New Agreements With ADW Companies To Increase California Purses; TwinSpires Lone Holdout

The Thoroughbred Owners of California (“TOC”), Del Mar Thoroughbred Club, The Stronach Group's 1/ST Racing and FanDuel Group's TVG have announced a new purse enhancement program that will inject up to $15 million into California Thoroughbred purses in 2021 and 2022.

The parties to the agreement, all major stakeholders in California Thoroughbred racing, believed that working together on additional sponsorship and purse enhancements would help support the state's racing industry in light of the loss of purse revenue due to the cessation of live racing in California in 2020 and the restrictions on on-site attendance due to public health requirements. The parties also share a commitment to support and promote the significant equine health and safety advancements made by California racing interests over the last two years.

“California racing has always been very important to TVG, and we are committed to continuing our support of the racing industry here, especially given the challenging circumstances the industry faced in 2020,” said TVG CEO Kip Levin. “We feel the right strategy is to partner with the stakeholders to further strengthen what has always been a premier racing circuit in the United States.”

In anticipation of the program, Santa Anita Park recently announced a 10% across the board purse increase for its 2020-2021 Winter/Spring Meet. With a daily purse average of $533,000, Santa Anita Park's purses are now competitive with the top circuits in the U.S. despite not receiving any casino gaming revenues or government subsidies.

“This is a great development for California horse racing,” said Craig Fravel, The Stronach Group's CEO of Racing. “Along with our horsemen and regulators, we instituted historic safety reforms starting in 2019. We believe these reforms and the enhanced purses previously announced have created a great racing environment that has already attracted top stakes horses, trainers and riders from all over the country to our current Santa Anita Winter/Spring meet.”

With the support of these purse enhancements, the Del Mar Thoroughbred Club is projected to increase average daily purse levels at its summer meeting to more than $600,000 in 2021, Del Mar officials indicated. Josh Rubinstein, Del Mar's president, stated, “Coming off our extraordinarily successful summer and fall meets in 2020, these increased purses, coupled with the growing excitement for the 2021 Breeders' Cup World Championships, sets us up for a fantastic 2021.”

The purse enhancements come as a result of new hub agreements involving TOC and the advance deposit wagering companies TVG and 1/ST Bet, also known as Xpressbet. With the coronavirus pandemic eliminating virtually all on-track wagering, the ADW companies enjoyed a financial windfall for most of 2020 and into 2021, as betting shifted online. In recognition of that, TVG and 1/ST Bet agreed to accept a lower fee – 4.1% instead of 5% – on all wagers from California residents through their platforms. Other, smaller wagering platforms have also agreed to the new terms, according to TOC.

Churchill Downs Inc.'s ADW company, TwinSpires, did not agree to the fee reduction and the matter will go to arbitration in accordance with California Business and Professions Code 19604.

“This unprecedented level of partnership among California's horsemen and women, FanDuel/TVG, The Stronach Group and Del Mar is just the beginning,” said TOC President Greg Avioli. “With sports wagering on the horizon and its potential to both add millions more to purse accounts and to create new horse players, combined with the successful safety and welfare measures instituted over the last two years by our race tracks, we are well on the way to returning California to its historic place as the country's premier racing circuit.”

The post New Agreements With ADW Companies To Increase California Purses; TwinSpires Lone Holdout appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Problems Persist with Gmax Timing System

Despite a press release in late August from Equibase in which the company announced it would be conducting an “extensive analysis” of its Gmax timing system, the technology has continued to produce a number of inaccurate times at the racetracks it services.

The TDN has found recent examples from Del Mar, Tampa Bay Downs and Penn National that show there were problems with the Gmax timing of the races. Gmax, which is operated in the U.S. by Equibase, relies on Global Positioning System (GPS) to record times, as well as providing additional information such as the running order of a race.

Equibase issued the press release after the TDN and other media outlets reported on a series of problems with the timing system since it was first introduced to American racing in 2018 and subsequently suffered a number of timing issues during this year’s Del Mar summer meet. Starting with the Aug. 2 card, Del Mar took the unusual step of relying not on Gmax, but on hand times, for all its grass races through the remainder of the meet.

The more recent problems were particularly pronounced during the early days of the meet at Tampa Bay Downs, where the Gmax system is being used for the first time. The chart for the first race on opening day, Nov. 25, notes that the race was hand-timed. During the running of the first three races of the day, no fractional or final times were posted on the toteboard as the races were being run.

After an uneventful day Nov. 27, the second day of the Tampa meet, there were several problems Nov. 28. The charts of five of the 10 races on the card noted that the races were hand-timed. In some of the races, no times were posted on the toteboard or through the simulcast feed while the races were being run. In others, the times listed were clearly incorrect. In the fifth race, the opening quarter time was posted as 33.81. In the sixth race, after the horses crossed the wire a time of 1:29.94 was listed for the quarter-time. In the seventh, the quarter-time was posted as 1:04.39 and the final time for the six furlong race went up as 1:10.71. In the official race chart, the running time is listed as 1:11.70, nearly a full second off the Gmax time originally posted on the toteboard.

Tampa Bay Downs President Pete Berube told the TDN that some of the problems with the posting of inaccurate fractional and final times were the result of errors being made by an outside vendor contracted to handle Tampa’s television graphics package. Berube added that he had not lost faith in the Gmax system.

“I am very confident with the times,” he said. “I know there has been a lot of talk about timings and things like that from the speed figure guys and I certainly appreciate that. But I am very pleased that Equibase is doing the video control with the timing to make sure we are putting out correct times because I know how important they are to the bettors.”

Over the Aug. 1-2 weekend, the original times of seven races at Del Mar were updated in the final chart. The altered times came in both turf and dirt races and the differences were as small as 0.07 seconds and as big as 1.19 seconds. Addressing the problems after the meet concluded, Del Mar officials announced that they had re-surveyed the turf course to “enhance timing and tracking accuracy with the state-of-the-art GPS system.” There was no mention of correcting problems with the timing for dirt races.

Speaking to the California Horse Racing Board in September, Del Mar President Josh Rubinstein told the regulators that the track would not have to rely on hand timing for the Bing Crosby meet because problems with the Gmax system had been corrected.

But the official charts for five races run at the Bing Crosby meet list that they were hand-timed. Two of the races were run on the dirt and three were turf races. Asked by the TDN to address the five hand-timed races, Rubinstein pointed to extenuating circumstances that led to the problems. Some of the problems, Rubinstein said, involved miscalculating how far the run-up distance prior to the start was and how far out the rails were on the turf course.

There were a handful of additional problems during the meet. Over the three-day span beginning Nov. 20, there were at least four races where Gmax times that went up on the toteboard while the race were being run were changed in the final chart.

Equibase President and COO Jason Wilson said there were issues with “probably 10 races” at the Del Mar fall meet.

Despite the problems with Gmax, Rubinstein said he remains a fan of the system.

“Del Mar continues to believe in the platform and GPS technology for timing and tracking” he wrote in an e-mail  “We’re working with Gmax and Equibase to provide the most accurate information possible.”

During November, there were numerous occasions at Penn National where the Gmax time was later corrected, with an adjusted time going into the official charts. On the night of Nov. 13 alone, the were seven races in which the final Gmax time was adjusted before going into the official chart.

Chris McErlean, the vice president of racing for Penn National Gaming, referred Gmax questions to Wilson.

Among the first to discover that there were problems with Gmax, the team that puts together the Beyer figures stopped using the Gmax times when making their numbers. Instead, they used a computer program that, they said, allows them to get accurate times by watching the replays. Wilson said that Equibase is now relying on a similar video timing program whenever it comes to their attention that a Gmax time may be inaccurate. By doing so, it appears that Equibase has been able to catch most of the mistakes and correct them before they become a permanent part of the charts and a horse’s past performance lines. But Wilson admitted that it would be preferable for there to be fewer mistakes in the first place.

“We use video timing as a way to check for races where there needs to be some investigation as to whether a time is good or not,” he said. “We will go in and review those races and make changes as we need to. People have probably seen some of that. I think we need to work on how we communicate those changes to people. A lot of this is growing pains and, unfortunately, it has been a bit more painful than we thought it was going to be. We are getting there. Obviously, video timing every single race is not, in the long term, sustainable. It’s just not a good use of resources.”

Gmax was developed by the British company Total Performance Data. In an Oct. 11, 2018, press release, Equibase first announced its partnership with Total Performance Data and that Gmax had been installed at Woodbine, Golden Gate Fields, Laurel and Pimlico. Gmax was being touted as an efficient and inexpensive timing system that could not only time races but provide tracks with such things as automated charts and dynamic video graphics. The problems began at the outset. Theracingbiz.com website reported that during a four-month period at Laurel beginning in Feb. 2019, 10 track records were set at Laurel and that it was later found that in all 10 cases the Gmax time was faster than the time recorded by traditional timing methods.

Wilson said that Equibase realized early on that an effort was needed to continually improve the system.

“When we went into this project, we didn’t necessarily look at it that we were buying something off the shelf, had to install it and that was that,” he said. “We definitely looked at it from a standpoint of how can we make the overall environment better and bring in more research and development. It’s not just times. It is information in general. How do we improve on that and make it better for everybody?”

That 21 months have passed since the first signs of problems at Laurel and Gmax is still creating a number of inaccurately timed races has raised questions as to whether or not Gmax will ever work properly and whether or not GPS is a good means of measuring time. In the meantime, other sports where timing is part of the equation have made great strides in their timing methods. The times for Olympic events are now so accurate that races can be measured at one-millionth of a second. Gmax times have been known to be off by as much as a full second.

Wilson said that tests have shown that Gmax is getting better all the time and he listed a number of steps Equibase has taken to improve the technology. Wilson acknowledges that the goal should be for the Gmax times to be so reliable and so accurate that they no longer come under question. He said he was confident that day would come.

“We are in the business of continuous improvement,” he said. “We don’t want to have to check the times with video timing going forward. We want to be to the point where we don’t have to go and check those times because we are confident they are accurate to, say, a tenth of a second 99% of the time.”

Editor’s note: Barry Weisbord, the founder and former publisher of the TDN, is the Chairman of Trakus, a competing timing and tracking system. 

The post Problems Persist with Gmax Timing System appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Q&A With Josh Rubinstein

Del Mar’s short fall meet ended this past weekend with a flourish and a blitz of top-class racing that lured quality runners from across the country, as epitomized by Chad Brown’s Grade I double courtesy of Domestic Spending (GB) (Kingman {GB}) in the Hollywood Derby and Viadera (GB) (Bated Breath {GB}) in the Matriarch S.

The meet rounded out what has been a challenging year for the track, to say the least, thanks to the extraordinary headwinds from a global pandemic, and the already tough economic environment for California horsemen. But the bare numbers underscore plenty of reasons for optimism.

The five-week fall meet carded 15% more races this year over last–131 races compared to 114 races last year. Total handle hit the $195.9-million mark, which constituted an increase of 32% over last season. The average field size also increased 9.5% over last year–8.1 runners per race compared to 7.4 in 2019.

In terms of equine safety, this has been yet another noteworthy year for the facility, with one racing fatality and two training deaths for the entire year, according to the California Horse Racing Board’s (CHRB) Equine Fatalities database.

To discuss both the year just passed and the road ahead, the TDN spoke to Del Mar Thoroughbred Club president, Josh Rubinstein.

TDN: Broadly speaking, what’s your main takeaway from the year as a whole?

JR: Well, 2020 has obviously been a very unusual year. Prior to 2020, the industry had been laser focused on equine safety. But due to COVID, safety took on an entirely new path. We knew it would take a very comprehensive plan to keep everyone at the racetrack and the surrounding community safe, and we’re fortunate to have a great team here at Del Mar. we’ve got terrific medical guidance from folks at Scripps [hospital], and we put together a detailed COVID response, protocols and procedures.

We’re also very fortunate to get buy-in from industry stakeholders. You can have as good a plan as there is on paper, but if you don’t have buy-in, it’s not worth a whole lot. The folks who are down at Del Mar every day, taking care of the horses, they took this extremely seriously, followed protocols, followed procedures.

Early on, when COVID hit, we weren’t even sure we were going to be able to race this summer. There was obviously a lot of uncertainty. There were closures. So, to have the year we did, both the summer and fall meet, producing some pretty significant increases is pretty remarkable.

Our racing product was excellent. I cannot say enough about the job our racing department, led by Tom Robbins and David Jerkens, did. Those guys are truly miracle workers. And we also got tremendous support from our local horsemen-they really supported us both meets, and it showed.

The Ship & Win [program] this year really helped with the depth of our racing product. We had 182 horses quality for the Ship & Win bonus, 104 in the summer and I believe 78 in the fall. These horses had 285 starts at our two Del Mar meets and most will remain and race in California at other racetracks this and next year. Once again, racing secretary David Jerkins was outstanding communicating to local trainers and owners the benefits of Ship & Win.

Because of COVID and lack of on-track revenues–not being allowed to have people on-site-our strategy, especially for the summer, was to run a maximum number of races over the high-handle weekends. We were running 11 [races] most Saturdays and Sundays, and nine and 10 [races] Friday over the summer.

We increased field size over the summer from 8.0 last year to 8.4, and in the recently concluded fall meet, the field size was 8.1 compared to 7.4 last year. So, really competitive quality racing, and the horseplayers support that.

TDN: The overall handle was certainly impressive, but as we know ADW revenues aren’t as lucrative for the horsemen as wagering at brick and mortar venues. How have the ADW numbers you’ve seen at Del Mar this year broken down into purse generation?

JR: I’ll touch on overall handle just for the moment. Given what I said earlier-that we weren’t even sure if we’d race this summer and what that would look like–we ended up with the second highest wagering year in Del Mar’s history.

Over $662 million was wagered between the summer and fall meet, and that’s second only to 2015, when we had 60 race days–40 in the summer and 20 in the fall–and that resulted in $677 million. So, to have those overall results, we were extremely pleased with that.

Overall, total wagering increased 8% during the summer, and that’s with 25% fewer race-days [than 2019]. The recently concluded fall-meet, wagering increased 32% [with 15% more races than 2019]. So, again, extremely solid numbers.

You mention ADW-we knew we were going to sink or swim this year with ADW, due to fans not being allowed on site, and very, very limited brick and mortar wagering. ADW was going to carry us or not. What we saw in the summer, in-state ADW was up 130% and out-of-state was up 70%.

But, in looking at the fall, there was some trepidation our end–we didn’t know if those numbers would hold. With college football and NFL coming back, would those online players shift to other sports? Fortunately for us, ADW numbers held-in fact, they increased. In-state ADW this fall was up 139% [on 2019], and out-of-state increased 108%.

While we had a really strong racing product, you’ve got to give some credit to ADWs, like our terrific partner TVG. Folks like TVG, when racing was the only game in town, they picked up new customers, and they did a very good job at retaining those customers with aggressive marketing.

As it relates to purses, ADW generated this year more than 60% of purses. Last year, ADW was responsible for 27% of our purse generation. So, with COVID restrictions, and the loss of nearly all of our high-margin on-track wagering-along with about two-thirds of the California on-track wagering network purse generation-you total that up for Del Mar, and that’s $115 million in loss of handle.

But even with that loss of high-margin handle, we were still able to pay out approximately $22.5 million in purses, and that’s level with last year. So, to have that $115 million yanked out from under you–and again, that’s high-margin on-track handle–to deliver purse generation of right around $22.5 million is significant.

Don’t forget, we had the benefit of being able to run most all of our race days. Santa Anita had to close for approximately two months, and we fortunately did not have that. Though we had those three days we had to postpone early in the summer due to some of our jockeys testing positive–although they were asymptomatic–we were able to make up two of those three days later in the summer.

TDN: You say that $22.5 million is a comparable purse payout to last year. Is that with the same number of races?

JR: We’re pretty much right in line with the same number of races [413 races in 2020 vs. 411 in 2019].

TDN: It’s been another great year for you safety wise. What do you think are the most important lessons you’ve learned in this sphere?

JR: We’re very proud of our safety record–I say ‘we,’ because it’s California. This has been a group effort between the racetrack operators, trainers, vets, everybody associated with the care of the horse, working with our regulator, the CHRB. For Del Mar in 2018 and 2019, we were ranked the safest major racetrack in the country, and our 2020 numbers are continuing that trend.

It’s not just us–you look at Santa Anita at what they’ve done. I applaud them–they’ve invested like we have in terms of additional oversight, and communicated on a regular basis with the backstretch community. They had a terrific fall meet–zero fatalities racing or training.

We know this has not been easy on the horse men and women of California–they’ve had to make significant adjustments to training and racing over the last couple of years. But the results speak for themselves–there has definitely been a cultural shift.

What we’re also seeing is other states, New York and Kentucky for example, they are adopting, or in the process of adopting, many of the reforms that were put in place in California. The fact that other states are following us I think says a lot about how what we’re doing is definitely going in the right direction.

I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention Dennis Moore, our director of track maintenance, who probably has the toughest job in the industry. Nobody works harder, cares more than Dennis. It’s an art and science, and Dennis does a fabulous job of combining those two things. We’re very fortunate to have him on our team.

TDN: I know the vagaries surrounding the coronavirus pandemic make long-term planning a dicey task, but looking forward, how are you aiming to navigate these enormous challenges next year?

JR: Like everyone, we’re hopeful a vaccine will soon be widely available, and allow some sense of getting back to normal, including fans attending the races. As we go through the budgeting process, we’ll look at multiple operational scenarios as it relates to the facility footprint. Like everybody in the sports and entertainment industry, it’s kind of wait and see in terms of a how we’re going to be allowed to operate, but we’ll adapt to the conditions. Our number one priority will be to maintain the safety of the horses and the safety of the people who care for them.

 

TDN: The possibility of year-round stabling at Del Mar has been recently mooted in some corners. How serious a proposition is that?

JR: Del Mar has been and will continue to be a long-term participant in the California horse racing industry. Del Mar won’t be sold or developed like other California racetracks have or may continue to be.

As a testament to Del Mar’s long-term equine commitment, over $11 million was invested in an onsite wastewater treatment facility here that will allow for horse activity on the property on a year-round basis. This project will be completed later this month.

The California industry took some criticism for not having a plan post Hollywood Park, and Del Mar is a long-term player in the industry. We believe it’s critical to ensure there’s sufficient first-rate stabling commensurate with a premier racing circuit. We believe year-round stabling at Del Mar helps to achieve that goal. This is especially the case if we’re to attract out-of-state stables to relocate here.

However, to be clear, we don’t own the property. And we must get approval from the 22nd District Agricultural Association, our landlord. We continue to have discussions with the 22nd DAA on the benefits of year-round stabling. Also, the substantial feedback we’ve received from owners and trainers has been that year-round stabling at Del Mar would be welcomed with open arms. We’re going to give it our best shot.

TDN: Is there a possible timeframe for that to occur? And what are the main obstacles standing in the way from this materializing?

JR: The first piece was getting the wastewater treatment facility done. That will be completed at the end of this month–operationally, that was critical. We couldn’t have addressed year-round training without that piece.

The second is the approval from the Ag’ District. The conversations we’ve been having have been positive. I don’t want to put a time-stamp on when we think that will happen, but we will continue to have conversations with them about stabling here.

Assuming we can get the approvals needed, 2022 would seem to be probably the earliest realistic time frame. But again, it’s something we’re focused on now, and are continuing to have discussions with the entities we need to, to hopefully make it a reality.

TDN: There’s a long way to go before next year’s Breeders’ Cup, which Del Mar of course is scheduled to stage next year. But have you started preparations?

We’re very excited to host the Breeders’ Cup. The 2017 Breeders’ Cup at Del Mar was the most profitable in the event’s history. People from all over flock to the Breeders’ Cup. Seventy percent of Breeders’ Cup attendees were from outside of California, so the economic impact on the local community was about $100 million-hotels, restaurants.

Even though it’s a year away, when you walk around town, people ask about the Breeders’ Cup, how preparations are going. We have already begun to have planning meetings with the Breeders’ Cup team. Fortunately for us, Nov. 5 and 6, 2021, is a ways off, so hopefully that time frame will allow the current environment to change, and allow us to put the event on with a similar footprint that we had in 2017.

The post Q&A With Josh Rubinstein appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Del Mar’s Bing Crosby Season Ends With Safe Racing, Bigger Fields, Increased Wagering

The Del Mar Thoroughbred Club continued its industry-leading safety record and its increased wagering trends as its Bing Crosby Season concluded on Sunday, November 29.  The five-week fall meet provided total handle of $195.9 million, an increase of 33% over last season

“A terrific meet on all levels,” said Del Mar's CEO, Joe Harper.  “First and foremost, the horses and people who care for them were safe.  Wagering, which fuels the industry's economic engine, exceeded expectations and the racing product was once again topnotch.”

Average field size was 8.1 runners per race, a healthy increase of 9.5% from 2019's number of 7.4. A total of 131 races were run, compared to 114 last year.  Grass racing, including the seven graded stakes that make up the “fall turf festival,” once again highlighted the Bing Crosby Season.  In total, races on the grass produced an impressive average filed size of 8.7.

“Outstanding support from our horsemen and horsewomen,” said executive vice president of racing, Tom Robbins. “The racing was extremely competitive and, judging by our handle numbers, horseplayers responded.  We raised purse levels prior to the meet and it's gratifying to see that pay dividends.”

Racing during the seventh Bing Crosby Season was first-rate and no more so than the track's “turf festival” emphasis on its closing Thanksgiving weekend when seven graded stakes were run on the green and drew 20 runners from the east to participate. Champion trainer Chad Brown was especially successful with his horses, winning four of the stakes including the track's two Grade I races – the Hollywood Derby with Domestic Spending and the Matriarch Stakes with Viadera.

The meet's riding and training champions looked familiar: they were the same pair that led the session last year. Jockey Abel Cedillo easily outdistanced his rivals with 19 wins during the 15-day meet. Conditioner Richard Baltas sent out 11 winners after having won last year's crown with the same 11 firsts.

Juddmonte Farms was the leading owner for money won at the session with $256,000, while owners Perry and Ramona Bass won the most races – five all told.

“To follow up our highly successful summer meet with these excellent fall season results, on both the safety and business side, is a credit to the Del Mar team and the partnership we have with industry stakeholders,” said DMTC president and COO, Josh Rubinstein.  “It has obviously been a very unusual year and we have dearly missed our fans. But we have hopes that 2021 will bring us all back toward normal and let racing shine again in its usual fashion at Del Mar.”

Del Mar now will look forward to hosting the Breeders' Cup on November 5 and 6, 2021. It will be the 38th running of the championship celebration that features 14 races worth $31 million. The seaside track previously hosted a record-breaking edition of the event in 2017.

The post Del Mar’s Bing Crosby Season Ends With Safe Racing, Bigger Fields, Increased Wagering appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights