Smooth Like Strait ‘On Top of His Game,’ Seeking Shoemaker Repeat

Cannon Thoroughbreds' Smooth Like Strait (Midnight Lute) will attempt to defend his title in the GI Shoemaker Mile–a Win and You're In event for the GI Breeders' Cup Mile–when he faces five rivals in the Santa Anita contest Monday. The 5-year-old, the 4-5 morning-line favorite, was runner-up in four graded events following last year's Shoemaker, setting the pace before getting past late by Space Blues in the Nov. 6 GI Breeders' Cup Mile. Making his 2022 debut, he set the pace before ending up third in a blanket finish in the Apr. 15 GI Makers Mark Mile at Keeneland last time out.

“It seems like he's on top of his game,” said trainer Michael McCarthy.

Phil D'Amato will saddle three of the six runners in the Shoemaker Mile, led by Agave Racing Stable and Sam-Son Farm's Count Again (Awesome Again). The 7-year-old went to the sidelines after earning top-level success in the GI Frank E. Kilroe Mile last March and was closing into a slow pace when a close-up sixth while making his return in the Marker's Mark Mile. He could get a pace assist from stablemate Dance Some Mo (Uncle Mo) Monday.

Rockingham Ranch's Masteroffoxhounds (War Front), winner of last year's GII San Marcos S. over the Santa Anita turf course, turns back to a mile off a runner-up effort in the Apr. 30 GII Charles Whittingham S. for trainer Richard Baltas. The 5-year-old will be making his first start for D'Amato Monday.

The post Smooth Like Strait ‘On Top of His Game,’ Seeking Shoemaker Repeat appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Stilleto Boy Aims for Gold Cup Glory

Steve Moger's Stilleto Boy (Shackleford), who has been knocking on the door to top-level success, will attempt to gain that first Grade I victory while facing four rivals in the GI Gold Cup at Santa Anita Monday. The chestnut gelding, 7-5 on the morning line, was second in last year's GI Awesome Again S. and third in the GI Malibu S., GI Pegasus World Cup Invitational, and GI Santa Anita H. before scoring a front-running victory in the Apr. 30 GII Californian S. last time out.

Pegram, Watson and Weitman's Defunded (Dialed In) looked poised for big things when second in last year's GIII Affirmed S. and GIII Los Alamitos Derby, but went to the sidelines following an optional-claimer romp at Del Mar in August. The  4-year-old, 3-1 on the morning line, resurfaced with a powerful victory in a one-mile optional claimer at Santa Anita May 8 in his first start for trainer Sean McCarthy.

Fox Hill Farms and Siena Farm's Royal Ship (Brz) (Midshipman) missed by just a head to subsequent G1 Dubai World Cup winner Country Grammer (Tonalist) in last year's Gold Cup. He returned from eight months on the sidelines to score a front-running victory in the Apr. 10 John Shear S. last time out.

The post Stilleto Boy Aims for Gold Cup Glory appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

The Week in Review: The Met Mile Belongs on Memorial Day

A New York racing tradition began in 1971, the first time that Memorial Day was officially celebrated each year on the last Monday in May. A crowd of 61,147 showed up that Monday at Belmont Park to watch Tunex win the $121,600 Metropolitan Mile for trainer Allen Jerkens and owner Hobeau Farm. For the next 42 years, New York racing fans circled Memorial Day on their calendars, knowing that it would be one of the biggest days of the year, thanks to the GI Metropolitan H.

In 1976 and 1977, they saw the mighty Forego win the race. In 1982, the 3-year-old Conquistador Cielo won by 7 1/4 lengths, five days before he would return to win the GI Belmont S. In 1990, Criminal Type beat Easy Goer and Housebuster. In 1994, Holy Bull won the Met, rebounding from his lackluster performance in the GI Kentucky Derby. Ghostzapper won in 2005. The winner in 2010 was Quality Road.

Fast forward to Memorial Day 2022 and the Belmont card not only won't include the Met Mile, but there are no graded stakes on the program. The highlight on this afternoon will be five stakes races for New York-breds. There were supposed to be six, but one, the Commentator H., did not fill. It will be just another day at the track.

During the three-day holiday weekend, Belmont offered just one graded stakes, Saturday's GIII Soaring Softly S. The weekend was crying out for a big race, and there is no better way to fill the void than returning the Met Mile to its traditional place on the calendar.

The Met Mile was last run on Memorial Day in 2013. The following year, it was moved to Belmont Day and it has remained there ever since. The idea was to create a blockbuster card that went beyond just the Belmont Stakes. This year, there will be nine graded stakes on the card, eight of them Grade I's. It's working. With the exception of the Saturday Breeders' Cup program, the Belmont Stakes card might be the best in the sport. Last year's handle for the card was $112 million, a record for a non-Triple Crown year.

But there's been a price to pay. The weekend racing leading up to and following the Belmont has absolutely no sizzle. That might be fine for some of the weeks, but it shouldn't be ok for Memorial Day.

You can make a case that the Met is the third most important, most prestigious race run each year in New York, behind only the GI Travers S. and the Belmont. Put it along side eight claiming races if you have to and it can carry a day. But on Belmont Day it tends to get lost.

The solution is to go back to Memorial Day. To do so wouldn't affect Belmont Day one bit. A Met Mile-less card that still had eight stakes, seven of them Grade I's, and a Triple Crown event would get by just fine without the Met. And moving the Met back to Memorial Day would instantly make the Monday holiday program the special type of occasion that it was for 42 years but is no longer.

Repole-Viola Partnership Off To Good Start

It comes as no surprise that the first two-year-old to earn 'TDN Rising Star' status this year in New York is owned by the partnership of Mike Repole and Vinnie Viola. The feat was accomplished Friday at Belmont when Forte (Violence) romped by 7 3/4 lengths, paying $2.40 to win. Forte was purchased for $110,000 last year at Keeneland September.

On the same day, Repole and Viola finished third in a 2-year-old maiden at Churchill Downs with Summonyourcourage (Practical Joke). Summonyourcourage and Forte were their first two 2-year-old starters on the year.

Viola and Repole have assembled a stable of 2-year-olds that is so large and so potent that it is unlike anything ever seen in racing before. They bought 43 yearlings last year at Keeneland September, paying a combined $16.045 million. They also bought three yearlings at Fasig-Tipton sales for an aggregate cost of $1.725 million. The vast majority of the horses are colts.

“Vinnie and I have at least 50 2-year-olds together,” Repole said via text. “Plus, we probably have at least 25 each alone. I'm extremely excited about these 2-year-olds. Forte looked great in his debut, winning by almost eight lengths and getting an 81 Beyer. Vinnie and I are excited about unleashing some potential future stars at Saratoga. Building this stable has been 15 years in the making for me and the great team I have managing the stable.”

While awaiting the debut of more 2-year-olds, Repole can turn his attention to the GI Belmont S. He has a confirmed starter in Mo Donegal (Uncle Mo) and says that he is “leaning heavily” toward running the filly Nest (Curlin) in the race.

“If we run her, it will be because she deserves to be in this race,” Repole said. “She is just as fast as the 3-year-old colts. She is a daughter of Curlin and will relish the distance.”

Piggott in the North America

Equibase stats on Lestor Piggott's rides in North America go back only to 1976. Starting with that time, Piggott, who passed away Sunday at age 86, had seven winners in North America from 68 mounts. That includes two stakes wins, with Royal Academy in the 1990 GI Breeders' Cup Mile, and with Argument (Fr) in the 1980 GI Washington D.C. International.

Piggott's last-ever mount in the U.S. was one he probably would have liked to forget. He rode Mr. Brooks (GB) in the 1992 GI Breeders' Cup Sprint, where the horse broke down and had to be euthanized.

In 1979, the Meadowlands brought him over to take part in an international jockey challenge pitting U.S. versus European riders. Steve Cauthen captained the victorious U.S. team. Piggott did not win a race that night.

Before the advent of the Breeders' Cup, the Washington D.C. International at Laurel led the way when it came to attracting star horses and riders from Europe. With three wins in the International, Piggott is tied with Manny Ycaza for most wins in the race by a jockey. Piggott also won the International in 1968 with Sir Ivor and in 1969 with Karabas. He also won the 1974 Canadian International aboard Dahlia.

After riding in the 1967 D.C. International, Piggott stayed in the U.S and tried to break in at Aqueduct during a time of year when flat racing is shutdown in the U.K. According to a New York Times report, he was 2-for-his-first-18 over the course of seven days. He said his intention was to finish the Aqueduct meet, which ended Dec. 15. When asked why he had made a detour at Aqueduct before returning to the U.K., Piggott said: “because I enjoy riding. Why not ride here?” He admitted he wasn't getting on the best mounts. “I wouldn't be riding these bad ones in England,” he said. “But I guess there's nothing else I can do here.”

The post The Week in Review: The Met Mile Belongs on Memorial Day appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

The Premier Book in Every Way: Keeneland September Book 1 by the Numbers

Here's a conundrum for you. When does your outstanding yearling become merely one that stands out?

It's something the Keeneland sales team find themselves asking a great deal right now, out on the farms, during the annual process of sieving entries into the right tier of the world's biggest yearling catalog.

Time after time, they run into the same, nearly superstitious nervousness among some consignors about September Book 1. The action is too tight at the top end. Let this guy be a big fish in a smaller pond.

Well, that kind of talk is hardly unfamiliar to Tony Lacy and Cormac Breathnach, respectively Vice President of Sales and Director of Sales Operations, in that both took up their appointments last year from positions with leading consignors. On being invited to the other side of the dais, however, Breathnach decided to test perceptions against the data.

He did so with an open mind. If there turned out to be genuine vulnerabilities, whether in the format of the sale or a horse's position within it, then Keeneland would do something about it. But where he found misapprehensions, equally, then those would be clarified.

“We wanted to look at the sale and its performance as objectively as possible,” Breathnach emphasizes. “To look at facts, not preconceptions. We know how strongly some assumptions have been propagated over the years and we need some objective analysis. Our goal is to identify where any weak spots might truly be in the sale, and how to combat those: whether by altering start times, or the numbers in a particular session, or marketing focus, anything that Keeneland might do to help offset any dead spots.”

But the headline discovery is unmistakable. There should be no cold feet about Book 1. Just best foot forward. In fact, wilfully seeking relegation to Book 2 can be downright counter- productive.

On joining Keeneland a year ago, Breathnach first ran the basic numbers on the relative performance of Books 1 and 2 over the previous decade. In that time, of course, there had been all manner of format changes–with Book 1 variously allocated one, two, three and four sessions; and Book 2 either two or three–and evidently most people now agree that it is time for some consistency. Remarkably, however, Breathnach found that the Book 1 brand had crushed Book 2 every single year, regardless of how the elite stock had been spread.

“Through all those different formats, the average from Book 1 into Book 2 dropped every year between 51 and 60%,” Breathnach says. “And the median fell between 48 and 64%. In other words, both the Book 1 average and median were at least double those achieved by Book 2 every year. [Okay, strictly 1.96x for the 2019 median!] Honestly, that shocked me–and some of the agents I shared the figures with couldn't believe it either. I really did think that there were going to be years when Book 2 at least came close. Even the blended RNA rate was lower in Book 1. Over those 10 years, it came in at 24% for Book 1 and 25% for Book 2. Book 1 is where the money is.”

Having established the power of the Book 1 brand, Breathnach set out on a deep dive through his first September Sale at Keeneland. What could be learned by comparisons made Book to Book, session to session, and even within sessions?

The real revelation came in the modelling of buyer activity, which Breathnach measured by the number of radiograph views (blue in the table below) and the number of videoscope views exceeding 30 seconds (orange). This is a most interesting and instructive graph, showing that purposeful prospecting is nowhere higher than across both sessions of Book 1.

“The repository data show convincingly that a large volume of buyers are here, and, more importantly, are active in Book 1,” suggests Breathnach. “Some sellers tend to feel that a higher RNA rate might suggest otherwise, even though the RNA rates in Books 1 and 2 over the preceding 10 years are virtually identical. But buyers are not in the habit of vetting horses without intent. This shows that they're here, and they're here to buy from the beginning.”

While some vendors are convinced of greater purchasing depth in Book 2, Breathnach argues that some bumper transactions in the opening Book would never be made about the same horse in the next one. Several important principals, if they have come at all, tend to have left town by Book 2. He points to recent Book 1 purchases for $1 million and $800,000 that were made simply because those principals were on the spot for Book 1 only.

Breathnach urges sellers (and buyers) to grasp how the complexion of Book 1 is changing: “If you compare Book 1 from September 2019 and 2021 side-by-side–skipping 2020, when international travel was so restricted–buyers who contributed close to $60 million worth of purchases from 2019's Book 1 did not participate in 2021, for various reasons. But that deficit was backfilled extremely well, primarily by domestic racing stables: people like Vinnie Viola and Mike Repole, and new entities like the BSW/Crow Colts Group and the Bernhards [Jim and Dana, of Lynnhaven Racing], among others.

“With more exposure for the sport of horse racing and the improved purses, it was refreshing to see domestic end-users so active from the very beginning of the sale. Many vendors sold horses very effectively in the $400,000-$750,000 range for example. Of the first 15 horses through the ring last September, 12 sold, to 11 different domestic buyers.”

This feels huge, in the perennial debate with nervous vendors. Breathnach believes that some people may set too high a bar when considering their stock for Book 1: that every yearling entrant has to be 'perfect.'

“What we are looking to sell in Book 1 is as many good physicals as possible,” he says. “Pedigree and sire power are important too, to a degree, but athletes are what the buyers are looking for in Book 1, and that's what they are going to pay for. They can't all be by the same six-to-eight sires because we have a deep international buying bench, as the repository data shows. If the median is $325,000, like in 2021, and you've got a $400,000 horse, Book 1 is where your market is. You're an outlier anywhere else.”

In terms of Book-to-Book trends, Breathnach focused on medians and RNA rates as the most reliable gauge of sale performance. As this next table shows, the median conformed pretty neatly to the status of each Book. The RNA line (orange in the table) also descended as the sale moved forward, but that's pretty much as you would expect given the high production costs of elite yearlings, whose breeders are often equivocal about selling at all. (Moreover at an auction that broke records for average, median and completed sales, there may never again be an RNA rate like the one achieved in the second week of last year's September Sale.)

Another nervous assumption is that there are inbuilt momentum swings even within a session. Vendors typically dislike slots at the very beginning or end of the day. Again, Breathnach investigated last September. He identified the first and last 20 hips that sold in each session, and compared them to the 20 that sold right in the middle of that session. In doing so, he compared the average and median price of each of those subgroups as well as the likelihood that a horse sold for at least 50% above its reserve, what might be termed the “pleasant surprises.”

“It's interesting to me that in the 11 sessions, those good sales (50% above reserve) were more likely to happen in the first 20 sellers in three sessions (incidentally including the first and fourth sessions); the last 20 sellers in three sessions; and right in the middle of the day in the other four,” Breathnach says. “The average sale price of those yearlings was only highest in the middle 20 sellers in two of the 11 sessions. In other words: no pattern.”

Where there can surely be virtual unanimity is that the sale finally needs a more settled format. That's certainly Keeneland's intention for 2022, with the first two Books once again expected to be spread over two sessions apiece, with Book 1 opening around 1 p.m. (as was the case last year).

“Industry-wide, almost everybody agrees that we need a consistent format, and that includes our sales team,” Breathnach concedes. “Based on the performance of last year's sale, and particularly from a stabling point of view, we feel that the format we landed on was very positive.”

Obviously there will always be a certain critical mass of yearlings eligible for the two opening Books. And Breathnach feels that there are two important differences between the format of two sessions apiece, as opposed to commingling over four days.

“You get too many peaks and valleys [with a four-day Book 1],” he explains. “There aren't 1,000 really top-end horses, so the sale gets too inconsistent, and it's hard to build momentum. And, maybe more importantly, when you use the entire barn area like that, it's very hard for buyers to patrol the whole of Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, and then to do their shortlists and their second looks, when they're going from Barn 1 to 49 on every pass. Some sellers might think they would prefer that–but the horses are just too spread out that way, and several of them are going to be missed.”

So if 400 won't necessarily be the precise number of elite horses out there for Book 1, it's a number that gives everyone a chance–buyers and vendors alike.

“It's a manageable number and you can start a 200-horse session at 1 p.m.,” Breathnach says. “That allows extra time in the mornings for buyers to get their second looks and vetting done, and to get ahead with Book 2, and not be constantly falling behind. And it gives these good horses the time they deserve. They can be stabled loosely in some of our best show areas, with the time and space for people to show them to the best of their ability.”

The lunchtime start also allows atmosphere to build for the beginning of what is, after all, an occasion of great theater.

“Tony and Shannon [Arvin, president and CEO] and the entire team, we want to make sure there's a buzz to kick the sale off,” Breathnach says. “That is a priority. The September Sale is a significant event for Lexington and this area, but it's critical to our customers and it deserves to start off the right way.”

As he mentions, this is all a team effort. Besides Lacy and Breathnach, the inspections so vital to the balance of these Books are being shared by Mark Maronde, Dean Roethemeier and Kyle Wilson, with valued external perspectives from the experienced Frankie Brothers and Julie Cauthen. And of course there are also important contributions from other vital cogs in the Keeneland machine like Gatewood Bell, Buff Bradley and Ryan Mahan. While every sales company candidly strives on behalf of the vendor, once a horse is on the dais, in planning an auction these people must try to achieve an equilibrium between seller and buyers.

But obviously there's a limit to how much the hosts can assist trade.

“We do understand that there's a lot of anxiety and opinion among breeders and consignors about book placement,” Breathnach says. “Our job is to put the whole sale together, which requires taking a broad view, and factoring in the requirements and preferences of buyers and sellers alike. The kind of things we're talking about can't create a strong market, of themselves. But we can do our best to give it space to breathe.”

The post The Premier Book in Every Way: Keeneland September Book 1 by the Numbers appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights