The Horse Owner’s Role in Fighting Gastric Ulcer Syndrome: How Much Are You Willing To Change?

Gastric ulcers are an issue for horses of all breeds, disciplines and lifestyles—it's not just a performance or racehorse thing. Owners, trainers and managers are bombarded with research and advice on how they should be dealing with equine gastric ulcer syndrome for years now, but throughout all of the chatter, there have been constant pieces that veterinarians remind owners to practice daily:

  • Stick to recommended medication timelines
  • Offer unlimited forage
  • Offer unlimited turnout

Recommended Medication Timelines

The ulcer medication omeprazole helps to heal the stomach and cut down on the acidity. This is very important for glandular ulcers, or ulcers that form in the bottom section of stomach. (Squamous ulcers are found in the top section of the stomach.) For best results, the medication needs to be given to horses on an empty stomach to allow the stomach to thoroughly absorb the medication. If the horse has not fasted prior to being given the medication, the absorption is impaired.

The routine of the modern stall bound horse actually aids in the medication process because the horse will have fasted overnight, after finishing his evening meal. In this case, the owner/manager/trainer can then administer the medication first thing in the morning, wait one hour, then feed the morning meal.

“A lot of times, my clients will give their horses their medications first thing in the morning, do some chores in the barn to give the medication an hour to absorb, then feed breakfast to the herd,” said Dr. Ashley Embly, associate ambulatory veterinarian at Rood & Riddle Equine Hospital in Lexington, Ky.

However, Embly and other veterinarians understand that owners might be crunched for time in the mornings.

“Clearly, the owner has to be dedicated to treating their horse with medication,” she said. “Another option is medicating the horse before evening meal time—but that's if the horse is kept inside all day and has consumed his hay.”

It depends on how the barn is managed—when are the horses turned out? What's the feeding schedule?

“It all depends on what works best for the owner and their specific horse,” said Embly. “The ideal timing is to do so on an empty medication.”

[Story Continues Below]

Unlimited Forage and Turnout

The majority of Embly's clientele are performance horses, which means that turnout is limited and there is a limit to the amount of forage the horse has access to, considering they are kept inside for a period of time. Of course, this is the case with racehorses and horses that are maybe kept inside overnight or during the day to avoid the summer heat. Which presents the problem of offering unlimited turnout and unlimited forage.

“This is a case, especially with racehorses who aren't able to have any turnout, where hay nets are kept full throughout the day to allow for the access to forage,” said Embly. “However, ideally the more turnout time they have, the better it is for their stomach. But, if that is not an option, hay offered all day is the option.”

If there are concerns about an obese horse munching on high quality hay all day long, for fear of weight gain or increased sugars, Embly recommends utilizing a hay of lesser quality, perhaps just a grass cut, to feed throughout the day. This allows the horse to continuously graze throughout the day (or night).

“Alfalfa is lovely because it buffers the stomach, and with some horses you're able to do that, but with others, for other issues, you cannot do that all of the time,” said Embly. “It's very horse-dependent and you have to look at each horse and their metabolic state to see which program works best for them.”

Other Factors

On top of the medication and access to unlimited forage, Embly reminds owners that they need to look at other factors, like stress factors. If a horse has a particular buddy in the pasture or next to him in the barn, and that buddy leaves for a period of time, that might increase the stress of that horse, for example.

“Ulcers are not just about feeding, of course, but also the stress level of the horse,” she said. “You have to analyze what is stressful in their day and see if you can minimize that.”

Give the Horse a Chance

With all this information given in different forms yearly, it's assumed that most owners are starting to follow prescribed actions to help their horses battle their gastric ulcers. In Embly's practice, her clients are aware that in order for their horses to perform at their very best when called upon, they must follow through with feeding and medication practices. Much can be said for racehorse trainers and other performance horse owners and trainers.

“My owners are amazing because they have their horses on preventatives, they know when there is just one slight thing wrong and they want to diagnose the issue as quickly as possible,” said Embly. “They know that if their horses feel better, they'll perform better and it's worth the money.”

Support our journalism

If you appreciate our work, you can support us by subscribing to our Patreon stream. Learn more.

One such example was a client's horse who started to have one slight quirk. The dressage gelding didn't have any complaints except for being a little spooky, which was out of the norm. Embly exhausted all diagnostics from lameness to blood tests and nothing came up abnormal.

“He was the fattest, laziest, sanest horse that gobbled his food and ate quickly,” she says. “He didn't show any of the classic signs of ulcers, but I had exhausted everything else except for scoping him for ulcers.”

With the owner's permission, the gelding was scoped to discover one of the worst cases of ulcers Embly had ever seen.

“You do have your classic ulcer signs—skinny, avoids grain, slow eater, dull coat—but then you have horse that is chunky, eats everything, shiny coat, perfectly beautiful coat…scoping for ulcers should always be on your diagnostic list,” she said.

The post The Horse Owner’s Role in Fighting Gastric Ulcer Syndrome: How Much Are You Willing To Change? appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Express Yourself: Do Horses Demonstrate Micro-Expressions?

Micro-expressions in humans are facial expressions that last only a fraction of a second; though often discreet, they can be understood easily and often show a person's true emotions. These expressions are involuntary and are hard to repress or control. 

Dr. Claude Tomberg and a team of researchers from the University of Brussels wanted to determine whether horses had micro-expressions, and if they were evident around other horses. Horses have a vast array of facial expressions that can convey a wide range of emotions. The team theorized that expressions – and therefore micro-expressions, could be used as a tool to communicate with other horses.

The scientists used 22 horses of a variety of breeds, aged 4 to 26 for their study. The horses were videoed while they stood in a grooming stall with a familiar human. The horse could see but not reach a carrot. 

The footage was analyzed frame by frame using the Equine Facial Action Coding System (EquiFACS) to see if the horses showed any micro-expressions that lasted for under a half a second. 

The team found that all of the horses had micro-expressions and that two-thirds of all the horse's expressions were micro-expressions. Interestingly, the horses showed less micro-expressions when in the presence of the handler versus when they were alone. 

The horses exhibited “fixed attention” patterns, where they stood still, but looked at and pointed their ears toward the handler. The horses did not exhibit signs of stress or pain. 

The focus of a horse on the experimenter and the reduction in micro-expressions supports the idea that horses are sensitive to social context. 

The researchers conclude that a horse's micro-expressions might provide information on the true state of the horse, including pain, which could increase equine welfare.  

Read more at HorseTalk. 

The post Express Yourself: Do Horses Demonstrate Micro-Expressions? appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

The Story Behind The Research: Why Studies Sometimes Seem To Contradict, And Why They Take Such A Long Time

Last week, we published new data from a research project out of the University of Exeter which found that genetic improvement is driving increasing speed of Thoroughbreds in the United Kingdom.

(You can read more about that study here and can find the complete paper in the journal Nature here.)

The data showed that genetic improvements driven by breeders were influential in speed improvements for all horses in Britain, but that these improvements were particularly influential for sprinters — which makes sense, given the increasing propensity of British racing for shorter distances.

The study's results were interesting in part because they ran somewhat counter to earlier academic research that suggested the British racing population was showing little genetic improvement in response to selection from breeders. It was also part of an evolving research process from one of its co-authors, who we first corresponded with on the subject back in 2015. This reminded us of common questions that the public often has about peer-reviewed academic research. 

We've tackled some of those common questions in this feature from 2018 (including the ever-popular 'Why'd you need a study to come to this conclusion?). In this case, we wondered — how common is it for one study to contradict a previous study's findings? Why does peer-reviewed research on a topic like this take such a long time? And, what's it like for a researcher to put their results out into the world, worrying about how broadly the public may apply their results? 

We posed these questions to Dr. Patrick Sharman, postdoctoral research associate at the University of Exeter who co-authored the most recent study about genetic improvements and speed in British horses. His answers in narrative form are below.

For a number of decades there has been a general consensus that racehorse speed is no longer improving. This is despite selection by racehorse breeders and evidence of heritable variation in performance, and has led to the proposition by some researchers that genetic progress can go no further. However, this theory that racehorses have reached a limit to how fast they can run never felt satisfactory to me. In livestock species, where selection for improvement of beneficial traits has been intense, there is little evidence of genetic limits.

The consensus that speed has reached a limit followed the publications of a handful of studies which all reported similar findings: little-to-no improvement in the winning times of major races around the world. In my PhD, I first investigated whether race times in Great Britain have indeed reached an asymptote. I felt there were limitations in the previous publications. In particular, only the winning times of a handful of major races were analysed, no races over sprint distances were included in any of the previous studies, and no account was taken for potentially confounding factors (for example, whether a race was hand-timed or automatically-timed).

We analysed over 600,000 performances between 1850-2012 and concluded that horse speeds are continuing to improve in Great Britain, particularly over shorter distances (5-7 furlongs). Given that speeds have not reached a limit, and in fact in sprint races have recently (1997-2012) been increasing fastest than at historical rates (1850-1996), the earlier consensus that genetic progress has reached a limit appeared false (at least in Great Britain).

The next stage in my PhD was then to determine if contemporary improvement in speed in British racehorses has been underpinned by a genetic response to selection. We recently reported that we found that genetic improvement is indeed ongoing, and that it is greatest over shorter race distances. Over long-distances, we still found significant genetic progress, but at a much lower level.

On the whole, these results did not surprise me. I have been following horse racing all my life and spent a decade working in studs, breaking yards and training yards before starting my PhD, so I am well aware of the increasing focus by the breeding industry on sprinters rather than stayers. Having said that, I was surprised by such a low level of improvement over long-distance races. It will take further investigation to understand that better.

As you note, there have been a number of years between the two publications. In part this is down to preparing the huge dataset and pedigree for analysis. The analyses themselves then took months to run, even on a high-powered computer. Following writing up, the process through to publication can take a number of years. Journals put research papers through a rigorous peer-reviewing process, whereby experts within a field critique research and suggest improvements. For the current publication, this led to time-consuming analyses being re-run. The reviewing process can be long and drawn out but ultimately leads to improvements in the research prior to final publication. On top of all of that, I carried out my PhD studies part-time, balancing them with work which often took priority.

Regarding your final question, of course it can be frustrating to see your research misrepresented or misunderstood. Unfortunately, scientific research is not always easily accessible and often the original work is not read by the general public, who instead might rely on the media. In turn, the nature of media is to prefer clean, simple, and definite answers for their readers, whereas the true research results may be more nuanced.

However, through public engagement it is possible for scientists to make their work more open to interested members of the public. Hopefully these answers will help your readers understand my research (and the process behind it) but please encourage them to contact me with any questions.

The post The Story Behind The Research: Why Studies Sometimes Seem To Contradict, And Why They Take Such A Long Time appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance Represented During Belmont Stakes Racing Festival

The Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance will be represented at Belmont Park during the Belmont Stakes Racing Festival. The 155th Belmont Stakes Presented by NYRA Bets will be held on Saturday, June 10, 2023, at Belmont Park. This exciting final leg of the Triple Crown will kick off with a week of live racing beginning on Thursday, June 8.

The Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance will be honored with a named race to highlight accredited aftercare. The Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance Race will be Race 10, on Thursday, June 8, with a post time of 7:45 PM ET. Following the running of the race, a presentation will be made to the winning connections including a branded blanket and swag bag.

“NYRA is committed to supporting the work of the Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance in ways that advance the shared mission of protecting, re-training and re-homing Thoroughbreds when their racing days are done,” said Kevin Quinn, NYRA VP of Sales and Hospitality. “The Belmont Stakes provides an ideal stage to expand the public's understanding of the meaningful aftercare efforts underway in New York, and we are pleased to welcome the Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance back to Belmont throughout the Belmont Stakes Racing Festival.”

Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance will be on-site to facilitate winning guests from one of the VIP experiences auctioned off earlier this year in the “Off to the Races” campaign, promoting aftercare awareness. Winners from the VIP experience will enjoy a weekend of racing with a table for six, buffet meals, parking, and paddock access. This experience celebrating the third leg of the Triple Crown was generously donated by NYRA.

About the Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance

Based in Lexington, KY, the Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit that accredits, inspects, and awards grants to approved aftercare organizations to retrain, retire, and rehome Thoroughbreds using industry-wide funding. Along with continued funding from its original partners Breeders' Cup, The Jockey Club, and Keeneland Association, the Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance is supported by owners, trainers, breeders, racetracks, aftercare professionals, and other industry members. Since inception in 2012, the Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance has granted more than $28.1 million to accredited aftercare organizations. Currently 81 aftercare organizations comprised of approximately 180 facilities across North America have been granted accreditation. To learn more about the Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance, visit ThoroughbredAftercare.org.

The post Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance Represented During Belmont Stakes Racing Festival appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights