CHRB Elaborates on Specifics of Baffert Suspension

Earlier this week, a Kentucky judge denied trainer Bob Baffert's attempts to stay a 90-day suspension related to Medina Spirit's betamethasone-positive disqualification from the 2021 GI Kentucky Derby by the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission (KHRC).

While the appeals process plays out, the question now is: What will happen to the nearly 100-horses in Baffert's California-based stable if the suspension goes into effect on April 4.

As the TDN previously reported, the California Horse Racing Board (CHRB) will honor the 90-day suspension metered down to Baffert through a system of reciprocity between jurisdictions.

That honor system is laid out in CHRB rule 1484: “If any applicant for a license or any licensee is under suspension, set down, ruled off, excluded from the inclosure, or otherwise barred from any racing occupation or activity requiring a license, it is prima facie evidence that he or she is unfit to be granted a license or unfit to hold a license or participate in racing in this State as a licensee during the term of any suspension or exclusion from racing imposed by any competent racing jurisdiction.”

On Tuesday afternoon, the CHRB elaborated further on the specifics of any such suspension.

Citing CHRB rule 1843.3 which deals with disciplinary actions stemming from medication violations, licensed trainers suspended for 60 days or more shall be banned from all CHRB licensed facilities.

“In addition, during the period of suspension, such trainer shall forfeit all assigned stall space and shall remove from the inclosures all signage, colors, advertisements, training-related equipment, tack, office equipment, and any other property,” the rule states.

The CHRB also prohibits a trainer suspended for more than 30-days from transferring the horses to any licensed family member, or to any other licensee employed by the suspended licensee within the previous year.

“'Licensed family members' means any person who holds an occupational license issued by the CHRB and who is related to the suspended licensee, or the licensee whose license is revoked, by blood, or by marriage or domestic partnership, or who is related by blood to the spouse or domestic partner of such licensee,” the rule adds.

As written, the rules do not preclude a licensed trainer with no immediate ties to Baffert from assuming the running of his stable in whole or in part, including employees, should the relevant owners in Baffert's barn agree to such a replacement, explained an expert on these matters who asked to remain anonymous.

There would, however, be a set of strict stipulations governing such a scenario, the expert explained.

Baffert would not be allowed to directly contact that trainer for the period of the suspension, for example. And all financial duties of the day-to-day running of the barn—such as payroll and other routine stable costs—would also be the replacement trainer's sole responsibility.

The KHRC has yet to weigh in officially on this particular matter. In its original ruling, the KHRC ruling states that, “Entry of all horses owned or trained by Mr. Baffert is denied pending transfer to persons acceptable to the stewards.”

The TDN emailed the KHRC for clarification on who the Kentucky stewards deem acceptable but has not yet received a response.

The post CHRB Elaborates on Specifics of Baffert Suspension appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Baffert Stay Denied by Franklin County Judge

The Franklin (Ky) Circuit court has denied Bob Baffert and Amr Zedan a stay of the suspension handed down by the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission after Medina Spirit (Protonico) tested positive for betamethasone in the Kentucky Derby, ruling that the plaintiffs are not entitled to a temporary injunction.

The ruling was filed Monday afternoon by Judge Thomas Wingate, who wrote that Baffert met none of the requirements necessary for relief, and that it wasn't the job of the court to make the decision.

On February 21, 2022, nine months after the Derby, the KHRC stewards disqualified Medina Spirit and suspended Baffert for 90 days. Baffert and Medina Spirit's owner, Amr Zedan, appealed the ruling and petitioned KHRC Executive Director Marc Guilfoil for a stay. On Feb. 25, Guilfoil denied that request. On Feb. 28, Baffert and Zedan moved the KHRC for a stay. On March 17, in Franklin County Court, the plaintiffs and the KHRC presented their arguments.

“Under KRS 230.320(2)(f), the role of this Court's review is not to make an independent decision,” the document states. “By statute, Guilfoil was charged with determining whether good cause existed to issue the requested stays. Guilfoil provided the reasoning behind his decision to the Court on March 17, 2022, and the Court holds that Guilfoil did not act arbitrarily or abuse his discretion in denying Plaintiffs' requests for stays. Guilfoil cited the role of the KHRC, as crafted by the General Assembly, and Baffert's four (4) medication positives in the past 365 days”

The judge ruled that Baffert had not demonstrated irreparable injury which would be caused by the suspension, which he said was unlike the cases of other athletes presented by the plaintiffs. “Athletes have a finite period of eligibility or peak performance,” the ruling states, making the distinction between his horses, who could still compete, and himself, who could return to his coaching role after the suspension. “However, Baffert is not an athlete. He is a trainer, much more akin to a coach. Unlike certain athletes whose careers are subject to a small window of eligibility or period of peak performance, Baffert's career has spanned decades and will continue following this brief suspension.”

The judge said that the suspension would begin on April 4. “The Court understands the gravity of this ruling on Plaintiffs,” the document reads. “Accordingly, the Court will alleviate this impact by staying the implementation and enforcement of Stewards Rulings 21-0009 and 21-0010 until April 4, 2022. In the interim, Plaintiffs may seek emergency relief with the Kentucky Court of Appeals and take any necessary action to comply with the ramifications of the penalties imposed. However, absent relief from a reviewing court, the penalties imposed by Stewards Rulings 21-0009 and 21-0010 shall take effect on April 4, 2022.”

This story will be updated.

 

The post Baffert Stay Denied by Franklin County Judge appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Familiar Arguments at Hearing for Baffert’s Stay of Suspension

The hearing on the motion for a stay to be granted for Bob Baffert's 90-day suspension by the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission (KHRC) was held on Thursday, Mar. 16 in the Franklin County (Ky) Circuit Court, with both sides repeating what are now familiar arguments about the initial ruling.

Thursday's court hearing was held after the original hearing scheduled on Mar. 2 was postponed when it became apparent that the KHRC would be holding a special meeting two days later to consider and rule on Baffert's request for a stay. This meeting was held on the appointed day and the KHRC voted 10-0 to deny stays of penalties while Baffert and owner Amr Zedan appeal the drug positive rulings related to the disqualification of Medina Spirit in the 2021 GI Kentucky Derby. These penalties include a 90-day suspension and $7,500 fine for Baffert while Zedan was ordered to forfeit Medina Spirit's purse winnings.

After the KHRC board denied Baffert's appeal for a stay on Mar. 4, the matter was taken to the circuit court before judge Thomas Wingate, who did not give an indication of his final decision after Thursday's hearing but said a ruling would be determined by Monday, Mar. 21.

Baffert attorney Craig Robertson was the trainer's sole representative present in court on Thursday while fellow Baffert attorney Clark Brewster appeared later in the hearing over Zoom.

As Robertson began his opening statement, Wingate asked for clarification on the matter of the penalties that came out of Arkansas in May of 2020 when Gamine (Into Mischief) and Charlatan (Speightstown) tested positive for lidocaine. Both horses were initially disqualified and Baffert was handed a fine and a 15-day suspension, but the disqualifications and suspension were later overturned.

“What the facts showed were numerous issues with the original findings of the stewards,” Robertson explained, citing how one sample that supposedly came from Charlatan was incorrectly labeled as a sample from a gelding. “In the end, they set aside the stewards' ruling with no disqualification.”

In Robertson's opening statement, he discussed how the KHRC was attempting to paint Baffert as having a problematic drug violation history, but said that Baffert's violation record stacks up to virtually every trainer in America.

“Their narrative is false,” he said. “By any objective measure, Mr. Baffert has been a tremendous ambassador for horse racing.”

He continued in pointing out the significance of a 90 day suspension because the California Horse Racing Board (CHRB) has confirmed that they too will honor the suspension set forth by the KHRC. Trainers suspended 60 days or more are banned from all CHRB premises and must forfeit their stalls.

“It would essentially end his Hall of Fame career,” Robertson said. “It's preposterous that we would end a Hall of Fame career over a topical ointment. What's even more preposterous is that we end his career before he can appear in court.”

The KHRC is scheduled for a full hearing regarding Baffert's appeal on April 18th. Up to four days of proceedings are scheduled if needed.

“I'm not asking for you to rule today that Mr. Baffert wins on the merits of this case. That day will come. What I'm asking is that he not be forced to serve his penalty now until his case is heard. If he's forced to serve his penalty now, he can't get those days back if he subsequently wins the appeal. It's not uncommon for stewards' rulings to get reversed by the KHRC itself or by this court,” Robertson said, citing the 2015 Graham Motion case where Motion appealed a suspension and fine handed down by the KHRC. Both were later thrown out by Wingate.

Robertson's arguments placed heavy emphasis on differentiating betamethasone valerate–found in the topical ointment Otomax–and the intra-articular injection of betamethasone acetate. Test results obtained from the New York Equine Drug Testing and Research Laboratory confirmed the finding of betamethasone valerate in Medina Spirit's system.

Robertson noted that while KHRC regulations state that a 14-day stand-down period is required for the intra-articular administration of the corticosteroid as betamethasone acetate, he said that no such violation took place because there was no intra-articular injection of betamethasone as a corticosteroid. In addition, he said that KHRC regulations state that the presence of a detectable concentration of more than one corticosteroid will constitute a violation.

“They only prohibit injections of betamethasone acetate,” he said. “There is no prohibition or regulation of the topical ointment betamethasone valerate and no limit of detection standard unless there is more than one corticosteroid. The KHRC could have specified limit of detection for one corticosteroid or they could have specified for betamethasone topically. They didn't. They are asking for you to read things into the rules that simply don't exist.”

Jennifer Wolsing, the general counsel for the KHRC, began her statement by saying, “There has been a lot of talk about the unprecedented nature of the KHRC's action to deny the stay. It is our position and I would like to submit that Mr. Baffert's conduct is also unprecedented and justifies the stay denial that we have before us today.”

Wolsing went on to explain how Baffert's accrued penalties are “literally off the charts,” how the suspension is justifiable because he presents an elevated risk of re-offense and also how the suspension serves to protect racing participants, the horses, integrity in racing and the public's confidence in racing.

In response to Robertson's comments about the overturned rulings in Arkansas, Wolsing pointed out that Baffert still received fines for the positives from Charlatan and Gamine because the commission found that Baffert was “the absolute insurer of the condition of the horse.” Because Baffert was still fined for both horses, the KHRC considers these occurrence as two separate violations.

Judge Wingate asked Wolsing about the difference in the administration of betamethasone topically and intra-articularly.

“[Regulations] explicitly state, 'Except as expressly permitted in [in 810 KAR Chapter 9], while participating in a race, it is a violation if a horse carries in its body any medication that is foreign to the horse.'”

She went on to state that betamethasone is not expressly permitted, referencing the KHRC's Drug Classification Schedule where betamethasone is listed as a Class C medication. She explained that because the KHRC did not make a distinction as to the form of betamethasone, it therefore indicates that any form of betamethasone is considered a Class C violation. She also notes that a warning is listed on the withdrawal guidelines that states medication administered outside of the guidelines may lead to a positive test result.

“The source of betamethasone is pharmacologically irrelevant to its impact on the horse,” she said. “When betamethasone valerate is absorbed, valerate is cleaved off and you have pure betamethasone in a horse's system.”

When Wingate asked Wolsing about Robertson's earlier point about the KHRC attempting to put Baffert out of business, Wolsing responded by saying that it was not her understanding that the 90-day suspension would put Baffert out of business. She explained that he could transfer his horses to another trainer for that period and said that the trainer could apply for the same stall space and Baffert's employees would not necessarily need to be laid off.

Wolsing concluded, “At the end of the day, we have to look at who is more likely to prevail. Our regulations are very clear. Betamethasone, in whatever form, is completely prohibited on race day…We have unprecedented behavior and it is totally allowable for the KHRC to deny a stay. If it's allowable, this presents the appropriate case to deny a stay.”

Robertson did rebuttal several points from Wolsing's statement.

Addressing her statements regarding the medication specifically, he said that she is relying on a “catch-all” term that betamethasone is a foreign substance, but in looking at the regulations for betamethasone, regulations are clear about the intra-articular injection of betamethasone acetate but nothing is said about topical administration.

“There's nothing in there that says betamethasone valerate is prohibited,” he said. “They could have stated that, but they didn't. They can't go around punishing this man-and putting him out of business and ending his Hall of Fame career– for something they didn't put in their regulations.”

Addressing the fact that Baffert did pay fines for the positives of Charlatan and Gamine at Oaklawn Park, Robertson said that the stewards did not overrule the fines because of political pressure and that while Baffert could have appealed the fines and won, he did not because he considered the overturned disqualification and suspension a victory.

In regards to Wolsing's points about Baffert transferring his horses to another trainer if he is forced to serve the suspension, Robertson pointed out that such a transfer would have to be agreed upon by the other trainer and the horses' owners, and the other trainer would also have to agree to take on Baffert's employees.

“It's not nearly as simple as Ms. Wolsing tried to paint it,” he noted.

KHRC executive director Marc Guilfoil was called to witness to talk about denying Baffert's request to a stay.

When Wolsing asked about his decision, he responded that he put a lot of thought into it and cited the KHRC's mission statement of maintaining integrity and honesty in horse racing. He said that he reflected on Baffert's announcement in November of 2020 where he made several statements including that he would hire Dr. Michael Hore of Hagyard Equine Medical Institute to “add an additional layer of protection to ensure the well-being of horses in my care and rule compliance.” Guilfoil said that to his knowledge, Baffert failed to fulfill the promises made in the public statement.

“Trainer 101 is to look at a medication you're giving and see if there are any prohibited substances,” Guilfoil said, then referencing how Baffert's four medical violations within a one-year time frame averaged to one per 88 starts.

When Wolsing asked Guilfoil how Baffert's case compares to others he has worked on in the past, Guilfoil said, “The word unprecedented has been thrown around quite a bit and I do agree that it is unprecedented, and the two [violations] in Kentucky were two premiere races in the state of Kentucky.”

When Robertson had the opportunity to question Guilfoil, he asked Guilfoil if the executive director could conclude, without question, that he knew Baffert had not attempted to fulfill the promises made in the public statement, to which Guilfoil ultimately said he could not.

Attorney Clark Brewster, who represents both Zedan Racing Stable and Baffert, also gave a statement via Zoom. He too emphasized the distinction of betamethasone administered as a topical or an intra-articular injection and pointed out that prior to Medina Spirit's drug positive, Baffert had only had one medication positive in 29 years of racing in Kentucky. He ended by stating that he was confident that Baffert would ultimately be exonerated.

In order for Wingate to grant Baffert a stay, the judge must conclude that Baffert's stable would suffer irreparable harm without a stay and must also determine that the trainer's appeal could reasonably lead to an overturned ruling at the April 18th hearing.

The post Familiar Arguments at Hearing for Baffert’s Stay of Suspension appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

California to Honor Either Suspension or Stay of KY Baffert Ruling

As had been anticipated, the California Horse Racing Board (CHRB) will honor the 90-day suspension meted down to trainer Bob Baffert by the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission (KHRC) if the trainer's legal efforts to block the suspension aren't successful in the interim, confirmed a CHRB spokesperson Saturday morning.

Likewise, the CHRB will reciprocate any stay on the KHRC's ruling “if granted by a court,” the spokesperson confirmed in an email.

Earlier this month, the KHRC handed Baffert a 90-day suspension and a $7,500 fine after Medina Spirit (Protonico) tested positive for an elevated amount of betamethasone, a Class C anti-inflammatory corticosteroid, after last year's GI Kentucky Derby.

If enforced, the suspension will run March 8 through June 5.

On Friday, the KHRC denied Baffert's request for a stay on the suspension. In the immediate aftermath of that decision, Baffert's legal team stated that they would seek legal intervention in court.

“Denial of the stay is consistent with arbitrary and capricious manner in which the stewards have ignored the facts and law in this manner,” said Baffert attorney, Clark Brewster. “Fortunately, we will soon procedurally eclipse the biased actors and have the ear of adjudicators that adhere to the rule of law instead of man.”

The basis of the CHRB's actions is rule 1484, pertaining to “Evidence of Unfitness for License.”

The rule 1484 states: “If any applicant for a license or any licensee is under suspension, set down, ruled off, excluded from the inclosure, or otherwise barred from any racing occupation or activity requiring a license, it is prima facie evidence that he or she is unfit to be granted a license or unfit to hold a license or participate in racing in this State as a licensee during the term of any suspension or exclusion from racing imposed by any competent racing jurisdiction.”

When it comes to what will happen to the horses in Baffert's care for the duration of the 90-day suspension, the KHRC ruling states that, “Entry of all horses owned or trained by Mr. Baffert is denied pending transfer to persons acceptable to the stewards.”

The TDN emailed and texted Marc Guilfoil, the executive director of the KHRC, for clarification on who the Kentucky stewards deem acceptable, and whether that includes Baffert's assistants, but hasn't yet received a response.

The relevant rules in Kentucky appear unclear on the specifics of the horse transfer process in this particular scenario.

The TDN also asked the CHRB for clarification on what would happen to the horses in Baffert's care in California if the stay is denied in court. “We are currently working through the legal analysis with respect to whether reciprocation requires enforcement of the terms of suspension under California rules or Kentucky rules,” the CHRB spokesperson wrote, in response.

The CHRB's spokesperson did, however, highlight language in the CHRB's rules guiding disciplinary actions in cases where licenses are revoked through medication violations.

The CHRB prohibits a trainer whose license is revoked because of a medication violation from being able to benefit financially through the period of their suspension.

“This includes, but is not limited to, ensuring that horses are not transferred to licensed family members or to any other licensee who has been an employee of the licensee whose license is revoked within the previous year,” the rules state.

Furthermore, trainers suspended 60 days or more are banned from all CHRB premises, for example, and must forfeit their stalls and remove from their barn areas all “signage, colors, advertisements, training-related equipment, tack, office equipment, and any other property.”

The post California to Honor Either Suspension or Stay of KY Baffert Ruling appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights