Hollendorfer Files Petition Against CHRB

Hall of Fame trainer Jerry Hollendorfer has filed a petition for writ of mandate and damages in San Diego County Superior Court against the California Horse Racing Board (CHRB) arguing the agency has failed to exercise its regulatory authority and intercede in disputes where several California racing associations have barred the trainer from their grounds.

The petition also raises bias and conflict of interest concerns within the CHRB, contending that these issues have compromised the board’s ability to exercise its oversight authority in an impartial manner.

In June of last year, The Stronach Group (TSG) banned Hollendorfer–one of California’s most prolific trainers–from Santa Anita after four of his horses were catastrophically injured between the end of 2018 and the first half of 2019, when the facility experienced a well-publicized spike in equine fatalities. The trainer remains barred from all TSG facilities in California, including Golden Gate Fields.

Last summer, Del Mar management similarly attempted to bar Hollendorfer from their facility—an action that Hollendorfer subsequently overturned in court. Del Mar president, Josh Rubinstein, said that Hollendorfer requested and was granted 25 stalls this summer at Del Mar.

In an email, Drew Couto, Hollendorfer’s attorney, wrote that the CHRB has failed to exercise its statutory and legal obligations towards Hollendorfer in a “timely or impartial fashion,” and as such, “Jerry’s career has been damaged beyond comprehension, despite his being a licensee in good standing at all times. The CHRB has left Jerry languishing in uncertainty in California for over a year. That’s simply inexcusable.”

Couto added that it appears the CHRB “implicitly condoned” actions taken by the racetracks whereby they intentionally “shifted the narrative” from safety issues “inherent to dirt racing surfaces and poor track management” onto Hollendorfer.

The CHRB’s actions “deprived Hollendorfer of his occupational rights as a licensee, without any of the protections and processes afforded licensees under the law” Couto added, describing the CHRB’s legal obligations as “some of the most important duties and responsibilities of a state regulatory body and licensing agency.”

When asked for a response to the petition, CHRB spokesperson Mike Marten wrote that the board does not comment on pending litigation.

The petition argues that those California tracks that have barred Hollendorfer from training and racing on their premises have used him as a “scapegoat” in response to much broader horse welfare problems, and took these actions in breach of the race meet agreements signed between the trainers and the racing associations.

Because the CHRB is charged with “implementing and enforcing the law equally within its statutory authority and jurisdiction,” it has failed to afford Hollendorfer his rights as a licensed trainer, the petition contends.

“Petitioner seeks judicial relief because, despite his possession of a valid license and subsequent denial of occupational rights and privileges, and substantial economic interests, the CHRB has wrongfully refused to act in conformity with the law, and has thus further deprived Petitioner of his vested fundamental rights–the ability to pursue his licensed occupation and livelihood–without due process and/or equal protection under the law,” the petition states.

Perhaps most damningly, the petition lays out an argument that the CHRB has “abused its discretion and abrogated its duties,” including suppressing evidence and information, covering-up its own involvement in “exclusionary actions,” and denying the existence of possible conflicts of interests among board members.

The petition states that at the end of August last year, Hollendorfer’s legal representative told the CHRB’s chief investigator of concerns that the board was unable to adjudicate on Hollendorfer’s complaints, related to his exclusion, as a result of a “pattern of concealed acts and conduct, the appearance of impropriety, and actual and potential conflicts of interest on the part of several CHRB board members.”

One of the examples given in the petition includes the much-publicized co-ownership of the Richard Mandella-trained Fravel between former board members Chuck Winner and Madeline Auerbach, Tim Ritvo, former TSG CEO, and Stacie Clark, wife of Mike Rogers, president of the TSG’s racing division.

As a result of that discussion, the petition claims, “Petitioner’s counsel understood Respondent’s Chief Investigator to have confirmed that the CHRB was suspending its investigation into Hollendorfer’s complaints.”

Also detailed is an email that Rubinstein sent to Winner, Auerbach, former CHRB executive director Rick Baedeker, and the board’s legal counsel in light of the San Diego Superior Court’s tentative ruling last year allowing Hollendorfer to train and race at the facility during the summer meet.

In the email, Rubinstein argues that the track’s attorney “may be able to sway the judge in person tomorrow,” but also lays out alternate contingency plans in the event Hollendorfer is successful, including rough ideas as to an official track statement.

The petition contends that the email “reflects a preliminary, additional and continuing level of coordination between Respondent and the Racing Associations, and confirms both Respondent’s willingness to abrogate its licensing duties and responsibilities to those private entities, and to act with bias toward Petitioner.”

Rubinstein failed to respond to a request for comment before deadline.

The petition–which calls for the CHRB to conduct a hearing on Hollendorfer’s track bans before “impartial neutral hearing officers”–is the latest in a long series of legal actions that Hollendorfer has taken over the past year as he seeks a professional return to the California racing circuit as a whole, along with redress for the economic toll that events of the past 12 months have had on his career.

At the end of April, Hollendorfer filed a first amended complaint against the Santa Anita-based Los Angeles Turf Club (LATC) in the Los Angeles County Superior Court.

The trainer currently has a string at Monmouth Park, and throughout the past year, has never been barred from the Long Beach-located Los Alamitos racetrack, in Southern California.

The post Hollendorfer Files Petition Against CHRB appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Sadler Fined, Suspended for Medication Violations

In a settlement agreement and mutual release with the California Horse Racing Board (CHRB), leading California trainer John Sadler has been fined $15,000 and handed a 60-day suspension–45 days of which are stayed–for three medication violations dating from 2019. The suspension runs June 29 through June 13.

As part of the agreement, Sadler has been placed on probation for one year, ending June 28, 2021. If he incurs any medication violations during that period, the 45 days of stayed suspension will be imposed following a noticed hearing.

As first reported in the Paulick Report, the CHRB stewards delivered their ruling Sunday, June 28.

The three violations occurred in April and May of last year. Jasikan (Ire) (Bated Breath {GB}), who finished third in the Singletary S. at Santa Anita Apr. 28, and Field Bet (Sidney’s Candy), fifth in a maiden claiming at Santa Anita Apr. 14, both tested positive for gabapentin. Sneem (Ire) (Sir Prancealot {Ire}), who won a maiden special weight at Golden Gate Fields May 10, tested positive for clenbuterol.

The Association of Racing Commissioners International lists both gabapentin and clenbuterol as Class 3/Penalty B medications.

Sadler finished the recently concluded six-month Santa Anita meet in sixth place on the trainers’ standings, with 18 wins and over $1.7 million in earnings, including the $360,000 that Combatant earned for winning the GI Santa Anita H.

Sadler provided the following statement on the CHRB stewards ruling:

“Trainers are liable for the condition of their horses regardless of the acts of third parties. The imposition of the trainer insurer rule requires only the detection of a prohibited substance in an official sample and identification of the trainer of the horse. The trainer insurer rule is not based on actual administration of a drug or negligent care. Fault is not an element of liability under the trainer insurer rule.

“The incidents covered by the settlement agreement and the penalties imposed under the agreement reflect the fact that these incidents resulted from circumstances beyond my control but which nonetheless are my responsibility. Two of these cases involved the passive transmission by a groom of a medication prescribed for his own medical condition. The other involved detection of a prohibited substance in a horse over which I did not have actual custody or control.

“I want to thank the CHRB for their consideration of the mitigating circumstances underlying these complaints in reaching this agreement. My decision to enter into the settlement agreement was based upon the costs involved in defending against these allegations and recognition of the impact of the trainer insurer rule. Over my 40 years as a trainer, I can unequivocally state that I neither administered nor had knowledge of the administration of any prohibited substance to any of my horses.”

The post Sadler Fined, Suspended for Medication Violations appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Sadler Fined $15,000, To Serve 15-Day Suspension For Three 2019 Medication Violations

California Horse Racing Board stewards have fined trainer John Sadler $15,000 and suspended him for 60 days, with 45 days of the ban stayed, for three medication violations in April and May 2019.

The ruling, dated Sunday, was the result of a settlement agreement and mutual release between Sadler and the CHRB that stayed 45 days of the suspension provided he has no additional Class 1, 2 or 3 violations during a probationary year that ends June 28, 2021.

Cited were violations of CHRB Rule 1887 (trainer or owner to insure condition of horse) and 1843 (prohibited drug substances: gabapentin and clenbuterol.

The horses that tested positive were Field Bet, fifth as the favorite in a $50,000 maiden claiming race at Santa Anita on April 14, 2019; Jasikan, third in the $100,000 Singletary Stakes at Santa Anita on April 28, 2019; and Sneem, first in a maiden special weight race at Golden Gate Fields on May 10, 2019.

The ruling does not address whether the horses will be disqualified and any purse money won will be redistributed. All three horses were owned by Hronis Racing LLC.

Gabapentin is commonly used to treat shingles or neurologic conditions in humans, but also as an analgesic for pain management for aging horses or those with laminitis. It is classified as Class 3/Penalty B under Association of Racing Commissioners International guidelines. Clenbuterol is a bronchodilator classified by RCI as Class 3/Penalty B. Since the dates of the violations, the CHRB has further tightened use of clenbuterol in horses.

Sadler issued the following statement about the sanctions:

“Trainers are liable for the condition of their horses regardless of the acts of third parties. The imposition of the trainer insurer rule requires only the detection of a prohibited substance in an official sample and identification of the trainer of the horse. The trainer insurer rule is not based on actual administration of a drug or negligent care. Fault is not an element of liability under the trainer insurer rule.

“The incidents covered by the settlement agreement and the penalties imposed under the agreement reflect the fact that these incidents resulted from circumstances beyond my control but which nonetheless are my responsibility. Two of these cases involved the passive transmission by a groom of a medication prescribed for his own medical condition. The other involved detection of a prohibited substance in a horse over which I did not have actual custody or control.

“I want to thank the CHRB for their consideration of the mitigating circumstances underlying these complaints in reaching this agreement. My decision to enter into the settlement agreement was based upon the costs involved in defending against these allegations and recognition of the impact of the trainer insurer rule. Over my 40 years as a trainer, I can unequivocally state that I neither administered nor had knowledge of the administration of any prohibited substance to any of my horses.”

According to ThoroughbredRulings.com, hese are the first medication violations for Sadler since he was fined $500 for a positive test for the Class 4 muscle relaxant dantrolene on Dec. 1, 2017. Prior to that he was fined in 2013 for a flunixin overage and twice in 2011 for methocarbamol violations.

Sadler's 15-day suspension begins Monday, June 29 and runs through July 13.

A licensed trainer since 1978, Sadler has won 2,551 races from 15,419 starts. His biggest career victory came in the 2018 Breeders' Cup Classic with Accelerate, who was voted an Eclipse Award as that year's champion older male racing on dirt.

The post Sadler Fined $15,000, To Serve 15-Day Suspension For Three 2019 Medication Violations appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Violations Show New Medication Rules In California Require A Learning Curve

California now has some of the strictest rules regarding medication in racehorses of any jurisdiction in the United States, and a report on medication violations for April and May show that horsemen and veterinarians are still working to understand newer regulations.

At a meeting of the California Horse Racing Board (CHRB) conducted via teleconference last week, CHRB equine medical director Dr. Rick Arthur reported that April saw nine medication violations, only one of which was in a post-race sample, while there were six medication violations in May, two of which were in post-race samples.

Three of April's nine violations were from horses working before the state veterinarian, and the other five were out-of-competition samples taken on horses recording workouts.

“Of the nine violations in April, six would not have been violations in other states,” said Arthur. “I suspect two others would not be violations in most states.”

Four of May's six positives were horses working for the official veterinarian. Arthur guessed only one of the six would be a violation outside of California.

In mid-March, new regulations placed restrictions on the use of “local anesthetics, narcotic analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatories” on horses within 24 hours of a timed workout, and prohibiting more than one NSAID in a post-work sample. In late February, regulations went into effect prohibiting NSAIDs within 24 hours of post time.

“To my knowledge, California is the only state currently regulating these medications during training,” said Arthur. “I'm usually not sympathetic to trainers and veterinarians not paying attention to our rule changes, but we have made numerous regulatory changes recently and from discussions with trainers and veterinarians, the new rule is not as clear to licensees as I would have hoped or expected. Trainers and veterinarians appear confused between house rules and CHRB regulations.

“The most difficult change has been the new medication regulations during training. Keep in mind, regulating medication during training is a new concept in racing.”

Arthur said he is working with California Thoroughbred Trainers to guide a series of webinars aimed at educating trainers and veterinarians on the new rules. And not a moment too soon — as he pointed out, several more veterinary regulations are set to go into effect July 1, including the transfer of a health record for claimed horses and a prohibition on bisphosphonates.

The post Violations Show New Medication Rules In California Require A Learning Curve appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights