Eric Hamelback | Horse Racing Free Tips

Landry To Deliver Keynote Address at National HBPA Conference

Edited Press Release

Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry will be the keynote speaker at the National HBPA's annual conference Mar. 6-10 at the Hotel Monteleone in New Orleans' historic French Quarter, the horsemen's organization announced. The conference, being hosted by the Louisiana HPBA, takes place in conjunction with the Association of Racing Commissioners International (ARCI) Annual Meeting and Racing Integrity Conference.

Landry's keynote address is to be delivered Mar. 7. He has been at the forefront of states challenging the constitutionality of the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act (HISA) and the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority (Authority) that the law established. In addition to constitutionality issues, Landry has expressed concern for the financial hardship that a largely duplicative bureaucracy will put on large portions of the horse-racing industry. Louisiana has four tracks that conduct horse racing.

“I am honored to be chosen the keynote speaker at the National HBPA Conference, and I look forward to visiting with so many who ply their trade in such a great industry,” said Landry, a decorated Army veteran. “I will continue fighting for them to prevent the federal government from taking over horse racing.”

Added National HBPA CEO Eric Hamelback: “Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry embodies the positive vision with the inspiration and passion we seek in a keynote speaker. He has proven to be a strong advocate for horsemen and women who understands our labor-intensive industry with its substantial agribusiness, not only in Louisiana but throughout the country. He believes in a bright and better future for horse racing, and refuses to let us be trampled by special interests.”

More information and registration is available here.

The post Landry To Deliver Keynote Address at National HBPA Conference appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Grassley Amendment Fails; HISA `Fix’ Language in Omnibus Bill

After a week of political uncertainty, the Senate has passed a version of the full year-end omnibus spending bill with language affording the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) more rule-making authority in the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act (HISA), according to a source close to the process.

The language is designed to address a ruling in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals from November, which found the law as written doesn't afford the FTC enough latitude in the rule-making process.

The Senate voted in favor of the bill 68-29, but it must first pass the House of Representatives before heading to the president's desk.

It's currently unclear what specific language the Senate's version of the $1.7-trillion spending bill includes regarding HISA and the FTC's modified role.

But language in a prior version of the bill allows the FTC to “abrogate, add to, and modify the rules of the Authority promulgated in accordance with this Act as the Commission finds necessary or appropriate to ensure the fair administration of the Authority, to conform the rules of the Authority to requirements of this Act and applicable rules approved by the Commission, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of this Act.”

Currently, the FTC can only accept or reject a proposed rule constructed by the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority, the private entity given broad umbrella power over implementing the act.

In a statement immediately following the news, National Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association (HBPA) CEO, Eric Hamelback, praised last-minute efforts by a group of lawmakers led by Senator Chuck Grassley to strip the language from the omnibus spending bill.

“We know there were several Senators who would have supported removal language. However, the amendment did not get that opportunity and the HISA “fix” language remains in the Omnibus bill. With that said we are on firm ground to remain focused as the “fix” language changes very little about the Act as it remains unconstitutional,” wrote Hamelback.

HISA spokesperson, Mandy Minger, said that the Authority would have a comment after the bill is signed.

If enacted into law, questions swirl about what this legislative fix possibly means for HISA. Various avenues were detailed in a recent conversation with constitutional law expert, Lucinda Finley.

Last week, the FTC announced that it had disapproved “without prejudice” the program's anti-doping and medication control (ADMC) rules because of the law's constitutional holes.

In the near-term, with this new language HISA can resubmit the ADMC rules with the FTC. It would then take approximately 60 days for these rules to go into effect, “assuming that the FTC was going to approve them substantively,” HISA CEO Lisa Lazarus previously explained.

There remains a ruling pending in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals concerning similar constitutional questions to the Fifth Circuit. It is currently unclear when that ruling will land.

But if the amended language in the omnibus spending bill is sufficient in the judgement of the Fifth Circuit, it could essentially render the current cases before the Fifth and Sixth Circuits legally moot in a practical sense.

It could also make the possibility of the Supreme Court taking them up altogether highly unlikely.

Even then, don't expect the legal fireworks to end, with a case in the U.S. District Court of Texas–Northern District, Amarillo Division–a potentially nasty looking legal blackthorn for the law.

Finley told the TDN that the case raises several additional constitutional arguments that the Fifth and Sixth Circuits did not rule on, including HISA's investigative, subpoena and punishment power as a private body, and the way in which individuals on the HISA board are appointed.

“It argues that the whole structure is a delegation of not only too much executive authority, but can amount to a delegation of legislative and judicial authority as well,” Finley explained.

If the judge in the case agrees that HISA indeed delegates too much power to a private entity, the plaintiffs in the case are seeking an injunction to suspend enforcement of the law, said Finley.

Would such an injunction apply nationwide or just in Texas?

“You've actually asked what is one of the most raging controversies in U.S. law,” Finley replied, leaving the answer open-ended.

The post Grassley Amendment Fails; HISA `Fix’ Language in Omnibus Bill appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Language Amending HISA in Omnibus Spending Bill

Draft language has been inserted into the full-year omnibus spending bill designed to fix a constitutional problem with the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act (HISA) identified by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which found in November that the law as written doesn't afford the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) enough authority in the rule-making process.

In short, the draft omnibus spending bill cedes the FTC–the governmental agency which ultimately signs off on any new HISA rule–new autonomy to remove, add to and tweak language in the rules constructed by the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority, the private entity given broad umbrella power over implementing the act. Previously, the FTC could only accept or reject a proposed rule.

The FTC may now “abrogate, add to, and modify the rules of the Authority promulgated in accordance with this Act as the Commission finds necessary or appropriate to ensure the fair administration of the Authority, to conform the rules of the Authority to requirements of this Act and applicable rules approved by the Commission, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of this Act,” the language states.

The news was first reported by the Paulick Report. Lawmakers have until Friday to pass the spending bill before the make-up of Congress changes shape next year.

After this draft language was released, The National Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association (HBPA) CEO Eric Hamelback and General Counsel Peter Ecabert released a joint statement, taking aim at legislation they say was “crafted in the dark of night with no public hearings and virtually no industry input.”

“This amendment does not address other substantive issues, nor does it address the funding disaster that remains in the flawed Act. It is clear from the issues raised in the various lawsuits contesting the legal validity of HISA that this one-sentence 'fix' does not alleviate the glaring constitutional infirmities this law has created.

“The constitutional defects still include a non-federal private entity granted the power to levy taxes in violation of Article I, Tenth Amendment violations for anti-commandeering of states powers, Fourth and Seventh Amendment violations for lack of due process, and violations of the Administrative Procedures Act,” wrote Hamelback and Ecabert.

Hamelback and Ecabert added that, “For all the reasons we state above, the Act itself remains unconstitutional by handing the regulation of an entire industry over to an unelected, unaccountable private corporation. This fight is not over, and the National HBPA will go all the way to the Supreme Court if we have to, in order to protect the interests of horsemen across the country.”

In a rare move for the chair of the HISA board of directors, Charles Scheeler issued his own statement Tuesday, addressing what he sees as “misinformation” about the law, in the process arguing that HISA's drug testing program protects “good-faith horsemen,” that HISA's rules “seek to protect” small racetracks and racing jurisdictions, and that HISA has “consistently sought feedback from horsemen” across the country.

“Some horsemen have recently expressed a desire to scrap the substantial progress made over the last two years and start from scratch on safety and integrity reform. But after failing for decades to create uniform standards, we've finally made real progress and have momentum. In fact, early indications suggest that racing is already getting safer for horses. Starting over would be to risk losing all of that,” wrote Scheeler.

“Getting a federal law passed was a monumental accomplishment, and the progress and momentum since then has been astounding. Thoroughbred racing must take advantage of this moment. Change can be uncomfortable and often comes with growing pains, but the future of the sport depends on its evolution. Let's find the courage to do this together,” Scheeler added.

The year-end omnibus spending bill left the Senate and House Appropriations Committees Tuesday morning, and must now be finalized before this Friday, to avert a governmental shut-down.

During that process, the amendment to HISA could still be removed, though sources say that is extremely unlikely. If this language remains in the bill, however, there are a few different scenarios at play.

Last week, FTC announced that it had disapproved “without prejudice” the program's anti-doping and medication control (ADMC) rules.

But with this new language, HISA could resubmit the ADMC rules with the FTC. It would then take approximately 60 days for these rules to go into effect, “assuming that the FTC was going to approve them substantively,” HISA CEO Lisa Lazarus previously explained.

There remains a ruling pending in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals concerning similar constitutional questions to the Fifth Circuit. It is currently unclear when that ruling will land.

But the current language in the omnibus spending bill would essentially render the current cases before the Fifth and Sixth Circuits legally moot in a practical sense, and would make the possibility of the Supreme Court taking them up altogether highly unlikely.

Even then, don't expect the legal fireworks to end, with a case in the U.S. District Court of Texas-Northern District, Amarillo Division-a potentially nasty looking legal blackthorn for the law.

Constitutional law expert Lucinda Finley recently told the TDN that the case raises several additional constitutional arguments that the Fifth and Sixth Circuits did not rule on, including HISA's investigative, subpoena and punishment power as a private body, and the way in which individuals on the HISA board are appointed.

“It argues that the whole structure is a delegation of not only too much executive authority, but can amount to a delegation of legislative and judicial authority as well,” Finley explained.

If the judge in the case agrees that HISA indeed delegates too much power to a private entity, the plaintiffs in the case are seeking an injunction to suspend enforcement of the law.

Would such an injunction apply nationwide or just in Texas?

“You've actually asked what is one of the most raging controversies in U.S. law,” Finley replied, leaving the answer open-ended.

The state of West Virginia is a plaintiff in two lawsuits against HISA that allege unconstitutionality. During a Tuesday morning meeting, the West Virginia Racing Commission (WVRC) discussed the ramifications of the pro-HISA language being added to the federal omnibus spending bill.

“This amendment appears to try to flip the rulemaking authority back to the FTC in a way that HISA can make suggested rules to the FTC, [which would] have the ultimate authority as to whether or not to approve them,” said WVRC commissioner J.B. Akers, who is an attorney.

“On its face, [this] could potentially resolve the constitutional issues, some or all, that were present in the Fifth Circuit case,” Akers said. “What's clear here is that someone has influenced the staffers or politicians who were responsible for writing this 4,000-plus page legislation to put a couple of paragraphs [in the bill] where they're now attempting to 'fix' the Fifth Circuit constitutional analysis so that the FTC has its mandated authority back. Whether or not that would satisfy those constitutional concerns,” Akers added, is unclear.

The post Language Amending HISA in Omnibus Spending Bill appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

FTC Delays Implementation of HISA’s Drug and Doping Program

In an order Monday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act's (HISA) anti-doping and medication control (ADMC) program would not go into effect as scheduled Jan. 1 due to swirling legal uncertainty.

“The bedrock principle of the Act is the need for uniformity,” wrote the FTC in the order, adding that “the Commission's approval of the Anti-Doping and Medication Control proposed rule would not result in uniformity because the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act has been held unconstitutional by a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.”

Oral arguments similarly surrounding HISA's facial constitutionality were held last week in a separate case before the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.

“The Commission therefore disapproves the proposed rule without prejudice. If the legal uncertainty regarding the Act's constitutionality comes to be resolved, the Authority may resubmit the proposed rule or a similar rule, and the Commission will consider all comments filed in this proceeding as well as any updated or new comments and filings.

“In the meanwhile, and until any future proposed rule on the subject is approved by the Commission, State law will continue to regulate the matters that the proposed rule would have covered,” the order states.

According to HISA's CEO Lisa Lazarus, who held an impromptu press conference Monday afternoon, this means that the current regulatory “status quo” will remain in place at the start of 2023.

“They made reference to the fact that, since the FTC has not approved any ADMC rules under HISA's authority, that means all the state rules remain in full force and effect,” said Lazarus, stressing that this was her “interpretation” of the FTC order.

“If there wasn't a clear statement on this issue quickly, then we might get to Jan. 1, and there might be some uncertainty around who actually has the authority. It's important for the states to know now that they're going to continue to be the ones in charge of testing on Jan. 1,” Lazarus added.

When it comes to the financial implications from Monday's announcement, HISA will refrain from collecting any of the 2023 fee assessments, designated for the individual states or, alternately, the racetracks, said Lazarus.

“The vast majority of those fees relate to the anti-doping program,” said Lazarus, explaining that the 2023 fees will be collected once the legal uncertainty has been resolved.

“There are still assessments being paid for 2022 that obviously are still required for the state racing associations who opted in, and the racetracks to cover, because those costs have already been incurred, or are in the process of being incurred,” she added.

Ben Mosier, executive director of the Horseracing Integrity & Welfare Unit (HIWU), the enforcement arm of HISA's ADMC program, released a statement explaining that HIWU will continue its education and outreach efforts “to all stakeholders in the Thoroughbred industry,” despite the delay in implementation.

“As HISA re-submits the draft ADMC rules for the FTC's approval, HIWU will use any additional time before implementation as an opportunity to ensure the industry is even more prepared for an efficient rollout of this Program, which will promote fair competition in the sport of Thoroughbred racing and the safety and welfare of our human and equine athletes,” wrote Mosier.

According to Lazarus, “So long as that preparatory work doesn't extend beyond two to three months, [HIWU's work] would still be covered by the 2022 budget.” However, “if it extends longer, we would have to revisit that issue.”

As for potential timelines moving forward, Lazarus explained that once the ADMC rules have been resubmitted with the FTC, it would take approximately 60 days for them to then go into effect, “assuming that the FTC was going to approve them substantively.”

Lazarus also broached a number of different scenarios in what appears to many in the industry a swirling morass of unpredictability and confusion.

Last month, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals found the law facially unconstitutional due to the lack of rule-making authority ceded to the FTC. That mandate is set to go into effect Jan. 10.

But if HISA is able to secure a stay on the Fifth Circuit's ruling in the interim, “we would then go back to the FTC [with the ADMC rules] and seek approval on that basis,” said Lazarus.

A similar case questioning HISA's constitutionality is also before the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. According to Lazarus, a ruling in the Sixth Circuit is expected “in the next month or two.”

If the Sixth Circuit issues a ruling favourable to HISA, “it would potentially give us the ability to continue with our program in those jurisdictions the Sixth Circuit covers,” said Lazarus.

“And it would also potentially lead to the [U.S.] Supreme Court hearing the case,” said added.

Nevertheless, even if the Sixth Circuit issues a friendly ruling on HISA, the FTC still might prove reluctant to allow HISA's ADMC to go into effect in those jurisdictions as the new law wouldn't be implemented uniformly, said Lazarus.

“For that reason, it's very possible the FTC would maintain the position that we shouldn't resubmit our rules until we have clear ability to move forward and launch across the whole country,” said Lazarus.

Another potential fix to the current knot of legal problems is a congressional re-write of the rules to cede more rule-making power to the FTC. Lazarus declined to speculate on the likelihood and possibility of that option.

A number of experts have questioned whether the legal uncertainty surrounding HISA's constitutionality puts into jeopardy the law's racetrack safety rules, already in effect. Lazarus said that Monday's order has no effect on the racetrack safety prong of the program.

“This related solely to the ADMC rules, and also, it was not a substantive review,” said Lazarus. “It was a statement on their perspective with regards to the legal uncertainties and ensuring there's clarity before we launch the new program.”

Ed Martin, the Association of Racing Commissioners International's (ARCI) president and CEO, referenced a letter the organization sent last week to the FTC highlighting “a real Catch-22” come Jan.1 concerning the legality of HISA's ADMC program.

“We are appreciative that the FTC listened and considered the request of the Association of Racing Commissioners International not to create regulatory uncertainty on Jan. 1 by approving the proposed HISA rules,” Martin told the TDN.

“Whoever got brought up on a charge could potentially have appealed it ad nauseam, and maybe win, which means there might be no rules in effect. That was the danger here,” Martin speculated. “They might be mad at me for bringing it up, but it needed to be brought up.”

The following is HISA's full statement in response to the FTC order:

“HISA appreciates the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) decision to deny HISA's draft Anti-Doping and Medication Control (ADMC) rules without prejudice as we actively seek to resolve current legal uncertainties. HISA is eager to launch Thoroughbred racing's first and long-awaited national, uniform ADMC program and stands ready to do so. We will re-submit the draft ADMC rules to the FTC for their review as soon as these legal uncertainties are resolved, and once approved, we will implement the program through the Horseracing Integrity and Welfare Unit (HIWU). In the meantime, HIWU will continue to work toward the implementation of a uniform, independent anti-doping and medication control program that is administered consistently and fairly across the United States.”

In a statement, National HBPA CEO Eric Hamelback wrote, “The recent FTC decision is another positive step forward for horsemen in our battle against the unconstitutional takeover of our industry. The strength of our legal arguments led to a unanimous decision in the Fifth Circuit, and now the FTC has done the right thing in declining to defy a federal court that has found HISA unconstitutional. The FTC order is clear: state law continues to govern medication issues until our final victory in this case.”

The post FTC Delays Implementation of HISA’s Drug and Doping Program appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post