“The Kentucky Supreme Court heard oral arguments Feb. 8 pitting MGG, a lender of millions of dollars to Zayat Stables, against buyers of some of the now-defunct Zayat operation's Thoroughbreds and breeding interests. The parties landed in court when money generated by purchases did not turn up in the hands of the lender, even though it held liens on the assets,” Downey reported.

“After the Zayat loan lapsed into default in early 2020, MGG obtained in Fayette Circuit Court in Lexington an uncontested judgment of more than $24 million. Ahmed Zayat and Zayat Stables subsequently took shelter in bankruptcy court, where MGG filed several adversary proceedings based on allegations of fraud and other misconduct. Those claims were eventually settled for substantial sums, but sums well short of the defaulted obligation,” Downey reported.

According to court records cited by Downey in his Blood-Horse story, the sales included “breeding rights to American Pharoah to LNJ Foxwoods and Orpendale, breeding rights in stakes-winning mare Lemoona to Flintshire Farm and Brad Sears, and horses El Kabeir to Yeomanstown Stud, American Cleopatra  to Hill 'n' Dale, and a 50% interest in Solomini to McMahon Thoroughbreds.”

The post Report: Kentucky Supreme Court Hears Case to Recoup Money from Zayat Asset Sales appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Of that amount, only $30,000 is earmarked to eventually go to “unsecured creditors,” some of whom are Thoroughbred industry participants owed money by Zayat Stables and are much further down the legal pecking order for otherwise getting repaid.

MGG will also get a disbursement from the funds in the bankruptcy trustee's account amounting to $1,025,145.

In return, MGG–the lender that alleged Zayat and his family members obtained a $24 million loan by fraud in 2016 then never repaid it–will issue a “waiver” giving up any further pursuit of the total $27.1 million total amount it had been seeking as a secured creditor.

MGG has also agreed to return $452,500 of the settlement money it gets from the “Zayat Parties” to the trustee, which will provide for the above-mentioned $30,000 “carve-out” that gets set aside to pay unsecured creditors.

The trustee will then be permitted to use $185,981 of that MGG payment to cover “administrative obligations” that the estate has incurred.

“[E]ntry into the Settlement Agreement serves the paramount interest of the creditors of the Debtor's estate,” trustee Jeffrey Testa wrote in a July 26 series of documents filed in United States Bankruptcy Court (District of New Jersey). “Resolution of the claims by and between the Chapter 7 Trustee MGG and the Zayat Parties through the Settlement Agreement represents a successful outcome for the Debtor's creditors.”

Not every creditor is going to agree with the trustee on that “successful outcome” statement.

Drew Mollica, the attorney for New York-based trainer Rudy Rodriguez, told TDN in a phone interview that his client has an unsecured claim of $397,000, and the $30,000 set aside for all unsecured claimants amounts only to a “drop in the bucket” for what Rodriguez is owed.

“Although I don't know all of the details and I'm going to reach out to the trustee, it seems the only carve-out for anybody but MGG is $30,000, Mollica said. “And all of the other unsecured claimants are in the same boat.”

It's important to note that this involuntary bankruptcy petition involving Zayat Stables is different from the Chapter 7 personal bankruptcy claim that the allegedly impoverished breeder and owner of Triple Crown champ American Pharoah initiated Sept. 8, 2020, when he claimed to own just $300 in cash and $14.22 in two checking accounts.

Six days later, on Sept. 14, 2020, an involuntary bankruptcy petition led by Zayat's former financial advisor was initiated against Zayat's family racing business.

Involuntary bankruptcy proceedings are relatively uncommon in United States courts. They are designed to protect creditors, not debtors, and are often filed against companies (as opposed to individuals) as an attempt to get paid when it is believed that a firm is rapidly burning through assets and/or financial malfeasance is alleged.

The trustee could have elected to keep battling MGG to try and whittle down the sought-after $27.1 million. But Testa explained in court documents that the proceedings had reached a point where resistance equated to a losing proposition for the estate.

“Litigation against MGG would involve sufficiently complex legal and factual issues, particularly regarding the substance of complex loan documents and the establishment of lender liability, which would require protracted hard-fought and arduous litigation and significant expert costs,” Testa wrote.

“In addition, as a result of MGG's properly-perfected status and outstanding amounts owed to it, the Chapter 7 Trustee has no encumbered funds to fight such a taxing battle,” Testa wrote.

“As to the Zayat Parties, litigation against them would be equally challenging, demanding, complex, and come at significant additional cost and delay,” Testa wrote. “In addition, based on the litigious history of this proceeding, any judgment obtained would almost certainly be subject to an appeal.

“The Settlement Agreement avoids these obstacles in favor of a prompt and efficient resolution without the need to expend further estate resources,” Testa wrote.

Other family members of Ahmed Zayat (identified in court documents as his wife, Joanne; four children, Justin, Ashley, Benjamin and Emma, plus a brother, Sherif) are on the hook for contributing to the $5-million settlement payment because, Testa wrote, “The Zayat Parties strenuously asserted that to their detriment they provided funds to Zayat Stables in an effort to keep the entity operating [by contributing] approximately $2.5 million more to Zayat Stables than the transfers they had received from Zayat Stables.”

The proposed settlement agreement even includes a section related to who gets the trophies and other racing mementos that the trustee has been storing since their seizure from the under-receivership Zayat Stables offices.

“Zayat and several of the Zayat Parties objected to the removal of the Memorabilia based upon the position that the Memorabilia were not estate property,” Testa wrote.

The trustee added that he now considers that property “abandoned,” which likely means that Zayat can reclaim it.

“So it looks like he keeps the trophies, and the horsemen who earned the trophies get nothing,” Mollica said.

The next step in the process is for the court to approve the settlement. If other parties file an objection by Aug. 16, then an Aug. 23 hearing will take place to hear the objection(s). If no one objects, the court will enter a notice of “no objection” and the settlement will be completed as proposed.

Asked if he would be objecting on behalf of Rodriguez, Mollica said, “I'll know more after I reach out to the trustee. I'll reserve my right.”

The post Proposed $5M Zayat Settlement Gives Only $30K to ‘Unsecured’ Claimants appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

The motion for approval of that settlement, if so ordered by a judge in a New Jersey federal bankruptcy court July 6, doesn't mean the end to the complicated, now 21-month-long Chapter 7 petition by the allegedly insolvent former Thoroughbred owner and breeder.

But it does mean some of that $1.5 million might trickle down to creditors once the case gets fully settled.

As an attorney for trustee Donald Biase put it in his June 6 court filing, the settlement will “provide a benefit for the Debtor's estate, which was otherwise uncertain.”

The settlement documents were filed exactly seven years and one day after Zayat's superstar homebred American Pharoah swept the 2015 Triple Crown.

The $19-million debt question for Thoroughbred trainers, horse farms, bloodstock businesses, veterinarians, and equine transportation companies who are among the 132 entities listed as non-secured creditors still hasn't changed much.

That's because the money owed to them is in the form of “non-priority unsecured claims,” which puts those people and businesses far down in the pecking order for repayment of Zayat's debts.

Under Chapter 7 bankruptcy laws, non-priority unsecured claims are at the bottom of the hierarchy to get paid–if they get paid at all–once a trustee liquidates assets and discharge debts. They get ranked behind “secured” loans in which property is pledged as collateral, like with liens and mortgages.

The June 6 filing stated that there are five known first-, second- and third-mortgage loans secured by Zayat's 7,714-square-foot home and two adjacent lots in Teaneck, New Jersey.

However, the same document stated that three of those mortgages–which were made by friends and family members and not lending institutions or banks–would be considered by the trustee as “avoidable transfers,” which means that they can be canceled and the proceeds returned to the estate for distribution to creditors. Avoidable transfers can also lead to fraud charges.

One of those property-secured loans that Biase wrote was “avoidable” was for $500,000 from the Egypt-based Sherif Zayat.

That loan was recorded as a mortgage with a New Jersey county clerk Sept. 2, 2020–six days before Ahmed Zayat filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection while claiming that he had only $300 in cash and $14.22 in two checking accounts.

On September 14, 2020, an involuntary bankruptcy petition was initiated against Zayat's family racing business, Zayat Stables, LLC. That case is separate from this personal bankruptcy case, although many of the racing-related creditors overlap in both cases.

In a riches-to-rags case brimming with fraud allegations since its onset, Biase's filing stated that he has attempted to trace the tangled web of Zayat family finances via the “issuance of numerous Rule 2004 Subpoenas, reviewing thousands of pages of documents, including bank statements and tax returns, and conducting Rule 2004 depositions and extensive motion practice, including numerous motions to obtain access to the Debtor's real property, and the contents of same, by my appraisers.”

Beyond not having his Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection granted by the court if he isn't being truthful, Zayat faces a possible federal investigation and/or charges if the U.S. Department of Justice believes crimes have been committed.

Biase has repeatedly claimed the Zayat and his family have hindered his investigation with evasive tactics and non-compliance.

Zayat has consistently denied that he has engaged in any illegal activity or that he is hiding money. He has also insisted that neither he nor his family members are trying to obstruct the work of either of the trustees who are assigned to vet his personal finances and business operations.

The June 6 filing revealed one new nugget about Ahmed Zayat that had not been previously contended: “The Debtor has an ownership interest in a farm located in Egypt,” the Biase filing stated.

If true, it is unclear whether that alleged property interest could be also attached as an asset to pay creditors. The filing did not elaborate either way.

The settlement document, which was signed by all parties May 26, stated that “the Debtor, the Zayat Parties, and Sherif, and any entity they have an interest in shall waive any claim against the Debtor's estate [and] the Parties shall have released each other from any and all claims and causes of action and the Trustee shall be deemed to have abandoned the Debtor's estate's interest in the NJ Property pursuant to Section 554 of the Bankruptcy Code.”

Biase's filing stated that this type of settlement was preferable to continuing to fight the matter in court and/or by forcing a sale of the real estate.

“Though the Trustee believes that he would likely prevail on the claims against the Debtor, the Zayat Parties, and Sherif, the Trustee wishes to settle the claims, in order to save the Debtor's estate time and money that would otherwise be spent on litigation of the claims,” the filing stated.

“With respect to the NJ Property, even if the Trustee could obtain an offer of $4.8 million and avoid [the three mortgages with individuals] after deducting the first and second mortgages totaling $3.4 million and the broker's commission of $240,000, there would be non-exempt net equity in the approximate amount of $580,000…” the filing stated.

“This amount also does not include the Debtor's potential homestead exemption, the cost and time to seek approval under [the] Bankruptcy Code to sell the NJ Property, and the time and cost to avoid the [individual mortgages],” the filing stated.

“The Settlement Amount of $1.5 million greatly exceeds the potential non-exempt equity in the NJ Property,” the filing summed up.

The post $1.5m Zayat Settlement to Make Small Dent in Overall $19m Debt appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Such a request, if granted at a Feb. 1 hearing, could pave the way for the financial institution to initiate foreclosure proceedings against Zayat.

Citing the $1.86 million outstanding on the loan plus liens totaling $2.91 million, lawyers for Fay Servicing, LLC, wrote in a Jan. 7 motion in United States Bankruptcy Court (District of New Jersey) that “it is self-evident that the debtor lacks any equity in the subject property [and] the debtor has failed to make any showing that the property is required for reorganization under the Bankruptcy code.”

The filing specifically asks for relief “including but not limited to allowing [Fay] to enforce its remedies to foreclose upon and obtain possession of the Property.”

In a riches-to-rags case brimming with fraud allegations that has languished in federal court for an unusually long 16 months, the owner and breeder of Triple Crown champ American Pharoah is seeking legal clearance to get out from under $19 million in debt.

Many of those creditors are Zayat's former Thoroughbred trainers, plus numerous breeding, boarding, horse transportation and veterinary entities.

When Zayat first filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection on Sept. 8, 2020, he wrote in court documents that he owned only $300 in cash and $14.22 in two checking accounts.

Yet he and his wife continue to own and live in a 7,714-square-foot home in Teaneck, New Jersey.

Six days after Zayat filed his personal bankruptcy claim, Zayat's former financial advisor and several other entities initiated a separate “involuntary bankruptcy” petition against Zayat's family owned racing stable.

Involuntary bankruptcy proceedings, although relatively uncommon in U.S. courts, are designed to protect creditors, not debtors, and are often filed against companies (as opposed to individuals) as an attempt to get paid when it is believed that a firm is rapidly burning through assets and/or financial malfeasance is alleged.

Donald Biase, the trustee assigned by the court to find out if Zayat is being truthful about his alleged state of impoverishment in his personal bankruptcy petition, has repeatedly told the judge in the case that Zayat and his family members are refusing to cooperate in his legal attempt to trace millions of dollars in possibly fraudulent transfers.

In July, Biase wrote in a court filing aimed at uncovering hidden assets that “Documents obtained by the trustee from third parties strongly suggest that the Debtor still possesses significant assets in Egypt.”

Zayat has repeatedly denied that he has engaged in any illegal activity or that he is hiding money. He has also insisted that neither he nor his family members are trying to hinder the work of either of the trustees who are assigned to vet his personal finances and business operations.

Beyond not having his Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection granted by the court if he isn't being truthful, Zayat faces a possible federal investigation and/or charges if the U.S. Department of Justice believes crimes have been committed.

The post Filing Could Trigger Foreclosure on Zayat’s $3.5M Home appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

This comes after Donald V. Biase, the trustee overseeing Zayat's bankruptcy case, charged last month that Zayat and members of his immediate family were engaged in “an exercise in gamesmanship, obstruction and delay” to prevent the trustee from having access to financial documents.

Blaise is clearly zeroing in on Sherif El Zayat because he suspects that Zayat has assets in Egypt that are being controlled by his brother. In his July filing, Blaise wrote: “Documents obtained by the trustee from third parties strongly suggest that the debtor still possesses significant assets in Egypt.”

Sherif El Zayat has been ordered to email all documents and information requested in the subpoena by Sept. 8. The brother has also been requested to take part in a video conference examination.

Blaise noted in June that the family members had made only “paltry productions in response to the subpoena directed to them.” Subpoenas seeking documents were issued to Zayat's wife, Joanne, three of his four children, and to JPZ Holdings, a company run by Zayat's son, Justin.

The attempt to subpoena Zayat's brother is trickier because he is not a U.S. resident or citizen and it appears that the court has only limited powers to enforce the subpoena. With that in mind, the judge, Vincent Papalia, wrote in his Aug. 25 filing that if Sherif El Zayat does not comply with the subpoena, the court will issue an order of contempt requiring a United States Marshal to detain Sherif El Zayat upon his arrival in the U.S.

Sherif El Zayat has been involved with a number of Egyptian businesses over the years. He is listed as the CEO of the investment firm Egypt Kuwait Holding. In his bio on the Egypt Kuwait Holding company website, it lists Sherif El Zayat as the founder and former CEO of Misr Glass.

Ahmed Zayat has said that he sold his assets in Misr Glass in 2010 or 2011 for about $2 million, but Blaise has questioned that. In July, he wrote that Zayat's affiliation with Misr Glass continued past 2011 and that in 2015 the company was sold to a third party for $93 million.

In the July memorandum, Blaise wrote that Zayat and family members had not provided information and documents regarding the sale of Misr Glass.

In April, MGG Investment Group, the company suing Zayat, charged that his brother loaned Zayat at least $1.5 million in 2020, which allowed him to maintain a “lavish personal lifestyle.”

Born in Cairo, Egypt, Ahmed Zayat formed an investment group that bought the Al-Ahram Beverages Company in 1997. His brother came on board as the managing director and deputy chairman of the beverage company.

Zayat filed for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy last September after Zayat and Zayat Stables were sued by MGG Capital Group for defaulting on a loan. The company won a $24.5-million summary judgment against Zayat in June 2020.

The post Judge Orders Zayat Brother to Comply With Subpoena appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

We aren't experts on legal issues, so went to someone who is: Bob Heleringer, a Louisville, Ky., attorney and former state legislator who joins Paulick Report publisher Ray Paulick and bloodstock editor Joe Nevills to discuss the Zayat case. (Full disclosure: Heleringer said he represents trainer Rudy Rodriguez, one of several trainers to whom Zayat Stables owes money, according to court documents.)

While Heleringer's expertise is in equine regulatory law, he has some interesting comments and observations about the Zayat bankruptcy and the $23-million lawsuit filed against him by MGG Investment Group alleging fraud and breach of contract on a loan.

Joe and Ray review the performance by Jolie Olimpica, the Woodbine Star of the Week who carried the red and white Fox Hill Farm colors of the late Rick Porter to victory in last week's Grade 2 Nassau Stakes.

Watch this week's show, presented by Monmouth Park, below:

The post The Friday Show Presented By Monmouth Park: What’s The Deal With Zayat? appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

Jay L. Lubetkin, a partner in the Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully law firm that has been representing Zayat in both the bankruptcy and MGG adversary proceedings, filed a notice with U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey on Monday seeking to withdraw from the case.

Lubetkin said Zayat has failed to fulfill his promise to keep outstanding invoices within 60-day terms and a subsequent promise to make minimum monthly payments of $50,000. Lubetkin said he tried communicating with Zayat “at least nine times” in July to discuss the status of payments but has not received a “substantive or satisfactory response” from the Eclipse Award-winning owner and breeder who campaigned 2015 Triple Crown winner and Horse of the Year American Pharoah.

Lubetkin said Zayat currently owes $368,273.33, not including billings incurred since June 29, 2021. Lubetkin said the last payment received was May 5, with outstanding bills now dating back to February of this year.

“If (Zayat) were to satisfy his previously expressed commitment to keep our receivables within 60-day terms,” Lubetkin wrote, “it would require an immediate payment of $232,899, and a further payment of $76,717 when the billing governing July's efforts is tendered.”

Lubetkin commented that the MGG Investment Group lawsuit is “in its earliest stages” and likely would not go to trial until the second quarter of 2022, at the soonest.

Zayat's “payment failures constitute a failure to substantially fulfill obligations to our firm,” Lubetkin wrote, “and the debtor (Zayat) has been given reasonable warning that we will have no choice but to withdraw unless those obligations were fulfilled. … Additionally, continuing representation of the debtor will result in an unreasonable financial burden on our firm.”

Zayat, Lubetkin added, is “an extremely intelligent individual who fully understands the Chapter 7 bankruptcy process, the nature of the claims being made against him by MGG Investment Group in its adversary proceeding seeking the non-dischargeability of the alleged debt due MGG Investment Group, the role of his individual Chapter 7 trustee, the role of the Chatper 7 trustee for Zayat Stables LLC, the prospect of an objection to discharge complaint being filed against the debtor by his individual Chapter 7 trustee and the prospect of a Section 523 complaint being filed against the debtor by the Stables' trustee. The debtor also understands the exemption available to his interest in residential real property, the exemption available to his ownership interest in home furnishings, and the impact of the real property and personalty appraisals  obtained by his Chapter 7 trustee.

“Based on the debtor's intelligence and the detailed statutory and caselaw information which has been shared with the debtor,” Lubetkin concluded, “the debtor is fully capable of representing himself in his main bankruptcy case and in the adversary proceeding.”

The post Claiming They Are Owed $368,272, Zayat’s Attorneys Want Out Of Bankruptcy Case appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

“The representation of the Debtor has consumed an extremely significant amount of the available resources of our firm,” wrote attorney Jay Lubetkin of Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC, in a July 26 “motion to withdraw” filed in United States Bankruptcy Court (District of New Jersey).

“The Debtor has been consistently advised that absent satisfactory arrangements for the payment of the outstanding fees and expenses due to our firm and newly incurred billings, the firm would have no alternative but to seek to withdraw from representation of the Debtor,” Lubetkin wrote.

The purportedly insolvent owner and breeder of Triple Crown champ American Pharoah hired the firm when he filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection nearly one year ago.

Lubetkin's firm has also been defending Zayat in an adversary proceeding filed against him by MGG Investment Group, LP, for allegedly obtaining a $24-million loan by fraud and then not repaying it. MGG wants that debt ruled as non-dischargeable.

Zayat's bankruptcy case has repeatedly been slowed by allegations from the trustee assigned to the case that Zayat and his family members have been uncooperative and obstructive as the trustee tries to trace millions of dollars in possibly fraudulent transfers.

Lubetkin wrote in his court filing that at the outset of their legal relationship, Zayat promised to pay what he owed in legal fees based on 60-day receivable terms. He later agreed to make at least $50,000 monthly minimum payments.

At the time of his initial bankruptcy filing in September 2020, Zayat told the court he had only $314.22 to his name.

Lubetkin wrote that Zayat has not paid his firm since May 5, 2021.

“If the Debtor were to satisfy his previously expressed commitment to keep our receivables within 60-day terms, it would require an immediate payment of $232,899 and a further payment of $76,717 when the billing governing July's efforts is tendered,” Lubetkin wrote.

“I attempted at least nine times during the month of July to communicate with the Debtor regarding status of payments to our firm, without substantive or satisfactory response by the Debtor,” Lubetkin wrote.

As for who might next represent Zayat, Lubetkin wrote in his filing that Zayat himself “fully understands the Chapter 7 bankruptcy process” and “is fully capable of representing himself.”

Lubetkin wrapped up his motion for withdrawal by noting that when he finally did manage to reach Zayat July 21, it seems as if Zayat tried to tell him he was fired before Lubetkin could quit.

“[W]hile not knowing what the Debtor's intentions were at the time of the communication,” Lubetkin wrote, “the Debtor requested that I write to the Court to advise my firm was 'no longer defending” the Debtor, which may be interpreted as the Debtor terminating his relationship with our firm.”

The post Zayat’s Bankruptcy Lawyers Want to Sever Ties Over $368K in Unpaid Fees appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post

Trustee Donald V. Biase made those accusations in a memorandum in opposition to a motion by Zayat family members to block subpoenas for records from a number of financial institutions, credit card companies and even wagering accounts with TVG. The motions to quash were filed by Justin Zayat, Joanne Zayat, Emma Zayat, Benjamin Zayat and JPZ Holdings LLC.

Zayat filed for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy last September after Zayat and Zayat Stables were sued by a lender, MGG Capital Group, for defaulting on a loan. The company won a $24.5 million summary judgment against Zayat in June 2020.

Even without many of the documents requested, Biase was able to trace a number of financial transactions he found questionable between Zayat Stables and Ahmed Zayat's wife, Joanne, son Justin and other family members.

“The trustee's investigation reveals that the debtor (Zayat) and his family members have engaged in a pattern of intermingling of assets and ongoing financial transactions among themselves, Zayat Stables, LLC, and the creditors of the debtor,” the memorandum from Biase states.

Biase also raises questions about whether Zayat may have assets in his native Egypt. He cited statements from Zayat that he had sold Egypt-based Misr Glass company in 2010 or 2011 for approximately $2 million and no longer had any interest in the company. “Yet despite the trustee's request for records of this transaction, no such records have been produced to date,” the trustee wrote.

“Notably, in 2015, press reports show that Misr Glass was acquired by a third party for $93 million,” Biase wrote. “Furthermore, documents produced by Cedarview Capital Management LP … indicated that the debtor's affiliation and/or ownership of Misr Glass continued well past 2011.

“Documents obtained by the trustee from third parties strongly suggest that the debtor still possesses significant assets in Egypt,” Biase continued.

The trustee obtained a Dec. 23, 2019, communication from Zayat to a creditor stating: “Maybe it is our turn that things turn back to normalcy, and I will have the liquidity and right funds I need to manage Zayat Stables without relying on our income and ownerships on companies in Egypt that have been supporting this business.”

Another note from Zayat to a creditor on Jan. 12, 2020, stated: “I have pushed myself to the brink of bankruptcy personally by using every dollar I have in America to fund the company until I find an investor to pay you in full.”

Biase observed: “Given the foregoing facts, there is reason to believe the debtor still has assets in Egypt, some of which are the funds being funneled to him from the debtor's brother Sherif through accounts held in the name of JPZ Holdings (Justin Zayat's company) and Joanne Zayat.”

The post Trustee In Zayat Bankruptcy Cites Potential Assets in Egypt appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

Source of original post

The trustee assigned to the case is now alleging that three children and the wife of the financially strapped owner and breeder of Triple Crown champ American Pharoah are refusing to cooperate in providing documentation the trustee had subpoenaed from them to try and trace millions of dollars in possibly fraudulent transfers.

“[T]he Trustee's investigation reveals that the Debtor and his family members have engaged in a pattern of intermingling of assets and ongoing financial transactions among themselves,” the attorney bankruptcy trustee Donald Biase wrote in a July 13 filing in United States Bankruptcy Court (District of New Jersey).

“Notably, the [Zayats] have made only paltry productions in response to the subpoenas directed to them. Worse, their counsel has engaged in extensive redactions of the bank account statements they did produce based upon nothing but their own unilateral determinations of relevance, and has also simply omitted bank records for important periods,” the filing continued.

Ahmed Zayat's case seeking Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection has now dragged past the 10-month mark and has been hallmarked by the trustee's multiple allegations of stalling, evasion and non-cooperation. Zayat has repeatedly denied those claims via court filings.

The primary role of a court-appointed trustee in a bankruptcy case is to ensure that a debtor who files for federal bankruptcy protection is not hiding assets that could instead be used to pay creditors–many of whom in Zayat's case are Thoroughbred trainers for his now-liquidated racing stable and various racing- and bloodstock-related entities.

An objection to a bankruptcy protection plea can be filed if a trustee believes aspects of the required documentation are not on the up-and-up. A judge can either dismiss a case on his own or by acting on a trustee's objection. A judge can also deny the discharge of a particular debt.

If alleged fraud is uncovered in a bankruptcy filing, the Federal Bureau of Investigation can investigate, and the U.S. Department of Justice can prosecute if it believes a crime has been committed.

Back on June 4, the trustee issued a Rule 2004 subpoena to Zayat's wife, Joanne Zayat, and three of their four children, Emma, Benjamin and Justin Zayat. A business entity controlled by Justin, JPZ Holdings, LLC, was also subpoenaed.

Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2004 authorizes the Trustee to investigate the “acts, conduct, or property or to the liabilities and financial condition of the debtor, or to any matter which may affect the administration of the debtor's estate, or to the debtor's right to a discharge.”

Specifically, the trustee wanted to see detailed information from the family's allegedly intermingled accounts with banks, credit card companies, other lending-related institutions.

The subpoena also wanted access to four TVG betting accounts “belonging individually to or jointly with, including as an additional or authorized user…any member of the Debtor's Family…or JPZ Holding,” as well as any passwords associated with such accounts.

On June 23, the four above-named Zayat family members (the “movants”) asked the court to quash the trustee's subpoena, alleging that “Each Subpoena is exceptionally broad and seeks wholesale financial records and other personal and proprietary financial information regardless of whether it has any relationship whatsoever to the Debtor or the Estate.”

In the trustee's July 13 memorandum in opposition to that proposed quashing, Biase contended that the motion to quash “is an exercise in gamesmanship, obstruction, and delay…. [T]hree of the Movants [Justin, JPZ Holdings and Joanne] were tied especially closely to the finances of the Debtor and to Zayat Stables.”

The filing continued: “Justin Zayat was the President of Zayat Stables, and so far as can be determined his sole source of income during the relevant period was Zayat Stables. Justin Zayat was also the beneficiary of nearly $1 million in transfers at a time when the financial condition of the Debtor and Zayat Stables were deeply troubled. Justin Zayat's company, JPZ Holdings, has also received millions of dollars in payments from the Debtor's brother and creditor, Sherif Zayat.

“Joanne Zayat, the Debtor's wife, was the recipient of over $1 million dollars of direct transfers from Zayat Stables. She is jointly named on every material bank account used by the Debtor, and is also a joint account holder with Justin Zayat.

“The accounts of Justin Zayat, Joanne Zayat and JPZ Holdings have been and are continuing to be used by the Debtor's brother, Sherif Zayat, to pay the Debtor's claimed $72,000 in monthly expenses. Joanne Zayat was also directly involved in obtaining loans from close friends and acquaintances for the benefit of the Debtor and/or Zayat Stables, and she has recently been repaying one of those creditors out of a bank account held in the name of her speech pathology business.

“In short, if the Trustee is to understand the conduct and financial transactions of the Debtor, he must necessarily obtain financial information relating to these third parties,” the filing contended.

The trustee further argued that the subpoenas at issue “are not only fully justified, but many are made necessary because the Debtor himself refused to produce records from a number of the financial institutions at which he has accounts.”

Biase explained the convoluted process by which Zayat, during the course of his bankruptcy plea, even directed the Trustee to serve his own financial institutions with subpoenas, “only to then have the Debtor's family members then move to quash those very subpoenas….”

“The Trustee's investigation also has revealed a substantial number of misstatements and omissions in the Debtor's bankruptcy schedules that were only uncovered through the issuance of Rule 2004 subpoenas to third parties, including overstatements of outstanding debt totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars.

“It is this ongoing pattern of obstructive activity, coupled with the Debtor's shifting and highly questionable statements in his schedules…that more than justified the Trustee's issuance of the subpoenas at issue. That same ongoing pattern of delay, obstruction, and gamesmanship requires that the Motion be denied in its entirety,” the filing stated.

The post Zayat Bankruptcy Trustee Alleges ‘Ongoing Pattern of Delay, Obstruction, and Gamesmanship’ appeared first on TDN | Thoroughbred Daily News | Horse Racing News, Results and Video | Thoroughbred Breeding and Auctions.

Source of original post