NYSGC Provides Forte Timeline

In response to comments from Forte's connections on a conference call last Thursday, May 11 accusing the New York State Gaming Commission of unprofessional handling of the Forte meloxicam overage in the Sept. 5, 2022 Hopeful Stakes, the commission's spokesman, Brad Maione, has issued a timeline of the eight months between the positive test and the stewards' hearing to discuss the results. At that hearing May 10, Forte was disqualified from the Hopeful Stakes win, Todd Pletcher was fined $1,000 and suspended for 10 days. The connections said they would appeal.

That timeline appears in its entirety here:

The RMTC split sample program was announced in 2017. At that time, the New York Thoroughbred Horsemen's Association notified its members, which includes Mr. Pletcher, of the program. As a courtesy, in the fall of 2022, the Gaming Commission worked with the trainer's counsel to help identify a RMTC-approved lab to test the split sample at issue. A list of such labs is readily available on the RMTC website.

Below is a timeline of communications between the Gaming Commission and the trainer's representative between the September 5, 2022 Hopeful Grade 1 Stakes at Saratoga Race Course and the May 10, 2023 “Stewards' Hearing:”

September 5, 2022: Saratoga Race Course: Hopeful Stakes G1; horse FORTE finished 1st; sample collected & shipped to New York Equine Drug Testing & Research Laboratory (Lab) in Ithaca, NY.

September 23, 2022: The Lab notified the Commission of a positive finding. The Commission immediately notified the State Steward, who then matched the sample's identifying numbers to the previously locked documentation of collected samples. An investigation began. The remaining dates and events are what led the “Steward's Hearing” on May 11, 2023.

September 29, 2022: The trainer's counsel was notified of the positive finding.

October 3, 2022: The trainer's counsel asked for the “laboratory finding” and “underlying data,” incorrectly claiming that providing such during an investigation has been “long standing practice.”

October 5, 2022: The Commission denied the trainer's counsel's request, noting: “a licensee being investigated for potential discipline is not entitled to evidence until such time as the Commission's adjudication rules require disclosure of the same. This position applies to any request for such disclosure, whether related to potential residual sample testing, or any other subject matter.”

October 7, 2022: The trainer's counsel protested and incorrectly reasoned that by not providing such findings at that time (before a ruling is even issued), there must have been a “change in that protocol.” The trainer's counsel then requested materials that led to this non-existent change in procedure.

October 11, 2022: The trainer's counsel complained via email that the copies of the aforementioned provided to her as a courtesy was inaccurate and that the labs they contacted were unable to conduct the requisite testing.

October 14, 2022: The trainer's counsel again complained about the aforementioned courtesy-provided lists of labs, falsely claiming that because the Commission would not permit disclosure of the Lab's report (NOTE: permitting as much during an investigation would be unprecedented), “We are unable to proceed with our election for split sample testing.”

November 16, 2022: Again, as a courtesy and convenience, the Commission sent the trainer's counsel an updated published list of lab options for split sample testing (downloaded from RMTC's website), and even pre-filled the split-sample request form. The Commission advised that, “As soon as the Commission is notified by the laboratory that you select, indicating that they have received your requests and the fee for performing the tests, we will ship the blood to that laboratory for analysis.”

November 23, 2022: Texas A&M's laboratory agrees to conduct the split-sample testing.

December 8-16, 2022: the Commission coordinates the trainer's payment of and shipment of the split sample to be tested at the Texas A&M Lab:

December 21, 2022: Texas A&M receives the sample for split-sample testing

January 28, 2023: Texas A&M confirms finding in split sample to the Commission, which then informs State Steward of the confirmation.

February 3, 2023: Test results of split-sample are sent to trainer's counsel and Commission.

February 22, 2023: State Steward advises trainer's counsel of March 2, 2023 Steward's Hearing, stating: “Please let your client know he can be available by phone.”

The trainer's counsel informed the State Steward that March 2 was not possible due to a prior scheduled obligation and that they expect to attend in person.

February 23, 2023: The State Steward offered March 22, 23, or 29 as possibilities for the “Stewards Hearing.”

March 1, 2023: The trainer's counsel asked for the “Stewards Hearing” to take place on March 23.

March 8, 2023: The State Steward clarified the purpose of the “Stewards' Hearing,” as:

“…not an adjudicatory proceeding … but …a meeting to provide your client, a licensee, with an opportunity to be heard before I consider potential regulatory action. …  a licensee may have counsel … to provide counsel/advice to the licensee. As the meeting's purpose is to provide a licensee with an opportunity to be heard, however, a licensee's counsel is otherwise only able to attend the meeting as an observer, and is not able to ask the stewards questions or to elicit any type of testimony or evidence… If some sanction of the licensee results, there would be a later opportunity for the licensee to request a de novo adjudicatory hearing, at which time the types of hearing procedures you suggest may be available pursuant to SAPA and Commission regulations.”

Despite this and prior explanations, the trainer's counsel again requested “hearing 'guidelines,'” the New York Lab test results, a confirmation of certain of witnesses and more records with an artificial one-day deadline of March 9, stating: “if it is not met, we will have to adjourn without date.”

March 13, 2023: The trainer's counsel and the owner of the horse proposed an inappropriate “conference in advance of the March 23 “Stewards Hearing,” stating that the horse's owner “believes this discussion of preliminaries will be in all parties' interest as well as in the best interest of the sport.”

Further complicating the scheduling of an already-postponed “Stewards' Hearing,” the Trainer's counsel represented that the owner “might find that his formal appearance is mandatory to ensure the integrity of the sport and that the process is conducted in a fair manner.”

March 14, 2023: The Commission Steward responded to the trainer's counsel, reiterating that the “Steward's Hearing will move forward as previously described to provide Mr. Pletcher an opportunity to be heard. As it is an opportunity for a licensee to provide the stewards with any additional information or evidence that the licensee wants the stewards to consider prior to my implementing a decision as the State Steward, Mr. Pletcher may present witnesses to provide such additional information at that time.”

March 16, 2023: The trainer's counsel responded with a list of 17 witnesses – in addition to the trainer – they wished to speak at the “Stewards' Hearing” and asked for a confirmation by end of the day.

March 18, 2023: The Commission responded to the trainer's counsel:

“…the Stewards Hearing is an opportunity for Mr. Pletcher to be heard. If Mr. Pletcher wants to present witnesses (to appear and provide information voluntarily), he may do so.”

March 20, 2023: The trainer's counsel responded to Commission:

“…While we appreciate the ability to present witnesses, your failure of a timely response leaves us with insufficient time to contact and prepare our witnesses.  …Consequently, we are respectfully postponing the Thursday Hearing.  Once we have reached out to everyone and secured time on their schedules, I will get back to you with dates.

March 22, 2023: The Commission Steward grants another the postponement of the “Stewards' Hearing” and offers March 30, April 12, April 19, May 3, or May 10, noting:

“… if the Stewards Hearing does not take place on or before May 10, 2023, no further dates will be offered, and Mr. Pletcher will be deemed to have declined the opportunity.”

March 23, 2023: The trainer's counsel selects the May 10, 2023 date.

May 8, 2023: The trainer's counsel writes to the Commission Steward:

“An unforeseen circumstance has caused Mr. Pletcher to remain in Kentucky and, thus, he is unable to be present on Wednesday for the 'Stewards Hearing.' Accordingly, he respectfully requests an adjournment without date at this time.”

The Commission Steward responds to the trainer's counsel:

“As you will recall, on March 22, 2023, I advised that if the Stewards Hearing does not take place on or before May 10, 2023, no further dates will be offered, and Mr. Pletcher will be deemed to have declined the opportunity. In light of your email of May 8, 2023, we offer that Mr. Pletcher may appear at the May 10, 2023, Stewards Hearing via videoconference, in order to take part in a Stewards Hearing. Please advise as soon as possible so that we may set up the videoconference. Otherwise, we will note that Mr. Pletcher has declined the opportunity to participate in a Stewards Hearing and proceed accordingly.”

May 9, 2023: The trainer's counsel writes to the Commission Steward:

“…we are at this very moment showcasing the entire racing Industry on a National stage. And in doing so, the subject of extraordinary and appropriate scrutiny (on that point, I have been contacted by a prominent reporter of a national New York publication who can not be called a friend of racing concerning the subject at hand). The misfortune of the tragedies at Churchill Downs will only be wrongfully amplified should the Board of Stewards proceed at this time. As such, we respectfully renew our request that tomorrow's Stewards Hearing be adjourned until after the completion of the Triple Crown — an action that is certainly in the best interests of our entire racing community. …Second, as is always the case, the health and welfare of the horse must come first and there will be no exception here. The “unforeseen circumstance” mentioned above is the scratching of the Kentucky Derby favorite Forte and then having him placed on Kentucky's veterinary list. This requires Mr. Pletcher's complete attention as he will be monitoring him on a daily basis. In full transparency, tomorrow morning Forte is scheduled for testing at which both Mr. Pletcher and his owner will be in attendance. Mr. Pletcher, therefore, is unable to participate, even remotely, in the Stewards Hearing at that same time. …Because of the urgency of this matter, we expect to hear back from you at your earliest convenience or no later that 8 AM tomorrow morning.”

The Commission Steward responds to trainer's counsel:

“…we have repeatedly have offered and will again offer that Mr. Pletcher may appear at the May 10, 2023 Stewards Hearing via videoconference, in order to take part in the Stewards Hearing. In light of his schedule in the morning, we are able to reschedule the Stewards Hearing for a later time tomorrow, at 1:00 p.m. Please advise as early as possible if Mr. Pletcher wants to proceed tomorrow, so we may set up the video conference. Otherwise, we will note that Mr. Pletcher has declined the opportunity to participate in a Stewards Hearing and proceed accordingly.

5:33 p.m.: Forte's Owner to Commission Steward: “We both look forward to the hearing!!!!!”

May 10, 2023: The “Stewards Hearing” took place.

The post NYSGC Provides Forte Timeline appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Dutrow Relicensed In New York

Richard E. Dutrow, Jr., the GI Kentucky Derby-winning trainer whose history of racing infractions resulted in a 10-year license revocation in New York for a period that recently concluded last month, on Monday was granted a trainer's license by the New York State Gaming Commission (NYSGC).

The announcement was read into the record during the regularly scheduled Feb. 27 NYSGC meeting without commentary by commissioners.

“The former New York State Racing and Wagering Board revoked the Thoroughbred trainer's license of Richard E. Dutrow, Jr., on Oct. 12, 2011, imposing ineligibility to apply for any license for 10 years and [fining] him $50,000,” said NYSGC executive director Robert Williams.

“Mr. Dutrow administratively and judicially contested the penalties [that commenced] Jan. 17, 2013. Having already satisfied his fine, Mr. Dutrow's term of revocation ended on Jan. 17, 2023,” Williams said.

“Mr. Dutrow recently applied for a Thoroughbred trainer's license, which was reviewed by the Bureau of Licensing in consultation with the division of racing,” Williams said.

“Review found that Mr. Dutrow satisfied the penalty imposed by the Racing and Wagering Board, and his record is bereft of transgressions during his period of revocation. Accordingly, the bureau has determined to issue a license to Mr. Dutrow to participate in New York horse racing,” Williams said.

Dutrow spent the better part of several decades appealing medication-related penalties in several jurisdictions, and in 2013 he filed a failed federal lawsuit seeking monetary damages and a reinstatement of his licensure.

According to Equibase, Dutrow's trainees earned more than $87 million between 1979 and 2013. His trainees won multiple graded stakes, including the 2008 Kentucky Derby (Big Brown) and two Breeders' Cup races, and he often topped the trainer standings at New York tracks during the 2000s decade.

Dutrow's rap sheet of racing offenses totals at least 75 infractions spread out over multiple jurisdictions. In addition to his troubles with equine medication violations, his sanctions over the decades include multiple penalties for personal drug use, check forgery, falsified applications, failing to report a criminal conviction, plus various license refusals for “moral turpitude,”  “evidence of unfitness,” and attempts to “deceive state racing officials.”

This story will be updated.

The post Dutrow Relicensed In New York appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

New Ruling on Changes Leaves NYRA, Trainers Puzzled

The notice began appearing on the overnight in early January. “By order of the stewards. Pursuant to NYSGC RULE 4033.8. Effective February 1st, only equipment specifically approved by the stewards shall be worn or carried by a jockey or a horse in a race. No equipment change (including shoes) will be allowed once the overnight is published.”

“There is no new rule,” wrote Brad Maoine, Director of Communications for the New York State Gaming Commission in response to TDN's request for information about the new posting on the overnight. “The intent of the message is (to) ensure that the betting public has access to accurate information regarding equipment changes in a timely fashion.”

But a reading of the NYSGC's rule 4033.8 reveals no mention of a horse's equipment, and reads only, “Only equipment specifically approved by the stewards shall be worn or carried by a jockey or a horse in a race.” There is no mention of equipment changes for horses after the publishing of the overnight in the ruling as stated on the Gaming Commission's website.

Trainers, horsemen's representatives and the NYRA expressed confusion over what the impetus for the rule was, and concern over the repercussions.

Right now, NYRA races are drawn either five, three or two days in advance of the race, with any late changes announced on the t.v. and general address system at the track, and off.

“NYRA has mechanisms in place to inform the betting public in the event of a late equipment change,” said NYRA spokesman Patrick McKenna. “This new rule does nothing to further protect horseplayers and will likely penalize owners for administrative errors that can easily be corrected in real time.”

“I think there are several issues with it,” said trainer Todd Pletcher. “My first concern would be over an occasional shoe situation. We've had scenarios where a horse sheds a frog and we train the horse in an aluminum pad, and we try to keep it on to complete their training, which is usually right up to the day of the race. If you want to make that shoe change you sometimes literally don't know until game day. Entries in most jurisdictions are becoming further and further out, so that's one concern.”

Secondly, he said, “everyone makes mistakes occasionally, and maybe you made an honest mistake and didn't enter with blinkers, and caught it after the overnight came out, or maybe the racing office made a mistake and didn't note blinkers on. It seems as if there should be a 24-hour grace period.”

Trainer David Donk conceded that in a perfect world, trainers would and should indicate changes of equipment at entry time, but that the current system of taking entries by phone, rather than by computer with mandatory fields filled out, made it more likely for errors to be made.

“Why can't I enter online?” said Donk. “Listen, it is the trainer's responsibility. I probably don't have a real problem with it, but is it the commission overstepping? I don't see where it's coming from, and why there can't be a grace period? Common sense says there should be some compromise.”

Donk said that he imagined that the equipment changes hinted at would be blinker changes or the addition of a bar shoe. Attorney Drew Mollica—who has represented numerous clients in conflicts with the Gaming Commission, including two currently–said that he envisioned that the rule would not only make it more likely to cause unnecessary scratches, but could be subject to legal challenges.

“No shoe changes after entry puts the horse in jeopardy and hurts the track,” said Mollica. “Say a horse pops a small quarter crack and needs a bar shoe. If that is announced, does that not protect the owner, the public, the horse and the track? But under this rule, he must scratch. Why?”

“And how about blinkers?” he continued. “Say a horse breezes on the day after entry and the trainer thinks blinkers would help, but now has to scratch or run without equipment that could benefit his performance because the new rule says he must scratch or not wear them? Who does this help? In a game that has enough natural landmines, do we have to plant more?”

Will Alempijevic, the executive director of the New York Thoroughbred Horsemen's Association, replied in an email, “NYTHA is currently engaged in discussions with both the NYSGC and NYRA to understand the issues that precipitated the change.  We will continue to play an active role to see if we can collectively come up with proposed solutions to everyone's mutual benefit.”

The post New Ruling on Changes Leaves NYRA, Trainers Puzzled appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Suspended NYRA Clocker Denied Stay, Claims Absence Will ‘Harm’ Horsemen

Richie Gazer, the longtime NYRA head clocker who is set to begin a 30-day suspension and pay a $2,500 fine for “altering a published work of a horse to make the horse eligible to race,” has been denied a stay of his penalties by the New York State Gaming Commission (NYSGC) while he seeks to elevate the case to the state court level.

Gazer's attorney, Karen Murphy, confirmed the NYSGC's denial to TDN on Friday afternoon, shortly after the commission emailed her the decision stating the stay would not be granted. She said at this point, Gazer has exhausted all his commission-level appeals.

“This is a purely vindictive response. I am actually shocked by the whole thing,” Murphy said.

In making the case for a stay to be granted, Murphy had written to the commission that Gazer's “absence from his duties as the Head Clocker for the significant suspension imposed will be harmful to all NY horsemen and horsewomen whose horses rely on his daily services.”

On Dec. 12, the NYSGC voted unanimously to uphold Gazer's commission-level appeal of penalties by rejecting a hearing officer's recommendation that the case be dismissed.

Instead, the commissioners imposed the original penalties that had been handed down earlier in the year by Braulio Baeza, Jr., the NYSGC state steward at the three New York Racing Association (NYRA) tracks.

Gazer's penalty stems from a May 19, 2022, stewards' ruling in which he changed a published five-furlong work by subsequently substituting the correct four-furlong split from within that longer work.

The purpose of providing the half-mile timing was to make a horse eligible to come off NYRA's “poor performance” list, which is governed by a seldom-triggered rule that does not allow for a workout farther than four furlongs.

“The decision to issue the penalty [is] without precedent and lacking strong basis to affirm the decision…” hearing officer Dayrel Sewell wrote in his Oct. 21 report that recommended vacating Gazer's penalty. “Respondent has a spotless 40-year track record, and there is no evidence of corruption or favoritism towards a trainer(s) during his employment as head clocker.

“Although there is no regulation [specific to what Gazer was accused of doing], the Stewards have discretion on how to handle this, but the discretion must be proportionate to the harm and there must be boundaries to the practice of discretion,” the hearing officer summed up.

The commissioners' outright rejection of the hearing officer's months of work in conducting the hearing and writing up the report is somewhat unusual. But in most state jurisdictions, racing commissioners are not bound to accept the opinions of the hearing officers, who are often attorneys, that they hire to hear appeals.

An exasperated Gazer has called the entire ordeal “a joke.” On Dec. 18, TDN's Bill Finley editorialized that the decision by the NYSGC to penalize the clocker was a “disgrace” that bucked common sense.

Murphy told TDN on Dec. 30 that Gazer is still clocking horses, and that he has yet to be informed when his suspension is supposed to start.

“He's at work and he'll be able work until [Baeza] sets the [dates for the] suspension down,” Murphy said. “But am I going to be able to get into court and get an injunction to stop that suspension? I think that's probably a hope that is beyond our reach at this point.”

Murphy explained that Gazer's court appeal involves a type of filing known as Article 78, which is a New York law by which a petitioner asks a court to review a decision or action of a state official or administrative agency to determine whether such action was unlawful.

Murphy added though, that petitioners have to weigh whether going through the courts is worth it, because Article 78 cases are expensive to litigate and often languish in the court system for months or even years.

TDN asked Patrick McKenna, NYRA's vice president of communications, if there was anything trainers needed to know about the morning clocking routine given Gazer's pending suspension and the in-limbo court appeal.

“Richie Gazer is a deeply experienced professional whose presence and skills as a clocker would absolutely be missed at Belmont Park should the NYSGC suspension take effect,” McKenna wrote in an email. “That said, NYRA does have the necessary staff in place to adequately cover his duties.”

Back on Dec. 12, NYSGC chairman Brian O'Dwyer said during the meeting that, “The commission reviewed the entire record [and] established the violation as a matter of fact…. And in particular, found that the conduct was improper in relation to commission rule 4042.1(f).”

That rule prohibits “improper, corrupt or fraudulent” acts or practices in relation to racing or conspiring or assisting others in such acts or practices.

Along with O'Dwyer, NYSGC commissioners John Crotty, Peter Moschetti, Jr., Christopher Riano, Marissa Shorenstein and Jerry Skurnik all voted in favor of rejecting the hearing officer's recommendations not to penalize Gazer.

The outcome of their vote, which had taken place at some point prior to the open, public meeting, was simply read into the record, and the commissioners did not debate any specifics or discuss findings during the Dec. 12 meeting itself.

The post Suspended NYRA Clocker Denied Stay, Claims Absence Will ‘Harm’ Horsemen appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights