Oaklawn Park Boosts Purses Across The Board; Race Date Added To Schedule

Oaklawn Park in Hot Springs, Ark., currently offering the highest purses in its 118-year history, is getting even richer with an across-the-board purse increase beginning Friday, March 11.

All claiming and starter allowance races are being increased by $4,000, while all Maiden Special Weights and allowances are being increased by $6,000.

The minimum purse will now be $29,000, Maiden Special Weights will be $90,000 and Allowances will start at $106,000.

Due to greater on-track and off-track wagering during the past three weeks, Oaklawn will add Thursday, April 7 to its schedule after racing was canceled Jan. 21 due to inclement weather.

“The first half of the racing season has gone extremely well, and we could not be happier to be sharing that success with our Horsemen,” Oaklawn President Louis Cella said. “We are particularly proud of the quality of the horses we are seeing on a daily basis, and we are very excited for the great racing to close out our season.”

“Anytime you see graded stakes winners running regularly in allowance races, you know you have attracted the best of the best to your meet,” added Racing Secretary Pat Pope. “There is no doubt the horses beginning their year here at Oaklawn are going to be the same ones everyone is talking about at the end of the year. That's really gratifying.”

Oaklawn's live meet runs through Sunday, May 8.

The post Oaklawn Park Boosts Purses Across The Board; Race Date Added To Schedule appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Baffert Files Suit Against Churchill Downs, Carstanjen, Rankin In Attempt To Overturn Derby Ban

As expected, trainer Bob Baffert has filed a civil lawsuit against Churchill Downs, Inc., in an attempt to halt the company's ban on his trainees from stalls or entries, including its ban of his horses from the 2022 and 2023 Kentucky Derby and Kentucky Oaks races.

The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for Kentucky's Western District on Feb. 28 and also names CDI's CEO, Bill Carstanjen and CDI board chairman R. Alex Rankin. The 56-page complaint requests a trial by jury.

Baffert is represented in the case by attorneys Clark Brewster and Michael Meuser. W. Craig Robertson, who has been part of Baffert's legal team in his fight against the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission, the New York Racing Association, and a class action suit from horseplayers, has a previous working relationship with CDI and could not represent him in this action.

In the complaint, Baffert claims his Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process have been violated by the company, which suspended his right to race at CDI properties following Baffert's announcement Medina Spirit tested had positive for betamethasone after the 2021 Kentucky Derby. Last week, the horse was disqualified from his win in that race by Kentucky stewards.

The complaint reiterates Baffert's well-publicized argument that the drug positive should not count because the trainer says the betamethasone came from a topical and not an injectable form of the drug.

It also points out that Tyler Pickelsimer was one of the three stewards responsible for overseeing racing in Kentucky during the Kentucky Derby and that Pickelsimer is a CDI employee. The other two were employed by the commission.

(It is typical in many states for stewards' stands to contain a mix of officials hired by the state and by the racetracks to represent as many different interests as possible when enforcing regulation. The 2:1 ratio for commission/association-employed stewards is written into Kentucky regulations and has been in place for years.)

Baffert seeks a declaration that CDI would be prohibited from denying his horses entry or stall space at any of CDI's properties, from denying him access to the grounds, and from barring him from the Kentucky Derby, Kentucky Oaks, and their prep races. He's also seeking preliminary and permanent injunction, meaning he hopes a judge will put a temporary halt to the track's ban on Baffert while the broader legal questions are worked out in court.

“CDI does not have the legal authority to place conditions upon a license held by Baffert or any trainer who is employed under Bob Baffert Racing Stable; that authority rests solely with the racing commission as the entity that issued his occupational license — a license that affords Baffert a constitutionally-protected property interest under state law,” the complaint read.

Baffert said he and his attorneys asked Carstanjen for an opportunity to dispute the track's allegations, but was denied. He also takes issue with what he says was a leak by CDI of a draft of the complaint in January, along with a statement by the track that it believed the impending legal fight from Baffert was without merit.

In addition to preliminary and permanent injunctions, Baffert seeks damages “exceeding $75,000” and attorneys' fees.

“This case and the events of the last eight months are about more than just me and my ability to do the work I love,” Baffert said in a statement distributed to media March 1. “If powerful forces can block me from competing, they can do this to anyone. This is a fight for the integrity of our great sport, and we have the facts, the law, and the truth on our side.”

“The lawsuit filed by Bob Baffert is disappointing but certainly not surprising,” read a statement from CDI, which was published by Sports Illustrated. “His claims are meritless and consistent with his pattern of failed drug tests, denials, excuses and attempts to blame others and identify loopholes in order to avoid taking responsibility for his actions. These actions have harmed the reputations of the Kentucky Derby, Churchill Downs and the entire Thoroughbred racing industry. Churchill Downs will fight this baseless lawsuit and defend our company's rights.

“What's at stake here is the integrity of our races, the safety of horses and the trust of the millions of fans and bettors who join us every year on the first Saturday in May.”

The post Baffert Files Suit Against Churchill Downs, Carstanjen, Rankin In Attempt To Overturn Derby Ban appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

New York Eliminates Coupling Restrictions On Married Jockeys

The New York State Gaming Commission voted Monday to eliminate a rule that required the coupling of entries ridden by married jockeys, reports the Daily Racing Form.

The marriage coupling rule came under fire when jockeys Trevor McCarthy and Katie Davis, married in late 2020, began riding in New York last year. Mindy Coleman, general counsel for the Jockeys' Guild, spoke at a hearing last month to testify that the rule prevented both McCarthy and Davis “from fully and fairly engaging in their careers.”

Last year, despite supporting the elimination of the married jockey coupling rule, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul vetoed a bill to eliminate it due to concerns that allowing legislature to rewrite racing regulations could create a dangerous precedent.

The NYSGC also voted to allow stewards to require jockeys to serve suspensions during the meet at which the violation occurred, in order “to discourage gamesmanship in the agency hearing process that has the effect of delaying a suspension until after the Saratoga meet.”

Finally, the commission adopted new wagering rules that will allow Pick 4 and Pick 5 pools to be designated for carryovers in the event that no ticket has all of the winners in the wagering sequence.

Read more at the Daily Racing Form.

The post New York Eliminates Coupling Restrictions On Married Jockeys appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Jury Awards Vaccarezzas $1.5 Million In Negligence Lawsuit Against California Veterinarian Baker

A jury in California Superior Court for the county of Los Angeles has awarded Priscilla and Carlo Vaccarezza more than $1.5 million in damages and interest stemming from a medical negligence lawsuit they filed against veterinarian Dr. Vincent Baker and his Equine Medical Center for Baker's treatment of the Vaccarezzas' filly, Little Alexis, prior to the 2014 Breeders' Cup World Championships at Santa Anita in Arcadia, Calif.

Jurors listened to six days of depositions and testimony from Carlo Vaccarezza, Baker and an array of expert witnesses and others before awarding the Vaccarezzas $1,060,000 in damages plus just over $500,000 in interest dating back to Nov. 3, 2014. That's the date Little Alexis – a stakes-winning, G1-placed daughter of Mr. Greeley – was to have been offered at the Fasig-Tipton November Sale, where Carlo Vaccarezza had been told by Kentucky horseman John Sikura she would bring at least $1.5 million. According to Vaccarezza, an offer was made to him on behalf of Sikura for that amount following the filly's third-place finish, beaten a length and a nose, in the G1 Test Stakes at Saratoga.

Little Alexis never made it to the 2014 sale, however, as she was unable to travel to Kentucky from California on Nov. 2, 2014, after coming out of a ninth-place finish in the previous day's Breeders' Cup Filly & Mare Sprint (G1) with a fever.

One year later, after four additional starts in non-graded stakes company, Little Alexis sold for $440,000 at the Fasig-Tipton November Sale. The difference between the original $1.5 million appraisal of 2014 (subsequently confirmed by bloodstock agent/appraiser Thomas Clark) and the 2015 hammer price is the amount of damages ($1,060,000). The jury ruled that interest should begin accruing on the date of the 2014 Fasig-Tipton sale.

The original complaint alleging medical and general negligence was filed in late 2015 and amended on March 8, 2016. The plaintiffs' case was strengthened months later later when Carlo Vaccarezza learned for the first time of abnormal blood test results for Little Alexis in a sample taken the morning before the Breeders' Cup. Vaccarezza said Baker never told him the results of the blood tests, an alleged failure that would become the linchpin in the case against Baker, accusing him of providing veterinary services that fell short of the “standard of care” for the veterinary medical profession.

All parties agree that Baker was contacted by Carlo Vaccarezza – who had taken out his trainer's license in 2013 – to provide veterinary services while Little Alexis was at Santa Anita for the Breeders' Cup. Baker or an associate from Equine Medical Center treated Little Alexis with routine therapeutics and vitamin jugs prior to and after timed workouts in the weeks leading up to the  race.

Two days before the Breeders' Cup Filly & Mare Sprint, on Oct. 30, 2014, Baker gave permitted pre-race medication treatment with the anti-inflammatory Ketofen, electrolytes and a vitamin jug, all delivered into Little Alexis' left jugular vein through a catheter.

On the morning of Oct. 31, Wilson Seaman, the groom taking care of Little Alexis, noticed that the filly was off her feed, had an elevated temperature and a noticeable bump on the left side of her neck where the catheter had been placed. Seaman called Carlo Vaccarezza early on the morning of Oct. 31, telling him, “We've got a problem.” Vaccarezza contacted Baker.

Baker testified that he told Vaccarezza he would stop by the barn to assess the condition of Little Alexis and have some bloodwork done. Vaccarezza testified that Baker did not say anything about taking blood samples for testing.

Upon seeing the filly's condition, including an elevated 103.2 temperature, Baker dispensed the phenylbutazone and another vitamin jug, this time through a catheter into the jugular vein on the right side of the neck. The Bute, an anti-inflammatory that at the time was legal in California up until 24 hours before a race, would help reduce the fever, Baker said. At the same time, Baker drew blood that he would send for testing to the equine hospital in the stable area at Santa Anita.

Baker also suggested rotating hot and cold compresses to reduce the bump on the left side of the neck that the veterinarian described in his testimony as “small” and “mushy.” He reminded the filly's groom to keep her head elevated. Baker said the swollen area was not sensitive to the touch, though the filly's groom and owner, along with Vaccarezza's son, Nicholas, all said Little Alexis would “flinch” whenever pressure was applied to the swollen area.

Vaccarezza testified that he expressed concern to Baker about whether or not Little Alexis should run, knowing that a fever would prevent her from getting a health certificate to fly to Kentucky for the sale. Baker testified that he didn't recall such a conversation.

Later that day, Baker picked up the test results he had ordered for Little Alexis. The results of the complete blood count (CBC) showed an elevated white blood cell count of 12.1 k/ul (normal is 4-10). The serum amyloid A (SAA) test is a marker of inflammation and infection. The normal range in horses is 0-15; Little Alexis had an SAA level of 2,534. (Read more about SAA tests here.)

Baker testified that he tried to call Vaccarezza with the test results late afternoon or early evening of Oct. 31 but that Vaccarezza did not answer. He said he did not leave a message or send a text message to Vaccarezza's cell phone and did not share the results with anyone else connected to Little Alexis.

By race-day morning on Nov. 1, Little Alexis' temperature had returned to normal and so had her appetite. The bump on the neck was reduced – all thanks to the combination of the anti-inflammatory phenylbutazone and the hot and cold compresses that the filly's groom continued to put on the inflamed area through the previous day and night.

Vaccarezza said he was still concerned about her condition and whether to scratch from the Filly & Mare Sprint. Baker checked in on the filly and told Vaccarezza, “You'll be OK to run.” Little Alexis lacked early speed, dropped back to last, then finished ninth of 10 runners at 16-1 odds in the seven-furlong contest, beaten 9 ¼ lengths in a race won by Judy the Beauty.

Shortly afterwards, groom Seaman and Nicholas Vaccarezza both noticed that Little Alexis seemed dull, and that the bump on the left side of her neck, according to Carlo Vaccarezza's testimony, was “bigger than ever,” and she now had a fever of 104.7. A photograph of the swollen area, taken about 3 ½ hours after the race, was entered into evidence.

Baker had stopped by the barn shortly after the race and left three anti-inflammatories: Bute and Banamine paste and Aspirin tablets.

Baker did not see Little Alexis again before she would eventually fly to Florida after being forced to miss the Fasig-Tipton Sale. On Nov. 2, the morning after the Breeders' Cup, Dr. Ryan Carpenter, an associate of Baker's at the Equine Medical Center, testified that he stopped at the barn briefly to check on Little Alexis. Without going into her stall, Carpenter said he observed “a normal horse standing in her stall” who was “not depressed or distressed.”

Vaccarezza, to the contrary, said that Little Alexis was “lethargic and not eating much” on the morning after the race.

Little Alexis was given an examination upon her return to Florida on Nov. 5 by Dr. Stephen Selway, a portion of whose deposition was shown to the jury. Selway stated that he found the filly's jugular vein on the left side of her neck was “occluded, ” “like a hard rope,” and  that blood was not flowing through the vein properly. The filly “flinched” to the touch in the area where the cellulitis, or inflammation had occurred, he said. “Something was injected that didn't get into the vein,” Selway said in the deposition.

Dr. Michael Chovanes, another equine practitioner who testified on behalf of Vaccarezza, said the 2,534 reading on the SAA test was the highest he had ever heard of and that the horse should have been scratched on that information alone. From his perspective, Chovanes said, it was a “significant risk” to run Little Alexis after such abnormal test results. If Little Alexis' jugular vein was blocked due to thrombosis, Chovanes told jurors, blood on the left side of the horse was not getting back to the heart, meaning the heart would not be pumping properly, which could lead to further problems.

While Baker said blood tests like CBC and SAA are just a “piece of the puzzle” when diagnosing potential problems in a horse, that's what the jury focused on during their two hours of deliberation.

The presiding juror, or foreperson, a 34-year-old engineer, told the Paulick Report the jury was swayed by the plaintiff's argument that Baker failed to live up to his profession's standard of care by not sharing the results of the blood tests with Carlos Vaccarezza.

“Negligent care, not reporting medical facts to an owner or not doing all you can to report all the medical information to the owner,” the presiding juror identified as the reason the jury found Baker at fault.

The vote was 11-to-1 on the question of whether Baker failed “to use the level of skill, knowledge and care that other reasonably careful veterinarians would use in same or similar circumstances.”

The presiding juror was the lone vote not finding fault with Baker.

“I do a lot of scientific reasonings and have to give a lot of scientific opinions,” the presiding juror said. “I have a technical background and often have to make decisions based on my expertise, oftentimes under immense amount of pressure and short amount of time. So I empathize with that scenario. I also empathize with having to make those decisions on behalf of people who may or may not always understand the mechanics, the physics, the whatever behind those decisions. I personally understood where that came from but that's not ultimately how the jury voted.”

The jury voted 9-3 that the negligence was a “substantial factor in causing damage” to the Vaccarezzas. It was a 10-2 vote that damages should be $1,060,000 and unanimous that the plaintiffs are entitled to prejudgment interest of the amount of damages awarded and that the date from which the interest accrues is Nov. 3, 2014.

Priscilla and Carlos Vaccarezza were represented by James R. Morgan of Walnut Creek, Calif. Baker's attorney was Lisa Brown of Wallace Brown & Schwartz of Pasadena, Calif. The presiding judge was Richard J. Burdge.

Brown said the judgment will be appealed.

“This verdict sends a message loud and clear that vets have to be held accountable for what they do,” Carlos Vaccarezza said. “Here you have a vet that took an SAA and a blood test on my horse without even telling me. It's like in racing: if a trainer gets a 30-day suspension for a medication violation, the vet should get a 30-day suspension. There has to be some kind of accountability.”
The judgment is just the latest blow against Baker, who unrelated to this civil lawsuit is facing disciplinary charges from the California Veterinary Medical Board for negligence, unprofessional conduct and other alleged violations of the Practice Act. Baker is also the veterinarian who prescribed an ointment containing betamethasone that led to the disqualification of Medina Spirit from victory in the G1 Kentucky Derby and a 90-suspension for his trainer, Bob Baffert.

The post Jury Awards Vaccarezzas $1.5 Million In Negligence Lawsuit Against California Veterinarian Baker appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights