Welfare and Safety Summit To Return To Keeneland

The 10th Welfare and Safety of the Racehorse Summit will take place June 22, 2022, in the Keeneland Sales Pavilion, the Grayson-Jockey Club Research Foundation announced Feb. 28. The previous summit, held in June 2020, was a virtual webinar due to the COVID-19 outbreak.

The event will be free and open to the public as well as being streamed online. The agenda will include a review of the Thoroughbred industry's implementation of safety recommendations developed at the first summit in 2006 as well as a presentation by Dr. Tim Parkin on the latest statistics from the Equine Injury Database. The full program and list of speakers will be announced at a later date.

“This year marks 16 years since the first Welfare and Safety of the Racehorse Summit, and our 10th edition of this event will showcase the progress our industry has made during that time as well as areas of safety and welfare that continue to require our attention,” said Jamie Haydon, president of Grayson. “Keeneland has been a committed partner with us from the beginning, and we are thankful for their hospitality as well as their recognition of the importance of the summit to the Thoroughbred industry.”

Added Keeneland President and Chief Executive Officer Shannon Arvin: “Keeneland is a firm believer in promoting the safety and welfare of our human and equine athletes. The accomplishments of the previous summits are a testament to the value of this gathering, and Keeneland is proud to support it.”

Among the major accomplishments that have evolved from the previous nine summits are the Equine Injury Database; the Jockey Injury Database; the Racing Surfaces Testing Laboratory; a uniform trainer test and study guide; the racing surfaces white paper and publication of educational bulletins for track maintenance; the publication of stallion durability statistics; the Hoof: Inside and Out DVD, available in English and Spanish; protocols for horses working off of the veterinarian's list; recommended regulations that void the claim of horses suffering injuries during a race; and inclement weather protocols.

The post Welfare and Safety Summit To Return To Keeneland appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Thoroughbred Safety Committee Revises Recommendation For Voided Claims

The Jockey Club Thoroughbred Safety Committee (TSC) announced today a revision to its recommendation titled, “Timing of Title Transfer with Claimed Horses,” which regards voiding claims of horses injured during a race. The TSC first announced a recommendation for voided claim rules at the 2012 Round Table Conference on Matters Pertaining to Racing.

The revision calls for enabling a claim to be voided by the claimant if the claimed horse is placed on the official veterinarian's list due to the horse's exhibiting signs of unsoundness, lameness, or epistaxis within one hour of the race's being declared official.

“Research by Dr. Tim Parkin, head of Bristol Veterinary School and a consultant on the Equine Injury Database, indicates that racetracks that enforce void claim rules have significantly lower incidences of racing fatalities per 1,000 starts when compared to tracks without void claim rules,” said Matt Iuliano, executive vice president and executive director, The Jockey Club. (The full presentation by Dr. Parkin on the subject can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9Aa2_inAgU&t=2s).

The full text of the void claim recommendation revision, as well as the complete list of recommendations by the TSC, can be found at http://jockeyclub.com/default.asp?section=Advocacy&area=14.

The TSC was created in May 2008 to review every facet of equine health and to recommend actions the industry can take to improve the health and safety of Thoroughbreds. The committee convenes to review myriad safety issues with a cross section of industry representatives, including jockeys, trainers, veterinarians, chemists, pedigree experts, handicappers, owners, breeders, blacksmiths, racing commissioners, racetrack executives, and geneticists.

Committee members are Craig R. Fravel (chairman), Dr. Rick Arthur, James G. (Jimmy) Bell, Dr. Larry Bramlage, Dell Hancock, Jim Lawson, Christopher J. McCarron, Dr. Hiram C. Polk Jr., Tom Robbins, and Jaime Roth. Each is a member of The Jockey Club.

The Jockey Club, founded in 1894 and dedicated to the improvement of Thoroughbred breeding and racing, is the breed registry for North American Thoroughbreds. In fulfillment of its mission, The Jockey Club, directly or through subsidiaries, provides support and leadership on a wide range of important industry initiatives, and it serves the information and technology needs of owners, breeders, media, fans and farms. It founded America's Best Racing (americasbestracing.net), the broad-based fan development initiative for Thoroughbred racing, and in partnership with the Thoroughbred Owners and Breeders Association, operates OwnerView (ownerview.com), the ownership resource. Additional information is available at jockeyclub.com.

The post Thoroughbred Safety Committee Revises Recommendation For Voided Claims appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Brothers: Time To Face What’s Right And What’s Wrong With Racing

It's time for racing to stop apologizing for who we are. Dating back to the rash of breakdowns that occurred in Southern California during the winter/spring of 2018 -19 that sent a ripple effect throughout the industry, we have all worn a cloak of contrite sheepishness adorned with remorse.

Santa Anita and the Stronach Group led the way on major industry reforms and the industry as a whole has come a long way in a short period of time. We are still far from perfect.

In this article I will acknowledge the ways in which horse racing has improved by the things we're doing right. I'll then look at a couple of things we could simply be doing much better: what's wrong.

In a subsequent commentary I'll dive into the abysmal—things we have a long history of doing wrong. And, hopefully, impress upon readers the importance of cooperation. Let's begin with what's right.

What's Right with Racing

Fatality Rates

Catastrophic breakdowns are down—way down. A quick look at the Equine Injury Database (EID) reveals that the risk of fatal injury declined 7.8% from 2019 to 2020 and that it has declined 29.5% overall since 2009. The 2020 rate of fatal injury is the lowest number since the EID started collecting data in 2009. That's a pretty big deal.

Statistical Summary from 2009 to 2020 (Thoroughbred Flat Racing Only)

These stats indicate that in 2020, 99.86% of racing starts at the racetracks participating in the EID were completed without a fatality. In other words, a catastrophic breakdown happened 0.14% of the time—less than a quarter of 1%. That they are truly a rare occurrence, is one of the things that makes them so difficult to completely eliminate.

When something happens frequently the events surrounding each occurrence can be studied and measured in great detail. But because catastrophic breakdowns are actually rare events, it makes it more difficult to study them in great numbers and form reliable conclusions about their causality. And even so, horse racing has managed to reduce these occurrences by nearly 30% in 11 years. The veterinarians, researchers, horse trainers, track maintenance crews, and anyone else who had a hand in this massive reduction deserve congratulations.

We are not done and zero is our goal. While no equine discipline has yet to be able to achieve zero, we are aiming high to hit our mark. Ten years of data show that not only are we aware, not only are we trying, but we are actually finding success and doing a really, really good job at it.

The formation of the Horse Racing and Safety Authority (HISA) is another step in this positive direction. There are pros and cons, supporters and detractors, and there are sure to be ups and downs. But horse racing obviously needed a hand in getting its act together and the HISA has the potential to offer much more good than bad.

Aftercare

This is the only topic that will appear in both the “what's right” and “what's wrong” sections. (Full disclosure, I'm on the board of directors for the Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance (TAA) and have been on the advisory board since its inception in 2012, so I have witnessed their exponential growth and impact over the past nine years.)

  1. The development of the Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance (TAA) in 2012. Before the TAA there was no accreditation for aftercare facilities and there was little or no sharing of information and resources between these aftercare organizations. Transparency was hit or miss for potential buyers and adopters, and there was no required standard of care for individual organizations to maintain. Thanks to the work of the TAA, Thoroughbred racing now has a group of accredited aftercare organizations working together to support retired Thoroughbreds. The TAA now facilitates a monthly meeting where TAA accredited organizations get together on a largely attended Zoom call to share ideas and help each other, offering a constructive forum for each organization and for aftercare development.
  2. The evolution of a first exit from racing. Thanks to placement programs in California, New York, South Florida, and Maryland, there is a direct path for horses leaving the track to enter into a TAA accredited aftercare organization, and due to the success of this program, it continues to expand and influence. For example, while Pennsylvania has a program that does not work directly with the TAA, there are 1,200 Pennsylvania horses that have to date, gone to TAA accredited organizations.
  3. The New York Racing Association (NYRA) 1.5% Aftercare Assessment in claiming races that is due at the time of the claim, with 40% going to the TAA and 60% going to the New York Thoroughbred Horseman's Association (NYTHA) OTTB program Take the Lead.
  4. Inventory and tracking. Historically, where a horse ended up was anyone's guess. With an active post-racing sales scene (this is where show and pleasure trainers put a little training into an OTTB and then move it on – otherwise known as “flipping”) a horse may have changed ownership several times over the course of a couple years. As a part of the TAA program, the reporting of Thoroughbred Inventory to the TAA has allowed the TAA to trace more than 13,000 Thoroughbreds so far. These horses are given more oversight and future security than any horse ever offered in private sale.
  5. The visibility and development of new careers for Thoroughbreds. We have long known Thoroughbreds could be good sport horses in disciplines such as eventing and show jumping but it turns out that, owing to their versatility and huge hearts, they can excel in everything from trail riding to various English disciplines such as dressage, western disciplines such as barrel racing, equine assisted therapy programs, and everything in between.

What's Wrong  

Wagering Insecurity

Pat Cummings from the Thoroughbred Idea Foundation (RacingThinkTank.com) did such a masterful job of writing about what's wrong with racing—and, importantly, how to fix it—that, rather than opine with my own thoughts, I will refer you to his “Wagering Insecurity” series here.

Cummings covers everything from the problems surrounding illicit drug use, wagering insecurity, an eroding fan base, grey and illegal betting markets, and more.

In addition to identifying the challenges, Cummings also makes recommendations of how the industry can improve. Two of my favorites:

Recommendation #1: The Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority may be our only hope—if they are willing to take up the challenge. Of course, we're already tasking them with the formation of uniform medication rules, uniform riding crop rules and infallible drug testing.

Recommendation #2: Reporting all test results—as in all test results. As things are now, aside from the general assumption that the winner will report to the detention barn for a post race test, we have no idea which horses have been tested—pre or post race. Here's the Thoroughbred Idea Foundation's recommendation:

“Every pre-race, post-race or out-of-competition sample should be reported publicly, soon after it is processed. The results should be reported regardless of the finding – most will be negative.”

I like it.

[Story Continues Below]

I also love the recommendation for steward transparency and face-to-face discussions with jockeys and trainers. One of the stewards' reports used in the article showed that a horse racing at Lingfield Park in Great Britain had visibly bled and lost a shoe. U.S. bettors never get that type of information.

Another stewards' report from Hong Kong — on a horse named Golden Mission who turned in a very disappointing effort as the favorite — shows how much information is being given to the public elsewhere, and shows us, sadly, how little we're getting in America. The Hong Kong stewards' report was 135 words long. A US version, which really only comes from the Equibase chart callers, would simply say, “pulled up and walked off”.

Aftercare

I have long believed that the Jockey Club should charge $1,000 to register a foal with something like $800 of it going directly into aftercare. No, this will not solve the problem of funding aftercare but it may discourage people from breeding and registering Thoroughbreds who are unlikely, at best, to be productive at the racetrack. Right now the Jockey Club charges $225 to register a foal with $25 of this going to aftercare, and while I applaud their participation, I believe they can do more.

The Jockey Club seems to be concerned that if they charge a higher fee for aftercare at the point of registration, then the breeder/owner will believe they've paid into aftercare and they no longer need to contribute. This is a valid point. The latest research from the TAA indicates that, on average, it costs about $644/month to care for an off track Thoroughbred so the $800 in their bank account will not even cover two months room and board. Which is why everyone who participates in Thoroughbred horse racing must understand that funding aftercare is not a donation, it's our obligation.

Referring back to the NYRA 1.5% Aftercare Assessment fee that is charged for each horse purchased through the claim box, why is NYRA the only group of tracks doing this? Every racetrack in the United States and Canada should be doing the same thing. Buyers and sellers are assessed at auction. Breeders are assessed through the mare fee they pay to the Jockey Club (that goes to the TAA). But the people who are playing the game predominantly through claiming are paying nothing. Meanwhile it is the claiming horses who most often end up in need of an aftercare solution.

Aftercare also has a public relations problem. Many people think the problem is solved. It is not.

We talk about this a lot at the TAA. In the words of Stacie Clark, TAA Operations Consultant: “I now believe no amount of advertising or article writing seems to push the awareness button. In order for aftercare to succeed (and in turn help our industry and the image of our sport) we need commitment to awareness. In short, the discussion of aftercare has to matter more to the industry at large. It has to matter to everyone and it does not. There is a willful misconception that, because some aftercare is going on, it is enough. People are generally happy to want to believe that the horses leaving racing are going to be ok: out of sight out of mind.”

Again, the good news is that if the industry works together, we can solve these problems. In the next installment I'll get into the need for industry-wide cooperation.

Donna Barton Brothers is a retired jockey, award-winning sports analyst, author, and chief operating officer for Starlight and StarLadies Racing. She serves on the executive board of the TAA and TIF, and is on the advisory boards of Boys & Girls Haven and the University of Kentucky Research Department's Jockey and Equestrian Initiative. 

The post Brothers: Time To Face What’s Right And What’s Wrong With Racing appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Stronach Group Funding Surgeries On Injured Horses, Amid Controversy

Everyone at a racetrack holds their breath when a horse pulls up. It was true before the fatality spike at Santa Anita Park in 2018-19, and it's even more true now that every on-track injury feels like a liability for the sport. Veteran horsemen have long felt they could guess, as they get closer to the solemn scene, whether they think the injured horse is going to make it or not. In those moments when they believe there is no salvation to be had, most of them say the kindest thing to do is to end the horse's suffering as quickly as possible.

A recent initiative at The Stronach Group racetracks has been pushing the boundaries of that assumption – but not everyone is happy about it.

Taking the finances out of the equation

Two years ago, Stronach Group management was looking for whatever solutions it could find to the breakdown problem at Santa Anita. Facing what was an enormous public relations crisis, the company needed fewer dead horses. Its executives implemented a flurry of new protocols, including rolling back administration times for various therapeutic drugs, increasing veterinary oversight, and reducing whip use. Around that time, the company also began exploring the idea of funding surgeries on injured horses.

“As we looked around, we said, 'If we take the financial piece out of it, what decisions do people make?'” said Dr. Dionne Benson, chief veterinarian for 1/ST Racing, The Stronach Group's racing brand. “You look at a horse like ArchArchArch, who broke down in the Derby, got a fetlock arthrodesis and [became] a breeding stallion. Those are no-brainers for people because they want the residual value of the stallion. But often if you've got a gelding that's running for $5,000, there's an economic decision that's made. We wanted to allow people to make the decision for the horse while taking some of the economic burden away.”

Orthopedic surgery and subsequent care can cost thousands of dollars, and costs increase exponentially based on the complexity of the injury and the smoothness of recovery.  Benson and others worried that there were cases of owners or trainers looking at the prospect of operating on an injured horse as a money-loser, and choosing to euthanize – even in cases where the horse might have had a productive life in retirement. She also wondered how many horses were euthanized without significant diagnostics to even find out if they could be saved. Benson said she heard of one case – not at a Stronach track – where a horse was euthanized after pulling up lame with a sizable bump in the leg, which veterinarians assumed was a serious fracture. Only upon conducting a necropsy did they learn it was a hematoma.

Santa Anita is unique in that it has a fully equipped equine hospital on-site, so it's logistically easy to assess and operate on a horse with an orthopedic injury. Benson consulted the best orthopedic surgeons in the country, including Dr. Larry Bramlage at Rood and Riddle Equine Hospital in Kentucky and Dr. Ryan Carpenter, who operates at Santa Anita, looking for guidance on what makes for a good surgical candidate and what doesn't.

Then, the racetrack began funding veterinary care in cases where owners wouldn't or couldn't. In the past year and a half, Benson said The Stronach Group has paid for veterinary care on a variety of injuries, including some serious wounds, a bilateral condylar fracture, cannon bone fractures, and sesamoid fractures. The track was willing to pay for surgery even in cases where a referring veterinarian may have suggested euthanasia. So far, it has paid for surgery for 17 Santa Anita-based runners since the start of 2020, and 13 are alive and well – which Benson considers a solid success rate, assuming those horses may have otherwise been euthanized by their connections. From those 17, there were 11 fetlock arthrodesis surgeries, where a serious sesamoid fracture is repaired by fusing the bones in the ankle joint. Eight of those horses are still alive and doing well. For horses who would otherwise be dead, Benson said she's comfortable with those outcomes.

That early success rate prompted The Stronach Group to expand its surgical assistance program to its tracks in Maryland and Florida. In lieu of on-site surgery suites at the racetracks there, The Stronach Group has implemented partnerships with Rood and Riddle and the University of Pennsylvania to refer surgical candidates.

Currently, Benson said if a horse sustains an injury on track, the horse's treating veterinarian and trainer will typically put a splint on the injured limb, administer sedation and pain relief, and take the horse back to its stall for evaluation. Someone from The Stronach Group veterinary team will reach out and ask for diagnostic images on any horse who does not have a fracture coming through the skin and does not have injuries to more than one limb (with one exception in California). Horses with those injuries are not considered good surgical candidates. The track then offers to send those images to Drs. Carpenter, Bramlage, or Rood and Riddle surgeon Scott Hopper for a consult. If the surgeon tells the racetrack and connections they think the horse has better than a 50/50 chance at eventual pasture soundness with surgery and the horse's owner doesn't want to proceed, they are offered the opportunity to sign the horse over to The Stronach Group.

Dr. Ryan Carpenter

All of this takes time, but it's time Carpenter says he would normally give a horse anyway before deciding whether to proceed with surgery. Perhaps surprisingly, he says that the main indicator of whether a horse will do well with surgery isn't a matter of how gnarly their radiographs look – it's about the amount of swelling and blood supply they have to the area. Independent of this program, he often waits until the day after an injury before assessing a horse's fitness for surgery because that's when it'll be most clear how the blood supply responded to the injury.

Carpenter said he has learned from the past two years of the track-funded surgery in California that the responsiveness of on-track emergency personnel is key to a horse's chances. While a horse with a fracture wears a Kimzey splint in the trailer ride from the track to the barn, Carpenter prefers to remove it at the barn, take the necessary images, then wrap the leg and put the Kimzey back on as quickly as possible. That extra compression and support from the bandage can significantly reduce swelling, and even a few minutes' difference can have a massive impact on how the horse's blood supply reacts to the injury later.

While the program has been going full strength in California for a year and a half, it was implemented much more recently at Stronach Group facilities in Florida and Maryland. In Maryland, three horses have been sent to surgery at New Bolton Center by the track, and all three have lived. One was a spiraling medial condylar fracture on a hind limb that needed a plate. The referring veterinarian suggested euthanasia, but the surgeon said the horse had a 50 to 60 percent chance to return to racing. After seeing the surgeon's report, Benson said the horse's connections decided to proceed with the surgery themselves.

In Florida, Benson admits the results haven't been as strong; surgical success rate is at about 50 percent.

Not everyone is on board

The Paulick Report has interviewed a number of horsemen and veterinarians with direct and indirect knowledge of The Stronach Group's program to fund surgeries. All declined to speak on the record for fear of retribution from racetrack management, and most expressed serious concerns about the ethics of the program.

For horsemen who had not had a horse injured on track since the program came to their state, there seemed to be little concrete information provided by the racetrack about how it would work. Many had the impression the track was strong-arming trainers into signing over ownership of the injured horses (an allegation Benson denies), playing on their fears of losing stalls. They also had no access to information about the outcomes of injuries they'd witnessed and believed or assumed all or most horses trailered to nearby clinics for surgery had died.

People who had been involved with an on-track injury confirmed the track is not exerting pressure on connections to sign horses over, but did say they had serious concerns about whether the decision to send particular horses to surgery had been fair on the animal.

For horses that go through a complex surgery and long recovery from a procedure like a fetlock arthrodesis, many people questioned those horses' short- and long-term quality of life, along with the associated cost to care for them. Benson said that horses who had been saved by track-funded surgeries in California were placed via the California Retirement Management Account (CARMA) if they were only pasture sound. The track has committed to following those horses throughout their lives to ensure that, given the relatively limited vocational options for some, they didn't fall into a bad situation.

Carpenter said skepticism of the program in the case of serious injuries like sesamoid trauma likely comes from an outdated notion of what a surgical repair, like a fetlock arthrodesis, entails. Dr. Dean Richardson at New Bolton has perfected the procedure in recent years with new materials, cables and locking plates, and new approaches to the incision sites that make the surgery shorter, less complicated, and more likely to achieve a positive outcome than it did a decade ago.

“You have to acknowledge that just because we're done things a certain way for a long time, that doesn't mean that's the way we will continue to do them or should continue to do them,” said Carpenter. “An arthrodesis done today has a far better chance of survival than an arthrodesis done 10 years ago. but the perceptions of people today are often based on the perceptions of the past.”

This horse suffered serious wounds in a freak accident at Laurel when he reared and fell onto an iron fence. The Stronach Group funded his care, and he is ready to leave the hospital and begin rehabilitation.

He's also troubled by the number of people who seem intent on euthanasia in cases he thinks don't warrant it, including career-ending sesamoid fractures on horses without residual value in the breeding shed. While the critics of the program believe they are coming from a place of kindness, Carpenter believes he is, too.

“This is one where if it was American Pharoah, everyone would be cheering 'Give this horse a chance,' but when it's a $10,000 claimer, everyone's cheering 'Put it down,'” he said. “That, I don't understand. A horse is a horse. If it's good enough for American Pharoah and humane enough for American Pharoah, then it's good and humane enough for the $10,000 claimer that no one knows their name.”

But as the program expands to other states and continues over a period of years, a greater success rate will mean there will be more horses that need that kind of care and monitoring. Some have wondered whether it's fair to salvage a horse for pasture soundness, only to pass on the costs for the remainder of its 15 to 20 years of life to a non-profit or a well-meaning adopter. Private home placements for pasture ornaments are hard to come by, which is why there are so many retired horses in sanctuary facilities already.

The question asked independently by nearly everyone who expressed concerns to this publication was also – is The Stronach Group doing this out of the kindness of its corporate heart, or to reduce fatality numbers? Horses are considered racing or training fatalities for the purposes of the Equine Injury Database (EID) if they are euthanized due to injury within 72 hours of incurring the injury.

Benson said this isn't the motivation behind the program, and that horses vanned off and euthanized in the 72-hour window are reported by The Stronach Group to the EID as racing or training fatalities. In California, the horse racing board keeps its own records on racing and training fatalities and follows up with necropsies and post-mortem reports as part of state regulations. In Florida, on-track deaths are supposed to be reported to the Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, but it seems from public records as though those reports are made voluntarily by a trainer or treating veterinarian, not a state representative keeping independent track of deaths.

It's also true that the track's desire to give an injured horse a chance does, by default, create the opportunity to reduce fatality numbers – and those numbers are better in all three states since the surgical program and other reforms were implemented.

“We have reduced the number of racing related fatalities in Florida and they are consistent year over year in Maryland to date,” said Benson. “In training, we have reduced horse fatalities (on-track musculoskeletal and sudden deaths) by about half in both Maryland and Florida year over year. Additionally, while I cannot speak for Florida generally, we enter all fatalities and injuries to horses in the EID for our tracks and training facilities located there. Moreover, every horse that dies or is euthanized at Gulfstream Park or Palm Meadows is sent to necropsy at our expense. This has been the case for over a year.”

Benson and Carpenter agreed that those concerns voiced by horsemen in Florida and Maryland are nothing new – they heard them when they launched the program in California. Both now say that referring veterinarians and horsemen in California are on board with the program, largely because they've seen horses move on to second careers or achieve pasture soundness. They remain confident that eventually, their success at other facilities will convince the naysayers.

“I acknowledge the fact that what we're doing here in California is not going to be widely accepted in other states,” said Carpenter. “I think we're a little bit ahead of the curve and part of that is because of what we endured in 2019.

“What I saw very quickly in interacting with people who don't know anything about racing, is that every single fatality is significant. When you make the comment that 'This year we've only had 30 [fatalities]' — which from an industry standpoint is amazing — the people are still appalled because that's still a very, very big number.”

The post Stronach Group Funding Surgeries On Injured Horses, Amid Controversy appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights