Study: Can Adoption Combat Wild Horse Overpopulation?

In March of 2020, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) estimated that there were about 95,000 wild horses and burros living on federal land, with an additional 50,000 being kept in holding facilities – more than triple the number of animals for appropriate land management, reports The Horse

The BLM says that private adoptions of these wild animals are key to controlling the overpopulation problem. Dr. Jill Stowe, a University of Kentucky associate professor of agricultural economics, and Hannah White, Stowe's student, created a survey to determine what horse owners thought about this solution to overpopulation. The team created a survey that was shared on social media to try to determine if enough people were willing to adopt one of these animals to eliminate the excess of animals. 

The survey received 2,247 responses from horse owners who were over 18 years old. The research team found that more than 90 percent of those surveyed would be receptive to adopting a wild horse or burro in some capacity.

The scientists also found that “ … respondents are willing to pay an average of $282.03 more for a horse that has received training for basic ground manners and $539.21 more for a horse that has been started under saddle as compared with a completely unhandled horse,” reports Stowe.

Additionally, previous wild horse and burro adopters are willing to pay more, indicating that their first adoption experience was positive. 

The team found that the two biggest barriers to adopting a wild horse or burro was accessibility to appropriate facilities and lack of experience, skills and time to start an unhandled horse.

Stowe concluded that if 4 to 5 percent of horse-owning households in the United State adopted one wild horse or burro, the 70,000-animal surplus could be eliminated. She suggested that education of horse owners on adoption requirements, training of horses and targeted information dissemination could help place more wild horses and burros.

Read more at The Horse

The post Study: Can Adoption Combat Wild Horse Overpopulation? appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Veterinarian: Well-Meaning Public Making It More Difficult And Expensive To Deal With Wild Horse Issue

The problem of what to do with thousands of wild horses and burros that roam through Western states continues to present a challenge for the Bureau of Land Management, and one veterinarian said a well-meaning public isn't helping.

“I think one of the biggest problems is the American public views horses as a symbol of the West,” said Dr. Tom Lenz at this week's American Horse Council virtual conference. “They almost have a mystic quality to people. So, most of the public's perception of how the horses should be managed is based on emotion and very little understanding of how these horses interact with the range and wildlife and other animals. They have a significant impact on Congress, which then limits the BLM.”

Lenz is a longtime veterinarian, diplomate of the American College of Theriogenologists, past president of the American Association of Equine Practitioners and has chaired the AAEP's Welfare Committee, as well as the welfare committees of the American Horse Council, Professional Rodeo Cowboys' Association, and the American Veterinary Medical Association. He provided an update to American Horse Council conference attendees in his capacity as a member of the Bureau of Land Management's Wild Horse and Burro Advisory Board.

The question of what to do with wild horses and burros has been in the headlines for years, with wild horse advocates expressing concerns about techniques the government has used to control the populations thus far and seeking to limit the number of horses that may be rounded up by the government each year. Critics of the BLM question whether the agency overestimates the number of horses on public lands and points to the large number of cattle allowed to graze on public lands, competing with the horses for resources.

Lenz said the BLM believes an appropriate number of free-ranging horses and burros would be about 27,000 animals. The government's current population estimates have 95,114 animals on the range as of March of this year. That doesn't count horses on non-BLM federal, state, or tribal lands, which could number more than another 100,000.

Critics of the BLM have also raised questions about the agency's figures on population growth, which Lenz characterized as “exponential.” Lenz presented an example — in February 2016, 2,700 horses were counted in a given herd management area. Two years later, 1,400 horses were gathered and removed from that space; the number of foals born in 2016, 2017, and 2018 completely offset the round-up, leaving the number in that herd management area at 2,700 in May 2018.

The U.S. Geological Survey indicates herd sizes for wild horses are increasing at rates of 12 to 36 percent annually, which means they're growing faster than the amount of forage and water available to them. Lenz said recent round-ups of horses have taken place because a particular herd was discovered starving in its home base. In times of drought, wild horses are known to move into towns, cities, private land, even golf courses in search of food and water — creating safety hazards for humans and for themselves.

So far, Lenz said efforts to reduce the population to manageable levels have been ineffective. The BLM does use a pelleted, feed-through form of contraceptive, but hasn't been able to get it to enough horses to produce an appreciable impact. There are contraceptive vaccines available for horses, but they have to be administered annually and while many wild horses are tolerant of people, they often won't come close enough to be vaccinated via dart more than once. Chemical or surgical vasectomies have not been effective for stallions; intrauterine devices are effective for mares, but must be inserted while the mare isn't pregnant — a challenge, as most female wild horses are pregnant by the age of two.

BLM agents have even tried removing stallions from herds, but has found that besides the potential welfare implications of disrupting a herd's social structure, mares end up being bred by stallions from other bands.

Round-ups are still the agency's primary method of population reduction. On average, Lenz said the BLM removes 6,000 animals from the range a year, though the last two years it rounded up slightly more than that. The problem comes in when those horses don't find adoptive homes after they're taken off the range. A huge chunk of the BLM's budget goes into warehousing horses in long-term holding areas if they aren't good candidates for adoption or don't attract any interest from the public. Lenz said horses in long-term holding facilities can live well past the age of 20 and end up costing the Bureau an average of $48,000 per head. A horse who is adopted within two and a half years may cost the Bureau $8,000. There are 50,020 animals in short and long-term holding pastures and corrals currently.

Adoptions were up last year — to 7,276 horses instead of the usual 3,400 or so — thanks in part to an adoption incentive program started by the BLM which pays adopters $1,000 for taking a wild horse or burro. Half the money is paid when the horse is picked up, and the other half is paid six months later after a representative has inspected the horse in its new home and verified it is being properly cared for.

Moving forward, Lenz is hopeful the BLM can get the population of wild horses under control by making its budget more efficient. The new goal will be to gather 18,000 to 20,000 horses annually (three times more than the current average), distribute pelleted contraception to between 3,500 and 9,000 horses each year and transition 6,000 to 7,000 horses to private care. The BLM will also be looking to identify partner organizations that can house 18,000 to 20,000 for lifetime care, removing existing financial burdens from the agency's books and allowing it to focus on population control instead of caring for warehoused horses.

Ultimately, Lenz said, these initiatives will make for a better life for wild horses and burros — especially if it means fewer of them will be out on the range.

“I think the problem we have today is that the public, through Congress, is managing the horses, rather than the BLM managing them through scientists,” Lenz said. “That's what's got us to where we are today.”

The post Veterinarian: Well-Meaning Public Making It More Difficult And Expensive To Deal With Wild Horse Issue appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Ethical Assessment Of Wild Horse Welfare

Some people believe wild horses left to their own devices would live happy, healthy lives. While this might sound plausible, scientists and equine advocates have never had the ability to accurately assess the welfare of these free-roaming horses—until now.

Researchers in Australia and New Zealand have developed a protocol to assess the quality of life of wild horses and other free-roaming animals. Assessing a horse's welfare is not easy: Accurate welfare assessment requires objectivity, scientific validity and repeatability, says Dr. Andrea Harvey, a member of the research team who invented the protocol. She, along with colleagues Drs. Ngaio Beausoleil, Daniel Ramp and David Mellor created a process that will allow different people to reach the same assessment of an animal's welfare.

The team created a 10-step approach that will evaluate the physical and emotional status of free-roaming animals. The protocol uses the Five Domains Model with conservation in mind; the system details information that should be considered with different species, as well as how to observe and measure them.

The protocol then delves into specifics that are relatable to both scientists and lay people. They encompass measuring and validating welfare indicators and confidence levels, as well as creating “grades” for levels of welfare.

The scientists note that many well-meaning people project their own emotions and feelings onto the animal while trying to assess their welfare—this could lead the person to a very different conclusion than what the animal is actually feeling and is not an objective way to assess animal welfare.

The protocol has already been used to assess the welfare of brumbies in Australia, which, like Mustangs in the United States, has become politicized. The research team hopes that the creation of this protocol will assist in clear and ethical decision making regarding free-roaming horses.

Read more at Horses and People magazine.

Read the full article here.

The post Ethical Assessment Of Wild Horse Welfare appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights