1/ST Racing Considering Moving Date of the Preakness; NYRA Not on Board with Move

1/ST Racing & Gaming is ready to shake up the Triple Crown.

The company, which operates Pimlico Race Course, has confirmed to the TDN that it is giving strong consideration to moving the date of the GI Preakness S. so that it is run four weeks after the GI Kentucky Derby.

“We have discussed it internally and believe it's in the best interests of horses and horse safety to move the race four weeks after the Kentucky Derby,” said Aidan Butler, Chief Executive Officer of 1/ST Racing & Gaming. “This would give horses more time to recover between races to be able to run in the Preakness. Horse safety is more important than tradition. NYRA is aware and considering how this would impact the Belmont. Stay tuned.”

Butler said there would be no further comment at this time.

Should the date of the Preakness get changed, the next move will be up to NYRA, which hosts the GI Belmont. If the Preakness is moved to four weeks after the Derby that would mean that, unless NYRA also shifts the date of the Belmont, the Belmont would be run just one week after the Preakness. That may be exactly what happens.

“NYRA has concerns about fundamental changes to the structure of the Triple Crown. We have no plans to move the date of the Belmont Stakes,” said NYRA spokesperson Pat McKenna.

The current structure of the Triple Crown works far better for the Belmont than it does for the Preakness. With five weeks between the Derby and Belmont, a number of trainers pass the Preakness and go next in the Belmont.

Traditionally, the Triple Crown is run over a five-week period, with two weeks between the Derby and the Preakness and three weeks between the Preakness and the Belmont. While that may be a long-standing tradition, it has clearly become an impediment to drawing horses to the Preakness because modern trainers are very reluctant to run their horses back within two weeks. In 2022, Kentucky Derby winner Rich Strike (Keen Ice) skipped the Preakness and waited for the Belmont. This year, Kentucky Derby winner Mage (Good Magic) was the only horse from the Derby to run back in the Preakness.

These developments have led to added support for changing the spacing of the races. Just last month, Tom Rooney, the president and CEO of the National Thoroughbred Racing Association, penned an editorial calling for the races be spread further apart. “The time has come in Thoroughbred racing for our own change, to modernize the timeline of the Triple Crown,” he wrote.

The post 1/ST Racing Considering Moving Date of the Preakness; NYRA Not on Board with Move appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Letter to the Editor: On The Triple Crown

Since the advent of professional sports, change has been a necessary part of the game. Adjustments have been made to make sports more safe, more practical, and more entertaining for the audiences. While change is never easy, sometimes it's necessary. From adding the three-point line in basketball, to implementing more stringent concussion protocols in football, to adding the pitch clock in baseball, making changes in sports doesn't mean taking away from the sport. Instead, change helps the sport evolve with the times, and make the experience as positive as possible for the athletes, teams, enthusiasts, and owners. The time has come in Thoroughbred racing for our own change, to modernize the timeline of the Triple Crown.

The current timeline was created in a different era in racing, back in 1932, 13 years after Sir Barton was the first to win the Kentucky Derby, Preakness, and Belmont Stakes in 1919. In fact, the term Triple Crown wasn't even used until Gallant Fox won the three races in 1930. In the 91 years since the five-week timeline was created, a lot has changed in racing and there are many benefits worth considering to potentially change the structure we have today. Instead of these condensed five weeks, what if the Kentucky Derby stayed the first Saturday in May, the Preakness was the first Saturday in June, and the Belmont was the first Saturday in July. Leaving multiple weeks in between three of the industry's most high-profile races, racing the top three-year-olds, would lend to a smoother transition between events and a more competitive, robust field to compete for the coveted Triple Crown. Incidentally, this new plan leaves about a month before the start of Del Mar and Saratoga which should satisfy the same cadence.

Trainers today have different philosophies than those in the past, and normally allow several weeks between races for top horses. For example, the 128 horses that competed in the Triple Crown races from 1979 to1983 made 3,769 starts in their career; 1,585 of those starts came within 14 days or fewer of their last start. By contrast, the 96 horses that competed in the Triple Crown races from 2007 to 2011 made 1,870 starts in their career and just 98 of those starts came within 14 days or fewer of their last start. Because of this change in training philosophy, many of the top horses from the Kentucky Derby that do not win skip the Preakness, solely because of the quick turnaround between races. What's more, as the industry continues to focus on improving safety and welfare standards for the horses and jockeys, you would be hard-pressed to find a trainer or owner who would choose to race at any level after two weeks. So why take that risk on the biggest stage? Tradition? As stated, other sports have evolved and adapted to the times. The tradition argument presumes all tradition is good, which is not necessarily true.

This year's Kentucky Derby was the second-most watched sporting event in this country, second only to the Super Bowl. Millions of viewers tuned in, picked their horses, and wished for the best. A lot of people spend a great deal of time getting to know the Derby contenders to place their bets. Imagine the increased interest there would be if more Derby contenders ran in the Preakness and the Belmont. I believe this would lead to even more excitement and rivalries throughout the Triple Crown season to see who really is the top 3-year-old in the country. Even a horse that ends up being scratched in the Derby like 2-year-old champion Forte gets a lot of coverage. Under a better separation of races, it's very conceivable that Forte could have run in the Preakness. But because of the existing rules and timing of his scratch, a quick turnaround to the Preakness was impossible. Under a more pragmatic Triple Crown schedule that might not be the case.

Of course, the three races are the property of Churchill Downs, the Maryland Jockey Club and the New York Racing Association. Ultimately, any change to an individual leg would be made solely by the respective organization. But this is a decades-old debate that is worth bringing to the forefront of public mind.

We all know winning a Triple Crown is an elusive goal. Twenty-five years separated the victories of Citation (1948) and Secretariat (1973), and nearly 40 years separated the victories of Affirmed (1978) and American Pharoah (2015). There's no saying if a change to the racing schedule would make any difference in this. But it is possible that by adjusting the schedule, Thoroughbred racing could see increased competition among the best horses and an expanded window of heightened mainstream interest. For those reasons alone, it's worth the discussion.

Tom Rooney is the president and CEO of the National Thoroughbred Racing Association. He is a former member of the US House of Representatives, serving Florida's 17th Congressional District. He and his family own and operate Shamrock Farm, a Thoroughbred breeding farm in Carroll County, Maryland.

The post Letter to the Editor: On The Triple Crown appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

NTRA Releases Names of Disqualified NHC Players

The National Thoroughbred Racing Association announced the disqualification of three unnamed players from the NHC and NHC Tour for a period of two years on Thursday. After hearing input from the horseplayer community and others in the industry, the NTRA revealed on Friday that the players who colluded are Jordan Jayne, James Pauly and Ryan Patrick Scully.

“Protecting the integrity of the NTRA and the NHC tournament is among my highest priorities in this job,” said NTRA President and CEO Tom Rooney. “By not initially releasing the names of the players involved, even though our rules give us broad discretion to do so for all prize winners, I believed I was doing what was best for the NHC. The demand from the public we have received far outweighs my personal beliefs. I highly value the opinion of the horseplayers' community, without whom our sport would not be what it is and whom we work with to protect all NHC sanctioned contests throughout the year.”

These three players controlled five entries in the 2023 NHC. The event paid out to the top 78 entries. The NTRA has officially disqualified the five entries controlled by these individuals and will proceed to move all other entries up in the prize structure. The entries that finished 79-83 who did not make the initial cut will be moved into the prize structure. Additionally, the NTRA will distribute the difference in prize money for all other entries that move up in the prize structure. The NTRA will mail checks to all individuals involved and the official leaderboard has been updated.

The post NTRA Releases Names of Disqualified NHC Players appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Florida Trainers Sure to Feel Impact of Draconian New Immigration Law

Last month, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed into state law the self-described “strongest anti-illegal immigration legislation in the country.”

Under the new statute–the bulk of which goes into effect on July 1–business owners with 25 or more employees must use E-Verify to confirm the immigration status of new hires, and be subjected to enforceable penalties for employing undocumented workers, as well as stricter penalties for sending undocumented workers across state lines to work in Florida, among other provisions.

When enforced, the new stringent laws are highly likely to impact everyone in the industry from trainers, farm managers, and the workers themselves. The TDN reached out to several stakeholders either based in Florida or who regularly race there. Some were unaware of the new law, while others downplayed its impacts.

According to Julio Rubio, backstretch services coordinator and Hispanic liaison for the Kentucky Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association, an unusual amount of backstretch workers have recently come to Kentucky from Florida.

Rubio has also fielded calls from trainers in Florida who have already lost employees. “Some of them left for South Carolina. Illinois. They're just getting out of there,” Rubio said.

Immigration experts warn that the bill contains key provisions that employers should be aware of if they're planning to do business in Florida.

According to Will Velie, an immigration attorney with many clients in the racing industry, what is startling about the bill is that it co-opts state governmental agencies into enforcing federal immigration laws.

“The state is creating its own role in this which is unprecedented,” Velie said. “This is by far the biggest incursion of state law into the federal immigration domain.”

For trainers shipping horses into Florida to race from out of state, a notable provision under Senate Bill 1718 is the criminalization of “knowingly or willingly” sending into Florida an undocumented individual across state lines–what could amount to a state felony.

According to Albany-based immigration attorney, Leonard D'Arrigo, of the law firm Harris Beach, the language of the bill is frustratingly vague. For example, the bill states that the employer would only be at risk of prosecution if they know, or “reasonably” should have known, that the employee is undocumented. Nevertheless, he recommends that employers take nothing for granted.

“You have to be thinking about, 'who are we driving into the state if they get pulled over by the police and asked for documentation to prove legal status?'” said D'Arrigo. “If they're unable to prove legal status, there's liability–the employer could ultimately be responsible.”

Another key change is that employers with 25 or more employees must now use the electronic employment verification system, E-Verify, to check the immigration status for all new employees. If the system red-flags the individual as undocumented, then the business employs that person at its own risk.

Importantly, an employer must retain a copy of the documents used by an employee to prove their immigrations status, along with the official verification generated by E-Verify, for at least three years.

This requirement for employers is important. The bill authorizes the state to request any copies of documents used for employment verification purposes from business owners. And come July 1 next year, state law enforcement will be able to perform audits of businesses it believes isn't following E-Verify requirements.

According to D'Arrigo, the added layer of paperwork from E-Verify will likely hamper hiring practices for trainers and farm owners in Florida. This is a state where 25% of the workforce are immigrants, and where about 65% of agricultural and equine-related jobs are filled by immigrant workers.

Furthermore, there are estimated to be over 710,000 undocumented individuals in the Florida workforce. A 2021 report found that some 42% of Florida's farm workers are undocumented.

“They've been getting by for years without this additional scrutiny,” said D'Arrigo, of the current system whereby immigrant workers present “I-9 documentation” to illustrate proof of work status–what often proves a “good faith” arrangement.

“Now, employers are going to know immediately whether those documents are fake or whether they're real,” D'Arrigo said, who emphasized how the new E-Verify requirements only apply to new hires.

The possible sanctions aren't exactly chump change.

For employers who fail to use E-Verify as required three times in any 24-month period, for example, the state can impose fines of $1,000 a day “until the employer provides sufficient proof to the department that the noncompliance is cured.”

Furthermore, the new law also creates incrementally more serious violation sanctions to business owners pinned to the number of undocumented workers employed there and frequency of violations, said D'Arrigo. In a worst-case scenario, the employer could lose their state business license.

At the same time, a worker found to use false identification to gain employment faces a possible $5,000 fine and a five-year prison sentence.

While the new E-Verify requirements apply only to companies with 25 or more employees, D'Arrigo cautions for smaller businesses and their workers to be mindful in other ways.

Trainers and farm owners near the 25-employee cut off need to be vigilant if they exceed that threshold at any time, as this will dramatically affect their hiring practices.

Another important wrinkle in the new immigration landscape in Florida concerns the ability to legally take to the road. According to D'Arrigo, the state Department of Motor Vehicles is expected to maintain a list of drivers' licenses that other states issue to undocumented individuals. Why is this important?

The new law bars counties and municipalities from issuing identification documents like drivers' licenses to individuals unable to prove their legal immigration status. At the same time, Florida law enforcement officers will be ordered to issue citations to anyone using one of the out-of-state licenses listed by the DMV who is unable to prove legal immigration status, said D'Arrigo.

“It's only going to come up if somebody gets pulled over in the normal course of a traffic violation. At that point, the law enforcement officer is directed, if it's one of those out-of-state licenses, to ensure that the person is legally in the U.S.,” said D'Arrigo. “If not, they're to issue them a citation.”

Then comes the issue of workplace injuries. “If somebody gets injured at the track and they're undocumented, they can usually get emergency aid,” said D'Arrigo.

As of July 1, Florida hospitals accepting Medicaid are required to collect patient immigration information on administration or registration forms. These same hospitals are also required to provide a caveat on forms stating that the response will not affect patient care or result in a referral to the immigration authorities. But that's still not enough to allay workers' fears, warned D'Arrigo.

“Although the law says that they cannot share that information, it's still possible it will be shared nonetheless, and potentially transmitted to immigration authorities,” said D'Arrigo. “So, [undocumented] workers are now going to be hesitant to get the medical care that they need because they're going to be fearful from being on the record.”

For Velie, the most chilling provision in the law is that it opens the door for individuals to report to the authorities a “good faith” belief that certain employees are unauthorized. Such a report would require the Florida Department of Economic Development to investigate the complaint–a new dynamic that is likely to generate a “climate of fear” among businesses and immigrant workers, said Velie.

“If I'm [someone looking to make trouble], all I have to do is say with a good faith belief that there's somebody employed without authorization [on the backstretch], and the Florida Department of Economic Development has to investigate,” said Velie. “If somebody's just bent on causing problems, they've got a good way to do that.”

When asked about the immigration climate in Florida, Tom Rooney, National Thoroughbred Racing Association (NTRA) president and CEO, pointed to the H-2B guest worker program as a labor safety net.

Because of the sheer demand for H2-B visas and the limited supply, however, it's unlikely to prove an adequate fix to Florida's immigrant labor gaps.

“The National Thoroughbred Racing Association has long advocated on the Federal level for solutions for the industry, like a permanent returning worker exemption, and will continue to do so,” wrote Rooney in an email, pointing to long-identified problems with the H-2B system.

“For those trainers with over 25 employees for which this law applies we will continue to work diligently at the federal level with our partners in the H-2B Coalition to push for more workers to help fill the need,” Rooney added.

The post Florida Trainers Sure to Feel Impact of Draconian New Immigration Law appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights