The Comments Section: Your Reactions To The Jockey Club’s Rescission Of The Mare Cap

Over a year after permanently disabling comments on The Paulick Report, the comments section is back! Well, sort of. We can't fire up story comments again. The number of hours our staff was collectively losing in moderation was too great, and the few bad actors out there made it too labor-intensive to continue, even as we tried many different systems to combat them. The good news is, we are still including reader voices here on the Paulick Report with this feature. Read a previous edition here.

In this edition, we're collecting the many, many thoughts we're seeing in the Twitterverse and in our inboxes about The Jockey Club's decision on Feb. 17 to rescind the cap it had instituted on the number of mares bred to stallions born in 2020 or after. Read the full announcement from The Jockey Club here.

 

Want to email us your thoughts? Click Ask Ray in the red header bar. Please include a good contact email where the staff can reach you with questions. 

The post The Comments Section: Your Reactions To The Jockey Club’s Rescission Of The Mare Cap appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Adrienne Hall: USTA Should Focus On Harness Racing’s Real Problem

The following commentary by Adrienne Hall is in response to a letter published in Harness Racing Update from Russell Williams, president of the United States Trotting Association, defending the USTA's revocation of Hall's membership in the organization following her testimony in the federal trial of Seth Fishman, who was convicted of drug adulteration and misbranding. 

In response to his comments about me in the HRU, I have the following to say:

Russell Williams is veering from the facts and being disingenuous regarding the USTA's true motives. The USTA did not make the decision to take my membership based on my testimony.  T.C. Lane, CEO of the USTA, acknowledged to my attorney that it was done prior to my transcript being available and occurred after reading the one initial media report. Unlike the New Jersey Racing Commission, which waited to receive context from me and discuss the matter, the USTA was looking for a quick press release and nothing more when they revoked my membership. I've not held back once from speaking with any organization looking to learn more of the facts. The USTA's action and silence toward me feels as if it is a “punish the source” mentality instead of about cleaning up the game.

I did not have a “history” of using Performance Enhancing Drugs. In fact, this was my very first year in the harness business. If Williams thinks I walked into the barn knowing anything about drugs or pre-racing, guess again. He should be more concerned and utterly embarrassed that in the backyard of the USTA headquarters, one of the biggest dealers of illegal drugs was allowed free rein of the Ohio horses and trainers for years before the Feds stepped in to stop him.

If anyone at his organization were doing their job, the government, 5 Stones, Jockey Club and Jeff Gural would not have had to do it for them. No matter how many times he wants to state as fact that I reached out to Fishman solely to acquire PEDs, it doesn't mean it is true. Testimony and text messages put into evidence clearly show that I innocently reached out to Fishman to perform a lameness exam and to be my horses' primary vet in Florida. Other text messages brought in as evidence between Fishman and Gianelli show them discussing me as being “not very knowledgeable.” I was naïve.

In my testimony I did say that it was my understanding that had I been caught administering anything to my horses, I could potentially be in big trouble. What Russell was not privy to were the conversations that I had with the Feds and the FBI about this and they were hopeful that any governing body of a sport would be inclined to look more at the positives from my cooperation as opposed to focusing solely on the admissions I made.

Russell mentions BB3, TB7, etc..as some form of “gotcha” but can he tell me what they are? Has anyone had a positive test for these things? I did not want Epogen or to hurt my horses and I made that abundantly clear. What may be the biggest irony here is that while these drugs are untestable on race day, and he uses them as examples of my cheating, Williams and the USTA have fought HISA and its desire to implement comprehensive out-of competition testing that might very well have an impact on these substances' ability to be used; all while simultaneously touting how clean the industry's race day testing results are as a way to laughably argue against the need for HISA.

While what I did was wrong and I owned up to it despite never being indicted and working for two years with the Feds with no guarantees of the outcome, the USTA and Russell Williams' response to the criminal cases and my situation only goes to show where the real problem in harness racing lay.

Whether it be the USTA turning a blind eye to the thousands of horses who are ending up in kill pens, moving to eliminate Freezebrands to make the horses unidentifiable, or fighting Congress, WHOA, HISA, The Jockey Club, Breeders' Cup, Jeff Gural and USADA's efforts to clean up the sport, their arrogance and disregard for the issues in racing is telling. An organization that ignores their own board member, Joe Faraldo's, ties to indicted trainers, ignores the Fishman client list that became public recently, pushes back on everyone from Congress to aftercare entities while attacking a trainer with two horses in her care as the problem, is either arrogant, clueless, crooked, a part of the bigger problem, or probably all of the above.

The truth is, my situation is meaningless in the scope of the problems in racing, but they are using it to take the heat off of themselves and to appease the mob on social media (who before my testimony had them in their crosshairs).  For the president of any organization seeking credibility to deem my admitted mental health struggles during this situation as “entertaining” pretty much says it all. It's at best a diversion, a redirect, and childish while at the same time making clear he does not have the horses, industry or industry participants' best interests at heart.

I made a mistake. I owned up to that mistake. I did so willingly and would do it again even now knowing that it has resulted in what is probably my last race in the Standardbred industry. What I won't own or accept is the fact that a monopolistic entity and its leadership that is solely interested in protecting their own personal interests is going to set the narrative and lie their way towards making the public believe they give a damn.

The post Adrienne Hall: USTA Should Focus On Harness Racing’s Real Problem appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

The Friday Show: Trials And Tribulations Of Federal Horse Doping Probe

Andrew Cohen is an attorney, legal analyst, journalist, senior editor of the Marshall Project and a Standardbred owner. In those various roles, he has a unique perspective on the federal horse doping investigation that shocked the racing world nearly two years ago with the indictments of more than two dozen individuals, including trainers from both Thoroughbred and Standardbred racing.

Cohen joins Paulick Report publisher Ray Paulick and editor-in-chief Natalie Voss on this week's Friday Show to review developments in the federal probe and discuss what may lie ahead for those awaiting trial, and whether or not history suggests more indictments may be on the way.

The subject of the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority also was raised in the discussion, as was the opposition to this independent regulatory agency by the United States Trotting Association, which plays an important role in the harness racing industry.

Source of original post

‘Broken Systems And Cronyism’: WHOA Advisory Board Says Horseracing Integrity And Safety Authority Will Flounder Without USADA

The Water Hay Oats Alliance (WHOA) is a grassroots movement of like-minded individuals who support the passage of federal legislation to prohibit the use of performance-enhancing drugs in the sport of horse racing. The appointment of an independent anti-doping program run by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) will resolve the problem of widespread drug use in American racing and put U.S. racing jurisdictions in step with international standards.

Doping destroys public confidence in racing, defrauds the betting fan, weakens the genetic pool, and, most importantly, puts the life and limb of our equine athletes and their jockeys at risk. It is obvious that after years of committee review and discussion, America's racing industry cannot police itself by eliminating the proliferation of performance-enhancing drugs in our sport, nor does it possess the power to adequately punish the purveyors of these drugs.

It was the summer of 2012…
Our original team of supporters had just returned from a trip to Washington, D.C., lobbying for drug and medication reform in U.S. racing. The legislation then was entitled The Interstate Horseracing Improvement Act of 2011 sponsored by Congressman Ed Whitfield (R-KY). It called to amend the Interstate Horseracing Act of 1978 (IHA). After that trip, it was obvious that the racing industry would never support those measures, so we began discussions with the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) to help address the intractable issue of doping in racing.

We decided that our individual voices would make a greater impact if we banded together under one umbrella, with one voice. It was crystal clear that our goal would be to find a way to put USADA in a place of independent management and oversight.

That was the beginning of the Water Hay Oats Alliance (WHOA). Over time, owners, breeders, trainers, jockeys, and industry professionals joined our ranks. We included racing fans and handicappers, partners in our sport. We included members of all racing disciplines: Thoroughbred, Standardbred, and Quarter Horse racing.

Since that time, USADA has played an integral role as a valued partner in efforts to pass the industry-shifting reform legislation that created HISA. USADA chief executive officer Travis Tygart and his  team have shared their time and expertise, often at their own expense, educating countless individuals and racing industry groups about the importance of clean sport and what USADA's gold standard program could do to better racing.

Today, WHOA has grown from that handful of advocates to over 2,000 industry stakeholders:  over 850 owners and breeders, 950 industry professionals, and a host of racing fans and handicappers.

Since that original bill, there have been five variations of legislation to address doping in horse racing.  With each variation, WHOA's simple mission statement stood the test.  As long as the legislation met our mission with the placement of USADA, WHOA supported it.

When the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act was passed in December 2020,  we all celebrated. Our mission was complete.  The legislation named USADA, an independent third party, as the entity to serve as “the anti-doping and medication control enforcement agency.”

But, not so fast…
In late December, negotiations between HISA and USADA stalled. The legislative compromise that WHOA supported – to put USADA in their rightful place with a five-year contract – has been aborted.  HISA is looking for other options and interviewing other entities to fill USADA's place.

“What a shame. What a travesty. What are the insurmountable issues that would preclude a fivc-year contract between USADA and HISA?” asked international owner and breeder George Strawbridge.

“I was so disappointed to see the breakdown of talks between HISA and USADA. There is no other agency that will handle testing as thoroughly as USADA, we need to get them back to the table so they can clean up our sport.” said leading Classic trainer Graham Motion.

Michael Engleman, a horseman, and former international cyclist, lamented, “Like so many others across the world, I was extremely disappointed to read the news of HISA suspending talks with USADA. The reality is that for U.S. racing there is no legitimate and globally respected alternative to USADA. Anything less than USADA just shows that we are not serious about making honest and real change for what is best for racing, the racing fans and the horses we all love.”

Members of WHOA have reached out to both parties asking for an explanation of the stalemate and offering to help bridge the gap.  To date, no light has been shed on the subject. The industry deserves to know what the issues are that caused the impasse. “Don't live in the problem, live in the solution.” In this case, without understanding the problem, we can't help find a solution.

WHOA's support of the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act hinged on the fact that currently there is no other “entity that is nationally recognized as being a medication regulation agency equal in qualification to the United States Anti-Doping Agency.” We challenge HISA to find another agency that meets USADA's program criteria. THERE IS NONE.

“We need USADA now.  Time is of the essence to put an end to doping in racing.” said Triple Crown winning jockey Steve Cauthen.

Members of WHOA do not feel that HISA has the expertise or luxury of time to build or piecemeal together an entity that would come close to doing what USADA does so well. It is a well-oiled machine. There is a level of trust that USADA stands its ground for what is right. It will not be swayed by outside parties. It is truly independent.

Owner, breeder Bill Casner believes that “without the years of expertise that USADA provides, HISA would basically be trying to reinvent the wheel. It will be floundering, trying to deal with the sophistication of the cheaters. We have to get USADA on board.”

WHOA will continue to endorse the independent turn-key program USADA brings to the table. Their scientists are respected at the highest levels. USADA's drug testing capabilities exceed that of any other agency in the field. They have been involved in drug testing, results management, and adjudication longer and at a higher level than any other organization. USADA utilizes advancing sciences to look for new performance-enhancing drugs to stay ahead of the cheater and uses data analysis to catch them and provide a fair process. USADA is a signatory to the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), giving it access to the best global anti-doping practices and science.

“USADA's knowledge of drug testing exceeds that of any other agency in the field.  They have been involved in drug testing longer and at a higher level than any other agency. There is a major difference between testing at the Olympic level than the NFL, for example.” said Barry Irwin of Team Valor.

“USADA has been at the heart of WHOA's efforts from the beginning. We all appreciate that changing a culture and a system will be challenging and expensive. But desperate times call for desperate measures.” said Staci Hancock, WHOA's managing member. “Racing's reputation and future depend on bold changes for the betterment of our sport and the health and well-being of our horses. USADA can give us that, putting an end to business as usual with broken systems and cronyism. We can't afford anything less.”

“I don't think the horse industry realizes the plight it is in, and it desperately needs the integrity of USADA to help shore up its sad reputation. Cheaters are still cheating, horses are still dying, and public perception is still worsening,” added Arthur Hancock of Stone Farm.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights