The Art And Science Of Setting Stud Fees

As the November mixed sales approach and mares start getting booked to stallions, practically all of North America's significant stud farms have released their advertised fees for the 2021 breeding season.

Each advertised fee is the end result of a decision-making process that can vary from farm to farm, whether a stallion's fee is being decided for the first time, if it's being raised or lowered, or if it's holding steady from the previous year.

There are few concrete “sliding scale” indicators when it comes to setting or moving a stallion's fee. They certainly help, but a Grade 1 victory on the racetrack or a fashionable pedigree are no guarantee of a sky-high introductory fee. The only hard and fast rule is that supply and demand should guide the ship, or else it might take on water.

For Bill Farish of Lane's End, setting fees means an extended series of feedback, starting with internal meetings, then picking up the phone to hear from outside breeders.

“I try to keep it pretty open in our organization,” he said. “Jill McCully, Levana Capria, Chance Timm, David Ingordo, we all talk about it pretty extensively, and then come up with it. I make the decision, but it's a collaborative effort, because if everyone's not comfortable with it, it's not going to work.

“We try to get a good feeling internally where we all are,” Farish continued. “We talk to a lot of people that breed with us and get a feel for where they are, and to make sure we're not way off with our thinking. You want to touch base with those that are going to be buying seasons. Generally, we're in the same ballpark with them, anyway, but we do have informal polling with them.”

Setting fees for incoming stallions presented a unique challenge for the 2021 breeding season. An increasingly fickle marketplace still responds positively toward first-crop sires at auction, giving them a unique premium in that first book of mares.

However, the bloodstock industry has been rattled by the shrinking foal crop and economic uncertainty inside and outside of the Thoroughbred business. Practically all of Kentucky's stallions except for the ones on meteoric rises saw decreased fees for the upcoming season. Most stallions will never stand for a fee as high as they do in their first season, but in a year where the purse strings stand to be especially tight, setting that price too high might turn breeders off.

With four first-season stallions expected to enter to the breeding shed in 2021, WinStar Farm has had to walk that tightrope on a large scale.

“You look at their race record and pedigree,” WinStar Farm's Elliott Walden said. “It's a bit of an art, it's not a science to get it right. There's quite a bit of comparative analysis with horses that have had a similar body of work that have gone to stud in the past, or this year.”

The intention behind a stallion's direction can also factor in the decision on an initial stud fee and beyond.

A syndicate built with “breed to race” operations who plan to wait on the foals to prove themselves on the racetrack might be less swayed by the whims of the marketplace, as opposed to syndicates comprised of commercial breeders.

This will also affect the types of mares sent to a particular stallion, both by syndicate breeders and outsiders.

“The commercial market is a driver, but it's not the main driver for me,” said Mill Ridge Farm's Headley Bell, who manages the syndicate for stallion Oscar Performance. “That's where the syndicate fell into place. We made the price of the shares attractive enough to get a really good syndicate. That's the foundation of the horse. Then, I think the market ends up seeing that and it provides them confidence, as well.

“We're not just sitting there relying on a commercial market that's going to be there the first year, and then they're going to leave you,” he continued. “This is a long-term project, so we try to manage him accordingly, as far as his fee goes, and the number of mares. We've tried to put the horse first in what we're doing.”

Because of the long-term strategy behind Oscar Performance's syndicate, the stallion's fee has not changed drastically over his first three seasons. He debuted at $20,000 in 2019, and his fee was unchanged in his second season when many others in his class see at least a mild drop. In his third season, typically a difficult one to drum up interest, Oscar Performance was lowered to $15,000.

Moving a stallion's fee up or down can be a delicate process. For one on the rise, it signifies a ringing public endorsement, but one that has to be tempered so as not to scare potential breeders away. For ones going down, the line has to be tiptoed between correcting supply and demand while still protecting the commercial reputation of the stallion and the investment of breeders.

“If it's a horse that's in the process of making it, you don't want to go too high and snuff out the positive demand,” Farish said. “If it's one that's on the fence and not really making it, it's a tough decision because you don't want to cut them too much and hurt them in the eyes of the breeders. There were a bunch of mares that were bred at a higher fee on those kinds of horses, so you don't want to drop them too far, because that goes into it, as well.”

Walden expanded on that point, noting that even lowering a stud fee contains a certain degree of gatekeeping to keep the number of unhappy customers to a minimum.

“Raising or lowering – That's the trickiest, I think,” he said. “There is a very interesting dynamic between supply and demand. Obviously, you want good demand. You want people to want your stallions, and you need to meet the supply. But, you also don't want to have 500 applications and have to turn a bunch of people away. You want to get it right where you have more demand than supply, but not to an extreme amount.”

Whether it's a newcomer or a veteran stallion, the ideal outcome of a Thoroughbred mating has changed ever so slightly in recent years due to The Jockey Club's 140-mare limit for stallions born in 2020 or later. No stallion standing today will see their books limited in any way going forward, but the foals they conceive will be born with that ceiling, should they warrant stallion careers in the future, which could be perceived as a limit on how much money a potential colt could make in his lifetime.

Realistically, only a sliver of any given foal crop is retired to stud, and an even smaller sliver of that group would be enough of a commercial success to threaten the stud book limit. Of all the factors that do go into a stallion's fee, Farish said the stud book cap on the ensuing foals was not on the list.

“Not in the slightest,” he said.

As if balancing a stallion's public value in his own ecosystem wasn't harrowing enough, there can be the issue of how the stallion and his fee interacts with those around him. At many larger Kentucky farms, veteran stallions will have sons or grandsons on the same roster, or farms will double down on horses by the same sires or similar female families.

Presumably, these stallions would be drawing from a similar pool of mares that match their general pedigrees and physicals, which could create some tough decisions for both the breeders and stud farms.

In some instances, the pricing system can offer breeders entry into a particular sire line at different price points.

For example, Lane's End stands cornerstone sire Candy Ride for $75,000. His son Twirling Candy stands at the same farm for $40,000, while newcomer Game Winner, also by Candy Ride, enters stud for $30,000. Fellow Candy Ride son Unified is advertised for $10,000, while Gift Box, a grandson of Candy Ride through sire Twirling Candy, will also stand for $10,000.

“You don't want one to hurt the other, so you try to price them to where they'd benefit from being in the same place,” Farish said. “Occasionally, they do get into each other's way, but that can be tricky.”

Bret Jones of Airdrie Stud said he preferred to price horses with similar pedigrees based on their individual merits, even if the price points are close, and let the breeders decide which option works best for them.

“At the end of the day, I don't know that you can get too caught up in that when it comes to standing a similar-bred stallion,” he said. “The Portland Trailblazers passed on Michael Jordan because they already had Clyde Drexler, so I think you can outthink yourself sometimes when it comes to stallions with similar pedigrees. I think you have to believe in the stallion on their individual merit, and price them however you think you can generate business.”

The post The Art And Science Of Setting Stud Fees appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

PR Special Fasig-Tipton October: How Do They Set Those Stud Fees?

CLICK HERE TO READ THIS EDITION OF THE PR SPECIAL

The Fasig-Tipton Kentucky October Yearlings Sale rolls on, and the Paulick Report has the reading material you need to go along with it in the latest PR Special.

In this edition, bloodstock editor Joe Nevills speaks to the decision-makers at some of Kentucky's top stallion operations about their processes for setting stud fees – a number that can have ramifications on a stallion's entire career.

Darley's Australian shuttle stallion Astern is the focus of this issue's Stallion Spotlight, with Darren Fox discussing what makes the son of Medaglia d'Oro an attractive prospect for breeders. In the Breeders' Cup Buzz, Nevills asks participants in the upcoming Breeders' Cup to recall their most vivid memories of the 2015 renewal, the last time the event was at Keeneland.

Dr. Maria Schnobrich of Rood and Riddle Equine Hospital covers why some years are worse than others for placentitis in Ask Your Veterinarian, and finally, we dive through the Fasig-Tipton October catalog to spotlight some of its young stallions in Second-Crop Sire Watch.

CLICK HERE TO READ THIS EDITION OF THE PR SPECIAL

Thanks, as always, to the sponsors of the PR Special. Your continued support is crucial to the functioning of our publication.

CLICK HERE TO READ THIS EDITION OF THE PR SPECIAL

The post PR Special Fasig-Tipton October: How Do They Set Those Stud Fees? appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

McMahon of Saratoga Releases 2021 Stud Fees

McMahon of Saratoga’s 2021 roster is headed once again by Central Banker (Speightstown), whose fee was reduced from $7,500 to $6,000 LFS&N for 2021.

Solomini (Curlin), who will be standing his second year at stud in 2021, also had his fee cut from $6,5000 to $5,000 LFS&N. Redesdale (Speightstown) was decreased from $5,000 to $3,000 LFS&N.

“Recent months have been very hard for everyone involved in racing and breeding and we are reducing the fees for our stallions for the 2021 breeding season to reflect the challenges brought on by 2020,” Joe McMahon said. “We feel confident that the New York breeding program remains the strongest of its kind in the world and our goal is to offer the best valued and most attractive stallions outside of Kentucky. We hope these reduced fees help New York breeders through this difficult time and we look forward to working with our breeders in the coming months.”

The post McMahon of Saratoga Releases 2021 Stud Fees appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

This Side Up: Fee Cuts Can Reboot the System

As we have come to expect, in a trading environment that nowadays owes so much to their boss, it was the guys at Spendthrift who first put their heads over the parapet.

This week, anyway. To be fair, the original lead actually came from Chuck Fipke–a match for the unorthodoxy and initiative even of B. Wayne Hughes, and prepared way back in the spring to waive his 2020 stallion fees altogether.

Fipke reasoned that his entire pitch was to small breeders, who were already looking down the barrel as the pandemic took hold; and also that he owned his stallions outright, duly having no responsibilities to shareholders. This week, however, Spendthrift became the first in a rapid series of big farms to grasp the nettle with some extremely purposeful fee cuts, at every level, for 2021.

It’s a fascinating situation, because you could argue that stallion fees have in recent years ceased to make sense from either side. For those breeders who must retrieve costs in the sales ring, the commercial imperative to use only new sires tends to require them to spend far too much on unproven potential. For farm accountants, equally, the window of opportunity is so narrow that corralling adequate books even into years two and three is becoming harder and harder; so much so, that even exorbitant opening fees may not square the ledger.

But now they have no alternative but to lead their stallions out to the crossroads and help the breeder save on gas. Our business operates in unalterable cycles, initiated by the choice of a stallion. His fee sets the bar of viability for every project. Add keep and labor–which, in contrast, scarcely vary whatever the value of your mare–and you’ll have your break-even number.

That’s how organically everyone is connected. And that’s why the guy setting the fee must read the marketplace for young stock, and give all parties the chance to come out ahead. Because he or she will need them to retain the funds and morale to do it all again. That’s why John Sikura, who views the big picture as dynamically as anyone in the business, was at such pains in pricing the Hill ‘n’ Dale roster to stress that “we are all in this together.”

And let’s not forget how slowly the wheel turns. At a time like this, that’s actually a comfort. Following a bereavement, I haven’t been ringside at the Tattersalls October Yearling Sale until the past couple of days, but the staggering resilience of the market there has been most instructive. Everyone, pending the promised land of vaccines and cures, shares the same misery over COVID and its indefinite span. But the breeding and trading of Thoroughbreds tends to develop in our insular, eccentric community–even in the pinhooker, fluttering from flower to flower–a patience and perspective that could, for once, be usefully emulated out there in the “real” world.

The reality is that plenty of horsemen made good money out of a bull run extending a decade since the last big market shock. If they can now tough out a couple of lean years, they will surely keep faith in a system that has served them so well. After all, they can’t just leave those horses chewing grass out there. And they have been broadsided, out of nowhere, by something completely unaccountable and extraneous. As and when they get back on an even keel, they know they have the maps and compasses to chart a sustainable course.

And that’s without admitting to ourselves that our business is exceptionally well positioned, should economic recovery be neither V- nor U-shaped but, as we increasingly hear, K-shaped. Trading in luxury goods, horsemen rely on “trickledown” from the most affluent in society. Among that class, even so, perhaps at least the old-school paternalists–a type of conservative often drawn to the Turf–will seek nothing more precious from the next four years, tax breaks included, than a little more political and social stability. Because we are, indeed, all in this together.

At every level of the industry, these fee cuts can trigger a communal reset. It boils down to a single word: opportunity. As I keep saying, the great harvests of capitalism are often sown in the thinnest soil. This winter, once again, we’ll be running a value check across all Kentucky stallions–and already we’re salivating over some of the fees announced this week.

Some prospectors may even resolve to invest in mares to take advantage. No sector of the market demands more patience, of course, than breeding stock. But you can guarantee that we’ll look back, a few years hence, and discover that many a top-class racehorse was bred from mares more or less “stolen” from the forthcoming sales.

Ah, racehorses! Remember them? There could be no more wholesome corrective, out of this crisis, than restoring our focus to the racetrack; than renouncing this addiction to the self-fulfilling, artificial values that begin and end on a sales rostrum.

In fact, whisper it, but it might be no bad thing for the commercial market to falter long enough for breeders to abandon these fast-buck stallions, scarcely any of which will ever again command so high a fee, for the kind of yeoman achievers that might build up a family with a few rosettes on the track instead. We will all have our different favorites, but already know that many will be priced to make that a very far-sighted strategy.

Hindsight may also show us, of course, that one or two weanling colts selling this November will eventually figure among the first stallions confined to 140 mares. That will certainly set a new puzzle to those careworn farm accountants. On the other hand, perhaps by then people will have grasped that breeding animals that can actually run ultimately makes more sense than wiping out families in pursuit of fleeting commercial gain.

It’s an ill wind, as they say, that blows no good–and that applies even to the tempests of 2020.

The post This Side Up: Fee Cuts Can Reboot the System appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights