Sanchez Bet Heavily, And Sometimes Against Himself

When it was revealed that jockey Mychel Sanchez had gone on a betting spree that included wagers where he bet against the horses he was riding, his attorney Alan Pincus argued that this was not a matter of race fixing. Rather, Pincus said, Sanchez had turned to gambling as an outlet to combat his depression, let things spin out of control and in all cases did his best to win, even when it meant he might beat a horse he had bet on.

“He was just doing something crazy that only a psychiatrist can explain,” Pincus said in January.

The TDN, through a Freedom of Information Law request, has acquired the records of Sanchez's betting activity that were reviewed by the Pennsylvania Racing Commission. In some respects, they lend credence to the lawyer's argument. The betting log covers the period of Dec. 23 of last year through Jan. 3, during which time Sanchez placed 104 bets on his TVG account. From those 104, there were only six races in which he made significant bets against himself. He bet on his own mount seven times. All other wagers were made on races in which he did not have a mount.

In most states, jockeys are not prohibited from betting on races in which they don't ride or on betting on their own mounts.

Nonetheless, a jockey betting against himself, no matter how few times it happened, is a serious offense that brings the integrity of those races into question. Did Sanchez, in fact, do his very best to win or was he more interested in cashing his bets, one of which was for $4,380? Only he knows for sure.

These are the six races in which Sanchez made significant bets on a horse other than the one he rode. They are:

 

(*) Dec. 26th, 8th at Laurel: Sanchez bet $2,190 to win and place on 6-5 favorite Cordmaker (Curlin) in the Robert Manfuso S. Cordmaker won, giving Sanchez a profit of $3,066. His mount, Alwaysmining, (Stay Thirsty) finished last at 13-1.

 

(*) Dec. 28, 7th at Parx: Sanchez bet $100 to win, place and show on 4-1 shot Miss Mosaic (Verrazano) in the Mrs. Claus S. Sanchez won the race aboard 18-1 Jakarta (Bustin Stones), beating Miss Mosaic, who finished second. Sanchez's share of the purse was $5,520. Had Miss Mosaic won he would have won about $800 on his bets.

 

(*) Dec. 29, 6th at Parx: Sanchez bet $200 to win, place and show on Six Cider (Medaglia d'Oro) and $25 to win, place and show on Double the Heart (Alternation). Both horses finished out of the money. He rode 52-1 shot Dangerfield (Into Mischief), who finished last.

 

(*) Dec. 31, 6th at Laurel: Sanchez bet $100 to win, place and show on I Can Run (Tourist), who finished fourth. His mount, Ocean Tide (More Than Ready), was last.

 

(*) Jan. 2, 5th at Laurel: Sanchez bet $1,000 win and place on 7-2 shot Bear Force Won (Bandbox), who won the race. Sanchez's profit on the bet was $4,900. His mount, the 2-1 shot Satchel de Ritches (Country Day), finished fourth.

 

(*) Jan. 3, 3rd at Parx: Sanchez bet $500 to win, place and show on Iova (lea), who finished second. He made a profit of $1,000 on the race. His mount, The Biggest One (Gone Astray), finished third at 9-2.

From those six races, Sanchez made a profit of $8,171.

In addition, Sanchez bet $864 on the Pick Five Dec. 29 at Parx and hit the bet, which paid $7,875. He did not include his mount in the first leg, the 52-1 shot Dangerfield, on his ticket. Sanchez rode the winner of the final leg, 12-1 shot No Fooling Dude (Orientate).

Pincus said that Sanchez was not gambling regularly until opening up a TVG account late last year. He did so under his own name and a TVG employee alerted the Pennsylvania Racing Commission after noticing that Sanchez was betting against himself. His betting was more or less in control at the start. On Dec. 23, a day in which he did not ride, he started off with a $100 win and place bet at Gulfstream and followed that with a $50 win bet and a $15 win and place bet, also on races at Gulfstream. But as the day wore on he began to bet larger amounts. He switched his betting to Turfway Park and in two races bet $1,000 to win, place and show on a horse. Both horses finished out of the money.

Racing took a break for the Christmas holiday and Sanchez did not wager again until Dec. 26, betting on Laurel, where he rode.  He made his first bet in the second race, in which he did not have a mount. He bet $1000 win, place and show on 3-1 shot Beneath the Stars (Connect), who finished second. In the third race, he bet on himself, wagering $1,000 to win, place and show on 7-2 shot Last Romance (Tapiture), who finished second.

After betting on two more races in which he didn't have a mount, he crossed the line for the first time, making the $2,190 win and place bet on Cordmaker. His mount, Alwaysmining, went to the front and led for the first half-mile before tiring. The footnote for the race reads: “Alwaysmining rushed up between foes and then dropped in to take the early lead, was pressured from his outside, ceded command around the far turn and faltered.”

A clear betting pattern was emerging. While Sanchez made an occasional multi-race wager, the majority of his bets were either to win and place or to win, place and show. And he was betting heavily. Sanchez would routinely bet $1,000 or more to win, place and show on a horse. On the Dec. 27th, he made a $2,000 win, place and show bet on a race at Laurel, betting on his mount, Johnny Sack (Mosler). On the largest bet he made during the period in question, he lost all $6,000 as Johnny Sack finished sixth.

On Dec. 30, while he was riding at Laurel, he bet $5,000 to win on 11-10 favorite Palace Magic (Palace Malice) in the ninth race at the Fair Grounds. Palace Magic finished second.

On Jan. 3, Sanchez rode at Parx, where he made just three wagers, two $500 win and place bets and a $400 Pick 5 ticket. From a gambling perspective, he was having a good day, winning $3,200 on his two straight bets. But Sanchez stopped abruptly and did not bet any other races on the card. It is not clear what motivated him to stop.

Throughout the betting binge, Sanchez bet a total of $129,212 and lost more than $18,000.

Based on the time stamp on his bets, Sanchez was placing them, on the days when he rode, from the track between races when he would have been in the jockey's room. In many countries, jockeys are not allowed to take communication devices into the jockey's room.

On Jan. 10, Sanchez appeared at a hearing before the Pennsylvania Racing Commission Board of Stewards and was suspended for 60 days and ordered to complete an accredited program for gambling addiction. Pincus said at the time that Sanchez had also sought treatment to deal with his depression.

The Maryland Racing Commission took no action against Sanchez at the time he was suspended in Pennsylvania. Michael Hopkins, the executive director of the Maryland Racing Commission, told Pat Cummings of the Thoroughbred Idea Foundation that the matter is closed and the commission has no plans to take action against Sanchez. On Jan. 21, after learning of the allegations against Sanchez, 1/ST Racing, the owners of Laurel, took the jockey off all his mounts that day and banned him for an indefinite period. At time of deadline for this story, the TDN was unable to confirm whether or not Sanchez will be cleared to ride by 1/ST officials after his Pennsylvania suspension has been served.

Sanchez rode at Aqueduct on Jan. 1, but did not bet against any of his own mounts that day.

Though there are no established guidelines for the length of a suspension when a jockey is caught betting against himself, that Sanchez only got 60 days suggests that the Pennsylvania Racing Commission believed that he was not fixing races and that it was sympathetic to his assertion that depression played a role in his betting frenzy.

“He just did something because of a mental problem,” Pincus said in January. “People are responsible for their own actions, but he has to be viewed with sympathy.”

Sanchez's suspension ends March 21.

The post Sanchez Bet Heavily, And Sometimes Against Himself appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Sanchez Suspended, Gambling an Outlet for Depression

Jockey Mychel Sanchez, who has been suspended 60 days by the Pennsylvania Racing Commission for betting on horses other than the ones he rode, is not a cheat or a race-fixer, his attorney told the TDN Friday. Rather, said lawyer Alan Pincus, Sanchez was dealing with a serious case of depression and took to gambling as an outlet. Pincus said that in all instances Sanchez tried his best to win the races in question, whether he had bet against his own horse or not.

“It was clear he was giving his best effort,” Pincus said. “He was not fixing races. He won several of the races in which he bet against his horses. The horse paid $37 in one race, $27 in another. He was just doing something crazy that only a psychiatrist can explain.”

With Sanchez's main track, Parx, dark Friday, the jockey was listed on two mounts at Laurel. After the Maryland Racing Commission learned of the Pennsylvania suspension, Sanchez was taken of his mounts. The Maryland Jockey Club and 1/ST RACING issued a statement later in the day in which it said Sanchez has been banned indefinitely.

“After learning of the serious allegations of illegal wagering on the part of jockey Mychel Sanchez, effective immediately 1/ST RACING will institute an indefinite ban against him from training or racing at any 1/ST RACING venue,” read a statement issued by 1/ST RACING. “Any decision regarding Sanchez's reinstatement will be made at a later time. 1/ST RACING stands on the principles of integrity and accountability, and we believe there is no place in our sport for this kind of unethical and illegal activity.”

Tom Chuckas, the director of the Thoroughbred division of the Pennsylvania Racing Commission, was not available to the media. A call to his office went to voice mail and no one returned the call from the TDN seeking comment. There was nothing related to Sanchez's suspension on the page on the Pennsylvania Racing Commission's website listing rulings. An official ruling will likely be issued following a regularly scheduled commission meeting next week.

Should Chuckas ever make himself available, he will likely be asked to explain what appears to be a serious offense resulted in a suspension of just 60 days.

“Mychal is a straight shooter and he has worked hard and with skill and talent has risen to a very strong position,” Pincus said. “He is the sole support for his family both here and in Venezuela and life, on the surface, was great for him. But, he was feeling depressed. And he was not doing anything to deal with it. He was just turning inward. He turned to gambling on the races for a very short period of time. I'm not a psychiatrist, but he was doing this to numb the pain.”

Pincus said that Sanchez opened a TVG account in his own name and began betting Dec. 23 and made his last bets Jan. 3. He went six for 28 during that period. During that time, he also rode at Aqueduct and at Laurel. Pincus said he was not sure whether or not Sanchez also bet against his mounts in New York and Maryland or just at Parx. If he bet against himself in New York or in Maryland, he could face additional penalties from those states.

“We will look into this,” said J. Michael Hopkins, the executive director of the Maryland Racing Commission. “But right now he's suspended in Pennsylvania, so there's no need to be in a rush because he doesn't ride here regularly. But we will definitely take a look at it.”

TVG employees noticed that the jockey had been betting against his own horses and notified the appropriate racing commissions.

Having, through his lawyer, admitted that he bet against his own horses, Sanchez will not fight the suspension.

“He was suspended 60 days starting [Friday] to the 21st of March,” Pincus said. “Obviously, it was warranted. We are not going to appeal this.”

Pincus said that Sanchez has already enrolled in a problem gambling program and has also sought out psychiatric help.

“He just did something because of a mental problem,” Pincus said. “People are responsible for their own actions, but he has to be viewed with sympathy.”

Sanchez began riding in the U.S. in 2013 and was the leading rider at Parx in 2020. According to Equibase, he's won 940 races from 6,097 mounts.

The post Sanchez Suspended, Gambling an Outlet for Depression appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Attorney For Suspended Jockey Mychel Sanchez: ‘He Is Not A Criminal … He’s A Person Who Needs Help’

The case against jockey Mychel J. Sanchez, suspended for 60 days by the Pennsylvania Horse Racing Commission for betting against his own horses, is not the story many of us might think it is, according to the rider's attorney, Alan Pincus.

Pincus confirmed that Sanchez opened a TVG account in his own name in late December 2021. He said that Sanchez made numerous bets over a period of about 10 days, including wagering on horses that were racing against his own mounts. But the attorney said Sanchez rode to win in those races and in fact registered two upsets at Parx Racing in Bensalem, Pa., during the period in question, one at 12-1 odds and the other at 18-1.

“These are extremely weird circumstances,” Pincus said. “You can never totally understand how the human mind works. People who may appear to be on top of the world – like the tennis star Naomi Osaka – can be suffering from depression. You don't know.

“Mychel Sanchez is suffering from some type of depression,” he said. “I'm not a psychiatrist, but he's someone who needs help. He started betting. Not in any cheating way, just as a way of coping with the pain he was experiencing. He's been feeling low for some time and it's been building up in him.

“He's doing this, and fortunately TVG notices who it is and what's going on and they alert the racing commission,” said Pincus. “It's inexplicable. He had races where he actually bet against his own horse, then went out and won the race. One horse paid $37 to win. Another race he bets against himself and he won the race on a horse that paid $27. He's not pulling horses, he's not doing it for evil purposes, he's doing it for crazy purposes, inexplicable purposes. But obviously it is against the rules and you can't do that.”

Sanchez rode the $38.60 winner Jakarta at Parx on Dec. 28 and the $27.40 winner No Fooling Dude on Dec. 29, according to Equibase charts.

TVG confirmed its role in alerting racing officials of Sanchez's wagering activities.

“As part of TVG's regular monitoring of new accounts and account activity, members of our team noticed wagers that warranted us suspending the account in question and alerting the regulatory authorities in the states where those races occurred,” a statement from the advance-deposit wagering platform said. “We are cooperating fully with the authorities investigating these activities.”

Pincus said the penalty was fair, given the circumstances.

“If you are betting against your own horse and stiff him, now you are talking about being barred forever,” he said. “That didn't happen.”

Sanchez has been ordered to undergo treatment facilitated by the Jockeys' Guild, Pincus said.

“He has started a treatment program,” Pincus said. “He is not a criminal. He was not pulling horses. He's a person who needs help.”

He also said regulators in Maryland and New York may be investigating the matter. Sanchez rode at several tracks in December, including Parx, Laurel Park in Maryland, Aqueduct in New York, and Gulfstream Park in Maryland.

A native of Venezuela who first rode in the U.S. in 2013, Sanchez was co-leading rider at Parx in 2019 and leading rider in 2020. He was a top 10 rider at Monmouth Park, Laurel Park and Parx in 2021. Sanchez compiled 940 career wins in the U.S. from 6,097 mounts.

1/ST Racing, which operates Laurel and Gulfstream, issued a statement saying Sanchez has been suspended indefinitely from riding at its tracks.

“After learning of the serious allegations of illegal wagering on the part of jockey Mychel Sanchez, effective immediately 1/ST Racing will institute an indefinite ban against him from training or racing at any 1/ST Racing venue,” the statement said. “Any decision regarding Sanchez's reinstatement will be made at a later time. 1/ST Racing stands on the principles of integrity and accountability, and we believe there is no place in our sport for this kind of unethical and illegal activity.”

“Although he needs to be punished and needs treatment,” Pincus said, “it shouldn't be fatal punishment.”

The post Attorney For Suspended Jockey Mychel Sanchez: ‘He Is Not A Criminal … He’s A Person Who Needs Help’ appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Suspension Reduction In Cobb Case Came Down To ‘She Said/She Said’ Regarding Mistreatment Of Filly

In late July, a grainy video circulated on Twitter, purporting to show the impetus for the two-year suspension issued to trainer Amber Cobb by Delaware Park stewards for “improper or inhumane treatment” of an animal and conduct detrimental to racing. The ruling had puzzled racing fans and media when it was published, since it did not describe the nature of the incident that prompted such a serious penalty.

(The Paulick Report received a clearer version of that video in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in late August. It is embedded below.)

The video shows a chestnut horse tied either to the back wall or to the metal grating over a window of a stall, while a woman shouts obscenities at the horse and strikes at the animal with a plastic pitchfork until the horse, a 2-year-old unraced filly, rears and stumbles, then falls to the ground with the wall tie still attached to either her bit or her halter. She tries to rise and falls again, finally lying still while breathing heavily until someone unclips the tie.

Many people wondered, after watching the video clip, what prompted the Delaware Thoroughbred Racing Commission to shorten Cobb's suspension from two years to 60 days after an appeal hearing held July 14. A recording of the appeal proceeding, which stretched for nearly five hours, revealed the decision came down largely to the perceived credibility of the accused and a whistleblower.

The video in question, along with a Live Photo captured on a previous date, were both shot by Lisa Whittaker, former groom for Cobb, sometime in February 2021 at a private farm in New Jersey. (The Paulick Report did not obtain a copy of the Live Photo. Whittaker testified she intended to take a video but didn't switch her phone's camera settings quickly enough and ended up with a live photo, which shows a short burst of action and a still image.) Whittaker provided both the photo and video along with a written statement to stewards in May 2021, after she said she had secured employment in another barn and was no longer afraid of being fired by Cobb.

Whittaker painted an unsettling picture of life in Cobb's barn. She worked for Cobb in November at Delaware Park, and then again at the New Jersey farm beginning in January or February, and continued with Cobb through the time that she sent a string to Delaware Park for the start of the new racing season. Whittaker said she saw treatment from Cobb that began to concern her – both at her time on the farm, where Cobb was starting young horses, and back at Delaware Park.

“Her methods are brutal,” Whittaker told the commission. “She is very heavy-handed. If they are slightly out of line, and these are young horses, she's screaming at them to whoa and hitting them with a whip. They don't understand why. She flips horses over all the time. She'll pull on their mouths when they're ground driving. She's screaming at them, she's whipping them, and there's nowhere for them to go but up.”

At the beginning of the 2021 Delaware Park meet, Whittaker recalled a horse – a bay colt – who was being taught to use the automatic walker. The horse broke loose and ran around the Delaware Park property for an extended period of time. When they finally caught him, the overwrought horse didn't want to go into his stall. Whittaker testified that Cobb beat the colt in the head with a chain shank to get him to back into the stall. She also said Cobb told her to withhold feed from the horse for four days afterwards.

Whittaker said the live photo she took was the day before the video and depicted the same horse.

“If you look, she's pulling this horse down,” she said, looking at the photo in the appeal hearing. “That's what she does, she'll drive them forward and she'll pull so hard, they have nowhere to go but up … This horse reared up, hit her head on the wall, and came down and broke a tack box.”

[Story Continues Below]

On the day the video was shot, Whittaker said Cobb had tried ground driving the horse, an unnamed filly out of Bluegrass Ellie, outside in an open area for the first time, four days into her ground training.

(Ground driving is a common practice in a horse's early training and usually involves tacking the horse with saddle and bridle and attaching a driving line on each side of the bit. The handler will walk behind the horse or, for work at a trot or canter, may stand while the horse travels in a circle around the handler. The practice is a good way to introduce a horse to steering and the feel of the lines on the horse's sides can prepare them for a rider's legs brushing them.)

The filly bolted, and at some point, got loose. Whittaker recalled Cobb brought the horse back into the barn and tied her to the wall in the stall while Whittaker kept mucking a nearby stall. When Whittaker heard scrambling and commotion, she rushed over and began filming Cobb's outburst.

For her part, Cobb did not deny that she is the person shown in the video, or that she hit the filly with a plastic pitchfork. Beyond that, her and Whittaker's interpretations of what takes place in her barn differ. Cobb denies that she ever instructed food be withheld from any of her horses for days; she recalled the colt who was loose at Delaware but said she told Whittaker to withhold food only until the colt was cool to prevent colic. She denied ever hitting any other horses.

Prior to the video, Cobb said both that the filly had been very tough but also that she had been responsive and reasonably compliant over their prior three days of ground driving inside the barn. The Live Photo from the previous day, Cobb and another witness said, showed the filly spooking at the noise from a car outside the barn, and Cobb disputed that the filly had fallen over, saying she broke the tack box with one of her feet as she regained her balance and was uninjured.

On the day in question, she said the horse became agitated when she got into the open field, seemingly with no provocation, and bolted. Cobb let one of her driving lines go almost immediately and struggled to hold the horse with the other.

“Eventually I didn't have anything but to let her go because she was so tangled up,” Cobb said. “I didn't want her to trip or hurt herself so I let go and she freaked out and ended up rearing up so bad, she got tangled up in the ropes. It wasn't anything I did, she just lost her mind.”

Once she caught the filly, Cobb said she brought her inside to Whittaker, who was told not to tie the horse to the wall. The filly, Cobb said, had previously demonstrated a propensity for “climbing the wall” or scraping and striking it with her front hooves.

When Cobb discovered Whittaker had tied the horse to the wall anyway, she said, she went in to release the horse. Then, Cobb said the horse tried to kick her – that was not shown on the video. The video recording began, Cobb said, when she made a second attempt to enter the stall to release the horse, first by standing in the doorway with the pitchfork and yelling.

“I was upset and I don't want to say 'stressed' because that's not right, but I didn't want anything to happen,” said Cobb. “I just didn't want anything to happen. So when I tried to get her to move over my fear and anxiety overtook me. I didn't want to hurt her, I just wanted her to be OK.”

Whittaker didn't see the incident the same way.

“That was her losing control of her temper,” said Whittaker. “She was mad at the filly. She lost control and went after the filly. That's pure anger. The filly, you see she's standing tied to the wall. She tried to say she was kicking at her, and the filly is standing calmly and had turned her head to her. She showed no aggressive behavior whatsoever.”

Indeed, commissioners appeared shocked by the behavior in the video. One can be heard muttering during the first replay of the video, “Jesus. Shit. I can't see this.” When a commissioner asks a staff member to confirm whether there is any further video evidence, a commissioner mutters, “That's enough.”

Commissioners did press Cobb on her motives for approaching the filly the way she did, focusing particularly on the moments early in the clip where the horse appears to be standing calmly before Cobb begins brandishing the fork at the horse.

“I know she looks calm,” said Cobb. “She's come at me numerous times. I'm scared that she's going to come over on me again. I kind of wanted to set my barrier.

“I wanted to say, hey, I'm dominant here. I need you to submit a little bit to me here. She's fighting me tooth and nail.”

Cobb was asked whether she could have anticipated that threatening the horse would be more likely, not less likely, to result in the horse flipping over in the stall.

“Yeah, but I didn't hit her that hard,” Cobb said, who attributed the horse's fall to slippery stall mats.

Cobb said she'd never had another horse flip over with her before.

But in fact, she has. In June 2020, an unraced 2-year-old named Sky High Interest flipped over coming out of a wash rack at Finger Lakes and sustained a head injury requiring euthanasia, according to a report from the New York State Gaming Commission.

“Oh,” Cobb said when asked about Sky High Interest. “I forgot about her. I try to forget about her. She bolted off the wash rack and flipped over. It was an older horse … they think it was semi-heart attack related. She was an older horse.”

Commissioners also focused on the time lag between when the video was shot and the time it was reported to stewards in Delaware. Alan Pincus, attorney for Cobb, brought up the whistleblower's personal life as a possible motivator, suggesting that Whittaker's ex-boyfriend had an affair with Cobb (who said she has been in a long-term relationship with jockey Jamie Rodriguez for the past decade). Whittaker laughed, seeming bemused by the suggestion when questioned by Pincus. That laughter, for two commissioners, spoke a thousand words.

“Quite frankly I found her to not be a credible witness,” said secretary-commissioner Ed Stegemeier, citing her laughter as “nervous.” “She's not on trial but if she really cared passionately about animals, which she does to a degree, why do you wait months to do something?

“I want to support our stewards … but I really feel we need to reexamine the decision that was made … Maybe this was an isolated incident. But God help you if in the future this ever happens again.”

At the same time, Stegemeier said, the horse's reaction suggested it wasn't an isolated incident.

“When the horse saw you had a pitchfork, the horse immediately reacted to you coming in, which said to me this has happened before,” he said. “This was not the first time.”

Character witnesses for Cobb questioned Whittaker's professionalism while praising Cobb's, reiterating that they'd never seen horses without food or water in her shedrow. Rodriguez also testified to corroborate Cobb's version of events. He can be heard at the end of the video, telling Cobb the filly is dangerous and needs to be removed from the barn.

By contrast, several commissioners remarked during public deliberations that they were impressed with Cobb, who studied equine business for two years before embarking on a series of internships at breeding facilities and training operations and sustaining a brief career as a jockey before a horse she was riding flipped over on her and injured her knee.

“You were articulate,” said chairman W. Duncan Patterson Jr. “You were an excellent witness. I believe you were scared but I don't know what was inside your head, that's just what I'm surmising. I believe you acted irrationally and I cannot ignore the video. It's too damning. I concur with what my fellow commissioners said that the stewards were correct in their ruling but the penalty goes much too far. I think that would put you out of business. But maybe being out of business for a couple months, three months might be a good thing. Let you clear your head. I know what this business is like because I've been in it.”

“I believe Miss Cobb is one of the most articulate people that I've heard from the back end of Delaware Park,” said commissioner Richard Levine. “Everything we heard about her was excellent except for one witness who I personally think was very flawed and had not-friendly motivations. But the film does show what the film shows. All the evidence we have is that it was a single incident.”

The stewards also could not corroborate any of the accusations Whittaker made in her written statement about other abuses, either in New Jersey or Delaware. William Troilo, acting chief state steward, said that the decision of the stewards was based only on the evidence provided to them, since Cobb disputed the majority of Whittaker's statement.

All commissioners agreed that two years would end Cobb's career and should be shortened. Per the official rules of meeting order, the group worked its way down from a two-year suspension until they could find a length of time that was acceptable to the majority. They settled at 60 days.

Henry “Jim” Decker was the lone holdout and abstained from the final vote, which without him was 4-0 in favor of lowering Cobb's suspension to 60 days. They also required that Cobb demonstrate proof of completion of a certified anger management program, apparently not realizing that the stewards' ruling had already included that requirement.

“Cruelty to animals, whether it's a one-off or not, is unacceptable anywhere,” said Decker, who had suggested a one-year suspension. “The fact that something is a death sentence for a racing career, I don't believe should have any bearing on what the penalty should be. The penalty should be commensurate with the crime, so to speak.”

Cobb appealed the 60-day suspension into the Delaware court system, but through her attorneys voluntarily dismissed that case on Aug. 24. She has not saddled a horse since July 21.

Pennsylvania had taken the unusual action of suspending Cobb's license for two years before the completion of the appeals process in Delaware. The Pennsylvania commission rescinded that ruling on Aug. 2.

Cobb and Rodriguez said the filly was sent back to her breeder, Saratoga Glen Farm, with the recommendation she not complete the breaking process over fears she was too dangerous. As of late June, Troilo said she was turned out in a field. She did not appear to be physically injured by the incident.

The post Suspension Reduction In Cobb Case Came Down To ‘She Said/She Said’ Regarding Mistreatment Of Filly appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights