horseracing integrity and safety act | Horse Racing Free Tips

HISA Questions and Answers: Part Two

This last week has witnessed a flurry of developments and information drops as the countdown to July 1–the official take-off for the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act (HISA)–continues apace.

Just last Friday, for example, HISA representatives fielded questions in an online industry forum, while the law's draft Anti-Doping and Medication Control (ADMC) rules have been issued for public comment.

HISA's official website can be found here, while the online registration portal can be found here.

Aside from providing a cheat sheet to help guide industry participants through the launch, TDN has been fielding unanswered questions that industry participants have about the process to register, and about the new playing field come July 1, forwarding them to HISA for response.

TDN published the first batch of questions last week. The latest batch is posted below, and includes this registration warning:

“Beginning July 1, 2022, horses will not be allowed to run in a race if the trainer has not registered the horse with HISA.”

Some of the following questions have been edited for brevity and clarity. If any submitted questions aren't answered here, we will endeavor to include them in the next batch.

Question: My question concerns horses at a farm or a lay-up facility. While it doesn't look like everyone employed at one of these places will need to be registered as a covered person, some of these people (like farm managers and veterinarians) will have a lot of responsibility over prescribed medications and veterinary treatments given to the horses in their care.

I see that there are important lay-up and treatment records that need to be made available to HISA. And so, if some of the people administering treatments and medications at a farm or facility aren't registered as “covered persons” under HISA, who's going to be ultimately responsible for what goes on there? The trainers? The owners?

HISA: You're correct, most of the employees who work at farms and lay-up facilities are not required to register with HISA. Employees that are licensed with a State Racing Commission and work directly with covered horses are required to register with HISA. For example, if a veterinarian is licensed by a state racing commission and is treating a covered horse at a lay-up facility, he/she is required to register with HISA.

The responsible person, usually the trainer, must obtain and maintain all exercise and medication treatment records for horses that are at farms, lay-up facilities and training centers. In the circumstances that the trainer is not the responsible person for the horse, the owner will be responsible for maintaining all exercise and medication treatment records for horses that are at farms and lay-up facilities.

Q: According to the jockey whip rule, in certain violations, the owner loses the purse. My understanding is that it's just the purse that's lost, while the horse keeps its place. If that's correct, where will the purse money go?

H: There are three classes of jockey crop use violations. Class 1 violations do not result in a loss of purse. If a crop violation is a Class 2 or Class 3 violation, the horse will be disqualified from purse earnings.

HISA's Racetrack Safety Committee will provide guidance on how that purse money will be used/allocated in the coming weeks.

Q: What if I am confused by the new regulations and I was supposed to register, but I don't? What are the consequences? And who enforces them?

H: Beginning July 1, 2022, horses will not be allowed to run in a race if the trainer has not registered the horse with HISA.

HISA is focused on getting as many people and horses as possible registered before July 1. This includes educating, assisting and engaging with stakeholders across the industry to ensure everyone is well-informed and well-equipped to get registered as soon as possible.

Q: Once we register ourselves, with our physical address being one of the requirements, we are authorizing the 'Authority' free access to our homes/farms. Please can you explain in detail why?

H: HISA will always exercise its authority in good faith and for the benefit of the sport. The Act passed by Congress provides that the Authority shall develop uniform procedures and rules authorizing “access to offices, racetrack facilities, other places of business, books, records, and personal property of covered persons that are used in the care, treatment, training, and racing of covered horses.”

Our original regulation stated: The Authority “[s]hall have free access to the books, records, offices, racetrack facilities, and other places of business of Covered Persons that are used in the care, treatment, training, and racing of Covered Horses, and to the books, records, offices, facilities, and other places of business of any person who owns a Covered Horse or performs services on a Covered Horse.”

The FTC in approving the Enforcement Rules noted that commentators who objected to this rule were really objecting to the Act since our rule tracked the Act. Despite the rule being approved by the FTC, we have revised the rule and will be sending the revisions to the FTC in the next few days. The relevant rule now states:

(1) Shall have free access to:

(i) with regard to Covered Persons, books, records, offices, racetrack facilities, and other places of business of Covered Persons that relate to the care, treatment, training, and racing of Covered Horses, and

(ii) with regard to any person who owns a Covered Horse or performs services on a Covered Horse, books, records, offices, facilities, and other places of business that relate to the care, treatment, training, and racing of Covered Horses.

Even if the revised rules are not approved by the FTC by July 1, 2022, HISA will abide by these portions of the amended regulations.

And finally, it is important to note that the language that Congress utilized is not novel. For example, current Kentucky law utilizes similar language as HISA's original regulation. It states:

“The racing commission, its representatives and employees, may visit, investigate and have free access to the office, track, facilities, or other places of business of any licensee, or any person owning a horse or performing services regulated by this chapter on a horse registered to participate in a breeders incentive fund under the jurisdiction of the racing commission.”

Q: Rule 8400 Investigatory Powers section a) subsection 1). This rule also allows HISA to seize “medication, drugs, paraphernalia, or substance in violation or suspected violation of the 'Authority,” along with all your books and files.

In every state, it's against the rules for any person not a vet to have injectables, needles, and syringes on the track. But under this rule, if you're in a rural area (which most farms, by definition, are) and have such perfectly legal medications on your property to treat your horses in an emergency when a vet may be hours away from you, you would be in violation of the “Authority's” rules and subject to seizure, fines, and suspension of racing privileges.

If accurate, this makes absolutely no sense, so please can you provide the reasons behind this?

H: HISA's regulations regarding hypodermic needles and syringes apply to Covered Racetracks and Covered Training Facilities. These regulations do not apply to farms.

Q: Under the “Authority's” revised rules (not yet submitted to the FTC) weekends and holidays are no longer “working days” and won't be considered “counted” days. If I'm reading this right, if you receive a five-day suspension starting Tuesday, you cannot return to work on Sunday because it's not a “working day”? And by waiting until Monday, you will have served six days? In horse racing, every day is a working day!

H: This is incorrect. The new provisions for calculation of time addresses only the response dates set forth in the Enforcement Rules.

For example, it makes clear that if an individual is given a certain number of days to file an appeal or file a brief and that day falls on a holiday or weekend then the deadline is the next working day. The calculation of time rule in the Enforcement Rules has nothing to do with the numbers of days someone serves for a suspension.

Additionally, this method of calculating time helps horsemen by giving them extra days to respond and not requiring them to count weekends which are often busy race days.

Q: I read the Q&A, and the answer to who needs to register says someone who works regularly in the stable area. Others who have access but don't work in the stable in the normal course of their job do not have to be registered. Access to the stable is still controlled by state commission licensing. This clears it up except their site says the complete opposite. Their site says any employee who has any access to the stables must register. Can you please try to clarify the clarification which clarified nothing?

H: This language has been updated on the HISA website. To be clear: you must register as a Covered Person if you are licensed by a State Racing Commission, unless you have no contact with Covered Horses and you do not have access to the restricted areas of a racetrack in the ordinary course of carrying out your duties. This means that if your job does not regularly require you to access the stable area in the normal course of your work, you are not required to register. Examples of other persons who do not need to register include, but are not limited to: vendors of goods or services and racetrack employees or contractors who do not have access to restricted areas (i.e. food service providers, ticket takers, mutuel employees, etc.). EVERYONE ELSE MUST REGISTER AS A COVERED PERSON.

The post HISA Questions and Answers: Part Two appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

HISA Questions and Answers

Last week, TDN launched a cheat sheet to help guide industry participants through the launch of the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act (HISA) on July 1.

Since then, we have been fielding unanswered questions that industry participants have about the process to register, and about the new playing field come July 1, forwarding them to HISA for response.

Over the weekend, HISA CEO Lisa Lazarus addressed a common registration problem bedeviling the system, with HISA's text message verification codes often been misclassified by telecommunications providers as spam.

In short: While the technical glitch has been fixed, says Lazarus, “it will take more than a week for the fix to fully propagate through these vast systems. Therefore, we have suspended the account verification requirement and continue to secure the accounts using alternate methods.”

The first batch of reader questions TDN has received is posted below alongside HISA's responses. Some of the questions have been edited for brevity and clarity. If any submitted questions aren't answered here, we will endeavour to include them in the next batch.

HISA's formal website can be found here, and the online registration portal can be found here.

Question: The HISA registration process requests that trainers register all 'employees'; the riders my husband uses are independent contractors who ride for multiple trainers. Should he be registering them as 'employees' on the HISA website?

HISA: Trainers are not required to register their employees. However, trainers should ensure that their employees register with HISA. Independent contractors, such as some exercise riders, are responsible for registering with HISA. As the case with the trainer's employees, your husband is not responsible for registering them but should encourage them to do so.

Q: I have a state issued license as a race track management employee. Do I have to register for a HISA license? If so, under what category? What about the many licensed employees in non-management roles? There has been zero information communicated on this issue. This is not non-compliance, but a lack of messaging.

H: Racetrack employees are required to register with HISA if they have a state racing commission license and are directly involved in horseracing. However, racetrack employees or contractors who do not have access to restricted areas of a Racetrack (the stable area or paddock, for example) in the ordinary course of carrying out their duties are provided an exemption from registering. This means that if a racetrack employee's job does not regularly require them to access the stable area in the normal course of their work, they are not required to register.

A few examples may help illustrate the registration exemption rule: Racetrack superintendents are required to register because their ordinary job duties are carried out in the restricted areas of a Racetrack. A racetrack public relations employee that occasionally spends time in the barn area is not required to register because access to the restricted areas of the Racetrack is not a part of the ordinary course of their job duties. It is important to note that HISA registration does not affect barn and track access. State and racetrack rules will continue to control access.

Q: I have been working on getting horses registered on the HISA website and have found that I can't go back in and edit them once they're in. For example, I can't update their vaccination record to reflect that they're up to date. Furthermore, I have yet to find where I can add medical information, lay off time, and more, as required by HISA to be put in. I'd like to know if anyone who has solved this problem has gotten it sorted, as HISA has not gotten back to me about fixing this issue.

H: It's correct that this functionality is not yet available through the HISA Portal, but it will be soon. The HISA Portal's functionality continues to evolve, with new features being rolled out every two weeks.

This Friday, June 3 will see the introduction of the ability to update vaccine information along with Coggins and the Health certificate. There will also be a better horse location modification screen, and you will be able to edit the Owner ID.

On Friday, June 17, another round of features will roll out that will allow users to provide the additional information that HISA requires. Importantly, it should be noted that once you have registered yourself and your Covered Horses, you have satisfied your obligations to HISA for the July 1 start date.

Q: I was about to start the process of registering with HISA, however, a friend of mine tried to do so and got all the way to the end and there was no drop down menu for an “Ontario” license so he couldn't complete the application. Any thoughts? We are trying to register from Canada with an AGCO (Woodbine) license.

H: HISA has no jurisdiction in Canada or over Canadian license holders. If a Canadian licensee is planning to race in the U.S., they can register with HISA after securing a license from the racing commission in the state in which they plan to race.

Q: Why are breeders being asked to register? The definition of a covered horse as one that has had its first workout, is entered or nominated for its first race, means a large portion of breeders are not covered persons. By the time they reach that point, if the breeder still owns them, they would be registered (and licensed) as an owner anyway. I understand the language is in the original bill, but even though it's defined, nothing listed after would indicate a need for them to register.

Furthermore, if they do, why are sales companies and consignors not required to register? Young horses preparing for sale receive vet care, surgery and medications up to the point of 2-year-old sales, but am I to understand those records aren't under the same oversight, and the individuals overseeing that sales prep are not either?

More confusingly, in the rules published by the safety commission in the Federal Review, the definition of a breeder has disappeared from the terms used section, so they don't even define what a breeder is. Can anyone clarify this?

H: Breeders are only required to register if they are required to be licensed by their state racing commission. As with any person, licensure by a state racing commission is the threshold requirement for registration with HISA. If a breeder is not required to be licensed by their state racing commission, then there is no requirement to register with HISA.

Q: During a lengthy conversation with the Jockeys' Guild, the HISA members were challenged with some language that had been changed from the original scope of the bill (Section 8400 in the published rules), namely, that HISA investigators could not only enter any property where covered horses were being cared for, but had access to any books, records and physical property of any other business owned by a covered person.

In other words, if an owner is a doctor or lawyer, by virtue of owning a racehorse, a HISA investigator appears to have the right to search their offices and records without a warrant.

According to representatives, that language did not fly with the FTC and was being changed, but it remains published and it would be a part of the agreement for anyone signing up with HISA.

When will we see the corrected language on their right to enter property and will that be before July 1st?

H: It is important to note that the referenced language in the current Enforcement Rules was approved by the FTC. This is not surprising since the language of the rule tracked the statutory language which states that the Authority “shall develop uniform procedures and rules authorizing- (i) access to offices, racetrack facilities, other places of business, books, records, and personal property of covered persons that are used in the care, treatment, training, and racing of covered horses.”

It should also be noted that other states have statutes that are similarly broad (such as Kentucky). The FTC addressed the entire matter in some detail in the order approving the Enforcement rules, noting that the commenters' quarrel was as much with the HISA Act itself as with the HISA 8400(a) rules.

Nevertheless, to allay the concerns expressed, HISA has restricted the scope of 8400(1)(a) in the revised enforcement rules. The revised rules were shared with numerous constituent groups (including the Jockeys Guild) earlier this month and are available here:

HISA plans to submit the revised enforcement rules to the FTC in the near future.

Q: How did the FTC sign off on only one crop being approved for use? How does a single company having the only crop approved by HISA not violate antitrust laws?

H: No company was approved to manufacture the riding crop. Any person or company is free to manufacture a riding crop that is in compliance with the Safety Rules.

If industry participants have any more unanswered questions about the process, let us know at suefinley@thoroughbreddailynews.com and we will try our best to get those answers.

The post HISA Questions and Answers appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Graham Motion Talks Importance of Taking Shots On Writers’ Room

In an era where trainers are increasingly hesitant to run their horses frequently and/or in races where they might be longshots, Graham Motion is a throwback. It often pays off for his perennially successful outfit, as it did on Saturday at Belmont, when his Highland Chief (Ire) (Gleneagles {Ire}), dismissed at 19-1 in a five-horse field, upset defending champion turf male Yibir (GB) (Dubawi {Ire}) and MGISW Gufo (Declaration of War) in the GI Man O' War S. Tuesday, Motion joined the TDN Writers' Room presented by Keeneland as the Green Group Guest of the Week to talk about why he's steadfast about taking shots and running his horses, how he feels about the current state of the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act, the upcoming Royal Ascot trip for his undefeated Spendarella (Karakontie {Jpn}) and more.

“I think we are very cautious these days,” Motion said of modern trainers. “I think everyone's so worried about that [win] percentage. I think you can learn a lot from watching a guy like Wayne [Lukas], who's never been afraid to take a shot. I think we're just so caught up in being careful. It's so easy to ship across the country now. It's so easy to avoid races that you think are too tough. At the end of the day, that takes a little bit away from the sport, which is to see who has the fastest horse, and the challenge. I kind of live for that. That's what I find so exciting. That's why I love going to Ascot, because it's out of the normal and it's a challenge for these horses. That's what it's all about, right?”

An early supporter of the HISA reform law that has since hit hiccups in potential implementation, Motion was asked how optimistic or pessimistic he is that the program will take full effect and the new rules will fundamentally improve the sport.

“It's going to be difficult, there's no doubt about it,” he said. “I realize there are issues with cost and where the money is going to come from. What I don't understand and what frustrates me a little bit–I'll probably get chastised for saying this, but–we're running for these extraordinary purses. We're running for $100,000 with maidens. Couldn't we put some of that money aside toward the integrity of our sport? I don't understand it. Improve the backstretch, improve safety, improve the integrity of our sport and put some of this money toward HISA. It's going to be a difficult task. I was disappointed when USADA dropped out. I don't know much about the new arrangement. I'm surprised how little, quite frankly, we read about it. So, look, I'm optimistic it's going to happen. I hope everybody eventually gets on board because I think it'll be game changing, and it's going to take a while. There are going to be some hiccups along the way.”

Elsewhere on the show, which is also sponsored by Coolmore, the Pennsylvania Horse Breeders Association, XBTV, West Point Thoroughbreds and Legacy Bloodstock, the writers had a thorough discussion on the proposals to increase the spacing of Triple Crown races and previewed a Rich Strike-less Preakness. Click here to watch the show; click here for the audio-only version or find it on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

The post Graham Motion Talks Importance of Taking Shots On Writers’ Room appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Q&A with HISA’s Lisa Lazarus: Part Two

Last week, an important piece of the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act (HISA) puzzle was slotted into place when the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority's board of directors announced that Drug Free Sport International (DFSI) had been selected as the enforcement agency for the Anti-Doping and Medication Control (ADMC) arm of the program.

In part one of this two-part Q&A, HISA CEO Lisa Lazarus discussed the reasons behind DFSI's selection, details about the newly announced Horseracing Integrity and Welfare Unit (HIWU) and broad updates on the Anti-Doping and Medication Control (ADMC) program in general.

In part two, Lazarus discusses the working relationship between DFSI and the Authority–the non-profit umbrella established by HISA to oversee the broad program–as well as practical concerns about implementation of the safety program on July 1.

The following has been edited for brevity and for clarity.

TDN: What will the working relationship between the Authority and DFSI–what is essentially a service agency–look like? Will they be working primarily at the behest of the Authority or will they be an entirely separate, autonomous agency?

Lazarus: Entirely separate. Once we sign off and give them the contract, we don't have any influence.

Our only authority, so to speak, is over the rule-making process and over, of course, selecting the agency. So, if we feel the agency is not doing their job, we have the right to make changes. But ultimately, running the day-to-day business of the unit is going to be their responsibility and the responsibility of the advisory council.

TDN: At the recent Association of Racing Commissioners International (ARCI) conference, journalist Tim Livingston made remarks about lax drug-testing protocols in sports like the NFL and the NBA. He said, “I think you guys have to be careful because a lot of these guys who architect these doping programs are doing so with the leagues,” and then he made the comment that they're not particularly thorough and aren't designed to catch cheats.

DFSI has worked with both the NFL and the NBA. Do these comments concern you?

Lazarus: They don't at all. I think they're completely untrue and actually quite shocking.

I worked at the NFL for 10 years, so I know very well how the NFL runs its drug program. To say that it's not intended to catch [cheats] while people are caught all the time, I don't really understand that perspective. I mean, I would disagree wholeheartedly.

I know people involved in every sports league in the U.S. I think the one difference is that the drug programs are collectively bargained between the leagues and the unions. So, there's obviously a representative of the athletes that has the chance to make sure that there's due process. There are protections–that's expected. That's what makes a program good. I mean, the program has to have integrity and fairness. But DFSI for me has the highest level of integrity. They also do work for USADA [U.S. Anti-Doping Agency] from time to time. So, they really have a stellar reputation.

I think the comments that were made are really unfounded and I don't know where they come from. My understanding was that his talk and experience wasn't in anti-doping, it was [to do with] a referee scandal.

Sarah Andrew

TDN: But in terms of transparency of results, transparency of who's getting tested, the sharing of results, this is a different ball game to what DFSI has had to largely handle with some of those other human leagues, right? This is a different beast for DFSI, no?

Lazarus: Yes, it is an entirely different beast. And that's why we've created this Horseracing Integrity and Welfare Unit.

The way that I look at it is, DFSI is sort of the anchor tenant, because testing is the most work-intensive component of the unit. But ultimately, what they're doing is working with the advisory council to oversee experts that we're going to hire in all of these different pillars. So yes, it is an entirely different beast than what they're used to, but that's why the structure reflects that difference.

TDN: Stepping back, July 1 is looming large, and so far only three states–California, Kentucky and Minnesota–have agreed to shoulder the costs of the track safety component of HISA. What if all or nearly all of the other states decide not…

Lazarus: And Colorado. But I don't know if that's public.

TDN: But what if all, or nearly all, of the other states decide not to join them? In that worst-case scenario…

Lazarus: It's not a worst-case scenario. It's not a question of whether or not the costs get paid, it's a question of who's responsible.

The constitution doesn't allow us to force the state to do anything, so, if the states choose not to pay, what happens is that cost gets transferred to the racetracks on a per-start, strength-of-purse basis. The race tracks then take on that responsibility and they have to come up with a formula to spread that cost amongst the covered persons and to determine who pays how much.

If it's not paid, obviously we're going to work with the tracks to make it as easy as we can for them, but ultimately, the stick that we have in the Act is that they can lose their signal for pari-mutuel wagering.

Horsephotos

TDN: There's an important personnel component to this as well, right? Let's take regulatory vets. There's already a real shortage of qualified veterinarians available to do the regulatory work. If a substantial number of states opt to leave that part of the equation to HISA come July 1, do you have a contingency plan to make sure there is a nationwide team of vets who can do the pre-race examinations, all that necessary work?

Lazarus: You're mixing up two concepts here. There are two components with every state. One is the money assessment. The other is the voluntary agreement. While only a few states have agreed to opt into the money [assessment], we have about 80% of the states agreeing to enter into a voluntary agreement.

For a very high level of success with voluntary agreements, I'm hoping it's going to be about 90%. But we're at about 80% now. And what that means is that we're agreeing with the states…to use their state stewards to enforce the HISA rules. Otherwise, what's going to happen is that HISA is going to have to come in and hire a steward to sit alongside the state steward.

We do have plans in place for those states where we have to do that. But a few racetracks have [also] come to us and said, 'Even though our state doesn't want to enter the agreement, can we work out a deal with you, because we have these staff, we want to be able to use them?' And we've been able to work with them.

We're in the process of getting together a stewarding panel that we can ship out to different racetracks if we need to, as well as regulatory vets, which you are right, there's definitely a shortage of. We're looking at ways that we can essentially plug those shortages if we have to. But we're really hopeful and optimistic that most states are going to reach that voluntary agreement with us.

TDN: As many as 80% to 90% of states have already signed the voluntary agreement?

Lazarus: No, I'm sorry, I should have said that about 80% have said that, because we still have a few more weeks. So, the deadline for opting in [about the] money was about May 1. The deadline for the voluntary agreement is toward the end of May. We've reached agreements with a number of them, but very close to reaching agreement with the majority.

To be fair, what I'm basing that number on are the ones that we're speaking to, working through logistics, coming to an arrangement. It's my belief and understanding that with those states, it obviously shows they want to make it work. We just have a couple more weeks to kind of wrap it all up.

TDN: You do have a contingency plan to make sure that the necessary personnel will be in place for those 10%, 15%, 20% of jurisdictions that don't sign that voluntary agreement?

Lazarus: Correct.

Coady

TDN: There is a considerable amount of concern–both from people stridently against HISA and those who are wholly supportive of it–that come July 1, we won't be ready for launch. What does the industry need to do to make sure this plane lands smoothly?

Lazarus: A couple things. One is everyone needs to go on to hisaus.org and register. We will soon be launching a campaign to remind everyone that they need to do that by July 1.

The second is racetracks need to get more involved and engage with us more–and most are–but especially in those jurisdictions where the racing commissions are not working with us, particularly the states that are suing us or are less likely to work with us. In those states, that's where the racetracks need to get involved because the burden is going to fall on them, not to pay for everything, but to be the sort of [fee] collector or the place where the information is going to be disseminated.

And [lastly], do what you can to kind of help get the message out to those that maybe are less likely to be on their laptops reading about developments. The industry belongs to all of us and this is a heavy lift. Congress gave us very aggressive timelines and we're going to be ready on July 1, but you're right, we're definitely going to need help and support to make this work.

TDN: There's a lot of really busy people in this sport who just don't have the time to go onto a website and try to find information that may not always be easily accessible. Do you think your outreach could be better?

Lazarus: Yeah, for sure. And we're working on that now and there'll be a lot more outreach between now and July 1.

I cannot tell you how many groups I've spoken to and how many appearances I've made on board calls, on Zoom calls, etcetera. I do that day and night. So, I hope I've reached a lot of people that way. And I think I have.

We've created materials for jockeys that are kind of a cheat sheet guide for them, what they need to do. We've disseminated those. We have one for the trainers that's coming up very soon and we also have a social media campaign that's about to launch. So, I'm hoping that's going to do as good a job as we can expect. We still have a couple months to get the word out, and I think we're going to get there. It's moving quickly, but we're going to get there.

The post Q&A with HISA’s Lisa Lazarus: Part Two appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post