Lasix Debate: The Stronach Group Refusing To Card 2-Year-Old Races In Maryland

Unless the Maryland Racing Commission directs otherwise, there will be no 2-year-old races in Maryland in 2020 in light of the refusal of The Stronach Group, owner of the Maryland Jockey Club, to card 2-year-old races unless they are lasix-free.

In March 2019, TSG announced that it would impose a ban on lasix in horses born after 2018 at its racetracks. The action stemmed from a series of catastrophic injuries at Santa Anita—though it was widely acknowledged that lasix had nothing to do with that situation and the announcement was considered a misdirection to deflect criticism of the company's safety and welfare practices and track maintenance. Subsequently, TSG joined with a coalition of racetracks that announced they would seek to ban lasix in 2-year-olds beginning in 2020 and all stakes races beginning in 2021.

The Boards of Directors of the MTHA and Maryland Horse Breeders Association, in response to the TSG announcement, met jointly to review the TSG lasix announcement. The Boards determined to issue a joint statement in opposition, and it was released on April 24, 2019. In response, TSG President Belinda Stronach asked to meet with both groups, and a meeting was held at Laurel Park during Preakness week in 2019.

At the meeting, the group discussed the situation and sought to have Ms. Stronach appreciate how the racing industry in the Mid-Atlantic region works collaboratively to ensure that jurisdictions adopt the same rules and regulations in an effort to continually build upon uniformity for the benefit of horsemen, racetracks and the public. She acknowledged that Maryland is not California or Florida—the other states where the company owns racetracks—and agreed to work collectively with Maryland leaders on the lasix issue and not impose any mandates that would put Maryland at a severe competitive disadvantage with its surrounding states.

The groups also indicated a willingness to discuss lasix policies and told Ms. Stronach that they would be willing to provide meaningful funds for research to find a suitable alternative to Lasix that would control respiratory bleeding in the horse and not be necessary on race day. Both the MTHA and MHBA invited Ms. Stronach to join in the funding effort.

To date, Ms. Stronach has made no effort to meet with the horsemen and breeders or engage in any discussion about changing lasix policy in Maryland or the Mid-Atlantic region.

At the same time, the MRC was asked whether TSG could impose a lasix ban by “house rule.” The Attorney General's Office, in a letter of advice to the MRC, stated:

“Clearly, COMAR 09.10.03.08 permits administration of race-day lasix. Accordingly, because the administration of lasix is allowable on race day, implementing a house rule forbidding its administration would be in contravention of the current regulations … Accordingly, it is the advice of this office that the potential imposition of a house rule by the licensee to prohibit the administration of race-day lasix is not allowable without modification of COMAR 01.10.03.08.”

Subsequently, during the negotiations last fall for funding the proposed Racing and Community Development Act for Pimlico Race Course and Laurel—in which substantial funding was sought from the horsemen and breeders for the next 30 years—both Boards made clear that a process for future medication policy, among other items, would need to be resolved in order for any permanent funding commitments could be finalized. In reliance on the belief that such a process would be agreed upon in any long-term agreement required in legislation, both groups agreed to support the plan to make it financially viable. Had TSG been forthright with both Boards at the time about its plans to impose its own lasix policies without any discussion or regulatory review, and the manner in which TSG actually planned to proceed, it is highly unlikely that either Board would have committed to funding the Redevelopment Plan for the next 30 years.

As it became apparent when live racing resumed May 30 that the MJC was not carding 2-year-old races, repeated inquiries to the MJC and TSG by the MTHA were met with explanations having nothing to do with lasix policy until June 18 when suddenly, and without any prior notice or discussion with the MTHA and MHBA, TSG advised the MRC by letter, and in a Press Release issued at the same time, that it intended to begin carding non-lasix 2-year-old races beginning June 24 by “house rule” despite the Attorney General's opinion to the contrary.

In a legal brief filed with the MRC, TSG asserted that it did not need the racing commission's approval, that the regulations did not apply to the company, that it had the right to card such races under its common law powers, and that the regulation on bleeders was poorly written and permitted TSG to card such races. In an acrimonious and contentious meeting June 25, the MRC rejected TSG's arguments, advised the company that it could not card non-lasix races for 2-year-olds without a rule change, and referred the lasix issue to its newly formed Equine Health, Safety and Welfare Committee that was mandated by the Racing and Community Development Act of 2020.

In response to a question about whether TSG planned to card 2-year-old races under current regulations in addition to non-lasix races, TSG announced that it would refuse to card races in which the horses could be administered lasix, notwithstanding that Maryland law permits horses to receive such a medication.

In an effort to defuse the crisis, get 2-year-old races carded, and help the industry continue to recover from the economic crisis caused by the COVID-19 outbreak, the MTHA Board of Directors on July 1 offered to TSG to permit 2-year-old races to be carded for the next 90 days, with 50% of such races to be run under the current rules and 50% of the races to be run lasix-free, and commence discussions with TSG and the new MRC Safety and Welfare Committee on future lasix policy.

The offer was promptly rejected by TSG, but TSG offered that it would be willing to card some non-lasix Maryland-bred 2-year-old races with bonuses paid by TSG. The MTHA unanimously rejected this offer.

Which brings us to the current situation. The manner in which this matter has been raised and handled by TSG, particularly in light of the history of this issue over the past year, commitments it made to the Maryland racing community that were not honored, and the current economic crisis in Maryland racing where it has lost two-and-a-half months of live racing, pari-mutuel revenue and video lottery terminal revenue because of the shutdown and currently can only afford to race twice a week, is bewildering to say the least.

Trainers have been conditioning 2-year-olds for months waiting for a race. Owners and breeders are taking a major financial hit, particularly with Maryland-bred 2-year-olds that must race in state to qualify for the lucrative owner and breeder bonuses that are depended upon to sustain their operations. On July 1, a $40,000 maiden special weight event at Delaware Park was split into two divisions, each with seven horses—almost all Maryland-based.

We are appalled and disheartened by the defiant manner and tone in which TSG has chosen to act. We have no problem discussing and reviewing Lasix policy in racing. It has been a decade since the industry conducted an intensive scientific and political review of its Lasix program, and the current regulatory scheme, the most uniform in racing, should be reviewed.

To its credit, the MRC wants to undertake a review before changing current regulatory policy and agrees the discussion shall be regional in scope. There are scientific, equine safety and welfare, integrity and public policy issues to be considered. Apparently, TSG does not want this discussion. Rather, it simply wants to dictate policy to trusted partners without any discussion and review and is holding Maryland racing and breeding hostage to achieve its goals.

In the process, TSG is causing economic havoc and has badly damaged a decade of partnership, trust and progress in Maryland racing—the renaissance of Maryland racing—as all stakeholders and the MRC have worked collectively to lift the industry and keep disagreements behind closed doors. If successful in its strategy,TSG could set a precedent going forward that could have them dictating industry policy without any input from horsemen and breeders or regulatory oversight by imposing their own rules and regulations and in the process, reduce this industry to division and acrimony.

The MTHA regrets that the possibility remains there will be no 2-year-old racing in Maryland this year. As was stated at the June 25 MRC meeting: “Maryland racing deserves better.” We trust the MRC recognizes it powers and responsibilities and will firmly deal with a track owner who believes it can do what it wants and without any regard for the industry at large.

The post Lasix Debate: The Stronach Group Refusing To Card 2-Year-Old Races In Maryland appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

MD Commission Pushes Back on Lasix-Free 2YOs, The Stronach Group Vows to Write No Juvenile Races

After the Maryland Racing Commission (MRC) on Thursday refused to vote or otherwise rule on a late agenda request to allow The Stronach Group (TSG) to card Lasix-free races for 2-year-olds, an attorney for the TSG-owned Maryland Jockey Club (MJC) told the commission that the MJC-owned Laurel Park wouldn’t be scheduling any juvenile races at all under the present rules that allow the use of the controversial anti-bleeding medication.

“We currently [don’t] have, and I don’t believe we will have, any intent of carding a 2-year-old race under the condition of the administration of Lasix,” said Alan Rifkin, the MJC’s lawyer. “Our position on Lasix isn’t going to change.”

With over 100 juveniles currently in training at Laurel and no races for 2-year-olds yet run or on the horizon in the state, Rifkin’s avowal prompted commissioner Thomas Bowman to predict a short-term “devastating effect on Maryland racing, because the horses are going to have to go out of state to run.”

Alan Foreman, the chairman/chief executive officer of the Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association (THA), whose members include Maryland owners and trainers, said TSG did not approach horsemen or breeders in advance of bringing the matter up before the commission June 25.

“We suspected something was up weeks ago because they weren’t carding 2-year-old races,” Foreman said, adding that the THA reached out to TSG officials for an explanation. “We couldn’t get an answer. We waited weeks to get an answer. We kept getting bounced around.”

Foreman continued: “So here we have, in the middle of the COVID pandemic, the horsemen with their backs up against the wall economically. We’ve got an industry we’re trying to rebuild. We’ve got barns full of 2-year-olds, and they come in this past week and tell the commission, ‘Oh, by the way, we’re not writing 2-year-old races with Lasix. Either you do it our way, or we’re not going to write those races.’ And we have to tell our horsemen now to take their horses out of state.”

Michael Algeo, the MRC chairperson, likened the way the MJC broached the no-Lasix topic as akin to trying to change the rules in the middle of a football game.

“And if you don’t agree with the change of the rules, we’re going to take our ball and go home,” Algeo added.

Algeo made it clear at the outset of the discussion of the agenda item that the June 18 request in the form of a letter from TSG technically came in too late to be considered for the monthly meeting, but he wanted to end up including it because the medication issue was of such importance.

Algeo said the letter, signed by Craig Fravel, TSG’s chief executive of racing operations, stated, “we intend to begin scheduling races for 2-year-olds [without Lasix] and hereby inform the commission that your action is required.”

Algeo said he was “somewhat taken aback” at receiving what appeared to be more of a written directive, rather than a request, from TSG. He noted the letter was accompanied by a press release about the 2-year-old Lasix ban that seemed to suggest the commission’s compliance was a foregone conclusion. Algeo said TSG then submitted a lengthy legal memorandum only 48 hours before the June 25 teleconference, meaning it came in too close to the meeting for commissioners to read and understand in a timely manner.

“That, sir, put us in a very difficult position,” Algeo told Rifkin. He then added in a curt tone that underscored his annoyance, “And it’s a position that I don’t like to be put in.”

Nonetheless, Rifkin was allowed nearly 18 minutes of uninterrupted testimony to state TSG/MJC’s case on not allowing 2-year-olds to race on Lasix.

“We are not asking the commission for a ban on race-day Lasix. We agree with you Mr. Chairman, that is a question for another day,” Rifkin said. “All MJC intends to do here is present the opportunity to owners or trainers who voluntarily wish to race their 2-year-olds drug-free of Lasix…without the competitive disadvantage of other horses using Lasix.”

Rifkin said no new regulation or law would be needed to approve the Lasix-free races for juveniles. He explained that’s because the current Lasix regulations hinge on the word “permissible” and not “mandatory” when describing how the drug is to be used.

“That regulation speaks to what owners and trainers may do. Not what the [MJC] must do,” Rifkin said. “That is, there is nothing in that regulation that requires MJC to run any races for horses using Lasix.”

Rifkin then pointed out that another section of the state’s regulations limit Lasix doses on race day to “not more than 100” nanograms.

“Quite obviously, carding a race with zero nanograms of Lasix as a voluntary condition of entrance is less than the maximum permitted 100 nanograms,” Rifkin said. “That’s entirely consistent with that regulation.”

As for the request coming in only a week before the meeting (and after an edition of the MRC agenda had already been publicly noticed), Rifkin said, “I know there is some concern that this has come upon you fast. But it really hasn’t in some respects. The debate over Lasix has been here for awhile.

“We submit that MJC has a legitimate business reason and absolute right to conduct drug-free races,” Rifkin continued. “There is no law, regulation, or condition that prohibits that action, [and that the 2-year-old Lasix ban] is in the best public interest of equine safety and the public’s general interest.

“While it may be permissible–in other words voluntary–for an owner or trainer to administer Lasix, it does not mean the track licensee is obligated to be an accomplice and run races for the benefit of those horses who have been administered the drug.

“The action we are taking here is modest,” Rifkin summed up. “The action we are taking here is a first step.”

Algeo replied that, “I understand what your argument is. I understand your interpretation. With all due respect, I just simply disagree with it.”

Algeo said that according to his interpretation, there is no statutory, case law, or regulatory authority that allows the commission to tell the MJC it can run certain races without Lasix.

“I happen to believe that…the best interests of Maryland racing would be to actually continue racing 2-year-olds with Lasix,” Algeo said.

After Algeo made his points, Rifkin asked for clarification: “Are you telling us we must run races for 2-year-olds with Lasix?”

“No sir,” was Algeo’s reply.

On the heels of that exchange was when Rifkin, in answer to another commissioner’s suggestion that Laurel try carding both Lasix-allowed and Lasix-free juvenile races to see what happens, stated his above-quoted desire by the MJC not to write any 2-year-old races at all under the current circumstances.

Algeo closed the discussion by saying that the commission’s official action on the item for Thursday would be to refer the no-Lasix proposal to the MRC’s newly formed safety and welfare committee, with the request that the issue be expedited so it can be taken up at a future meeting before the full commission.

The post MD Commission Pushes Back on Lasix-Free 2YOs, The Stronach Group Vows to Write No Juvenile Races appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Three Turf Races Selected For Friday’s Stronach Pick 5; Pool Guaranteed At $100,000

Races from Laurel Park and Gulfstream Park, including three on the turf, will comprise Friday's Stronach 5, a national wager featuring a $100,000 guaranteed pool and industry-low 12-percent takeout.

The sequence kicks off with Laurel's sixth race at 3:33 p.m. A field of maiden 3-year-olds and up will go six furlongs on the Fort Marcy turf course. The sequence concludes on the Fort Marcy approximately an hour later with fillies and mares also going six furlongs. The second leg of the Stronach 5, Gulfstream's sixth race, is the $55,000 Paradise Creek for 3-year-olds and up at a mile on the turf with stakes winner Renaisance Frolic, graded-stakes placed Tizzarunner, stakes-placed Forever Mo, and Sailing Solo.

Friday's races and sequence

· Leg One – Laurel Park 6th Race: (10 entries, 6 furlongs turf) 3:33 ET, 12:33 PT

· Leg Two –Gulfstream Park 8th Race: (6 entries, 6 ½ furlongs) 3:41 ET, 12:41 PT

· Leg Three –Laurel Park 7th Race: (10 entries, 1 1/16 mile) 4:06 ET, 1:06 PT

· Leg Four –Gulfstream Park 9th Race: (12 entries, 1 mile turf) 4:13 ET, 1:13 PT

· Leg Five –Laurel Park 8th race: (11 entries, 6 furlongs turf) 4:38 ET, 1:38 PT

Fans can watch and wager on the action at 1/ST.COM/BET as well as stream all the action in English and Spanish at LaurelPark.com, SantaAnita.com, GulfstreamPark.com, and GoldenGateFields.com.

The Stronach 5 In the Money podcast, hosted by Jonathan Kinchen and Peter Thomas Fornatale, will be posted by 2 p.m. Thursday at InTheMoneyPodcast.com and will be available on iTunes and other major podcast distributors

The minimum wager on the multi-race, multi-track Stronach 5 is $1. If there are no tickets with five winners, the entire pool will be carried over to the next Friday.

If a change in racing surface is made after the wagering closes, each selection on any ticket will be considered a winning selection. If a betting interest is scratched, that selection will be substituted with the favorite in the win pool when wagering closes.

The Maryland Jockey Club serves as host of the Stronach 5.

The post Three Turf Races Selected For Friday’s Stronach Pick 5; Pool Guaranteed At $100,000 appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Maryland Jockey Club Announces Intent Write No-Lasix 2-Year-Old Races

The Maryland Jockey Club sent a letter to the Maryland Racing Commission this week indicating the intent to begin writing 2-year-old races which prohibit the administration of Lasix withing 24 hours of the race, according to the Thoroughbred Daily News.

“The time has come to phase out Lasix beginning with 2-year-old horses,” said Belinda Stronach, Chairman and President, The Stronach Group and 1/ST. “We are following through on 1/ST Racing's commitment to put horse and rider safety and welfare at the forefront. We believe in the principle that horses should only be racing free of medication. By taking this important step together, the Maryland racing community will become stronger and provide the right foundation for our sport to progress into the future.”

The Maryland Commission told the Daily Racing Form it would have no comment on the letter until it determined the legality of the decision.

“The fundamental question is whether they have the authority to do this under current Maryland law,” Alan Foreman, the general counsel to the Maryland Thoroughbred Horsemen's Association, told drf.com.

Read more at the Thoroughbred Daily News and the Daily Racing Form.

The post Maryland Jockey Club Announces Intent Write No-Lasix 2-Year-Old Races appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights