priscilla Vaccarezza won a $1.06-million jury award in a California court Feb. 25 over a veterinary malpractice and negligence lawsuit against the Equine Medical Center and Dr. Vince Baker, who is the longtime attending veterinarian for trainer Bob Baffert.

The case dates to the 2014 Breeders' Cup and a filly the Vaccarezzas owned and trained, Little Alexis. The couple alleged that she was mistreated by Baker for a lump on her jugular vein and cleared to race. Not only did Little Alexis finish ninth in the GI Filly & Mare Sprint at Santa Anita Park, but her condition became so grave that she was unable to fly to Kentucky right after the Breeders' Cup to sell as planned at the Fasig-Tipton November Sale.

The Vaccarezzas kept her in training, but Little Alexis never again competed in graded stakes. She had been appraised for $1.5 million as a stakes-winning racing prospect who was competitive in Grade I races, but later sold for far less than that amount, at $440,000.

The jury's award represents the difference in valuation from actual sales price, and the defendants will also be on the hook for interest accrued since Nov. 3, 2014, the date Little Alexis would have been sold.

“The case probably sent a message loud and clear that we need to hold vets accountable for their actions,” owner/trainer Carlo Vaccarezza told TDN via phone Tuesday.

“Number one, [Baker] put my filly at risk to get an aneurism or a heart attack,” Vaccarezza said. “Number two, he put the other horses at risk if she broke down. Number three, he put my jockey Joel Rosario at risk. Number four, he put all the other jockeys at risk.

“And number five, not only that, he defrauded the public because they bet over $5 million on that race, and Dr. Baker was the only person who knew that that filly was sick. The public didn't know she was sick. They didn't know she had no shot in the race,” Vaccarezza said.

Asked to comment on behalf of her client, Baker's attorney, Lisa Brown, told TDN via email that, “We believe the case was incorrectly decided and are reviewing all options for further action.”

James Morgan, the lawyer for the Vaccarezzas, told TDN via email that the rapid verdict (after just 2 1/4 hours of jury deliberation) for the full amount of damages requested is a “confirmation as to how the real world will insist on 'accountability.'

“Some battles need to be fought,” Morgan continued. “Of all the battles in and around the horse industry, this was the most satisfying…. It is a victory for those who cherish shining the light on the truth and a defeat for those who choose to harm others by keeping them in the dark by hiding important information.”

Morgan noted that the current controversies surrounding trainer Bob Baffert weren't allowed to be communicated to jurors as they pondered the fate of the veterinarian who for decades has been closely associated with the immensely successful but recently equine-drug troubled trainer.

“The jury received no information about the connection between Dr. Baker and Bob Baffert, Medina Spirit, the 73 pages of accusations filed by the Attorney General for the California Veterinary Medical Board, or the issues pertaining to Dr. [Jeff] Blea,” Morgan wrote. “All the jury heard was the facts of this case.”

Those facts, as alleged in the suit first filed in 2015 in Los Angeles County Superior Court, date to Oct. 31, 2014, the day before Little Alexis was scheduled to start in the Breeders' Cup. The 3-year-old filly had an elevated temperature and Vaccarezza noticed a bump on her left jugular vein.

Baker agreed to treat Little Alexis, and advised the groom to apply hot and cold packs for the bump, Morgan told TDN. Vaccarezza said Baker took a blood sample but did not actually tell him any tests were being done.

Morgan said it would be nearly two years–long after the alleged miscommunication occurred and well after the initial lawsuit was filed–before either he or Vaccarezza learned that Baker had actually gotten test results back the same day they were taken but still didn't mention them to Vaccarezza.

“Instead, on Nov. 1, the morning of the race, Mr. Vaccarezza asked Dr. Baker if Little Alexis would be good to run and reminded him that she would fly out the next morning to be sold at auction in Kentucky,” Morgan explained. “Dr. Baker responded that the filly is good to run. At no point did Dr. Baker tell Mr. Vaccarezza about the complete blood count (CBC) or the serum amyloid A (SAA) test results.”

Morgan argued in court that the CBC was “high and abnormal.” The SAA Value (which measures a protein synthesized by the liver that increases dramatically with inflammation) was an alarming 2,534, far outside a healthy horse's normal range of 0 to 15.

“By concealing the test results, attention was deflected away from the jugular vein issue,” Morgan wrote.

Experts who testified on behalf of the plaintiffs stated that they had never seen an SAA level that high.

“The horse had an inflammatory process going on and the standard of care would have been to advise the owner of the results and scratch the horse,” Morgan wrote.

After Little Alexis beat only one horse in the Filly & Mare Sprint, her temperature spiked again and the jugular bump grew much larger.

“When she came back from the race, she had a 104.7 fever. It's amazing she didn't drop dead,” Vaccarezza said.

With that high a fever, the filly could not get a health certificate to fly out the next morning to sell as hip number 150 at the Fasig-Tipton sale.

The Vaccarezzas gave Little Alexis a five-month break and she returned to racing in April at Gulfstream Park. She ran second, fourth and second in non-graded stakes, then won her final start, the Barely Even H., June 20, 2015.

“The jugular issue would get larger whenever she was asked to go at full speed,” Morgan explained.

Little Alexis sold to WinStar Farm at the Fasig-Tipton mixed sale in November 2015 for $440,000.

Morgan wrote that the exact amount of money coming to the Vaccarezzas via the court judgment will be finalized after the parties “haggle over” the awarding of costs associated with the verdict.

“It was impressive to me how this jury of 12 individuals, none of which had ever seen a horse race, went about their assigned tasks,” Morgan wrote. “Juries typically protect and preserve issues that resonate with them as pertinent to public health and safety. The universal safety standard applicable in our case was that health care professionals must disclose all abnormal test results.

“The unknown back story is that originally this case was based solely on the left jugular vein injury,” Morgan explained. “We were over a year and a half into the case before we obtained a copy of those test results through discovery. The case then changed, and focus was on the nondisclosure of the abnormal CBC and the humongous 2,534 SAA.

“”The negligence claim focused on Dr. Baker's choice to hide the adverse test results from Carlo,” Morgan wrote. “Those results had been concealed. That is negligence. The horse would have been scratched and neither harm to the horse nor damages to the Vaccarezzas would have occurred if the results had been disclosed.”

Morgan also offered a prediction on the defendants' next move.

“In what others have referred to as a 'well-worn playbook,' the predicable next play is to undermine the jurors' verdict, seek immunity from accountability, and to brazenly proclaim vindication will be theirs on appeal,” Morgan wrote.

“Needlessly risking the health and safety of any horse by keeping adverse test results hidden is not the message the public needs to hear…again,” Morgan wrote. “Acknowledging responsibility and accepting the consequences is better for the industry and public perceptions after an avoidable loss occurs.”

Vaccarezza put it this way: “We needed to win [the case] because we need to clear the sport. There's so much pollution and we have to get to the bottom of this. This is a phenomenal, phenomenal sport and we're given bad press every single day. My solution: If a trainer gets 30 days [suspended], the owner should get 30 days, and the vet should get 30 days. You put those rules in place and I guarantee you that people will stop these shenanigans.”

The post Vaccarezzas Win $1M Veterinary Negligence Jury Verdict appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Baffert Sues CDI, Carstanjen & Rankin Over Suspension

Trainer Bob Baffert has filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky against Churchill Downs Inc. (CDI), CDI CEO Bill Carstanjen and CDI Board Chair Alex Rankin. Baffert is seeking a preliminary or permanent injunction that will enjoin Churchill from barring him. At present, Baffert cannot compete in the 2022 or 2023 runnings of the GI Kentucky Derby or any other races at Churchill or Churchill-owned tracks.

He  is also fighting a separate action from the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission, which suspended him for 90 days after Medina Spirit (Protonico) tested positive for betamethasone in last year's Derby.

“The notion that Churchill Downs, which is not even tasked with regulating horse racing in Kentucky, could unilaterally ban a trainer by an edict coupled in a press release without having the facts or any semblance of due process should arouse outrage in any fair-minded person,” said Baffert's attorney Clark Brewster.

Shortly after the lawsuit was filed, Churchill issued a scathing statement, declaring that its fight against Baffert was about protecting the integrity of racing.

“The lawsuit filed by Bob Baffert is disappointing, but certainly not surprising,” the statement read. “His claims are meritless and consistent with his pattern of failed drug tests, denials, excuses and attempts to blame others and identify loopholes in order to avoid taking responsibility for his actions. These actions have harmed the reputations of the Kentucky Derby, Churchill Downs and the entire Thoroughbred racing industry. Churchill Downs will fight this baseless lawsuit and defend our company's rights. What's at stake here is the integrity of our races, the safety of horses and the trust of the millions of fans and bettors who join us every year on the first Saturday in May.”

The Baffert side did not mince words, either. The lawsuit charges that “CDI has, with malicious intent, caused significant damage to Baffert's ability to conduct his customary business on a national scale. From context, it is apparent that CDI's targeted sanctions have the singular aim of destroying Baffert's career.”

The crux of Baffert's case against Churchill is twofold, that the ban deprives him of his right to due process and that only the state racing commission is permitted to issue a ban against trainers.

“Despite the prevalence of actual reckless and dangerous conduct by others trainers and owners (which have sometimes culminated in Racing Commission suspensions), CDI has arbitrarily and capriciously singled out Baffert for this baseless sanction in violation of Baffert's procedural and substantive due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution,” the suit reads.

A federal court ruled that the New York Racing Association violated Baffert's due process rights when issuing a suspension of its own against the trainer. That forced NYRA to hold a hearing into the Baffert matter, the results of which have yet to be determined. However, NYRA is a quasi-state organization and the courts generally treat such an entity differently than they do a privately held company like Churchill. In most cases, private tracks can ban individuals and do so without due process.

On the issue of whether or not Churchill can ban an individual, Baffert's legal team is arguing that such a suspension can only be handed down by a racing commission.

“Baffert expressly agreed to cooperate with the Racing Commission's regulatory process when he entered horses at Churchill Downs and to submit to any penalties imposed after a final order issued by that body. Baffert's culpability, if

any, will be determined in that forum,” the suit reads.

The lawsuit also seeks to force Churchill to award points for the Kentucky Oaks and Derby in the event a Baffert-horse places in a prep race. Churchill has declared that all Baffert-trainees are not eligible to earn any points in the preps, still another factor that might keep Baffert's horses out of those races.

But even if Baffert can win this round in court that does not mean he will be eligible to compete in the Derby. In order to do so, he will also have to find a way through the courts to get a stay of the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission's ban, which is set to begin Mar. 8.

The post Baffert Sues CDI, Carstanjen & Rankin Over Suspension appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Penny Breakage Among Gaming Legislation Introduced in KY

Kentucky State representative Adam Koenig (R-Erlanger) introduced four new gaming-related bills Monday, including one (HB 607) dealing with pari-mutuel wagering taxation that includes a provision whereby dividends on pari-mutuel wagers would be rounded to the nearest penny, rather than the nearest $0.10.

“This is an exciting step for horseplayers, not only in Kentucky but really anyone in America or around the world who bets into the pools offered on Kentucky racing,” said Pat Cummings, Executive Director of the Thoroughbred Idea Foundation, which has been a staunch advocate for a switch to penny breakage.

“We are hopeful for its favorable passage and, in the end, provide horseplayers with the most substantive reform of breakage provisions in American history. It is a great sign that Kentucky is leading the way and offer our great thanks for the support of Chairman Koenig.”

HB 606, sponsored by Koenig and Rep. Alan Gentry (D-Louisville), aims for Kentucky to join the growing national trend of legalizing sports betting. Under the proposal, racetracks would be among the venues legally allowed to accept bets on other sports.

Click here for Koenig's appearance on the TDN Writers' Room podcast in January.

The post Penny Breakage Among Gaming Legislation Introduced in KY appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Blea Seeks California Superior Court Relief From Suspension

Sidelined California Horse Racing Board (CHRB) equine medical director Jeff Blea has filed a writ of mandate with the California Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles seeking to lift the California Veterinary Medical Board's interim suspension on his veterinary license.

The court filing, dated Feb. 24, also seeks declarative and injunctive relief, arguing that the position of equine medical director does not require an active license, and that Blea, UC Davis and the CHRB will continue to suffer “irreparable harm” if California horse racing's head veterinarian remains unable to fulfill his duties.

UC Davis placed Blea on administrative leave from his role as equine medical director in January. That position is first appointed by the dean of UC Davis, which then contracts with the CHRB for the appointee's services.

In the interim, UC Davis has used “school personnel” to fulfill the duties of the equine medical director for the CHRB.

Monday, Blea also set the ball officially rolling towards a formal hearing on the veterinary board's accusations against him, filing a notice of defense.

In the meantime, Blea will also likely seek to stay the interim suspension of his veterinary license until the Superior Court can officially hear the matter, explained his attorney, George Wallace.

Another purpose of the stay would be to potentially delay the formal hearing on the accusations against Blea so that the veterinary board receives guidance from the Superior Court “on what the law is,” said Wallace.

At the start of the year, the veterinary board announced that an emergency hearing had resulted in an interim suspension of Blea's veterinary license for a number of alleged offenses, including purportedly administering medications to racehorses without a prior examination, without forming a diagnosis and without medical necessity.

The veterinary board also claimed that Blea presents a “danger to public health, safety and welfare,” due to his oversight as equine medical director of the high-profile investigation into the death of the Bob Baffert-trained Medina Spirit (Protonico), the Kentucky Derby winner who collapsed and died after a scheduled workout Dec. 6 at Santa Anita.

The necropsy and postmortem review of Medina Spirit's death is now complete, with the cause of death undetermined. John Pascoe, the executive associate dean of UC Davis's School of Veterinary Medicine, ultimately oversaw the necropsy examination.

According to various leading veterinary medical experts, the veterinary board's accusations levelled against Blea—including amended accusations from earlier this month—consist largely of lax record keeping.

Veterinary experts also suggest that the veterinary board's investigation potentially failed to account for the unusual nature of veterinary practice on the backstretch, where veterinarians–even those with multiple barns under their care–can build the sort of daily relationship with their animals absent from traditional small animal practice.

In his filing with the Superior Court, Blea argues that the interim suspension of his veterinary license is invalid for several reasons, including how the administrative law judge who issued the suspension used a “preponderance of evidence” to support her decision, instead of the legally required higher standard based on “clear and convincing proof to a reasonable certainty.”

The judge's findings “are not supported by the weight of the evidence, or by any substantial evidence, or at all,” the filing states.

Furthermore, even though Blea retired from medical practice in June of last year–to assume the role of equine medical director–there is “no substantial evidence” to suggest that even if he were still practicing, he poses a “danger” to anyone, the filing states.

“The Accusation is devoid of any assertion, or suggestion, that any equine patient of Dr. Blea was harmed in any way, or that any of Dr. Blea's clients (the owners and trainers of those horses, the “consumers” of veterinary services whose interests are to be protected by the Veterinary Medical Board) have the slightest complaint about his professional practices in the care of those patients,” the filing adds.

The veterinary board has also argued that the statutory definition of the equine medical director position means that Blea is actively engaging in veterinary medicine by conducting his duties.

In his Superior Court filing, Blea takes issue with that assessment, arguing that the veterinary board's reading of the state's Business and Professions Code is “overbroad and unreasonable,” and is incorrect “as a matter of law.”

The CHRB has thrown its weight behind Blea. Earlier this month, senior CHRB officials said that the agency was contemplating a similar legal intervention in the Superior Court on Blea's behalf.

Monday, CHRB executive director, Scott Chaney, explained the agency is still in the process of finalizing that strategy.

The TDN also asked UC Davis if Blea would resume his equine medical director duties if California Superior Court grants a stay on his interim suspension. UC Davis has yet to respond.

The post Blea Seeks California Superior Court Relief From Suspension appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights