hay | Horse Racing Free Tips

Selecting Horse Hay: Separating Fact From Fiction

Horse people are often described as picky, fussy or difficult when it comes to hay selection. This description is not surprising because many horses are either very valuable or viewed as part of the family.

It is often a lack of knowledge about selecting quality hay that gives horse owners a bad name and forces them to pay more for hay than their neighbors with other types of livestock. Myths develop because of a piece of truth that becomes inflated and held as absolute truth without justification. To improve our knowledge of hay selection, here are a few common myths about hay, how these myths came to be accepted and, finally, “the truth.”

Note: For the purposes of this article, “high quality hay” refers to hay with a high nutritive value.

Myth: Second cutting hay is always the best cutting.

How it came about: The number one factor that determines hay quality is stage of maturity at harvest. Cool season grasses such as orchardgrass and timothy will produce a seedhead in the spring, often just in time for the first cutting. For the hay producer, this means an increase in yield and therefore more bales can be harvested and sold. However, this also means that fiber is elevated in the crop, therefore reducing quality. Because seedheads are only produced one time per year in cool season grasses, subsequent cuttings do not contain them and second or later cuttings will be generally less fibrous as a result. Second cuttings tend to cure more quickly and are less likely to experience rain damage; both contribute to higher quality relative to first cutting.

Truth: First cutting hay can be high quality if cut early and second cutting can be low quality if it cut late. Stage of maturity and other management factors affect hay quality at harvest. High quality (or low quality) hay can be harvested from late spring to late fall if weather and management conditions are right. Quality should never be assessed based on cutting number, but on a laboratory-performed analysis.

Myth: Horses require higher quality hay than cattle.

How it came about: Some horses, especially those with high nutrient requirements, do require higher quality hay than cattle. Horses and cattle have very different digestive tracts. Cattle are ruminants and are able to breakdown fiber very efficiently, whereas horses are monogastrics with a functional large intestine (hindgut fermenters) and are less efficient at fiber digestion. Therefore, cattle can perform well on lower quality hay that horses cannot digest well.

Truth: Individual needs of the animal should dictate the quality of hay provided. An easy-keeping Quarter Horse in light work does not need the same quality of hay as a Thoroughbred at the peak of its racing career. Similarly, an open Angus cow does not need the same quality of hay that a high producing dairy Holstein needs at the peak of lactation. Consider the current body condition, level of work and pasture availability of your horse. Then choose hay that will meet the needs of your horse without excess based on a hay test.

Myth: (Fill in the blank) is the best type of hay.

How it came about: Statements such as this often come from horse owners that have moved from one area of the country (or world) to another and are not accustomed to the local hay. Different forages are adapted to different soils and climate conditions, so the most common hays available for horses vary among regions.

Truth: Hay quality is not about the forage species or even the variety. Forage species used for hay will fall into one of two categories: grasses or legumes. Grasses can include orchardgrass, Kentucky bluegrass, tall fescue, bermudagrass, timothy, teff and smooth bromegrass. Legumes include alfalfa, red and white clover, lespedeza and birdsfoot trefoil. When managed and harvested correctly, legumes will be higher in quality than grasses; however there will be little difference between different grasses or between different legumes when all other factors are held constant. Buying quality, local hay will likely save money due to reduced transportation costs. Make sure to address any concerns with a specific grass or legume species, such as endophyte infected tall fescue. If you are concerned about feeding a certain species of hay, ask your local county extension agent or equine nutritionist about it.

Myth: Forage stored as round hay bales or as silage contain diseases such as botulism and should not be fed to horses.

How it came about: The botulism bacterium prefers moist conditions and is commonly found in the soil, in stream sediments and in the intestinal tracts of fish and mammals. Silage (haylage) by definition is stored with higher moisture than hay, and when not properly handled, can allow the botulism bacterium to flourish. Hay that is conserved in large round bales is usually baled at a similar (often lower) moisture content as small square bales and thus is different than haylage. However, if round hay bales are stored outside, they can get wet from rain, encouraging the growth of bacteria and mold.

Truth: Proper storage, handling and feeding of round hay bales will minimize the risk of botulism in horses. Round hay bales should be covered when stored and fed using a hay feeder to reduce contamination from trampling and urination. Round bales that show clear signs of mold should not be fed to horses. Feeding silage to horses is much more common in other countries than in the U.S. Silage should be put up at the proper moisture content for the style of storage, kept airtight until feeding and fed quickly to reduce the risk of botulism. Silage should always be tested for forage quality before feeding. In botulism prone areas, a veterinarian should be consulted about the use of silage and the inclusion of a vaccination against botulism to protect horses.

Myth: Don't feed hay that has been rained on.

How it came about: Rain negatively affects hay in a variety of ways:

Rain on recently cut hay can prolong plant respiration and reduce energy content.

Rain on legumes will cause leaves to separate from the stems (called leaf shatter) and therefore remove the more nutritious portion of the plant. Fibrous stems will then be more concentrated in the final product, causing a decrease in quality.

Rain will also cause leaching of sugar and other carbohydrates, proteins and minerals.

Heavy rain can splash soil up onto curing hay, which can increase dustiness and rapidity of molding.

Truth: Rained on hay can be acceptable quality. While rain usually negatively affects hay, to what degree depends on several factors, including what type of hay is being harvested, how much/how intense the rain fell, stage of curing when it rained and what the producer has done to counteract these negative effects. For example, if light rain occurs within a day of cutting, it has very little effect on hay quality. All hay, especially material that has been rained on should be tested for quality and inspected for mold or dustiness before use.

Myth: Hay should be stored for six weeks before feeding.

How it came about: This myth likely came about from hay testing. After hay is stored in a barn, it will continue to cure for four to eight weeks. During this curing period, the quality of the hay can change slightly.

Truth: Hay can be fed at any time after harvesting. Hay should not be tested until it has been stored for six to eight weeks to increase the accuracy of the hay test. While feeding hay sooner will not be harmful to horses, it will be difficult to balance the ration because the quality of the hay is unknown.

Myth: Green is good; brown is bad.

How it came about: Often, hay that has been harvested too late or mishandled will lose its green color due to processes such as heating and bleaching. Green hay is less likely to have gone through these processes and more likely to be of quality.

Truth: A hay test is the only way to truly evaluate quality. No quality factors directly affect color or vice versa. Therefore, color is an inconsistent factor to evaluate the quality of hay.

Myth: Feeding hay causes a large, distended digestive tract, known as a hay belly.

How it came about: Hay belly usually results when malnourished horses are provided large quantities of low quality, high fiber hay. The horse will usually be thin over the neck, withers, ribs and hindquarters; however the belly will appear large because the horse is consuming large amounts of hay.

Truth: A balanced ration that includes quality pasture or hay will maintain a horse at an ideal condition without excessive gut fill.

It is important to remember that horses evolved consuming forage, and whether in the form of pasture or hay, is an important component in the equine diet. Choosing hay for your horse will depend on your horse's current condition, work level, pasture availability and the logistics of management on your farm. Hay should always be inspected and found to be free from contaminants such as weeds, insects, mold, dust and other foreign material. The nutritional value of the hay should also be evaluated prior to feeding so that a ration can be formulated that will meet the needs of your particular horse.

Study Shows Steaming Hay Helps Horses Banish Bad Bacteria

Steamed hay has proven beneficial for horses with respiratory disease and dental issues. Better nutritionally than soaked or dry hay, steaming preserves beneficial microorganisms, but banishes bacteria and allergens, reports The Horse.

A study, funded by Haygain Ltd. and spearheaded by Dr. Simon Daniels from the Royal Agricultural University, has shown that steaming hay with near-boiling water preserves its “haybiome,” a new term that encompasses the diverse good and bad bacteria found in hay. A healthy haybiome includes a variety of bacterial species, but the beneficial bacteria outweigh the disease-causing bacteria.

Haygain had no role in the design, data collection, or analysis of the study.

Researchers genetically sequenced samples of four types of ryegrass and meadow hay. Samples were either soaked for 12 hours in water at 61 degrees Fahrenheit or steamed for one hour in a commercial steamer that reached 203 degrees Fahrenheit for at least 10 minutes. The two other sequenced samples were left dry.

The scientists concluded that beneficial bacteria were present in the hay after both steaming and soaking, but the soaked hay didn't have the abundance of bacteria the steamed hay had. Soaked and dry hay contained bacteria that could cause dental and respiratory disease.

Additionally, a blue-green algae that is toxic was found in the dry hay that was sampled. Steaming eliminated the toxin completely, but soaking simply transferred the toxin to the water.

Teff: A Beneficial Forage For Easy-Keepers And Metabolically Challenged Horses

Teff may seem like an overnight success for some in the horse industry. However, teff has been a cultivated forage in the U.S. for some time. So why has teff become so popular and where does it best fit in the horse's diet?

Teff is an annual, warm-season grass that many believe originated from Ethiopia, where it was cultivated as a grain crop for human consumption. Teff is fine-stemmed, fast-growing, high-yielding, seems adaptive to numerous environments, and tends to thrive in warmer, drier conditions. However, teff's nutrient profile is what makes it attractive to many in the horse industry.

Compared to cool-season grasses and legumes, teff tends to be higher in fiber values and lower in nonstructural carbohydrates (NSC) and digestible energy (DE). This nutrient profile makes it an appealing option for horse owners with “easy-keeping” horses, over-weight horses, or horses diagnosed with Equine Metabolic Syndrome (EMS), laminitis, Pituitary Pars Intermedia Dysfunction (PPID), or Polysaccharide Storage Myopathy (PSSM).

These horses tend to require total diets lower in NSC and DE, making teff a desirable option. Elevating teff's popularity and demand is the rate of obesity and related issues (e.g. EMS and laminitis) in the horse population. Similar to human and companion animal populations, obesity in the horse population is estimated at 30 percent, requiring many horse owners to seek lower caloric feedstuffs. However, what does research say about fitting teff into horse diets?

Researchers at the University of Minnesota have explored the impact of horses grazing teff. They found that teff produced less season-long yield compared to alfalfa and perennial ryegrass, primarily due to less grazing events. Since teff is a warm-season grass, it must be planted later in the spring in northern climates when soil temperatures are warmer and is more easily killed by cooler fall nights compared to cool-season grasses.

Teff was confirmed to have higher amounts of fiber and lower amounts of NSC, DE, and crude protein (CP) compared to cool-season grasses and legumes. The combination of higher fiber values, which tend to slow intake, and lower NSC values have been reported to decrease the glucose and insulin response in horses. Similar to humans, maintaining a more level (or homeostatic) insulin response is thought to be desirable to overall health, especially in horses diagnosed with metabolic diseases like EMS.

Researchers found that blood glucose and insulin values of horses grazing teff, cool-season grasses, and legumes were not different in the spring and summer; however, they were lower when horses grazed teff in the fall and late fall (September and October) compared to horses grazing cool-season grasses.

Fall grazing tends to be a risky time for horse diagnosed with metabolic diseases, or with a history of laminitis, as warm days and cool nights can lead to spikes in NSC concentrations in cool-season grasses. Although teff was lower in DE, if consumed at 2.5 percent bodyweight on a dry matter basis daily, it did meet the DE requirements of adult horses at maintenance.

Additionally, when a more detailed amino acid analysis was conducted, researchers found that while alfalfa and cool-season grasses had greater concentrations of most amino acids, horses grazing teff had similar blood amino acid responses compared to the other forages. This suggested that the lower CP values found in teff were not detrimental to the mature, idle grazing horses. Finally, teff did tend to have a slightly inverted Ca:P ratio, making it essential to test teff for forage nutritive values and supplement Ca when necessary.

Several universities have also explored harvesting teff as hay and adult horse preference. When harvested under ideal weather conditions and maturity, most describe teff hay as fine-stemmed and leafy. However, like any forage, environmental conditions, maturity at the time of harvest, and production practices can greatly impact forage quality.

In a hay preference trial conducted at Penn State, horses unaccustomed to teff preferred both mature alfalfa and timothy hay over teff hay. However, many agree that once acclimated to teff, most horses will readily consume teff. A Kentucky study investigated the intake of teff hay cut at three different stages of maturity (boot, early, and late).

Based on voluntary intake, horses preferred boot (1.8 percent bodyweight) and early-maturity (1.7 percent bodyweight) teff hays over late maturity hay (1.5 percent bodyweight). Similar to what is observed in grazing research and with other forages, maturity can be a major factor in palatability and intake.

In the Kentucky study, nutrient requirements for mature horses eating the less mature teff hays were generally met, although when consuming the late-maturity teff, DE and CP requirements were not met for adult horses at maintenance.

Collectively, research on grazing teff and feeding it as hay confirmed it can be used as a horse forage, but is more suitable for horses with lower energy demands or horses prone to metabolic concerns. While teff's niche in the horse industry is most likely as a forage for “easy-keeping,” overweight, laminitic or metabolically challenged horses, there are some drawbacks and frustrations horse owners have anecdotally shared.

Because of the higher fiber values and lower NSC, some horses simply refuse to eat the forage. This is not surprising as past research has shown preference and intake are positively linked to NSC amounts and negatively linked to fiber values. In these cases, owners should provide part of the diet in teff, while including other more palatable forages.

Like any newer forage, there is also a learning curve in planting, harvesting, and feeding the forage. A few challenges shared by hay producers include successfully planting the small-seeded forage, timely harvests, ideal cutting frequency of the mostly prostrate growing forage, and lack of labeled herbicide options. Finally, research is needed to establish if horses can be successfully maintained long-term on only teff forage, and a vitamin and mineral supplement.

The post Teff: A Beneficial Forage For Easy-Keepers And Metabolically Challenged Horses appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Is Colic The Only Reason For Bacterial Changes In The Gut? Probably Not

It's long been known that the best way to prevent ulcers in horses is to make sure they have something to eat—preferably forage—nearly constantly. But what happens if feed and hay are withheld to not exacerbate a problem, like colic?

Drs. Jaclyn Willette, Dipti Pitta, Nagaraju Indugu, Bonnie Vecchiarelli, Meagan Hennessy, Tamara Dobbie and Louise Southwood found that the bacterial population of a horse's gut changes if he has been without food for at least 10 hours.

Chronic gastrointestinal disease leads to a decrease in variety of bacterial species in the gut of humans and cattle; the same is thought to be true for horses.

The bacteria in a colicking horse's gut is distinctly different from that in a healthy horse's gut. While this could be related to intestinal problems and inflammation that is leading to the colic epsiode, other factors could be at play, including withholding feed, which is an essential tool in managing a horse with colic.

The study team used eight mares for a crossover study that withheld nearly all feed for 24 hours and then allowed each horse free-choice timothy hay for 24 hours. The horses had access to water at all times.

The researchers found that bacteria richness and diversity were significantly lower 10 to 24 hours after the fast began. This limited bacterial population persisted for 2 to 12 hours after the horses were given access to hay. The horse's gut returned to normal 18 to 24 hours after the hay was reintroduced.

The team concluded that the effect of withholding feed should be considered when interpreting data on species and amount of gut bacteria in horses. Their findings may help locate markers that will lead to the development therapeutic interventions for horses that are colicking.

Read the study here.