Open Letter To The Industry: Tom Rooney

Many of you may have seen that last week a bill was introduced in Congress to repeal the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act, better known as HISA. I want to set the record straight as to what this legislation does or doesn't do, assure you that the bill isn't going anywhere in Congress, and stands no chance of becoming law.

First things first-it's important to remember that any member of Congress can introduce a bill. They write the language, file the bill, and voila it's been introduced. Just in the 118th Congress, which began in the beginning of 2023, more than 10,000 bills have been introduced. Of those more than 10,000 bills, only 14 have become law. It's important to have that perspective to truly understand why the likelihood of this bill ever becoming law is next to nothing.

Now let's get to this particular bill. Introduced by Congressman Higgins from Louisiana, the Racehorse Health and Safety Act (RHSA) has just one cosponsor. In order for any bill to become law, it needs a lot of support, support that comes in the form of “cosponsors.” HISA had more than 260 cosponsors and was supported by both Republicans and Democrats. RHSA only has one, and both are Republicans. In fact, the member of Congress who has been working to garner support for this bill for months has decided he can no longer support it. Without bipartisan support and many cosponsors, bills don't go anywhere in Congress.

Now to the lack of merits of the legislation. The very same people who spent years and millions of dollars fighting in Congress and in the courts against uniform safety standards and a unified regulator would now have us believe that they are actually for uniform safety standards and a unified regulator. The goal of RHSA is to repeal HISA, return the industry to the state-by-state patchwork regulatory system, and then create a unified regulator and unified safety standards. You read that correctly-this bill suggests rolling back all the work HISA has done, turn the industry back over to the states, and then create its own regulatory body and rules. Instead of trying to work with HISA, within the scope of the law, HISA's detractors are simply wasting everyone's time.

Congressman Higgins and the detractors of HISA know that it would take years to slog through the cumbersome process of passing enabling legislation in nearly three dozen racing states to establish RHSA. Repealing HISA to then enact RHSA with the consent of 32 states would be similar to the time-consuming process of amending the Constitution, which has only happened 27 times in more than 200 years. This bill is a laughable attempt to turn back the clock on track safety and anti-doping rules – which is precisely why there is so little support in Washington for the HISA repeal bill.

As I've said for months, these detractors need to put an end to their arguments. It is crucial that the whole of the Thoroughbred industry comes together for the betterment of our sport. In these challenging times, we must rally around HISA to ensure the highest standards of integrity and safety are upheld. The Racehorse Health and Safety Act would set the industry back when we should be setting aside our differences and working collaboratively towards a brighter, safer future for Thoroughbred racing under the guidance of HISA which is already the law of the land. Together, we can safeguard the integrity and longevity of this beloved sport.

Tom Rooney is the President and CEO of the National Thoroughbred Racing Association. He formerly served in the U.S. House of Representatives for five terms, representing the state of Florida.

The post Open Letter To The Industry: Tom Rooney appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

NTRA Joins Dean Dorton for Nationwide Survey on Farm Employee Compensation

The National Thoroughbred Racing Association (NTRA) has joined the certified public accounting and professional business advisory firm, Dean Dorton, in conducting a nationwide survey focused on Thoroughbred horse farm employee compensation. The survey includes questions related to average hourly and salary pay rates for various positions, bonuses, health insurance, housing, visa programs, internships, retirement plans, and more.

All Thoroughbred farm owners are encouraged to complete this survey, which will allow comparison and sharing of state-specific results to those of the nationwide respondents. All information from specific respondents will remain completely anonymous.

The deadline to complete the survey is Thursday, Aug. 31.

Click here to complete the survey.

The post NTRA Joins Dean Dorton for Nationwide Survey on Farm Employee Compensation appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

NTRA Adds Stephanie Hronis To Board Of Directors

Stephanie Hronis, a long-time member of the Thoroughbred racing community, has been added as a board member of the National Thoroughbred Racing Association Political Action Committee. The move was announced Monday by Board Chairman Bill Farish and President Tom Rooney. Hronis is part of the Hronis Racing ownership team, alongside her husband Kosta, his brother Pete, and their family.

“It is a great honor to join the NTRA Horse PAC® and to support the significant work being done to ensure the longevity of the horse racing industry,” Hronis said. “This is especially a priority during the industry's current period of significant change for the betterment of our equine and human athletes.”

“Stephanie's leadership and commitment to the racing industry is beyond admirable, which I believe makes her a perfect addition to our team,” said NTRA President and CEO and Horse PAC® President Tom Rooney.

The post NTRA Adds Stephanie Hronis To Board Of Directors appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Letter to the Editor: On The Triple Crown

Since the advent of professional sports, change has been a necessary part of the game. Adjustments have been made to make sports more safe, more practical, and more entertaining for the audiences. While change is never easy, sometimes it's necessary. From adding the three-point line in basketball, to implementing more stringent concussion protocols in football, to adding the pitch clock in baseball, making changes in sports doesn't mean taking away from the sport. Instead, change helps the sport evolve with the times, and make the experience as positive as possible for the athletes, teams, enthusiasts, and owners. The time has come in Thoroughbred racing for our own change, to modernize the timeline of the Triple Crown.

The current timeline was created in a different era in racing, back in 1932, 13 years after Sir Barton was the first to win the Kentucky Derby, Preakness, and Belmont Stakes in 1919. In fact, the term Triple Crown wasn't even used until Gallant Fox won the three races in 1930. In the 91 years since the five-week timeline was created, a lot has changed in racing and there are many benefits worth considering to potentially change the structure we have today. Instead of these condensed five weeks, what if the Kentucky Derby stayed the first Saturday in May, the Preakness was the first Saturday in June, and the Belmont was the first Saturday in July. Leaving multiple weeks in between three of the industry's most high-profile races, racing the top three-year-olds, would lend to a smoother transition between events and a more competitive, robust field to compete for the coveted Triple Crown. Incidentally, this new plan leaves about a month before the start of Del Mar and Saratoga which should satisfy the same cadence.

Trainers today have different philosophies than those in the past, and normally allow several weeks between races for top horses. For example, the 128 horses that competed in the Triple Crown races from 1979 to1983 made 3,769 starts in their career; 1,585 of those starts came within 14 days or fewer of their last start. By contrast, the 96 horses that competed in the Triple Crown races from 2007 to 2011 made 1,870 starts in their career and just 98 of those starts came within 14 days or fewer of their last start. Because of this change in training philosophy, many of the top horses from the Kentucky Derby that do not win skip the Preakness, solely because of the quick turnaround between races. What's more, as the industry continues to focus on improving safety and welfare standards for the horses and jockeys, you would be hard-pressed to find a trainer or owner who would choose to race at any level after two weeks. So why take that risk on the biggest stage? Tradition? As stated, other sports have evolved and adapted to the times. The tradition argument presumes all tradition is good, which is not necessarily true.

This year's Kentucky Derby was the second-most watched sporting event in this country, second only to the Super Bowl. Millions of viewers tuned in, picked their horses, and wished for the best. A lot of people spend a great deal of time getting to know the Derby contenders to place their bets. Imagine the increased interest there would be if more Derby contenders ran in the Preakness and the Belmont. I believe this would lead to even more excitement and rivalries throughout the Triple Crown season to see who really is the top 3-year-old in the country. Even a horse that ends up being scratched in the Derby like 2-year-old champion Forte gets a lot of coverage. Under a better separation of races, it's very conceivable that Forte could have run in the Preakness. But because of the existing rules and timing of his scratch, a quick turnaround to the Preakness was impossible. Under a more pragmatic Triple Crown schedule that might not be the case.

Of course, the three races are the property of Churchill Downs, the Maryland Jockey Club and the New York Racing Association. Ultimately, any change to an individual leg would be made solely by the respective organization. But this is a decades-old debate that is worth bringing to the forefront of public mind.

We all know winning a Triple Crown is an elusive goal. Twenty-five years separated the victories of Citation (1948) and Secretariat (1973), and nearly 40 years separated the victories of Affirmed (1978) and American Pharoah (2015). There's no saying if a change to the racing schedule would make any difference in this. But it is possible that by adjusting the schedule, Thoroughbred racing could see increased competition among the best horses and an expanded window of heightened mainstream interest. For those reasons alone, it's worth the discussion.

Tom Rooney is the president and CEO of the National Thoroughbred Racing Association. He is a former member of the US House of Representatives, serving Florida's 17th Congressional District. He and his family own and operate Shamrock Farm, a Thoroughbred breeding farm in Carroll County, Maryland.

The post Letter to the Editor: On The Triple Crown appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights