Horse Racing Free Tips

How Does Wildfire Smoke Affect Horse Health?

With over 100 wildfires raging in multiple states, both humans and animals are breathing unhealthy air containing smoke and particulates. These particulates can cause burning eyes, running noses and breathing complications like bronchitis. Smoke can also exacerbate heart and lung issues like congestive heart failure and asthma or heaves.

Though the composition of smoke differs with what is being burned, the particulate matter in the smoke is of the most concern. “Particulate” is a catch-all term used to encompass the mixture of solid particles and liquid droplets in the air. Particulates from smoke are very tiny, enabling them to get to the deepest part of the airways.

Horses that breathe particulates from smoke may have reduced lung function in addition to irritated eyes and respiratory tract. Particulates can also reduce the lung's ability to remove foreign materials like bacteria and pollen.

A healthy horse's respiration rate should be between 12 and 24 breaths per minute. If the horse is breathing consistently more than 30 breaths per minute, is having difficulty breathing, has flared nostrils, is coughing deeply or has abnormal nasal discharge, a veterinarian should be called.

To protect horse health during wildfires:

Limit exercise the horse is smoke is visible
Reduce exposure to dust by feeding dust-free hay or by soaking hay before feeding
Offer fresh water close to grain or hay; water will assist in clearing inhaled particulates
Contact a vet if the horse is coughing or having trouble breathing
Give a horse ideally 4 to 6 weeks to recover from airway damage from wildfire smoke once the air had cleared

The post How Does Wildfire Smoke Affect Horse Health? appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Betting Systems for Online Casino Gamblers

In this article, we’ll explain 6 popular betting systems that you can experiment with in your online casino gaming experience. Truth be told, these timeless, tried and true betting systems originated in the world of offline betting, but they apply equally as well to online casino gambling, no matter what the game, no matter what the betting structure.

Before You Begin: For most of these systems, you will need to decide what your betting unit will be ahead of time (such as the minimum allowable bet at the game and online casino in question).

1-3-2-6 Betting System

This is what’s called a Positive Progression system, meaning that as you win, your bets increase. The foundation of this online casino betting system is the premise that a player can win any game a maximum of 4 times in a row before they’ll probably lose.

Here’s how the system works:

– Bet 1 unit each betting round until you win a round;
– After you win a round, bet 3 units on the next (second) round;
– If you win a second round in a row, bet 2 units on the next (third) round;

– If you win a third round in a row, bet 6 units on the next (fourth) round;

– Then, no matter what happens (win or lose) return to the beginning of the pattern, betting 1 unit per round until you win one, etc.

The risk-reward scenario with the 1-2-3-6 betting system is simple. You can win as much as 6 times your original bet after 4 rounds of play while only putting 2 units of your own at risk.

The worst case scenario with the 1-2-3-6 betting system is that you lose 6 consecutive times in the second round. No matter, though. You can make it all up by winning 4 times in a row.

The Martingale System
This is a Negative Progression system, meaning that as you lose, your bets increase.

The foundation of this online casino betting system is the premise that a player cannot possibly lose an infinite number of times without ever winning a single round. Therefore, what the Martingale system is designed to help you do is offset all of your accumulated losses with a single win.

Whether you consider it cynical, realistic, or both, this system works best in cases when the online casino game is paying out a 1 to 1 payout ratio on each bet. Here’s how it works:

– First, place whatever bet you’ve decided to start with;
– If you win, bet the same amount again, but if you lose, bet double the amount;

– If you lose again, you double your bet again.

The downside to the Martingale system is that you need a large bankroll to start out with as well as the resolve to keep increasing your bets as your losses compound. Not just anyone can pull this online casino betting system off.

In the rarest of cases, you may, after enough losses, reach the online casino’s betting maximum and then not be able to raise your bet further or offset your losses with one win.

The D’Alenbert System
This is another Negative Progression system. It’s also considered an Insurance System in that, as you win, the size of your bets increase. Here’s how it works:

– Each time you lose, you raise your bets by one unit;
– Each time you win, you lower your bets by one unit;

This system also requires a large enough online casino bankroll to pull it off.

By adding the insurance system to the negative progression system, you’re hedging your increasing losses by pulling some profits off the table each time you win.

The Labouchere Betting System (a.k.a. The Cancellation System)
This system, another Negative Progression, is somewhat more complicated than those listed so far. Depending on the odds in whatever online casino game you’re playing, you’ll come up with some sequence of numbers — of any length you wish — and not necessarily sequential.

Each number in your sequence is a multiple of your predetermined betting unit (7 therefore is 7 times your betting unit; 5 is 5x, etc.) Here’s how it works:

– Your first bet should be the sum of the first and last numbers in your sequence;
– If you win, cross out those two numbers you just added together (the two outermost in your sequence) and bet the sum of the next two;

– If you win again, cross out those two outermost numbers and repeat the process

– If you continue winning until you have no more numbers in the sequence to add together, you simply start from the beginning with the entire, original sequence.

However:

– If you lose, you add to the end of the sequence, the sum that you had just used, thus creating a new sequence;
– Crossing out no numbers at all (because you didn’t win yet), add the first number in the sequence to the new last number that number and use that new sum as your multiple;

The supposed benefit of this complicated betting method is that anytime you have to start over with the original sequence, you come out with a profit. The drawback is that you can accumulate enormous losses before you ever win (if you ever win).

Your success at the Labouchere system really depends on selecting the right sequence.

The Paroli System (a.k.a. The Anti-Martingale System)
This is another Positive Progression system. More than simply selecting a unit of betting, with the Paroli system you also need to determine two other criteria before you begin:

1. A cap: The uppermost amount at which you will stop increasing your wager and return to your starting unit;

2. A multiple: How much you’ll increase your bet every time you win (1 unit, 2 units, 3 units, etc.)

You should base these factors on the odds of the online casino game you happen to be playing. The appeal of the Paroli System is that you can play at the online casino for a while with a small bankroll. You cut your losses and let your profits ride.

The Parlay System
This is another Positive Progression system. Similar to the Paroli System, the effect of the Parlay system is to “pyramid” your profits, meaning that every time you win you wager both your winnings and the amount of your initial bet as your next bet.
The reward of the Parlay system can be huge. The risk is that you can lose it all in a single bad online casino beat.

Road to the 2020 Breeders’ Cup: Crucial Preps Scheduled at Woodbine

As the Road to the Breeders' Cup series picks up steam following a schedule adjusted due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the focus this upcoming weekend shifts to Woodbine in Toronto, which will host three Challenge Series races offering automatic berths to the 37th World Championships on Nov. 6-7 at Keeneland Race Course. On Sept.

Former Zayat Financial Advisor Among Creditors Trying to `Force’ Stable’s Bankruptcy

Ahmed Zayat’s former financial advisor is among the entities now initiating an “involuntary bankruptcy” petition against Zayat’s family-owned racing stable. This Sept. 14 court action comes six days after the allegedly insolvent Triple Crown-winning breeder and owner voluntarily filed for his own personal Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection.

Although once prevalent, involuntary bankruptcy proceedings are now relatively uncommon in United States courts. They are designed to protect creditors, not debtors, and are often filed against companies (as opposed to individuals) as an attempt to get paid when it is believed that a firm is rapidly burning through assets and/or financial malfeasance is alleged.

Zayat Stables, LLC, is currently a defendant in a $23 million lawsuit filed in January by a New York lender alleging fraud and loan defaults. A Kentucky receiver is in the process of liquidating those equine assets.

Although it is unclear exactly what effect this attempt at “forced” bankruptcy might have on that case, one possible scenario is that the petitioners believe that the only way to preserve the remainder of the dwindling assets for distribution to them is to take legal action via an involuntary bankruptcy. They’d be banking on the bankruptcy order stopping the current liquidation from moving forward, which might keep others from getting paid first.

The Chapter 7 documents filed in U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of New Jersey (Newark), on Monday allege that Zayat Stables owes $275,000 in loans “above the value of any lien” to Steven Keefer.

A 2003 New York Times story on Zayat’s beverage business referred to Keefer as “a former New York investment banker and now chief of staff to Mr. Zayat” who was also head of the development group for the beverage firm.

Zayat apparently even named a Thoroughbred racehorse “Keefer” in honor of his business associate. The colt broke its maiden in 2008 at Monmouth Park in New Jersey, the home state for both men.

Keefer is now the chief executive officer at U.S. Elite, LLC, a New Jersey company that specializes in “tactical” apparel for fitness and military enthusiasts. According to Keefer’s bio page on the company website, the firm’s motto is “We exist to Enhance the Warrior Lifestyle.”

U.S. Elite itself is also listed as a petitioning creditor in the court documents, alleging $188,500 in loans owed by Zayat Stables.

A third party, Joseph Bodner, who lives in the same town (Teaneck) as Zayat, is listed in the petition as being owed $150,000 by the stable.

Under involuntary bankruptcy law, if a debtor has more than 12 creditors, three creditors must join in the involuntary petition for a “force” to move forward.

The claims total $613,500. All three amounts match what Zayat stated he owed those entities in his personal Chapter 7 filing last week.

The petitioners indicated via checking a box that “The debtor is generally not paying its debts as they become due, unless they are the subject of a bona fide dispute as to liability or amount.”

In his separate, voluntary petition for bankruptcy, Zayat is claiming $19,371,466 in total liabilities versus total estimated assets of $1,892,815.

Thoroughbred trainers, horse farms, bloodstock businesses, veterinarians, and equine transportation companies are among the 132 entities listed as creditors in Zayat’s own Chapter 7 filing. They are due $14,755,1717 in “non-priority unsecured claims,” which means they are at the bottom of the hierarchy to get paid—if they get paid at all. Zayat Stables is listed as a co-debtor to 112 of those 132 non-priority unsecured claims.

The next step in the involuntary petition is for Zayat Stables to file a response. If the debtor contests an involuntary petition, the petitioning creditor must prove that the debtor is generally not paying its debts.

If the petitioners are successful, the bankruptcy court will enter an “order for relief” granting the involuntary petition.

But if the court dismisses the petition, the creditors might be on the hook for paying Zayat Stables’ attorney fees and court costs. In addition, if the court rules that the petition was made in bad faith, it can award compensatory and even punitive damages.

Involuntary bankruptcies can be complicated and fraught with peril for both sides. Nicholas Gebelt, an attorney who writes on the subject as a California-certified bankruptcy specialist, described the process like this on his law blog:

“On a practical level, the most compelling reason for filing an involuntary bankruptcy against a debtor is the fear that the debtor is rapidly depleting the resources available to pay its creditors. [But] filing an involuntary bankruptcy against someone is very dangerous. If you are a creditor who files an involuntary bankruptcy against a debtor, then if you can’t establish one of the two grounds for relief…you may find yourself paying the very entity from whom you’re trying to collect. Therefore, absent compelling exigent circumstances it is probably safer to use some other approach to debt collection.”

The post Former Zayat Financial Advisor Among Creditors Trying to `Force’ Stable’s Bankruptcy appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post