Commentary: The Problem With … The Race To The Breeding Shed

Editor's Note: This is the first in a series of commentaries, all of which will begin under the premise of “The problem with …” Rather than to complain, however, as the introductory phrase might suggest, the purpose of these articles will be to present the big picture of a major racing issue and create a dialogue about what is best for the sport's future.

The problem with horse racing at its highest level in the United States is that it has become a marketing tool rather than a sport and that the people with the most power to help the sport grow don't make the actual sport their priority.

In a span of 24 hours, Flightline's victory in the Breeders' Cup Classic on Nov. 5 showed both the greatest opportunity and the greatest challenge American horse racing faces.

First, the greatest opportunity …

Before the Breeders' Cup, the comparisons were already starting to fly between Flightline and Secretariat. “Is Flightline the Greatest Thoroughbred Since Secretariat?” was the headline of a New York Times article published the day before Flightline's Classic victory.

Flightline's resume entering the Breeders' Cup: five wins from six furlongs to 1 ¼ miles by an average margin of victory of more than 12 lengths, with his most recent race being a 19 ¼-length defeat of 2022 Dubai World Cup winner Country Grammer in the Pacific Classic at Del Mar.

“Take a good look at this because you're not gonna see this too often,” announcer Trevor Denman said in the homestretch of his race call of the Pacific Classic.

Trevor was right in the most literal way. We'd see this exactly one more time at Keeneland in Flightline's win by the largest margin of victory in the history of the Breeders' Cup Classic, 8 ¼ lengths, made even more impressive because it came as part of one of the best fields in the history of the Classic. All eight runners were Grade 1 winners.

With Secretariat already on people's minds, the race played out like the 1973 Belmont. Life Is Good, a generational talent in his own right, pressed to the lead in the Classic like Sham did in the Belmont. These pairs had their respective dance floors to themselves. Secretariat rose to another level because of Sham, and Flightline did the same because of Life Is Good to produce a victory that will be talked about for decades to come. Announcer Larry Collmus punctuated his race call by exclaiming that it was a “Secretariat-like Breeders' Cup Classic win.”

Then, less than 24 hours later, Flightline would be retired to stud, and now horse racing is faced with its greatest challenge …

Just when the sport presents its best to the world on one of its biggest stages before an audience that could include potential new devotees, those stars fade away. The previous five horses of the year – Gun Runner in 2017, Justify in 2018, Bricks and Mortar in 2019, Authentic in 2020, and Knicks Go in 2021 – raced a grand total of two times in the calendar year after they won the Eclipse Award for Horse of the Year. Gun Runner ran in the 2018 Pegasus World Cup and Knicks Go in the 2022 Pegasus World Cup.

That's it. Everyone else was a “candle in the wind.” Imagine if Elton John retired after his first No. 1 hit. Or, if Muhammad Ali hung up his gloves after winning the heavyweight title. Or, if Michael Phelps never swam in a race after his first Olympics. Or, if (pick your favorite sports team) disbanded after its first championship.

Why did Flightline retire so suddenly? We all know the answer, and, sadly, we've become numb enough to accept it as inevitable whenever there's a truly great racehorse in America. Flightline's value is too great as a stallion to risk. On Nov. 7, a 2.5-percent interest in Flightline sold for $4.6 million in a unique auction at Keeneland. That doesn't make him worth $184 million as some have suggested, but he's worth a great deal more than the $1 million he brought at a 2019 yearling sale. His initial stud fee has been set at $200,000 for each foal he sires.

Horse racing now exists for owners of historic horses like Flightline or Justify or American Pharoah to cash in on their value after they finish racing. In that sense, racing exists to bring out the value in these horses and market them for what their real end goal is, the breeding shed. I lost count of the number of commercials for stallions that aired during NBC Sports' coverage of this year's Breeders' Cup.

After one year of racing brilliance – whether that comes at age 3 during a Triple Crown run like for American Pharoah in 2015 or Justify in 2018 or at age 4 like for Flightline in 2022 after a stall accident delayed the start of his racing career – owners choose to retire their superstars at a time when racing could grow from the fans these horses attract.

Like what you're reading?

Support our journalism while accessing bonus behind-the-scenes content, Q&As, and more. Subscribe to our Patreon stream.

We (speaking as a fan that became hooked as a teenager in the 1990s and 2000s by horses like Silver Charm, Daylami, and Skip Away) understand that horse racing is a business, but it's also a sport in need of stability and a message for the future. The owners of the recent horses of the year that could captivate current and new fans have instead made the highest level of the sport a stock market for cashing out their investment and then repeating the process by investing big at the next yearling sale.

The bait will be there for the taking. Another inexperienced youngster will emerge in their stakes debut, and we'll wonder if that horse is the next Flightline or Justify or American Pharoah. In that sense, horse racing has become about having a one-night stand with its superstars.

So, what solutions are out there for developing a longer-lasting relationship? Here's a far-fetched one: allow breeding of Thoroughbred racehorses to model other racing breeds with artificial insemination and embryo transfer. That could allow for simultaneously reaping breeding revenue while still extending a racehorse's career.

I get that any attempt to tamper with the Thoroughbred breeding status quo, such as The Jockey Club's limiting stallions to covering 140 mares in a year, will be met with the same reaction as to New Coke, but just consider this stat. Remember how the last five Thoroughbred horses of the year have collectively run in two races after being voted that award. The last five Arabian horses of the year have run 72 times since their first year achieving the sport's highest honor. Two of them – Paddys Day from 2015, 2016, and 2017 and Quick Sand AA from 2018 – are scheduled to race against each other in the Arabian Stallion Stakes at Lone Star Park on Dec. 10 and are contenders for horse of the year once again.

Paddys Day now has offspring running and has even raced against one of his sons. Paddys Day's connections were collecting on him in the midst of his three-straight horse of the year seasons, and that doesn't seem to have affected his racing ability.

Seeing familiar Arabian racing stars has increased the popularity of the sport, including among Thoroughbred racing fans. For instance, the first time Paddys Day ran in the UAE President Cup, the richest Arabian horse race in the United States, in 2016 at Churchill Downs, the race handled $207,869. On the same Downs After Dark card the next year as the same race number with the same wagering menu and one fewer betting interest, the 2017 UAE President Cup handled $275,330.

When Paddys Day and Quick Sand AA matched up in their first UAE President Cup when the race moved to the Preakness in 2020, the race handled $1,163,255. The next year, the handle for the race increased to $2,367,749 in the same position as the last race on the card with the same number of betting interests. The 2021 race was run in May instead of October, and the handle did include $502,973 for a Daily Double and a Pick 3 that was not part of the wagering menu in 2020.

Another solution could be to put more of a spotlight on the state-bred stars that return to their home tracks and develop a fan following year after year after year. For example, the Colorado-bred Collusionist capped a five-for-five season at Bally's Arapahoe Park in 2022 with an eye-catching win in the Butch Gleason Classic on Oct. 4. It was his 13th career stakes victory in his home state since 2018.

After not being part of Arapahoe's closing day card in 2020, Collusionist has run in the Butch Gleason Classic, the meet's final stakes race, in 2021 and 2022. Handle on that race in 2021 was $55,184 and in 2022 was $88,305, although the 2022 amount does include $10,133 for a Pick 4 and a Pick 5 that were not part of 2021. Total handle for the two closing day cards featuring Collusionist increased from $303,963 in 2021 to $327,444 in 2022. Those are positive trends.

Sure, Collusionist can't hold a candle to Flightline. His success has been confined to Colorado. However, he brings fans out to Bally's Arapahoe Park to watch a local star. I challenge you to watch his “Silky Sullivan” debut and tell me that's not a cool horse that you'd want to continue watching.

Other major racing countries also keep their stars around more frequently than the six times Flightline ran in two years. Anamoe, also 4 years old and based in Australia for Godolphin, has made 21 starts and won 11 races, including seven Group 1s. He lost his most recent race on the same date as the Breeders' Cup. It's alright to lose, unless you're worried about maximizing stud value, and unfortunately, that's what mainly influences whether we see American racing stars.

Hopefully, owners and trainers in America might take the approach like Bjorn Nielsen and John and Thady Gosden did with Great Britain's champion stayer Stradivarius. Stradivarius finally retired to stud in 2022 at 7 years old.

“He still loves his training and racing, and it's exciting for everyone to have him for another year,” Thady Gosden told Racing TV at the end of 2021.

Hopefully, an owner and trainer of an American horse of the year will have the guts to say that in the future.

Jonathan Horowitz is a longtime racing fan who is now a track announcer and an off-track Thoroughbred eventer.

The post Commentary: The Problem With … The Race To The Breeding Shed appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Weekly Stewards and Commissions Rulings – Nov. 1-7

Every week, the TDN publishes a roundup of key official rulings from the primary tracks within the four major racing jurisdictions of California, New York, Florida and Kentucky.

   Here's a primer on how each of these jurisdictions adjudicates different offenses, what they make public (or not) and where.

   With the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act (HISA) having gone into effect on July 1, the TDN will also post a roundup of the relevant HISA-related rulings from the same week.

CALIFORNIA

Track: Santa Anita

Date: 11/06/2022

Licensee: Armando Aguilar, jockey

Penalty: One-day suspension, $250 fine

Violation: Excessive use of the whip

Explainer: Having violated the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority Rule #2280 (c)(5) & (6) (Use of Riding Crop) and pursuant to Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority Rule #2282 (Riding Crop Violations and Penalties – Class 3), Apprentice Jockey ARMANDO AGUILAR, who rode MONGOLIAN NINJA in the sixth race at Santa Anita Park on Nov. 4, 2022, is suspended for one (1) day Nov. 13, 2022), and fined $250.00 for over use of the riding crop after reaching its maximum placing. Furthermore, Apprentice Jockey ARMANDO AGUILAR is assigned three (3) violation points that will be expunged on May 6, 2023, six (6) months from the date of final adjudication pursuant to Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority Rule #2282 (Riding Crop Violations and Penalties. Apprentice Jockey ARMANDO AGUILAR has accrued a total of three (3) points.

 

FLORIDA

The following ruling was reported on the ARCI's “Recent Rulings” webpage.

Track: Gulfstream Park

Date: 09/27/2022

Licensee: Nagib Aboughaida, trainer

Penalty: $500 fine, 15-day suspension

Violation: Medication violation

Explainer: 9/27/2022 – STEWARD'S RULING FINAL ORDER # 2022-027794 – F.S. 550.2415 VIOLATION = BOLDENONE. “CATCHING FISH” – $500 FINE IMPOSED AND DUE TO GSP/BOR 10/12/22; 15 DAY SUSPENSION IMPOSED (10/1/22 THROUGH AND INCLUDING 10/15/22); AND LOSS OF PURSE.

 

KENTUCKY

Track: Churchill Downs

Date: 10/30/2022

Licensee: Reyluis Gutierrez, jockey

Penalty: Five-day suspension

Violation: Careless riding

Explainer: Having withdrawn the appeal of Stewards Ruling #22-0117 issued July 17, 2022, Reyluis Gutierrez is now hereby suspended FIVE (5) racing days, Nov. 6 and Nov. 9 through Nov. 12, 2022 (inclusive).

 

Track: Churchill Downs

Date: 11/03/2022

Licensee: Ricardo Santana, Jr., jockey

Penalty: Five-day suspension

Violation: Careless riding

Explainer: After a hearing before the Board of Stewards, Ricardo Santana, Jr. who rode Echo Again in the eighth race at Churchill Downs on Oct. 30, 2022, is hereby suspended five (5) racing days, Nov. 6 and Nov. 9 through Nov. 12, 2022 (inclusive) for careless riding that occurred near the 7 1/2 furlong pole.

 

NEW HISA STEWARDS RULINGS

 

Note: While HISA has shared these rulings over the past week, some of them originate from prior weeks.

 

Violations of Crop Rule

 

Aqueduct

Jose Lezcano – ruling date Oct. 23, 2022

 

Delaware Park

Leonardo Corujo – ruling date Nov. 7, 2022

 

Finger Lakes

Christian Navarro – ruling date Nov. 7, 2022

 

Laurel Park

Luis Batista – ruling date Oct. 16, 2022

Jeiron Barbosa – ruling date Oct. 21, 2022

 

Mahoning Valley

Chelsey Keiser – ruling date Oct. 26, 2022

Odhair J. Mayta – ruling date Oct. 26, 2022

Luis Alberto Batista – ruling date Nov. 3, 2022

 

Braxton Carmouche – ruling date Nov. 3, 2022

 

Voided Claims

 

Delaware Park

Ghost Maiden – ruling date Oct. 27, 2022

 

Finger Lakes

Makeajoyfulnoise – ruling date Nov. 1, 2022

 

Hawthorne

Toddles – ruling date Oct. 30, 2022

Soul Story – ruling date Nov. 4, 2022

 

Horseshoe Indianapolis

Mi Estrella – ruling date Oct. 25, 2022

 

Mahoning Valley

Devil's Advocate – ruling date Oct. 25, 2022

 

Appeal Request Updates

 

Mountaineer Park

Marco Camaque

Crop rule violation

Ruling date Oct. 31, 2022

Appeal Filed Nov. 1, 2022

Stay granted

The post Weekly Stewards and Commissions Rulings – Nov. 1-7 appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Magical Lagoon Ready To Go For QEII Cup

Classic heroine Magical Lagoon (Ire) (Galileo {Ire}) is in “perfect condition” in advance of the G1 Queen Elizabeth II Cup on Nov. 14, according to assistant trainer Kate Harrington.

Racing for Zhang Yuesheng, the 3-year-old filly, who won the G2 Ribblesdale S. prior to her G1 Irish Oaks heroics, was fifth to future Arc winner Alpinista (GB) (Frankel {GB}) in the G1 Yorkshire Oaks in August.

“This morning, she galloped for about six furlongs,” said Harrington, who assists her mother, Jessica. “We just wanted to get a nice breeze into her and for Shane [Foley] to see how she's moving and how she was.

“She lost a nice bit of weight traveling here, but she's back to her best weight now. With Shane riding her today, she knows it's coming close to the race date, she's in perfect condition and we couldn't be happier with her. She's taking everything well in her stride and settled in really well with the surroundings here.

“The quick surface in Japan is one of the reasons why we brought her here. She's done well on quick surfaces in Europe and I think the right-handed course at Hanshin will suit her well. Magical Lagoon is a tough horse, she has stamina and she'll never give up a fight.”

Jockey Shane Foley added, “Hanshin Racecourse is a very good and fair track with a long straight so that she can get into a battle. The harder the battle, the better she'll be.

“She's usually good out of the gate and quick into her strides so we hope to get a nice position in the first five or six and get her into a nice rhythm.

“We'd prefer that it doesn't rain and that we can race on fast track because her best form is on firm ground, but she's getting stronger all the time and I think she'll handle it well. The soft ground in Japan is different to soft ground in Europe so hopefully it won't get too bad.”

The post Magical Lagoon Ready To Go For QEII Cup appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Sports Wagering Sunk in California: What’s Next?

After a months-long $400 million plus war of attrition between the two rival California sports wagering measures on this year's ballot, the endgame was a stalemate, both beat down into the muddy trenches–just as the polling had indicated.

The Associated Press made the call that both measures are sunk, though the official tally is far from in. With less than 50% of the ballots counted as of writing, roughly 70% voted against Proposition 26, and some 83% voted against Proposition 27.

“Ugly,” said Pat Cummings, executive director of the Thoroughbred Idea Foundation, calling the voters' rejection of sports wagering a “gag-reflex” to the incendiary nature of the attack-ads from the rival measures, which oftentimes left voters all at sea about exactly what each measure entailed.

Proposition 26 was an initiative called the Tribal Sports Wagering Act spearheaded by a band of extremely powerful Tribal gaming groups which, in short, would have allowed sports wagering at Tribal casinos and at approved racetracks in California. Most crucially, it would have prohibited mobile or on-line wagering on sports events.

Understandably, this Proposition garnered the public support of California racing industry heavy hitters like the Thoroughbred Owners of California (TOC), the Del Mar Thoroughbred Club and the 1/ST Racing and Gaming.

The second, Proposition 27, was the California Solutions to Homelessness and Mental Health Act led by online betting market outfits like FanDuel and Draftkings. This measure would have legalized online or mobile sports betting outside of Native American lands, though still leave legal avenues for Tribes to participate in the market.

As a selling point, the latter Proposition leaned heavily on the massive revenues it would have secured through license fees earmarked for homelessness initiatives, a hot-button topic for California voters. This included adds that often hid or obscured the sports betting component of the ballot measure, however.

Though the state's most powerful gaming Tribes lined up to support Proposition 26, a handful of less lucrative Tribal gaming groups threw their weight behind Proposition 27, including the Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians, who argued the FanDuel and Draftkings-backed measure would provide a financial life-line to struggling Tribes “that don't own big casinos.”

Proposition 26 proponents, on the other hand, spent more than $100 million on ads depicting the rival measure as an out-of-state incursion that would ultimately hurt California's Tribes. These conflicting Tribal allegiances only helped fuel voter bewilderment.

And what of the immediate future of sports wagering in California?

“The Tribes have asserted their power,” wrote TOC vice chairman, Bob Liewald, speaking independently of the organization, in an email. “I don't see a compromise that would make [sports wagering] possible without the Tribes having significant say [and] control.”

Liewald wrote it is “unlikely” that measures similar to Proposition 26 and 27 will be on the state-wide ballot in two years time.

Indeed, proponents of Proposition 27 have publicly hinted that the sheer scale of the spending behind both measures would make them think twice about endeavoring down the same path again.

Liewald also doubts state politicians will pass legislation in Sacramento legalizing sports wagering any time soon. “But if they did it would be crafted mainly by the Tribes for the Tribes,” he wrote. As such, he said it is “difficult” to see a viable path forward for sports wagering before 2025.

Scott Daruty, president of Monarch Content Management, the arm of The Stronach Group (TSG) tasked with distributing the company's signal, strikes a more ambivalent tone.

“I think it's too early to even assess that,” Daruty said, about the chances of one or both such measures returning to a state-wide ballot in 2024.

Sports wagering will eventually be legalized in California, he said. “How that happens, what the dynamic is that brings that about, I just think we need a bit more time to figure that out.”

If the Tribal groups behind Proposition 26 reintroduce it at some point, will California racetracks once again be part of the measure?

“I think it's too early to say,” Daruty said. “I think it'll take some time before that dialogue begins.”

As for why Proposition 26 was so comprehensively undone, Daruty points to the lack of resources invested in positive messaging.

“The Tribal interests that were the proponents of 26, I don't want to speak for them, but it appears they were much more worried about 27 passing than 26 failing,” he said. “There was never a positive message about 26 at all.”

A group of Tribes that includes the powerful San Manuel Band of Mission Indians are spearheading an online and in-person sports betting initiative restricted to servers on Tribal land that could run in 2024.

The Washington Post reports that at an October Global Gaming Expo, Tribal heavy hitters suggested that particular initiative could see collaboration with out-of-state entities as platform providers for Tribal mobile sports betting.

“There might be an opportunity for everyone, but they've got to be humble,” Dan Little, San Manuel's chief intergovernmental and tribal affairs officer, is reported to have said about gaming operations like FanDuel.

“That's not particularly favorable to the racing industry,” said Daruty, about the proposed initiative. “But it is something we're aware of.”

If sports wagering remains foreign to California's shores for the foreseeable future, the industry needs to ensure its wagering product is as “competitive as possible,” warned Cummings, pointing to things like eliminating jackpot bets, focused attention on lower takeout, and higher win-probability bets.

“We are already seeing the positive attention around Kentucky shifting to penny breakage. Give horseplayers the equivalent of a tax break and you give them an opportunity to invest that break back through the windows,” Cummings said.

The industry's continued focus on the “Pick X” and super exotic bets “is probably a mistake,” Cummings said. “It's great to have a low takeout pick five, but only if you hit all five winners. And the last I checked, it's still easier to pick one winner than five straight.”

With pari-mutuel betting California's only option, “the greater racing industry should want its customers to win and churn,” Cummings said. “Driving players to multi-race bets that are tough to win is leading them on a path to lower churn.”

As for the industry's long-term future within a sports wagering ecosystem in California, Daruty emphasized the importance of having a “seat at the table” as the lines are drawn.
“If you look at it today, racing is the only legal form of sports betting in California–it's also the only legal form of online betting in California,” he said. “So, we would just like to make sure we're part of whatever the sports betting future brings.”

 

The post Sports Wagering Sunk in California: What’s Next? appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Verified by MonsterInsights