Letitia James | Horse Racing Free Tips

The New York State Gaming Commission, represented by the office of New York State Attorney General Letitia James, has filed a memorandum of law with the Schenectady County Supreme Court regarding trainer Linda Rice's legal appeal of her three-year suspension.

According to the Thoroughbred Daily News, the July 2 filing argues that “Ms. Rice is not entitled to a preliminary injunction staying enforcement of the commission's determination. Ms. Rice is not likely to succeed on the merits of any of her claims, and the equities weigh in favor of the commission. Accordingly, the motion for a preliminary injunction should be denied.”

Rice had seen her license revoked officially on June 7, two weeks after the NYSGC voted to uphold a hearing officer's recommendation that Rice's license be revoked with the condition she could not reapply for licensure for at least three years. She had also been ordered to pay a fine of $50,000 and was to be denied all access to New York gaming commission-sanctioned properties.

The County of Schenectady Supreme Court granted a temporary restraining order two days after the New York State Gaming Commission issued the order to revoke her training license, allowing Rice to resume training in New York until her legal appeal is played out in the court system.

Rice is accused of receiving information from the racing office about which horses were entered in which races prior to the official close of entries. The alleged information exchange took place over a period of 2011 and 2014, and the commission first brought a complaint against Rice in 2019. A series of hearing dates took place in late 2020, during which the commission and Rice's attorney presented information to a hearing officer along with numerous volumes of data and interview transcripts.

The July 2 filing states:

“Ms. Rice moves for a preliminary injunction staying enforcement of the commission's penalty for her misconduct. The motion for a preliminary injunction must be denied because Ms. Rice has not shown a likelihood of success on the merits or that the equities weigh in favor of preliminary injunctive relief…

“Because Ms. Rice failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits, the Court need not address the remaining elements. Nevertheless, Ms. Rice also failed to demonstrate that the equities weigh in her favor. Rather, the equities weigh against the granting of a preliminary injunction because of the magnitude of impropriety at issue.”

Read more at the Thoroughbred Daily News.

The post New York Commission: ‘Magnitude Of Impropriety’ Stands Against Preliminary Injunction For Rice appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

The New York State Gaming Commission (NYSGC) has fired back in court at Linda Rice's legal appeal of her three-year license revocation and $50,000 fine for “improper and corrupt conduct” that the trainer had deemed “unduly harsh.”

In a July 2 memorandum of law opposing Rice's request to have her penalties vacated, the NYSGC's legal team argued that “Ms. Rice is not entitled to a preliminary injunction staying enforcement of the commission's determination. Ms. Rice is not likely to succeed on the merits of any of her claims, and the equities weigh in favor of the commission. Accordingly, the motion for a preliminary injunction should be denied.”

The filing was made in Schenectady County Supreme Court by lawyers from the office of New York State Attorney General Letitia James, which is representing the NYSGC in the matter.

On May 17, culminating an investigation that had stretched over five years, NYSGC members voted 5-0 to agree with a hearing officer that Rice's years-long pattern of seeking and obtaining pre-entry information from New York Racing Association (NYRA) racing office workers was “intentional, serious and extensive [and] inconsistent with and detrimental to the best interests of horse racing.”

The ban went into effect June 7. Two days later, Rice's legal team secured a temporary injunction from the court that allows her to resume training while the legal process played out.

Rice's trainees have won at a 17% clip overall in 2021, but are just 2-for-26 since that June 9 injunction got her back on track.

The state is arguing in favor of letting the suspension and fine stand.

“From winter 2012 to June 2014, horse trainer plaintiff-petitioner Linda Rice regularly and routinely received information not available to any other trainer–the names and past performance of horses entered in races before that information became public–from an employee of the NYRA,” the opposing memo stated.

“Ms. Rice used this confidential information to determine whether she would enter or withdraw her horses in specific races, thereby choosing the races where her horses would have the best chance of winning and avoiding those races where her horses might have been less competitive.

“In so doing, Ms. Rice improperly obtained a competitive advantage to the detriment of other trainers, the owners of horses not trained by Ms. Rice, and the public.”

Over the course of an eight-day NYSGC hearing late in 2020, Rice contended she did nothing wrong by using her inside sources to gain a competitive advantage over other trainers.

“Ms. Rice moves for a preliminary injunction staying enforcement of the commission's penalty for her misconduct,” the July 2 filing stated. “The motion for a preliminary injunction must be denied because Ms. Rice has not shown a likelihood of success on the merits or that the equities weigh in favor of preliminary injunctive relief.

“With respect to Ms. Rice's CPLR Article 78 claims, substantial evidence supports the agency's determination. Ms. Rice admitted to obtaining the non-public race entry sheets and multiple witnesses deemed credible by the hearing officer testified that the names and past-performances of horses in overnight races are universally understood in horse racing to be confidential….

“Ms. Rice contends that the commission's determination was arbitrary and capricious because it departed from precedent. Yet Ms. Rice makes no showing that the commission treated her case differently than others, despite having the burden to demonstrate the conflict with past precedent she alleges. According to Ms. Rice, because no one had been caught and disciplined for behavior such as hers, the commission failed to follow its past practice.

“Ms. Rice's argument that the commission failed to properly weigh her disciplinary history or significance to the sport is baseless. The hearing officer explicitly acknowledged Ms. Rice's accomplishments and positive contributions to the sport…

The post NY Commission Hits Back at Rice in Legal Filing appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post